| Anglia Television Ltd v Reed | |
|---|---|
 Robert Reed, with Florence Henderson | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of England and Wales |
| Citation | 1 QB 60 |
| Keywords | |
| Contract, remedies | |
Anglia Television Ltd v Reed 1 QB 60 is an English contract law case, concerning the right to reliance damages for loss flowing from a breach of contract.
Judgment
Lord Denning MR held that expenditure incurred before could be claimed, so long as it was within the contemplation of the parties. Here Reed would have known of considerable expense.
It is true that, if the defendant had never entered into the contract, he would not be liable, and the expenditure would have been incurred by the plaintiff without redress; but, the defendant having made his contract and broken it, it does not lie in his mouth to say he is not liable, when it was because of his breach that the expenditure has been wasted.
So not £854.65 awarded (after) but the full £2750 (before as well) for all the directors, designers, stage managers, and assistant managers' fees.
| Remedies cases | |
|---|---|
| Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850 | |
| Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P 2d 109 (1962) | |
| Ruxley Electronics Ltd v Forsyth | |
| Anglia Television Ltd v Reed 1 QB 60 | |
| Chaplin v Hicks 2 KB 786 | |
| Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd | |
| Farley v Skinner | |
| Hadley v Baxendale | |
| The Achilleas | |
| British Westinghouse Ltd v Underground Ltd AC 673 | |
| Banco de Portugal v Waterlow | |
| Saamco v York Montague Ltd | |
| Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum 1 WLR 576 | |
| Patel v Ali Ch 283 | |
| Cooperative Insurance Ltd v Argyll Ltd | |
| Attorney General v Blake | |
| Wrotham Park Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd 1 WLR 798 | |
| Surrey CC v Bredero Homes Ltd | |
| Rowland v Divall 2 KB 500 | |
| Dies v British Mining and Finance Corp Ltd 1 KB 724 |