Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski | |
---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |
Decided June 12, 1989 | |
Full case name | Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski |
Citations | 602 U.S. ___ (more) |
Holding | |
Where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Jackson, joined by unanimous |
Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, 602 U.S. ___ (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs.
References
- Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, 602 U.S. ___ (1989)
- "Courts rather than arbitrators to decide whether Dogecoin dispute goes to arbitration". SCOTUSblog. 2024-05-28. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
External links
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |