2017 United States Supreme Court case
| McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided April 3, 2017 | |
| Full case name | McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Docket no. | 15-1248 |
| Citations | 581 U.S. 72 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan |
| Concur/dissent | Ginsburg |
McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 581 U.S. 72 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.
References
- McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 15-1248, 581 U.S. ___ (2017).
- "Opinion analysis: Court unanimously adopts abuse-of-discretion review for district court decisions to enforce EEOC subpoenas". SCOTUSblog. April 4, 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2024.
External links
- Text of McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 15-1248, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |