Misplaced Pages

Part of a series on
Discrimination
Forms Institutional Structural Statistical Taste-based
Attributes Age Caste Class Dialect Disability Genetic Hair texture Height Language Looks Mental disorder Race / Ethnicity Skin color Scientific racism Rank Sex Sexual orientation Species Size Viewpoint
Social Arophobia Acephobia Adultism Anti-albinism Anti-autism Anti-homelessness Anti-drug addicts Anti-intellectualism Anti-intersex Anti-left handedness Anti-Masonry Aporophobia Audism Biphobia Clannism Elitism Ephebiphobia Social determinants of health Social determinants of health in poverty Social determinants of mental health Fatphobia Gayphobia Gerontophobia Heterosexism HIV/AIDS stigma Homophobia Leprosy stigma Lesbophobia Discrimination against men Misandry Misogyny Nepotism Pedophobia Perpetual foreigner Pregnancy Sectarianism Supremacism Aryanism Autistic Black Chauvinism Female Illusory Jewish Male Nordicism Tigraynization Ultranationalism White Transphobia 21st-century anti-trans movement in the United Kingdom Non-binary Transmisogyny Trans men Vegaphobia Xenophobia
Religious Atheism Exclusivism Baháʼí Faith Buddhism Christianity Persecution Catholicism Eastern Orthodoxy Jehovah's Witnesses LDS or Mormon Protestantism Tewahedo Orthodoxy post–Cold War era Falun Gong Hinduism Persecution Untouchability Islam Persecution Ahmadiyya Shi'ism Sufism Sunnism minority Muslim Judaism Persecution Neopaganism Rastafari Sikhism Yazidism Zoroastrianism
Ethnic/national Afghan African Albanian Arab Armenian Asian France South Africa United States Assyrian Australian Austrian Azerbaijani Black people African Americans China South Africa Bengali Bulgarian Catalan Chechen Chinese Colombian Croat Dutch English Estonian Filipino French Fulani Finnish Georgian German Greek Haitian Hazara Hungarian Igbo Indian Indigenous people Australia Canada United States Iranian Irish Italian Japanese Jewish Antisemitism New Korean Kurdish Lithuanian Malay Māori Mexican Middle Eastern Mongolian Montenegrin Nigerian Pakistani Palestinians Pashtun Polish Portuguese Quebec Romani Romanian Russian Scottish Serb Slavic Somali Spanish Tatar Thai Turkish Ukrainian Uyghur Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh
Manifestations Anti-LGBTQ rhetoric SPLC-designated list of anti-LGBTQ hate groups Anti-LGBTQ movement in the US Anti-trans movement in the UK Anti-Zionism Blood libel Bullying Cancel culture Capital punishment for homosexuality Compulsory sterilization Corrective rape Counter-jihad Cultural genocide Defamation Democide Disability hate crime Dog whistle Domicide Economic Education Employment Eliminationism Enemy of the people Ethnic cleansing Ethnic conflict Ethnic hatred Ethnic joke Ethnocide Excellence Gender-based dress codes Cosmetics policy High heel policy Forced conversion Freak show Gay bashing Gendercide Genital modification and mutilation Genocide examples Glass ceiling Hate crime Violence against LGBTQ people Hate group Hate speech Homeless dumping Housing Indian rolling Kill Haole Day Lavender scare LGBTQ+ grooming conspiracy theory List of people killed for being transgender Lynching Mortgage Murder music Native American mascots Occupational segregation Opposition to immigration Paper genocide Persecution Pogrom Political repression Purge Racialization Religious persecution Religious terrorism Religious violence Religious war Scapegoating Segregation academy Sentencing disparity Sexual harassment Sex-selective abortion Slut-shaming Trans bashing Victimisation Violence against women White flight White genocide conspiracy theory Wife selling Witch hunt
Policies Age of candidacy Blood purity Blood quantum Crime of apartheid Disabilities Catholic Jewish Gender pay gap Gender roles Transphobia in the US House of Representatives Gerontocracy Gerrymandering Ghetto benches Internment Jewish quota Law for Protection of the Nation LGBTQ rights opposition MSM blood donation restrictions No kid zone Numerus clausus (as religious or racial quota) One-drop rule Racial quota Racial segregation Jim Crow laws Nuremberg Laws Racial steering Redlining Same-sex marriage (laws and issues prohibiting) Segregation age racial religious sexual Social exclusion Sodomy law State atheism State religion Ugly law Voter suppression
Countermeasures Affirmative action Anti-discrimination law Anti-racism Constitutional colorblindness Cultural assimilation Cultural pluralism Diversity, equity, and inclusion Diversity training Empowerment Fat acceptance movement Feminism Fighting Discrimination Hate speech laws by country Human rights Intersex human rights LGBT rights Nonviolence Racial integration Reappropriation Self-determination Social integration Toleration
Related topics Allophilia Amatonormativity Bias Cisnormativity Civil liberties Criminalization of homosexuality Dehumanization Diversity Multiculturalism Neurodiversity Ethnic penalty Figleaf Gender-blind Heteronormativity Historical eugenics Internalized oppression Intersectionality Masculism Medical model of disability autism Net bias Oikophobia Oppression Police brutality Political correctness Polyculturalism Power distance Prejudice Prisoner abuse Racial bias in criminal news in the United States Racism by country Racial color blindness Religious intolerance Reverse discrimination Reverse racism Second-generation gender bias Snobbery Social equity Social exclusion Social identity threat Social model of disability Social privilege Christian male white Social stigma Speciesism Stereotype threat The talk
v t e

"Political correctness" (adjectivally "politically correct"; commonly abbreviated to P.C.) is a term used to describe language, policies, or measures that are intended to avoid offense or disadvantage to members of particular groups in society. Since the late 1980s, the term has been used to describe a preference for inclusive language and avoidance of language or behavior that can be seen as excluding, marginalizing, or insulting to groups of people disadvantaged or discriminated against, particularly groups defined by ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. In public discourse and the media, the term is generally used as a pejorative with an implication that these policies are excessive or unwarranted.

The phrase politically correct first appeared in the 1930s, when it was used to describe dogmatic adherence to ideology in totalitarian regimes, such as Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Early usage of the term politically correct by leftists in the 1970s and 1980s was as self-critical satire; usage was ironic, rather than a name for a serious political movement. It was considered an in-joke among leftists used to satirise those who were too rigid in their adherence to political orthodoxy. The modern pejorative usage of the term emerged from conservative criticism of the New Left in the late 20th century, with many describing it as a form of censorship.

Commentators on the political left in the United States contend that conservatives use the concept of political correctness to downplay and divert attention from substantively discriminatory behavior against disadvantaged groups. They also argue that the political right enforces its own forms of political correctness to suppress criticism of its favored constituencies and ideologies. In the United States, the term has played a major role in the culture war between liberals and conservatives.

History

Early-to-mid 20th century

In the early-to-mid 20th century, the phrase politically correct was used to describe strict adherence to a range of ideological orthodoxies within politics. In 1934, The New York Times reported that Nazi Germany was granting reporting permits "only to pure 'Aryans' whose opinions are politically correct".

The term political correctness first appeared in Marxist–Leninist vocabulary following the Russian Revolution of 1917. At that time, it was used to describe strict adherence to the policies and principles of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, that is, the party line. Later in the United States, the phrase came to be associated with accusations of dogmatism in debates between communists and socialists. According to American educator Herbert Kohl, writing about debates in New York in the late 1940s and early 1950s.

The term "politically correct" was used disparagingly, to refer to someone whose loyalty to the CP line overrode compassion, and led to bad politics. It was used by Socialists against Communists, and was meant to separate out Socialists who believed in egalitarian moral ideas from dogmatic Communists who would advocate and defend party positions regardless of their moral substance.

— "Uncommon Differences", The Lion and the Unicorn

1970s

In the 1970s, the American New Left began using the term politically correct. In the essay The Black Woman: An Anthology (1970), Toni Cade Bambara said that "a man cannot be politically correct and a chauvinist, too." William Safire records this as the first use in the typical modern sense. The term "political correctness" was believed to have been revived by the New Left through familiarity in the West with Mao's Little Red Book, in which Mao stressed holding to the correct party line. The term rapidly began to be used by the New Left in an ironic or self-deprecating sense.

Thereafter, the term was often used as self-critical satire. Debra L. Shultz said that "throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the New Left, feminists, and progressives... used their term 'politically correct' ironically, as a guard against their own orthodoxy in social change efforts." PC is used in the comic book Merton of the Movement, by Bobby London, which was followed by the term ideologically sound, in the comic strips of Bart Dickon. In her essay "Toward a feminist Revolution" (1992) Ellen Willis said: "In the early eighties, when feminists used the term 'political correctness', it was used to refer sarcastically to the anti-pornography movement's efforts to define a 'feminist sexuality'."

Stuart Hall suggests one way in which the original use of the term may have developed into the modern one:

According to one version, political correctness actually began as an in-joke on the left: radical students on American campuses acting out an ironic replay of the Bad Old Days BS (Before the Sixties) when every revolutionary groupuscule had a party line about everything. They would address some glaring examples of sexist or racist behaviour by their fellow students in imitation of the tone of voice of the Red Guards or Cultural Revolution Commissar: "Not very 'politically correct', Comrade!"

The term probably entered use in the modern sense in the United Kingdom around 1975.

1980s and 1990s

Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind, a book first published in 1987, heralded a debate about "political correctness" in American higher education in the 1980s and 1990s. Professor of English literary and cultural studies at CMU Jeffrey J. Williams wrote that the "assault on ... political correctness that simmered through the Reagan years, gained bestsellerdom with Bloom's Closing of the American Mind." According to Z.F. Gamson, Bloom's book "attacked the faculty for 'political correctness'". Prof. of Social Work at CSU Tony Platt says the "campaign against 'political correctness'" was launched by Bloom's book in 1987.

An October 1990 New York Times article by Richard Bernstein is credited with popularizing the term. At this time, the term was mainly being used within academia: "Across the country the term p.c., as it is commonly abbreviated, is being heard more and more in debates over what should be taught at the universities". Nexis citations in "arcnews/curnews" reveal only seventy total citations in articles to "political correctness" for 1990; but one year later, Nexis records 1,532 citations, with a steady increase to more than 7,000 citations by 1994. In May 1991, The New York Times had a follow-up article, according to which the term was increasingly being used in a wider public arena:

What has come to be called "political correctness," a term that began to gain currency at the start of the academic year last fall, has spread in recent months and has become the focus of an angry national debate, mainly on campuses, but also in the larger arenas of American life.

— Robert D. McFadden, "Political Correctness: New Bias Test?", 1991

The previously obscure far-left term became common currency in the lexicon of the conservative social and political challenges against progressive teaching methods and curriculum changes in the secondary schools and universities of the U.S. Policies, behavior, and speech codes that the speaker or the writer regarded as being the imposition of a liberal orthodoxy, were described and criticized as "politically correct". In May 1991, at a commencement ceremony for a graduating class of the University of Michigan, then U.S. President George H. W. Bush used the term in his speech: "The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land. And although the movement arises from the laudable desire to sweep away the debris of racism and sexism and hatred, it replaces old prejudice with new ones. It declares certain topics off-limits, certain expression off-limits, even certain gestures off-limits."

After 1991, its use as a pejorative phrase became widespread amongst conservatives in the US. It became a key term encapsulating conservative concerns about the left in cultural and political debates extending beyond academia. Two articles on the topic in late 1990 in Forbes and Newsweek both used the term "thought police" in their headlines, exemplifying the tone of the new usage, but it was Dinesh D'Souza's Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus (1991) which "captured the press's imagination". Similar critical terminology was used by D'Souza for a range of policies in academia around victimization, supporting multiculturalism through affirmative action, sanctions against anti-minority hate speech, and revising curricula (sometimes referred to as "canon busting"). These trends were at least in part a response to multiculturalism and the rise of identity politics, with movements such as feminism, gay rights movements and ethnic minority movements. That response received funding from conservative foundations and think tanks such as the John M. Olin Foundation, which funded several books such as D'Souza's.

Herbert Kohl, in 1992, commented that a number of neoconservatives who promoted the use of the term "politically correct" in the early 1990s were former Communist Party members, and, as a result, familiar with the Marxist use of the phrase. He argued that in doing so, they intended "to insinuate that egalitarian democratic ideas are actually authoritarian, orthodox, and Communist-influenced, when they oppose the right of people to be racist, sexist, and homophobic".

During the 1990s, conservative and right-wing politicians, think tanks, and speakers adopted the phrase as a pejorative descriptor of their ideological enemies, especially in the context of the culture wars about language and the content of public-school curricula. Roger Kimball, in Tenured Radicals, endorsed Frederick Crews's view that PC is best described as "Left Eclecticism", a term defined by Kimball as "any of a wide variety of anti-establishment modes of thought from structuralism and poststructuralism, deconstruction, and Lacanian analyst to feminist, homosexual, black, and other patently political forms of criticism".

Liberal commentators have argued that the conservatives and reactionaries who used the term did so in an effort to divert political discussion away from the substantive matters of resolving societal discrimination, such as racial, social class, gender, and legal inequality, against people whom conservatives do not consider part of the social mainstream. Jan Narveson wrote that "that phrase was born to live between scare-quotes: it suggests that the operative considerations in the area so called are merely political, steamrolling the genuine reasons of principle for which we ought to be acting..." Commenting in 2001, one such British journalist, Polly Toynbee, said "the phrase is an empty, right-wing smear, designed only to elevate its user", and in 2010 she wrote "the phrase 'political correctness' was born as a coded cover for all who still want to say Paki, spastic, or queer". Another British journalist, Will Hutton, wrote in 2001:

Political correctness is one of the brilliant tools that the American Right developed in the mid–1980s, as part of its demolition of American liberalism.... What the sharpest thinkers on the American Right saw quickly was that by declaring war on the cultural manifestations of liberalism – by levelling the charge of "political correctness" against its exponents – they could discredit the whole political project.

— Will Hutton, "Words Really are Important, Mr Blunkett", 2001

Glenn Loury wrote in 1994 that to address the subject of "political correctness" when power and authority within the academic community is being contested by parties on either side of that issue, is to invite scrutiny of one's arguments by would-be "friends" and "enemies". Combatants from the left and the right will try to assess whether a writer is "for them" or "against them". Geoffrey Hughes suggested that debate over political correctness concerns whether changing language actually solves political and social problems, with critics viewing it less about solving problems than imposing censorship, intellectual intimidation and demonstrating the moral purity of those who practice it. Hughes also argues that political correctness tends to be pushed by a minority rather than an organic form of language change.

Usage

The modern pejorative usage of the term emerged from conservative criticism of the New Left in the late 20th century. This usage was popularized by a number of articles in The New York Times and other media throughout the 1990s, and was widely used in the debate surrounding Allan Bloom's 1987 book The Closing of the American Mind. The term gained further currency in response to Roger Kimball's Tenured Radicals (1990), and conservative author Dinesh D'Souza's 1991 book Illiberal Education. Supporters of politically correct language have been pejoratively referred to as the "language police".

Education

Modern debate on the term was sparked by conservative critiques of perceived liberal bias in academia and education, and conservatives have since used it as a major line of attack. Similarly, a common conservative criticism of higher education in the United States is that the political views of teaching staff are more liberal than those of the general population, and that this contributes to an atmosphere of political correctness. William Deresiewicz defines political correctness as an attempt to silence "unwelcome beliefs and ideas", arguing that it is largely the result of for-profit education, as campus faculty and staff are wary of angering students upon whose fees they depend.

Preliminary research published in 2020 indicated that students at a large U.S. public university generally felt instructors were open-minded and encouraged free expression of diverse viewpoints; nonetheless, most students worried about the consequences of voicing their political opinions, with "nxieties about expressing political views and self-censorship ... more prevalent among students who identify as conservative".

As a conspiracy theory

Some conservative commentators in the West argue that "political correctness" and multiculturalism are part of a conspiracy with the ultimate goal of undermining Judeo-Christian values. This theory, which holds that political correctness originates from the critical theory of the Frankfurt School as part of a conspiracy that its proponents call "Cultural Marxism". The theory originated with Michael Minnicino's 1992 essay "New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness'", published in a Lyndon LaRouche movement journal. In 2001, conservative commentator Patrick Buchanan wrote in The Death of the West that "political correctness is cultural Marxism", and that "its trademark is intolerance".

Media

In the US, the term has been widely used in books and journals, but in Britain the usage has been confined mainly to the popular press. Many such authors and popular-media figures, particularly on the right, have used the term to criticize what they see as bias in the media. William McGowan argues that journalists get stories wrong or ignore stories worthy of coverage, because of what McGowan perceives to be their liberal ideologies and their fear of offending minority groups. Robert Novak, in his essay "Political Correctness Has No Place in the Newsroom", used the term to blame newspapers for adopting language use policies that he thinks tend to excessively avoid the appearance of bias. He argued that political correctness in language not only destroys meaning but also demeans the people who are meant to be protected.

Authors David Sloan and Emily Hoff claim that in the US, journalists shrug off concerns about political correctness in the newsroom, equating the political correctness criticisms with the old "liberal media bias" label. According to author John Wilson, left-wing forces of "political correctness" have been blamed for unrelated censorship, with Time citing campaigns against violence on network television in the US as contributing to a "mainstream culture has become cautious, sanitized, scared of its own shadow" because of "the watchful eye of the p.c. police", protests and advertiser boycotts targeting TV shows are generally organized by right-wing religious groups campaigning against violence, sex, and depictions of homosexuality on television.

Inclusive language

Inclusive or Equity Language is a language style that avoids expressions that its proponents perceive as expressing or implying ideas that are sexist, racist, or otherwise biased, prejudiced, or insulting to any particular group of people; and instead uses language intended to avoid offense and fulfill the ideals of egalitarianism. This language style is sometimes referred to as a kind of "political correctness", either as a neutral description or with negative connotations by its opponents. At least some supporters deny an association between the two. ("Political correctness is focused on not offending whereas inclusive language is focused on honoring people's identities.")

Satirical use

Political correctness is often satirized, for example in The PC Manifesto (1992) by Saul Jerushalmy and Rens Zbignieuw X, and Politically Correct Bedtime Stories (1994) by James Finn Garner, which presents fairy tales re-written from an exaggerated politically correct perspective. In 1994, the comedy film PCU took a look at political correctness on a college campus. Other examples include the television program Politically Incorrect, George Carlin's "Euphemisms" routine, and The Politically Correct Scrapbook. The popularity of the South Park cartoon program led to the creation of the term "South Park Republican" by Andrew Sullivan, and later the book South Park Conservatives by Brian C. Anderson. In its Season 19 (2015), South Park introduced the character PC Principal, who embodies the principle, to poke fun at the principle of political correctness.

The Colbert Report's host Stephen Colbert often talked, satirically, about the "PC Police".

Science

Groups who oppose certain generally accepted scientific views about evolution, second-hand tobacco smoke, AIDS, global warming, race and other politically contentious scientific matters have used the term "political correctness" to describe what they view as unwarranted rejection of their perspective on these issues by a scientific community that they believe has been corrupted by liberal politics.

Right-wing political correctness

"Political correctness" is a label typically used to describe liberal or left-wing terms and actions but rarely used for analogous attempts to mold language and behavior on the right. In 2012, economist Paul Krugman wrote that "the big threat to our discourse is right-wing political correctness, which – unlike the liberal version – has lots of power and money behind it. And the goal is very much the kind of thing Orwell tried to convey with his notion of Newspeak: to make it impossible to talk, and possibly even think, about ideas that challenge the established order." Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute referred to the right's own version of political correctness as "patriotic correctness".

See also

• Agenda-setting theory – Ability of the mass media to influence the public agenda of a society
• Anti-bias curriculum – Educational plan meant to reduce perceived racism and sexism in education
• Binnen-I – Style for gender-neutral written German
• Campaign Against Political Correctness – Defunct minor British lobby group
• Cancel culture – Modern form of ostracism
• Christmas controversies – Christmas ideological, political and religious disputes
• Common sense – Sound practical judgement in everyday matters
• Conventional wisdom – Ideas generally accepted by experts or the public
• Cultural Bolshevism – Nazi slogan opposing modernist and progressive cultural movements
• Cultural Marxism – Far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory
• Distancing language – Phrasing technique which disassociates speaker from subject
• Framing (social sciences) – Effect of how information is presented on perception
• Groupthink – Psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people
• Gutmensch – Pejorative German term for a sanctimonious do-gooder
• Kotobagari – Japanese term for euphemistic speech
• Linguistic relativity – Hypothesis of language influencing thought
• Logocracy – Form of government by use of words
• Microaggression – Term for commonplace slights
• Newspeak – Fictional language in the novel "Nineteen Eighty-Four"
• Pensée unique – Pejorative term for ideological conformism
• People-first language – Putting the person before the diagnosis
• Politics and the English Language – 1946 essay by George Orwell
• Red-baiting – Discrediting opponent's argument by accusing them of being a radical leftist
• Reverse discrimination – Discrimination against members of a dominant or majority group
• Self-censorship – Act of censoring or classifying one's own discourse
• Snowflake (slang) – Pejoratively, an easily offended person
• Social justice warrior – Pejorative term for a progressive person
• Speech code – Non-statutory restriction on word choice
• Sprachregelung – German term for prescribed form of official communication
• Toe the line - meaning either to conform to a rule or standard, or to stand in formation along a line
• Trigger warnings – Warnings that a work may cause distress
• Truthiness – Quality of preferring concepts or facts one wishes to be true, rather than actual truth
• Woke – Political slang term

Notes

1. In The New York Times newspaper article "The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct", the reporter Richard Bernstein said:

   The term "politically correct", with its suggestion of Stalinist orthodoxy, is spoken more with irony and disapproval than with reverence. But, across the country the term "P.C.", as it is commonly abbreviated, is being heard more and more in debates over what should be taught at the universities.

   — The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct, The New York Times, 28 October 1990

   Bernstein also reported about a meeting of the Western Humanities Conference in Berkeley, California, on the subject of "Political Correctness and Cultural Studies that examined "what effect the pressure to conform to currently fashionable ideas is having on scholarship".

References

1. "'politically correct' definition". Cambridge English Dictionary. Archived from the original on 6 April 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
2. "Definition of political correctness in English". Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on 13 April 2019. Retrieved 1 January 2017.
3. "'Politically Correct' definition". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
4. ^ Kohl, Herbert (1992). "Uncommon Differences: On Political Correctness, Core Curriculum and Democracy in Education". The Lion and the Unicorn. 16 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1353/uni.0.0216. S2CID 145173687.
5. ^ Gibson, Caitlin (13 January 2016). "How 'politically correct' went from compliment to insult". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
6. Florence, Joshua (30 October 2015). "A Phrase in Flux: The History of Political Correctness". Harvard Political Review. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
7. Chow, Kat (14 December 2016). "'Politically Correct': The Phrase Has Gone From Wisdom To Weapon". National Public Radio (NPR). Archived from the original on 11 October 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
8. ^ Schultz, Debra L. (1993). To Reclaim a Legacy of Diversity: Analyzing the 'Political Correctness' Debates in Higher Education (PDF). New York. ISBN 978-1880547137. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2016. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
9. ^ Friedman, Marilyn; Narveson, Jan (1995). Political correctness: for and against. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0847679867. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
10. ^ Whitney, D. Charles & Wartella, Ellen (1992). "Media Coverage of the "Political Correctness" Debate". Journal of Communication. 42 (2): 83. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00780.x.
11. ^ Hughes, Geoffrey (2011). "Origins of the Phrase". Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture. John Wiley & Sons. 1975 – Peter Fuller. ISBN 978-1444360295. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
12. ^ Ruth Perry, (1992), "A Short History of the Term 'Politically Correct'", in Beyond PC: Toward a Politics of Understanding, by Patricia Aufderheide, 1992, ISBN 978-1555971649
13. ^ Schultz citing Perry (1992) p. 16
14. ^ Willis, Ellen. "Toward a Feminist Revolution", in No More Nice Girls: Countercultural Essays (1992) Wesleyan University Press, ISBN 081955250X, p. 19.
15. ^ Hall, Stuart (1994). "Some 'Politically Incorrect' Pathways Through PC" (PDF). S. Dunant (ed.) The War of the Words: The Political Correctness Debate. pp. 164–84. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
16. Ford, Becky R. (2017). An Empirical Test of the Effects of Political Correctness: Implications for Censorship, Self-Censorship, and Public Deliberation (Thesis). University of California, Santa Barbara. Archived from the original on 11 June 2022. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
17. ^ Wilson, John. 1995. The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on High Education. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 26.
18. ^ Messer-Davidow, Ellen (1995). "Manufacturing the Attack on Liberalized Higher Education: The Humanities and Society in the 1990s". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
19. Mink, Eric (6 October 2016). "Trump's Political-Correctness Con Job". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
20. "Conservative Correctness" chapter, in Wilson, John. 1995. The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on Higher Education. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 57.
21. "Don Williams comments – Dixie Chicks Were Right". mach2.com. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 20 May 2017.
22. ^ Krugman, Paul (26 May 2012). "The New Political Correctness". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2013.
23. Kaufman, Scott Barry (20 November 2016). "The Personality of Political Correctness; The idea of political correctness is central to the culture wars of American politics". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 2 December 2016.
24. "political correctness". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 7 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
25. Safire, William (2008). Safire's political dictionary (Rev. ed.). New York : Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195343342.
26. Hughes, Geoffrey (2011). Political Correctness A History of Semantics and Culture. Wiley. ISBN 9781444360295.
27. Bleifuss, Joel (February 2007). "A Politically Correct Lexicon". In These Times. Archived from the original on 29 June 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
28. ^ Bellow, Allan Bloom; foreword by Saul (1988). The closing of the American mind (1st Touchstone ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0671657154. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
29. ^ Robinson, Sally (2000). Marked men white masculinity in crisis. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 17, 55–86. ISBN 978-0231500364. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
30. Kamiya, Gary (22 January 1995). "Civilization & Its Discontents". San Francisco Chronicle Magazine. Archived from the original on 28 February 2021. Retrieved 16 November 2015.
31. ^ Williams, Jeffrey (2013). PC Wars: Politics and Theory in the Academy. Routledge. p. 11. ISBN 978-1136656231. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
32. Gamson, Z.F. (1997). "The Stratification of the Academy". Social Text. 51 (51): 67–73. doi:10.2307/466647. JSTOR 466647.
33. Platt, Tony. "Desegregating Multiculturalism: Problems in the Theory and Pedagogy of Diversity Education" (PDF). Pedagogies for Social Change. 29 (4 (90)). Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 October 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015 – via Social Justice.
34. ^ Berman, Paul, ed. (1992). Debating P.C.: the controversy over political correctness on college campuses. Random House Publishing. p. Introduction. ISBN 978-0307801784. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
35. ^ Smith, Dorothy E. (1999). Writing the social: critique, theory, and investigations (Repr. ed.). Toronto (Ont.): University of Toronto Press. p. 175. ISBN 978-0802081353. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
36. ^ Schwartz, Howard S. (1997). "Psychodynamics of Political Correctness". Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 33 (2): 133–49. doi:10.1177/0021886397332003. S2CID 144305581. Archived from the original on 3 October 2009. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
37. ^ Valdes, Francisco; Culp, Jerome McCristal; Harris, Angela P., eds. (2002). Crossroads, directions, and a new critical race theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 59, 65. ISBN 978-1566399302. Archived from the original on 30 July 2020. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
38. Browne, Anthony (2006). "The Retreat of Reason: Political Correctness and the Corruption of Public Debate in Modern Britain Archived 3 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine". Civitas. ISBN 1903386500.
39. ^ Bernstein, Richard (28 October 1990). "Ideas & Trends: The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 October 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
40. Cho, Sumi (1997). "Essential Politics". Harvard Law Review. 433.
41. ^ McFadden, Robert D. (5 May 1991). "Political Correctness: New Bias Test?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 October 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
42. D'Souza 1991
43. Berman 1992
44. Schultz 1993
45. Messer Davidow 1993, 1994
46. Scatamburlo 1998
47. George H. W. Bush, at the University of Michigan (4 May 1991), Remarks at the University of Michigan Commencement Ceremony in Ann Arbor Archived 16 May 2004 at the Wayback Machine, 4 May 1991. George Bush Presidential Library.
48. Aufderheide, Patricia (1992). Beyond PC: Toward a Politics of Understanding. Saint Paul, Minn.: Graywolf Press. p. 227. ISBN 978-1555971649.
49. Meaghan, Morris (2013). New Keywords a Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. ISBN 978-1118725412. Archived from the original on 18 November 2015.
50. Bernstein, Richard (28 October 1990). "Ideas & Trends: The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 May 2010.
51. Western Humanities Conference Archived 15 December 2012 at archive.today
52. ^ Kimball, Roger (1990). Tenured radicals: how politics has corrupted our higher education (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row – Originally University of Michigan. ISBN 978-0060161903.
53. Lauter, Paul (1993). "'Political Correctness' and the Attack on American Colleges". The Radical Teacher (44): 34–40. ISSN 0191-4847. JSTOR 20709784.
54. Axtell, James (1 January 1998). The Pleasures of Academe: A Celebration & Defense of Higher Education. U of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-1049-3.
55. Scatamburlo, Valerie L. (1998). Soldiers of Misfortune: The New Right's Culture War and the Politics of Political Correctness. New York: Peter Lang. ISBN 9780820430126.
56. Glassner, Barry (5 January 2010). The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things: Crime, Drugs, Minorities, Teen Moms, Killer Kids, Mutant Microbes, Plane Crashes, Road Rage, & So Much More.
57. Tomlinson, Sally (2008). Race and education: policy and politics in Britain (. ed.). Maidenhead : Open University Press. p. 161. ISBN 978-0335223077. Archived from the original on 30 July 2020. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
58. Dekker, Teun J. (2013). Paying Our High Public Officials: Evaluating the Political Justifications of Top Wages in the Public Sector. Routledge. p. 119. ISBN 978-1135131265. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2015. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
59. Toynbee, Polly. "Religion Must be Removed from all Functions of State" Archived 11 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 12 December 2001 – Accessed 6 February 2007.
60. Toynbee, Polly (28 April 2009). "This Bold Equality Push is just what We Needed. In 1997". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 5 November 2021. Retrieved 22 May 2010.
61. Albrow, Martin (1997). The global age state and society beyond modernity (1st ed.). Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. p. 215. ISBN 978-0804728706. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
62. "The Economist: Will Hutton, p. 81". The Economist. Economist Newspaper Limited. 2002. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
63. Gyuris, Ferenc (2014). The Political Discourse of Spatial Disparities Geographical Inequalities Between Science and Propaganda. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 68. ISBN 978-3319015088. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
64. Hutton, Will (2015). How Good We Can Be: Ending the Mercenary Society and Building a Great Country. Hachette UK. p. 80. ISBN 978-1408705322. Archived from the original on 19 September 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
65. Hutton, Will. "Words really are important, Mr Blunkett" Archived 31 January 2008 at the Wayback Machine The Observer, Sunday 16 December 2001 – Accessed 6 February 2007.
66. Loury, G. C. (1 October 1994). "Self-Censorship in Public Discourse: A Theory of "Political Correctness" and Related Phenomena" (PDF). Rationality and Society. 6 (4): 428–61. doi:10.1177/1043463194006004002. S2CID 143057168. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 November 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
67. Hughes, Geoffrey (2015). An Encyclopedia of Swearing: The Social History of Oaths, Profanity, Foul Language, and Ethnic Slurs in the English-Speaking World. Routledge. pp. 348–349.
68. Heteren, Annette Gomis van (1997). Political correctness in context: the PC controversy in America. Almería: Universidad de Almería, Servicio de Publicaciones. p. 148. ISBN 978-8482400839. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
69. D'Souza, Dinesh (1991). Illiberal education: the politics of race and sex on campus. New York: Free Press. ISBN 978-0684863849. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 20 November 2015.
70. "On the Follies of the Politically Correct Language Police | Psychology Today". www.psychologytoday.com. Archived from the original on 16 August 2022. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
71. Hess, Frederick M.; Maranto, Robert; Redding, Richard E. (2009). The politically correct university: problems, scope, and reforms. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press. ISBN 978-0844743172.
72. Deresiewicz, William On Political Correctness Archived 2 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine, The American Scholar, 06/03/17, accessed 24/03/19
73. Larson, Jennifer, Mark McNeilly, and Timothy J. Ryan. "Free Expression and Constructive Dialogue at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Archived 23 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine." Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina (5 February 2020).
74. Friedersdorf, Conor (16 February 2020). "Evidence That Conservative Students Really Do Self-Censor". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 11 November 2021. Retrieved 16 February 2020.
75. Jamin, Jérôme (2014). "Cultural Marxism and the Radical Right". In Shekhovtsov, A.; Jackson, P. (eds.). The Post-War Anglo-American Far Right: A Special Relationship of Hate. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 84–103. doi:10.1057/9781137396211.0009 (inactive 15 November 2024). ISBN 978-1137396198. Retrieved 31 January 2023.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
76. Richardson, John E. (2015). "'Cultural-Marxism' and the British National Party: a transnational discourse". In Copsey, Nigel; Richardson, John E. (eds.). Cultures of Post-War British Fascism. Routledge. ISBN 9781317539360. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020. Retrieved 12 August 2015.
77. Jay, Martin (2010), "Dialectic of Counter-Enlightenment: The Frankfurt School as Scapegoat of the Lunatic Fringe". Salmagundi (Fall 2010–Winter 2011, 168–69): 30–40.
78. Buchanan, Patrick. The Death of the West, p. 89.
79. Lea, John (2010). Political Correctness and Higher Education: British and American Perspectives. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135895884. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
80. McGowan, William (2003). Coloring the news: how political correctness has corrupted American journalism (. ed.). San Francisco, Calif.: Encounter Books. ISBN 978-1893554603.
81. Novak, Robert (March 1995). "Political Correctness Has No Place in the Newsroom". USA Today. Archived from the original on 29 June 2020. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
82. Gorham, Joan (1996). Mass Media. Dushkin Publishing Group, Indiana University. ISBN 9780697316110. Archived from the original on 4 November 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
83. Sloan, David; Mackay, Jenn (2007). Media Bias. McFarland & Company. p. 112. ISBN 978-0786455058.
84. Sloan, David; Hoff, Emily (1998). Contemporary media issues. Northport: Vision Press, Indiana University. p. 63. ISBN 978-1885219107. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
85. Wilson, John. 1995. The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on High Education. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 7 ISBN 978-0822317135.
86. Boyd, Krys (17 February 2015). "The Limits Of Political Correctness (panel discussion)". Think (Podcast). KERA (FM). Retrieved 30 May 2022.
87. "Inclusive Language Standards". University of Delaware. Retrieved 25 April 2023.
88. "TidBits: The PC Manifesto". Fiction.net. Archived from the original on 7 October 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
89. "Book – Buy Now". Capc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 30 May 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
90. Rich, Frank (1 May 2005). "Conservatives ♥ 'South Park'". The New York Times.
91. Bell, Crystal (17 September 2015). "'South Park' Perfectly Showed How To Do A Caitlyn Jenner Joke Right". MTV. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 29 January 2016.
92. Caffrey, Dan (10 December 2015). "PC Principal rides the line between hero and villain on the season finale of South Park". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on 14 August 2017. Retrieved 29 January 2016.
93. Steinberg, Dan (27 March 2014). "Colbert Report on Redskins' new foundation". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 4 August 2020. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
94. D'addario, Daniel (1 April 2014). "Stephen Colbert jokes about #CancelColbert: 'The system worked!'". Salon. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
95. Bethell, Tom (2005). The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing. ISBN 978-0895260314.
96. Adams, Joshua (12 June 2017). "Time for equal media treatment of 'political correctness'". Columbia Journalism Review. Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
97. Aly, Waleed; Simpson, Robert Mark (2018). "Political Correctness Gone Viral". In Fox, Carl; Saunders, Joe (eds.). Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9781138571921.
98. Nowrasteh, Alex (7 December 2016). "The right has its own version of political correctness. It's just as stifling". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 8 December 2016. Retrieved 19 December 2016.

Further reading

• Bernstein, David E. (2003). You Can't Say That! The Growing Threat to Civil Liberties from Antidiscrimination Laws. Cato Institute, 180 pages. ISBN 1930865538.
• Hentoff, Nat (1992). Free Speech for Me – But Not for Thee. HarperCollins. ISBN 006019006X.
• Schlesinger, Jr., Arthur M. (1998). The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society. W.W. Norton, revised edition. ISBN 0393318540.
• Debra L. Schultz (1993). To Reclaim a Legacy of Diversity: Analyzing the "Political Correctness" Debates in Higher Education. New York: National Council for Research on Women. ISBN 978-1880547137.
• John Wilson (1995). The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on High Education. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-1713-5.

External links

• Media related to Political correctness at Wikimedia Commons

• Political correctness
• Political pejoratives
• Political terminology
• Sociolinguistics