Misplaced Pages

Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Citation ICR 482
Keywords
Emergency leave, unfair dismissal

Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors ICR 482 (EAT) is a UK labour law case concerning emergency leave to care for children.

Facts

Mrs Qua was absent for 17 days, because of her young son's medical problems. She had not told the employer quickly.

The Employment Tribunal held that she had not told the employer as soon as reasonably practicable and said how long she would be absent.

Judgment

Cox J held that Mrs Qua had not done anything wrong, and ERA 1996 section 57A did not require the employee give daily updates about absence. He noted that even if the right to automatically unfair dismissal was lost because one did not comply with section 57A(2), then an employee who had been working over a year could still have an unfair dismissal claim. He added that the legislation only covers unforeseen emergencies, and employees cannot use the right to deal with regular occurrences, e.g. one day a week.

See also

Sources on child care
Directive 92/85/EEC
Directive (EU) 2019/1158
Employment Rights Act 1996
Maternity and Parental Leave etc. Regulations 1999
Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992
Boyle v EOC ECR I-6401 (C-411/96)
Paternity and Adoption Leave Regulations 2002
Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010
Employment Rights Act 1996
Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors
Employment Rights Act 1996
Flexible Working Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/3236)
Commotion Ltd v Rutty
Work and Families Act 2006
see Child care in the United Kingdom

Notes

References

Categories:
Qua v John Ford Morrison Solicitors Add topic