| Rudisill v. McDonough | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided April 16, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Rudisill v. McDonough |
| Citations | 601 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| Soldiers who accrue educational benefits under both the Montgomery and Post-9/11 GI Bills may use either one and may use them in any order. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Jackson, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett |
| Concurrence | Kavanaugh, joined by Barrett |
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Alito |
| Laws applied | |
| G.I. Bill | |
Rudisill v. McDonough, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that soldiers who accrue educational benefits under both the Montgomery and Post-9/11 GI Bills may use either one and may use them in any order.
References
- Rudisill v. McDonough, 601 U.S. ___ (2024)
- "Rudisill v. McDonough". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved 2024-10-17.
External links
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |