| S v Williams | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Constitutional Court of South Africa |
| Full case name | State v Williams and Others |
| Decided | 9 June 1995 (1995-06-09) |
| Citations | [1995] ZACC 6, 1995 (3) SA 632 (CC), 1995 (7) BCLR 861 (CC) |
| Case history | |
| Prior action | Referral from Cape Provincial Division |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Chaskalson P, Ackermann, Didcott, Kriegler, Langa, Madala, Mahomed, Mokgoro, O'Regan & Sachs JJ, Kentridge AJ |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Langa |
| Part of a series on |
| Corporal punishment |
|---|
 |
| By place |
| By implementation |
| By country |
| Court cases |
| Politics |
| Campaigns against corporal punishment |
S v Williams and Others is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in which the court ruled that judicial corporal punishment of juveniles is unconstitutional. The decision was taken with respect to five different cases in which six juveniles were convicted by different magistrates and sentenced to receive a "moderate correction" of a number of strokes with a light cane.
The unanimous judgment, handed down on 9 June 1995, found the imposition of corporal punishment to be incompatible with the Interim Constitution of South Africa because it violates the right to human dignity and the protection against cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.
The case did not deal with judicial corporal punishment of adults, but in argument before the court all parties agreed that it was unconstitutional. In 1997 Parliament passed the Abolition of Corporal Punishment Act, which repealed all laws allowing for judicial corporal punishment.
References
- "Section 13: The abolition of JCP". Judicial Corporal Punishment in South Africa. World Corporal Punishment Research. 2005. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
- Angus, Laurel (1996). "Case Report: S v Williams". South African Journal on Human Rights. 12: 142–145.
External links
 | This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |