Misplaced Pages

Simple learning design 2.0

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article by providing more context for the reader. (January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.
Find sources: "Simple learning design 2.0" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Simple Learning Design 2.0 (SLD 2.0) is a learning design specification proposed by Durand and Downes from the National Research Council of Canada in 2009. It was intended as an interoperability specification, simpler to implement than IMS Learning Design, a specification as of 2010 restricted only to pilot and research projects. IMS Learning Design is a specification for describing methods of learning design, in a way that claims to be pedagogically neutral. Simple Learning Design 2.0 was designed to be implemented by developers in a commercial e-learning application, and was intended to be paired with a more complex specification, described as "a real UML for learning design." The intent behind SLD 2.0 was to propose a specification with a good balance between its expressivity and the simplicity of its implementation.

References

  1. Durand, G., Downes, S.: Toward Simple Learning Design 2.0. In: 4th Int. Conf. on Computer Science & Education 2009, Nanning, China, pp. 894-897, 2009.
  2. ^ Derntl, Michael; Neumann, Susanne; Griffiths, Dai; Oberhuemer, Petra (2010). "Investigating Teachers' Understanding of IMS Learning Design: Yes They Can!". In Wolpers, Martin; Kirschner, Paul A.; Scheffel, Maren; Lindstaedt, Stefanie; Dimitrova, Vania (eds.). Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6383. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 62–77. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_5. ISBN 978-3-642-16020-2.
  3. Durand, Guillaume; Belliveau, Luc; Craig, Benjamin (2010). Simple Learning Design 2.0. pp. 549–551. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2010.156. ISBN 978-1-4244-7144-7. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  4. "Simple Learning Design 2.0". ResearchGate. August 2010.
  5. Durand G., Belliveau L., Craig B., "Simple Learning Design 2.0, icalt, pp.549-551, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2010.
Category: