 | This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Solem v. Stumes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Solem v. Stumes | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Argued November 28, 1983 Decided February 29, 1984 | |
| Full case name | Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary v. Norman Stumes |
| Citations | 465 U.S. 638 (more)104 S. Ct. 1338; 79 L. Ed. 2d 579; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 36; 52 U.S.L.W. 4307 |
| Holding | |
| Edwards v. Arizona should not be applied retroactively, and therefore the Court of Appeals erred in evaluating the constitutionality of the police conduct in this case. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | White, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Rehnquist, O'Connor |
| Concurrence | Powell |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
Solem v. Stumes, 465 U.S. 638 (1984), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that its decision in Edwards v. Arizona (1980) should not be applied retroactively.
External links
- Text of Solem v. Stumes, 465 U.S. 638 (1984) is available from: Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |