Misplaced Pages

Talk:.277 Fury

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .277 Fury article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

.277 Fury versus .277 SIG Fury

Hi, should we name the article .277 Fury OR .277 SIG Fury? The cartridge is designated as the .277 SIG Fury by the SAAMI .

Non hybrid XM1186 specs

There is only passing mention of the XM1186 general purpose (conventional all brass case) round. From what I understand, the XM1186 is what would be used most of the time with the XM1188 being reserved for front line tip of the spear operations and only when necessary as it will wear out the rifles if they are fed a steady diet of that ammunition. Can someone find out what the specs are on the XM1186? Sig sells both ammunition commercially, with the XM1188 being called "Hybrid Elite" and the XM1186 just called "Elite." I believe the non hybrid version will be of more interest commercially as it can be fired in conventional rifle designs.DrHenley (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Possible error

For the 140 grain, 9 gram round, the quoted specs are 825 mps muzzle velocity for 3840 joule muzzle energy. 9 gram at 825 mps yields about 3063 joule. 9 gram at 925 mps yields about 3850 joule. It therefore appears that either the velocity or the energy is off. Whoodedswan (talk) 08:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: