1947 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. United Mine Workers | |
---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |
Argued January 14, 1947 Decided March 6, 1947 | |
Full case name | United States v. United Mine Workers of America |
Citations | 330 U.S. 258 (more)67 S. Ct. 677; 91 L. Ed. 884; 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2954; 12 Lab. Cas. (CCH) ¶ 51,239; 19 L.R.R.M. 2346 |
Case history | |
Prior | Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia |
Holding | |
| |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Plurality | Vinson, joined by Reed, Jackson, Burton |
Concurrence | Frankfurter |
Concur/dissent | Black, joined by Douglas |
Dissent | Murphy |
Dissent | Rutledge |
United States v. United Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258 (1947), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court examined whether a trial court acted appropriately when it issued a restraining order to prevent a labor strike organized by coal miners. In an opinion written by Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, the Court held that a restraining order and preliminary injunction prohibiting a strike did not violate the Clayton Antitrust Act or the Norris–La Guardia Act, that the trial court was authorized to punish the violation of its orders as criminal contempt, and that fines imposed by the trial court were warranted in the situation.
See also
References
- United States v. United Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 267-69 (1947).
- ^ United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. at 269.
- United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. at 289.
External links
- Works related to United States v. United Mine Workers of America at Wikisource
- Text of United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258 (1947) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Justia Library of Congress
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |