Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:44, 12 July 2011

Bulgar language

Абе мойто момче ( :) извинявай ако си с много по-голям от мен), като си българин и си си сложил прякора на Апостола, защо си изтрил скромниОТ ми опит да покажУВАМ, че тюркскиОТ ни произход и това, че сме дошлЕ Бог знае от къде из далечните пустини на Азия, са изключително спорни въпроси и не е уйбаво да се твърдят като твръди и аксиоматични енциклопедични данни. Не е тук мястото да се навлиза в полемика и подробности, но все повече везните наклоняват в друга посока... Hansen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.215.171.65 (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

--89.215.171.65 (talk) 15:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC) : Who are you and why are you making these strange reverts?

89.215.171.65, before changing articles and pushing your opinion, please read the discussions on the talk-pages and read the added sources. Then discuss them on the talk-page and if there will be any objections you can edit free the article. Thank you! Jingby (talk) 15:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

--89.215.171.65 (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Call me Hansen. 10x

Bulgaria#Politics

Deputy Prime Minister is not a "propagand". --Aleksd (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Torlakian edits

Hi! Sorry for the inconvenience, I have explained my edits on the article's talk page. By reading about Torlakian, there is no conclusion of it being a separate South Slavic language, and as such, its inappropriate to add a language box, the image is still there (Possible POV though?). I have added extensive info on the history of the area in terms of nationality, although information on this is scarce. I have clarified the views of Kantz and Blanqui, they were heavily different of what was really said. Regards. --92.32.45.19 (talk) 22:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I think your edits are POV-ish and inappropriate to this linguistic article. Regs. Jingby (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello. Thanks for the help and for solving the problem at Jovan Sterija Popovic article. It was getting out of hand... It is easy for the IP editor to do whatever he wants when wiki rules almost doesn`t mean anything for him :). Anyway, thank you for solving the dispute. I think this is acceptable for everybody. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

About Mihajlo Apostolski article

Hi. As you can see (here: ) non of the information that you added was removed from the article. The article was reorganizes. I added several references in order to stress what this person has done for the Macedonian nation and for the Republic of Macedonia at all. This is not a way for collaborative improvement of the content of Misplaced Pages. I already gave you an advice on Misplaced Pages on Macedonian language that we have to collaborate in order to improve the content. At the same time, as you can see the Bulgarian version of the article is not updated as much as this one and the article for Mihajlo Apostolski on Misplaced Pages on Macedonian language. I hope we will understand each other better in future. I hope you will not remove the undated version of the article again. Thank you for the understanding. I wish you a lot of pleasant moments while editing here. Kind regards, --Wikimk (talk) 12:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

On a contrary, stop manipulating the article. You have removed a lot of information and described an Academician source as Peter Lang (publishing company), as Bulgarian reference. The sources from the Communist Yugoslavia are biased and out of date. Please, use English language sources from scientific journals or publishing houses. Jingby (talk)

Hi. I am trying to make the article look decent. Please stop removing valuable data from the article only because you he fought in WWII for Macedonian state and Macedonian nation. I hope you can understand this.
Concerning the communist sources, that is the reason why Misplaced Pages is a collaborative project. The article will be not objective if it does not reflect different opinions, even if they are as bed as the communist sources or the sources of axis allied Bulgaria in WWII. --Wikimk (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

This is an encyclopedia, not a forum to collect all views, including unreliable and biased, i.e. fringe science, but only NPOV. Jingby (talk) 14:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree, but i will have to repeat myself. Why sources from axis allied Bulgaria in WWII should be considered as more reliable than communist sources? That is why we have to present both sources. Kind regards, --Wikimk (talk) 15:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

No sources issued before 1945 are used here. Jingby (talk) 15:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Dimitre Minchev (Military Publishing House, Sofia, 2002) Bulgarian Camagne Committees in Macedonia - 1941, Shtip, July 23, 1941, Document № 41.
But, it does not matter. Did not answer my question. Why sources from axis allied Bulgaria in WWII should be considered as more reliable than communist sources?
Kind regards,--Wikimk (talk) 15:59, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

BTW, this discussion is still going on on two places. That is not good. It is hard to follow the conversation if we continue like this. --Wikimk (talk) 15:59, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Jungiby, why are you re-editing my submissions about the bulgar language? The version you state is not the official of the Bulgarian historians and the state anymore, please accept the new one. The iranian origin of the language has been proven as correct for more than 5 years now, and I can list many publications here. Please edit this publication and treat the iranian theory with some respect, not with the irony you imply. Please correct these articles to add the theory or I will add it myself. These opinions are a disgrace for the Bulgarians... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.121.228.249 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, 87.121.228.249! Sorry, but here is not Bulgarian forum, but world encyclopedia. Regards! Jingby (talk) 05:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

You have a grudge on me

You should stop changing my talk page, because your warning is unjust. Seems like you are doing this deliberately. the discussion on the article bulgarians has already been settled, but still you keep provocating me with unjust changes to my talk page. If you add your trash accusations again to my talk page, I will report you to wikipedia 178.84.115.106 (talk) 06:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)