Jump to content

User talk:85.255.233.91

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


February 2017

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dave King (businessman) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Administration and liquidation of The Rangers Football Club Plc. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Craig Whyte, you may be blocked from editing. Wavehunter (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Administration and liquidation of The Rangers Football Club Plc. Wavehunter (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Easington Academy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

[edit]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Joelinton, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair, trigger-happy, discriminatory blocking

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.255.233.91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked unfairly by a discriminatory admin. I merely added in the word ‘alleged’ before the term ‘white privilege’ on a page. This is because white privilege is a notion - even if it is proven to exist in the future, as of now it has not been. Therefore, any references to ‘white privilege’ (an intangible notion) should be adjusted to ‘alleged white pro privilege’, until the concrete existence of an as yet abstract concept is universally accepted. Rather than allow the profligation of further misinformation, I chose to correct the article (I thought Wikipedia at least aimed for accuracy within its posts). Therefore, my ban should be overturned, and the erroneous admin provided with some further training and education. 85.255.233.91 (talk) 08:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no reason to believe the range block has anything to do with this sort of garbage. Perhaps you meant to sign in to an account and contest a block there? Yamla (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.