Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Ebeye

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 14:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Ebeye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable actress. Quis separabit? 12:33, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On further work, Delete: no evidence of notability - redlinked awards (whether or not there's a third T in "Terracota"), redlinked films, "City Sisters" not mentioned in imdb, the only "Tawa award" traceable on Google is a New Zealand community award, etc. PamD 09:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The current state of the article invalidates your reason for wanting a deletion. Could you kindly review? Darreg (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can you point out to sources that proves she is notable aside the petty interviews that focuses on her private life? —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to say, but you seem to participate in a lot of AFDs yet your votes usually add little or real value to discussions. Why is that so?? Darreg (talk) 08:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss refs added by Victuallers
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.