Misplaced Pages

14 August 2005

• curprev 12:3012:30, 14 August 2005 Ben Arnold talk contribs 7,486 bytes −1,704 →Royal title undo

22 July 2005

• curprev 21:0521:05, 22 July 2005 Taestell talk contribs m 9,190 bytes +38 No edit summary undo

15 July 2005

• curprev 17:3817:38, 15 July 2005 Formeruser-82 talk contribs 9,152 bytes −616 This needs to be sourced, otherwise it's conjecture. Also, removing reference to theorists as none named. undo
• curprev 17:2917:29, 15 July 2005 Jtdirl talk contribs m 9,768 bytes +1,596 Reverted edits by Homeontherange to last version by Gbambino undo
• curprev 17:2617:26, 15 July 2005 Formeruser-82 talk contribs 8,172 bytes −1,596 I don't see any constitutional theorists named either here or in talk. undo
• curprev 16:4816:48, 15 July 2005 Formeruser0910 talk contribs 9,768 bytes +1,596 Secondary sources have been provided, see talk. And that's one revert for you, Andy undo
• curprev 16:4316:43, 15 July 2005 Formeruser-82 talk contribs 8,172 bytes −1,596 if it's factual information you should have no problem finding a source to cite. Until then, it's being removed as original research. undo
• curprev 15:5615:56, 15 July 2005 Formeruser0910 talk contribs 9,768 bytes +1,596 Replacing removed accurate information undo
• curprev 02:0202:02, 15 July 2005 Formeruser-82 talk contribs 8,172 bytes −741 rm original research. undo
• curprev 01:5901:59, 15 July 2005 Formeruser-82 talk contribs 8,913 bytes −1,598 rm original research. Which constitutional theorists say this? undo

18 June 2005

• curprev 18:1318:13, 18 June 2005 Djegan talk contribs m 10,511 bytes +5 typos - dont mix languages undo
• curprev 13:3713:37, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 10,506 bytes −292 No, this was a product of the Balfour Declaration undo
• curprev 13:3613:36, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 10,798 bytes +163 No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:3313:33, 18 June 2005 Formeruser0910 talk contribs 10,635 bytes −56 structure, flow undo
• curprev 11:4611:46, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 10,691 bytes −18 Eugene Forsey for one. I've never heard one constitutiona theorist discuss this Act, to be frank, so I wouldn't mine hearing the name of one who considers it more imp. than Balfour or Stat of Westmins undo
• curprev 05:5305:53, 18 June 2005 Formeruser0910 talk contribs 10,709 bytes −17 →History: same as previous undo
• curprev 05:5105:51, 18 June 2005 Formeruser0910 talk contribs 10,726 bytes +35 Andy, please name and give examples of constitutional theorists who ''don't'' agree with this viewpoint. undo
• curprev 04:3904:39, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs m 10,691 bytes +435 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:3304:33, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs m 10,256 bytes −27 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:1304:13, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 10,283 bytes +4 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:1104:11, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 10,279 bytes −4 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:0904:09, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 10,283 bytes +40 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:0804:08, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 10,243 bytes +332 No edit summary undo
• curprev 03:3603:36, 18 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 9,911 bytes +5 All constitutional theorists think this? Most ignore this act and focus their intention instead on the Statute of Westminster, 1931 undo
• curprev 03:2503:25, 18 June 2005 Formeruser0910 talk contribs 9,906 bytes −5 No edit summary undo

17 June 2005

• curprev 17:1417:14, 17 June 2005 Jdforrester talk contribs 9,911 bytes −3,020 Move sources to Wikisource, add links thereto. undo

16 June 2005

• curprev 12:5912:59, 16 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 12,931 bytes −513 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:1402:14, 16 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 13,444 bytes +416 No edit summary undo
• curprev 01:3501:35, 16 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 13,028 bytes −624 →History undo
• curprev 01:3301:33, 16 June 2005 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 13,652 bytes +6,766 No edit summary undo

6 June 2005

• curprev 22:1822:18, 6 June 2005 Gabbe talk contribs m 6,886 bytes +42 {{mergefrom|Royal Style and Titles Act}} undo

19 April 2005

• curprev 08:5308:53, 19 April 2005 Sam Hocevar talk contribs m 6,844 bytes +1 spelling undo

15 April 2005

• curprev 14:1014:10, 15 April 2005 Jdforrester talk contribs m 6,843 bytes −1 "Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act, 1927" -> "Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act 1927" as per Misplaced Pages and Parliamentary usage. undo
• curprev 14:0914:09, 15 April 2005 Jdforrester talk contribs 6,844 bytes +173 Tidies, notably to capitalisation. (It's "Dominion", "Act", and "Parliament" when one refers to an explicit one or multiple instantiations of one particular one). undo
• curprev 13:5713:57, 15 April 2005 Jdforrester talk contribs m 6,671 bytes 0 →Royal title: Slight formatting changes. undo

29 March 2005

• curprev 06:5306:53, 29 March 2005 Bryan Derksen talk contribs m 6,671 bytes +25 Category:1927 in law undo

19 March 2005

• curprev 07:2907:29, 19 March 2005 141.161.70.77 talk 6,646 bytes −2 →History undo
• curprev 07:2207:22, 19 March 2005 141.161.70.77 talk 6,648 bytes −1 No edit summary undo

18 March 2005

• curprev 13:2713:27, 18 March 2005 Pinnerup talk contribs m 6,649 bytes −4 removed improperly placed "was" undo

13 February 2005

• curprev 20:0020:00, 13 February 2005 Iota talk contribs m 6,653 bytes −1 No edit summary undo

1 February 2005

• curprev 17:5317:53, 1 February 2005 Iota talk contribs 6,654 bytes +378 No edit summary undo

29 January 2005

• curprev 16:0316:03, 29 January 2005 Chrism talk contribs m 6,276 bytes +2 →Royal title undo

20 January 2005

• curprev 04:0904:09, 20 January 2005 213.202.163.81 talk 6,274 bytes +427 No edit summary undo

18 January 2005

• curprev 02:3502:35, 18 January 2005 Iota talk contribs 5,847 bytes +1,970 Redraft undo

5 January 2005

• curprev 14:5214:52, 5 January 2005 Andrew Gray talk contribs 3,877 bytes +17 add citation undo

2 December 2004

• curprev 22:4922:49, 2 December 2004 Sam Hocevar talk contribs m 3,860 bytes −4 fix double 'the'. please help us fix common mistakes in the article space undo

16 November 2004

• curprev 00:5800:58, 16 November 2004 Formeruser-81 talk contribs 3,864 bytes +28 No edit summary undo

17 September 2004

• curprev 15:0215:02, 17 September 2004 OwenBlacker talk contribs m 3,836 bytes +12 Typos undo

14 September 2004

• curprev 21:4021:40, 14 September 2004 MrWeeble talk contribs m 3,824 bytes +27 categorise undo
• curprev 21:3221:32, 14 September 2004 MrWeeble talk contribs 3,797 bytes +3,797 Created from bits and pieces on other pages