User talk:200.120.211.239 - Revision history

MalnadachBot: Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)

2023-01-02T11:35:59Z

Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:35, 2 January 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Blanked IP talk}}
	{{dynamic IP\|]}}

	==June 2013==
	<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ''']'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 12:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

	== Some friendly advice ==

	Misplaced Pages is a collaborative effort. There are lots of editors working on these articles besides. If other editors disagree with your edits, that's fine. Content disputes happen all the time on Misplaced Pages. The way to handle it is to start a discussion on the article talk page and try to work with your fellow editors to reach ]. If you cannot reach consensus, please follow the steps of ]. Further edit-warring will only result in more blocks. I hope that this helps. Your block will expire in a week. When you come back, please keep this in mind. Thanks, and good luck. ] (]) 15:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

	:When you correct obvious mistakes and people revert and attack you, there's no possibility of fruitful collaboration. What has happened here is akin to someone refusing to accept the correction of a spelling mistake, blindly reverting to an incorrect spelling, and wikipedia culture is so poisonously corrupted by idiots that they not only do not get criticised for reverting, not only does no-one else understand the wrongness of what they are reverting to, but they actually get defended and the person doing the correcting gets blocked. What about you, do you know the difference between opinions and facts? Do you understand that presenting subjective opinions as if they are objective facts is not acceptable? If you do, then why haven't you corrected the articles that I corrected? If you don't, then why are you editing wikipedia? ] (]) 15:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

	::I didn't actually realise that the person giving "friendly advice" was the very same person who had restored the incorrect style to several articles. Clearly you are also too stupid to distinguish between fact and opinion. Fucking moron. ] (]) 16:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

200.120.211.239 at 16:08, 22 June 2013

2013-06-22T16:08:56Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 16:08, 22 June 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:When you correct obvious mistakes and people revert and attack you, there's no possibility of fruitful collaboration. What has happened here is akin to someone refusing to accept the correction of a spelling mistake, blindly reverting to an incorrect spelling, and wikipedia culture is so poisonously corrupted by idiots that they not only do not get criticised for reverting, not only does no-one else understand the wrongness of what they are reverting to, but they actually get defended and the person doing the correcting gets blocked. What about you, do you know the difference between opinions and facts? Do you understand that presenting subjective opinions as if they are objective facts is not acceptable? If you do, then why haven't you corrected the articles that I corrected? If you don't, then why are you editing wikipedia? ] (]) 15:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)		:When you correct obvious mistakes and people revert and attack you, there's no possibility of fruitful collaboration. What has happened here is akin to someone refusing to accept the correction of a spelling mistake, blindly reverting to an incorrect spelling, and wikipedia culture is so poisonously corrupted by idiots that they not only do not get criticised for reverting, not only does no-one else understand the wrongness of what they are reverting to, but they actually get defended and the person doing the correcting gets blocked. What about you, do you know the difference between opinions and facts? Do you understand that presenting subjective opinions as if they are objective facts is not acceptable? If you do, then why haven't you corrected the articles that I corrected? If you don't, then why are you editing wikipedia? ] (]) 15:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

			::I didn't actually realise that the person giving "friendly advice" was the very same person who had restored the incorrect style to several articles. Clearly you are also too stupid to distinguish between fact and opinion. Fucking moron. ] (]) 16:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

200.120.211.239: /* Some friendly advice */

2013-06-22T15:47:12Z

Some friendly advice

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:47, 22 June 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Misplaced Pages is a collaborative effort. There are lots of editors working on these articles besides. If other editors disagree with your edits, that's fine. Content disputes happen all the time on Misplaced Pages. The way to handle it is to start a discussion on the article talk page and try to work with your fellow editors to reach ]. If you cannot reach consensus, please follow the steps of ]. Further edit-warring will only result in more blocks. I hope that this helps. Your block will expire in a week. When you come back, please keep this in mind. Thanks, and good luck. ] (]) 15:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)		Misplaced Pages is a collaborative effort. There are lots of editors working on these articles besides. If other editors disagree with your edits, that's fine. Content disputes happen all the time on Misplaced Pages. The way to handle it is to start a discussion on the article talk page and try to work with your fellow editors to reach ]. If you cannot reach consensus, please follow the steps of ]. Further edit-warring will only result in more blocks. I hope that this helps. Your block will expire in a week. When you come back, please keep this in mind. Thanks, and good luck. ] (]) 15:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

			:When you correct obvious mistakes and people revert and attack you, there's no possibility of fruitful collaboration. What has happened here is akin to someone refusing to accept the correction of a spelling mistake, blindly reverting to an incorrect spelling, and wikipedia culture is so poisonously corrupted by idiots that they not only do not get criticised for reverting, not only does no-one else understand the wrongness of what they are reverting to, but they actually get defended and the person doing the correcting gets blocked. What about you, do you know the difference between opinions and facts? Do you understand that presenting subjective opinions as if they are objective facts is not acceptable? If you do, then why haven't you corrected the articles that I corrected? If you don't, then why are you editing wikipedia? ] (]) 15:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

A Quest For Knowledge: /* Some friendly advice */ new section

2013-06-22T15:26:01Z

Some friendly advice: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:26, 22 June 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==June 2013==		==June 2013==
	<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ''']'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 12:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->		<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ''']'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 12:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

			== Some friendly advice ==

			Misplaced Pages is a collaborative effort. There are lots of editors working on these articles besides. If other editors disagree with your edits, that's fine. Content disputes happen all the time on Misplaced Pages. The way to handle it is to start a discussion on the article talk page and try to work with your fellow editors to reach ]. If you cannot reach consensus, please follow the steps of ]. Further edit-warring will only result in more blocks. I hope that this helps. Your block will expire in a week. When you come back, please keep this in mind. Thanks, and good luck. ] (]) 15:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

De728631: add ISP tag

2013-06-22T12:31:25Z

add ISP tag

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:31, 22 June 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{dynamic IP\|]}}

			==June 2013==
	<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ''']'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 12:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->		<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ''']'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 12:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

De728631: anonymous editing from this IP has been temporarily disabled

2013-06-22T12:06:31Z

anonymous editing from this IP has been temporarily disabled

New page

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ''']'''. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 12:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)</div>