User talk:70.190.111.213 - Revision history

MalnadachBot: Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)

2022-08-17T17:29:03Z

Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)

MalnadachBot: Fixed Lint errors in Huggle/warn-delete-1 template (Task 3)

2021-07-29T06:40:24Z

Fixed Lint errors in Huggle/warn-delete-1 template (Task 3)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:40, 29 July 2021
Line 25:		Line 25:
	== January 2015 ==		== January 2015 ==

	] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ]  with <span class="plainlinks"><span>, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-1 --><!-- Template:uw-delete1 -->] (]) 04:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)		] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ]  with <span class="plainlinks"></span>, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-1 --><!-- Template:uw-delete1 -->] (]) 04:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
	:{{ping\|Jim1138}} The edit summary was "yesterday already noted", which seems a good enough reason for deleting an item from the daily news page. -- ] (]) 07:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)		:{{ping\|Jim1138}} The edit summary was "yesterday already noted", which seems a good enough reason for deleting an item from the daily news page. -- ] (]) 07:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
	::My apology for the erroneous message and undoing your edit. Obviously, you did leave an edit summary and I missed it. Thanks, {{ping\|John of Reading}} for pointing this out! I'll see if I can fix my blunder.		::My apology for the erroneous message and undoing your edit. Obviously, you did leave an edit summary and I missed it. Thanks, {{ping\|John of Reading}} for pointing this out! I'll see if I can fix my blunder.

IJBall: /* Portal:Current events issues */ OK, last comment, I promise...

2015-04-03T01:52:10Z

Portal:Current events issues: OK, last comment, I promise...

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:52, 3 April 2015
Line 239:		Line 239:
	:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
	:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concern was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concern was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
			::: To answer the clear (and now deleted – thanks ]!) ], you should have just done what I suggested: simply copy the superior April 2 version to the April 1 entry. No other action was required. --] (]) 01:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Moosehadley: Reverted edits by 70.190.111.213 (talk): Personal attack or uncivil behavior toward another user (HG)

2015-04-03T01:46:49Z

Reverted edits by 70.190.111.213 (talk): Personal attack or uncivil behavior toward another user (HG)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:46, 3 April 2015
Line 239:		Line 239:
	:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
	:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concern was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concern was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
	:::do you have some kind of mental defect? what part of my previous statement "you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished" is so hard for you to understand?--] (]) 01:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

70.190.111.213: /* Portal:Current events issues */

2015-04-03T01:45:31Z

Portal:Current events issues

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:45, 3 April 2015
Line 239:		Line 239:
	:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
	:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concern was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concern was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
			:::do you have some kind of mental defect? what part of my previous statement "you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished" is so hard for you to understand?--] (]) 01:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

IJBall: /* Portal:Current events issues */

2015-04-03T01:39:14Z

Portal:Current events issues

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:39, 3 April 2015
Line 238:		Line 238:
	I have to say, when you were hauled before ] a while back I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt as some of your edits looked solid to me. But your recent behavior an the ], where you are insisting on your own version of an entry over a superior version of it from another editor (not me) has brought me around to the other viewpoint. You definitely don't seem to want work with others. If that doesn't change, I can't imagine this is going to work out well for you. --] (]) 01:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		I have to say, when you were hauled before ] a while back I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt as some of your edits looked solid to me. But your recent behavior an the ], where you are insisting on your own version of an entry over a superior version of it from another editor (not me) has brought me around to the other viewpoint. You definitely don't seem to want work with others. If that doesn't change, I can't imagine this is going to work out well for you. --] (]) 01:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
	:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
	:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original ~~concernt~~ was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concern was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

IJBall: /* Portal:Current events issues */ Last comment on this.

2015-04-03T01:38:17Z

Portal:Current events issues: Last comment on this.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:38, 3 April 2015
Line 238:		Line 238:
	I have to say, when you were hauled before ] a while back I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt as some of your edits looked solid to me. But your recent behavior an the ], where you are insisting on your own version of an entry over a superior version of it from another editor (not me) has brought me around to the other viewpoint. You definitely don't seem to want work with others. If that doesn't change, I can't imagine this is going to work out well for you. --] (]) 01:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		I have to say, when you were hauled before ] a while back I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt as some of your edits looked solid to me. But your recent behavior an the ], where you are insisting on your own version of an entry over a superior version of it from another editor (not me) has brought me around to the other viewpoint. You definitely don't seem to want work with others. If that doesn't change, I can't imagine this is going to work out well for you. --] (]) 01:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
	:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
			:: Yes, thanks for proving my point. Your original concernt was that the California water rationing entry belongs in the April 1 entry. Fair enough. But rather than move the entry from April 2 to April 1, you went back to your version, which wasn't as good as the April 2 version (including stripping out the subheading). If this were the only example of this, it wouldn't be a big deal. But this appears to be the consistent pattern to your editing at the Current events Portal, going back to before the ANI filing against you. It would appear that that development did not produce any self-assessment of your editing habits, as your current Talk page messages attest to. Consider this my last comment from me on this... But my original point remains: by not working cooperatively with others, being hostile, and taking a ] approach – and, clearly, I'm not the only editor who feels this way about your contributions – this is not likely to work out well. --] (]) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

70.190.111.213: /* Portal:Current events issues */

2015-04-03T01:31:10Z

Portal:Current events issues

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:31, 3 April 2015
Line 237:		Line 237:

	I have to say, when you were hauled before ] a while back I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt as some of your edits looked solid to me. But your recent behavior an the ], where you are insisting on your own version of an entry over a superior version of it from another editor (not me) has brought me around to the other viewpoint. You definitely don't seem to want work with others. If that doesn't change, I can't imagine this is going to work out well for you. --] (]) 01:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		I have to say, when you were hauled before ] a while back I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt as some of your edits looked solid to me. But your recent behavior an the ], where you are insisting on your own version of an entry over a superior version of it from another editor (not me) has brought me around to the other viewpoint. You definitely don't seem to want work with others. If that doesn't change, I can't imagine this is going to work out well for you. --] (]) 01:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
			:i have no fking idea what the hell you are talking about - the version i see is almost exactly your version - you think that you could be patient and just wait till i finished?!--] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

IJBall: /* Portal:Current events issues */ new section

2015-04-03T01:27:55Z

Portal:Current events issues: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:27, 3 April 2015
Line 233:		Line 233:
	] '''This is your final warning'''. You may be '''blocked from editing without further notice''' the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-4 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> <span style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD;">]]</span> 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)		] '''This is your final warning'''. You may be '''blocked from editing without further notice''' the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-4 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> <span style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD;">]]</span> 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
	:i have no idea what you are talking about - i have explained that edit - the blocked editor made what appears to me to be a constructive addition - was this warning sent from some kind of automated bot?--] (]) 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)		:i have no idea what you are talking about - i have explained that edit - the blocked editor made what appears to me to be a constructive addition - was this warning sent from some kind of automated bot?--] (]) 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

			== Portal:Current events issues ==

			I have to say, when you were hauled before ] a while back I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt as some of your edits looked solid to me. But your recent behavior an the ], where you are insisting on your own version of an entry over a superior version of it from another editor (not me) has brought me around to the other viewpoint. You definitely don't seem to want work with others. If that doesn't change, I can't imagine this is going to work out well for you. --] (]) 01:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

70.190.111.213: /* April 2015 */

2015-04-02T06:07:25Z

April 2015

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:07, 2 April 2015
Line 232:		Line 232:

	] '''This is your final warning'''. You may be '''blocked from editing without further notice''' the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-4 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> <span style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD;">]]</span> 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)		] '''This is your final warning'''. You may be '''blocked from editing without further notice''' the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-4 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> <span style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD;">]]</span> 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
	:i have no idea what you are talking about - i have explained that edit - was this warning sent from some kind of automated bot?--] (]) 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)		:i have no idea what you are talking about - i have explained that edit - the blocked editor made what appears to me to be a constructive addition - was this warning sent from some kind of automated bot?--] (]) 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)