User talk:129.133.124.199 - Revision history

MalnadachBot: Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)

MalnadachBot — Sun, 17 Jul 2022 23:25:04 GMT

Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)

SmackBot: Subst: {{unsigned}} (& regularise templates)

SmackBot — Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:11:51 GMT

Subst: {{unsigned}} (& regularise templates)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:11, 13 October 2010
Line 59:		Line 59:
	After reviewing the issue here, I just have to say a few things. Frankly, comments like: , are completely out of line. I suggest that if you don't get along with other editors, you just leave them alone and move on. There's a whole boatload of irony in you trying to convince anyone you're the one receiving personal attacks with diatribes like that. No amount of petty insults, no matter how eloquently worded, will get you any praise around here. If you have a problem, I suggest a getting a ], or ]. I assure you any further accusations against any other user will not be looked upon lightly. You don't have to like the other editors but you will treat them with civility on here. If you have any issues with what ] has said that is clearly a personal attack (e.g. specifically mentioning you, and not your edits, in a clearly insulting manner), please post a link to them here and I will most definitely take a look, but I have yet to see any at all from my digging. ''']''' ]\|] 08:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)		After reviewing the issue here, I just have to say a few things. Frankly, comments like: , are completely out of line. I suggest that if you don't get along with other editors, you just leave them alone and move on. There's a whole boatload of irony in you trying to convince anyone you're the one receiving personal attacks with diatribes like that. No amount of petty insults, no matter how eloquently worded, will get you any praise around here. If you have a problem, I suggest a getting a ], or ]. I assure you any further accusations against any other user will not be looked upon lightly. You don't have to like the other editors but you will treat them with civility on here. If you have any issues with what ] has said that is clearly a personal attack (e.g. specifically mentioning you, and not your edits, in a clearly insulting manner), please post a link to them here and I will most definitely take a look, but I have yet to see any at all from my digging. ''']''' ]\|] 08:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

	I am not the one being stalked. I am not the one with problems 'leaving them alone and moving on'. I am not the one making threats and demanding people be banned. I'm not the one posting garbage in articles. You may not like my tone, (I could comment on yours), but my tone is not the problem here. My tone doesn't do anything to people here. Starting attacks, involving admins in cases via misrepresentations, making threats, and stalking ARE problems. I don't have to pretend to be some defenseless lamb here, just to suit someone else's ego. ---If you can't seperate your personal reactions to tone, and respond to what people actually do, then I don't know why you put yourself in a position as an admin in the first place. I don't have to be liked by you to be right, and I suspect you can't tell the difference. {{unsigned\|129.133.124.199}}		I am not the one being stalked. I am not the one with problems 'leaving them alone and moving on'. I am not the one making threats and demanding people be banned. I'm not the one posting garbage in articles. You may not like my tone, (I could comment on yours), but my tone is not the problem here. My tone doesn't do anything to people here. Starting attacks, involving admins in cases via misrepresentations, making threats, and stalking ARE problems. I don't have to pretend to be some defenseless lamb here, just to suit someone else's ego. ---If you can't seperate your personal reactions to tone, and respond to what people actually do, then I don't know why you put yourself in a position as an admin in the first place. I don't have to be liked by you to be right, and I suspect you can't tell the difference. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

	== Move on ==		== Move on ==
Line 69:		Line 69:
	:''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''		:''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''

	I do not know if Sfahey is a sock puppet of yours or not, it really does not matter. You have deleted cited reference material. Frankly, you're far more destructive in that manner than I, since you did in about 22 cites. I knew you couldn't resist responding with hostile activity, since you've been stalking ISP addresses 129.133.124.199 and 159.247.3.210 since the first of the year. If you can't curb your aggression, why don't you consider therapy? Your content is wrong, and the game you are playing is borderline psychotic. {{unsigned\|129.133.124.199}}		I do not know if Sfahey is a sock puppet of yours or not, it really does not matter. You have deleted cited reference material. Frankly, you're far more destructive in that manner than I, since you did in about 22 cites. I knew you couldn't resist responding with hostile activity, since you've been stalking ISP addresses 129.133.124.199 and 159.247.3.210 since the first of the year. If you can't curb your aggression, why don't you consider therapy? Your content is wrong, and the game you are playing is borderline psychotic. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

	*No one is "stalking" you as is clear from my edit history; it is rhetoric and claims such as this that have resulted in your previous block and the page protection of ] for your central role in the edit wars there. You may continue to behave in the same way and hope for different results, but I wouldn't bank on it.		*No one is "stalking" you as is clear from my edit history; it is rhetoric and claims such as this that have resulted in your previous block and the page protection of ] for your central role in the edit wars there. You may continue to behave in the same way and hope for different results, but I wouldn't bank on it.

Alison: /* August 2008 */ blocked

Alison — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:08:02 GMT

August 2008: blocked

← Previous revision		Revision as of 19:08, 29 August 2008
Line 90:		Line 90:

	] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete1 --> ] (]) 01:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)		] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete1 --> ] (]) 01:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

			{{schoolblock\|time=6 months\|blocked for 6 months for sockfarming - Checkuser block - ] <sup>]</sup> 19:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)}}

DougsTech: Message re. Fraternity (HG)

DougsTech — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:28:44 GMT

Message re. Fraternity (HG)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:28, 5 August 2008
Line 86:		Line 86:

	You may also be reported to the IT department of Wesleyan University as well for your inexcusable actions on this IP and . ] (]) 19:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)		You may also be reported to the IT department of Wesleyan University as well for your inexcusable actions on this IP and . ] (]) 19:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

			== August 2008 ==

			] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete1 --> ] (]) 01:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Nousernamesleft: Protected User talk:129.133.124.199: IP vandalism (expires 21:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC))

Nousernamesleft — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:50:46 GMT

Protected User talk:129.133.124.199: IP vandalism (expires 21:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC))

← Previous revision		Revision as of 21:50, 18 February 2008
(No difference)

Momo san: /* Talk page vandalism */

Momo san — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:30:25 GMT

Talk page vandalism

← Previous revision		Revision as of 19:30, 18 February 2008
Line 84:		Line 84:

	Do not vandalize your talk page or you will be prevented from editing it. ] (]) 17:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)		Do not vandalize your talk page or you will be prevented from editing it. ] (]) 17:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

			You may also be reported to the IT department of Wesleyan University as well for your inexcusable actions on this IP and . ] (]) 19:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Momo san: /* Talk page vandalism */ new section

Momo san — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:07:13 GMT

Talk page vandalism: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:07, 18 February 2008
Line 80:		Line 80:

	<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 month\|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month'''\|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:severe incivility and personal attacks; see ]\|'''severe incivility and personal attacks; see ]'''\|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:] (]) 19:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)\|] (]) 19:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->		<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 month\|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month'''\|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:severe incivility and personal attacks; see ]\|'''severe incivility and personal attacks; see ]'''\|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:] (]) 19:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)\|] (]) 19:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->

			== Talk page vandalism ==

			Do not vandalize your talk page or you will be prevented from editing it. ] (]) 17:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Momo san: Reverted 3 edits by 129.133.124.199 identified as vandalism to last revision by Pgagnon999. using TW

Momo san — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:06:32 GMT

Reverted 3 edits by 129.133.124.199 identified as vandalism to last revision by Pgagnon999. using TW

Show changes

129.133.124.199 at 04:03, 18 February 2008

129.133.124.199 — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:03:17 GMT

← Previous revision		Revision as of 04:03, 18 February 2008
Line 100:		Line 100:

	_____First banning		_____First banning

	The first banning was by an administrator named Jehochman, who I still would maintain today		The first banning was by an administrator named Jehochman, who I still would maintain today
	could not have read carefully what had happened. It's impossible. I was actually not made		could not have read carefully what had happened. It's impossible. I was actually not made
Line 121:		Line 122:

	_____Stalking, part I		_____Stalking, part I

	The second blocking was in part because I made a charge of stalking. Well, it was during my		The second blocking was in part because I made a charge of stalking. Well, it was during my
	first banning that I saw signs that Pgagnon999 was stalking me in my absence.		first banning that I saw signs that Pgagnon999 was stalking me in my absence.
Line 144:		Line 146:

	_____End of the block and Content, content, content.		_____End of the block and Content, content, content.

	I on the other hand, get off the block and minded my own business. I didn't even post anything		I on the other hand, get off the block and minded my own business. I didn't even post anything
	until January 20, and then on my own talk page. I did not even post to the Middletown, Connecticut		until January 20, and then on my own talk page. I did not even post to the Middletown, Connecticut

129.133.124.199 at 04:02, 18 February 2008

129.133.124.199 — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:02:08 GMT

← Previous revision		Revision as of 04:02, 18 February 2008
Line 255:		Line 255:

	3. Block the guy who is stalking, who is pursuing fights across wikipedia, who won't let issues die.		3. Block the guy who is stalking, who is pursuing fights across wikipedia, who won't let issues die.




			Note--I have referred this to the arbitration committee since it seems nearly everyone is acting outside the
			policy guidelines at this point. And because it seems that a user has taken this to a whole different level
			of conflict. Above is a slightly modified version of what they have so far.