Coleshill, Warwickshire: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide To date:Tag filter:Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

cur prev 23:0523:05, 17 October 2005 Ryan Norton talk contribs 1,540 bytes +14 {{protected}} undo
cur prev 21:3621:36, 17 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,526 bytes −62 re-arrange undo
cur prev 21:3421:34, 17 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,588 bytes +336 Seen talk, responded to talk, I've even enclosed a map, change the record + Slight re-arrange undo
cur prev 21:1921:19, 17 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −60 rv., since Coleshill is in WM conurbation. See talk. undo
cur prev 21:1021:10, 17 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,312 bytes +60 restore factual version as can be verified by looking at any map undo
cur prev 21:0921:09, 17 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −60 I must be talking to a broken record or an automated revert device or something. Coleshill is in the WM conurbation. undo
cur prev 20:5120:51, 17 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,312 bytes +60 I must be talking to a broken record or an automated revert device or something undo
cur prev 20:4820:48, 17 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −60 rv., since Coleshill is in WM conurbation. See talk. undo
cur prev 20:2420:24, 17 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,312 bytes +60 rv to factual version undo

cur prev 22:1422:14, 13 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −60 rv., since Coleshill is in WM conurbation. See talk. undo
cur prev 21:3721:37, 13 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,312 bytes +60 Seen talk. Colsehill is still separated from Birmingham by a gap, as any map will confirm. I have measured the gap myself undo
cur prev 21:2921:29, 13 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −49 rv., since Coleshill is in WM conurbation. See talk. undo
cur prev 20:4020:40, 13 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,301 bytes +49 restore factual content as can be seen in any map undo
cur prev 20:2720:27, 13 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −49 rv., since Coleshill is in WM conurbation. See talk. undo
cur prev 20:1420:14, 13 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,301 bytes +49 Reverted edits by Pigsonthewing to last version by G-Man undo

cur prev 07:4707:47, 12 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −49 rv., since Coleshill is in WM conurbation. undo

cur prev 23:0523:05, 11 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,301 bytes +49 restore strangely removed factual content undo

cur prev 19:3019:30, 7 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,301 bytes +49 Reverted edits by Pigsonthewing to last version by G-Man undo
cur prev 19:1619:16, 7 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,252 bytes −49 restore conurbation fact undo
cur prev 18:5618:56, 7 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,301 bytes +74 No edit summary undo
cur prev 18:5518:55, 7 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,227 bytes +132 make less misleading + mention roman temple undo

cur prev 09:5309:53, 3 October 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,095 bytes +107 rv. to restore factual information undo

cur prev 20:2320:23, 2 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs 988 bytes −107 remove misleading sentence undo
cur prev 20:0020:00, 2 October 2005 JimmyGuano talk contribs 1,095 bytes −6 The West Midlands Conurbation is defined by the Office for National Statistics. Coleshill is inside it - evidence is on discussion page. Please respond to evidence before reverting. undo
cur prev 18:1118:11, 2 October 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,101 bytes +7 Reverted edits by 193.62.111.10 to last version by G-Man undo

cur prev 16:4816:48, 27 September 2005 193.62.111.10 talk 1,094 bytes −7 officially Coleshill is *inside* the conurbation undo

cur prev 10:5310:53, 28 August 2005 213.130.142.14 talk 1,042 bytes −13 rv better map shows it's outside - see Talk undo

cur prev 19:1919:19, 26 August 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,055 bytes +13 rv. If your map does not show this in the conurbation, get a better map undo

cur prev 20:4820:48, 25 August 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,042 bytes −13 That's funny my OS map clearly shows it as being SEPARATE from the conurbation undo
cur prev 20:3320:33, 25 August 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,055 bytes +13 restore place in conurbation, as can bee seen on OS map, eg http://tinyurl.com/cak3t undo
cur prev 20:1520:15, 25 August 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,042 bytes −13 rv unverified factual innacuracy undo
cur prev 20:1120:11, 25 August 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,055 bytes +13 rv undeclared, non- minor, change undo
cur prev 19:5819:58, 25 August 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,042 bytes −13 No edit summary undo
cur prev 11:5011:50, 25 August 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,055 bytes +51 rv. as previously undo

cur prev 18:3618:36, 24 August 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,004 bytes −51 Reverted edits by Pigsonthewing to last version by G-Man undo

cur prev 18:5118:51, 22 August 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,004 bytes −51 remove demonstrably false claim undo
cur prev 09:4309:43, 22 August 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,055 bytes +51 restore to eightful place in eth WM conurbation undo

cur prev 18:4618:46, 19 August 2005 G-Man talk contribs m 1,004 bytes −51 Reverted edits by Pigsonthewing to last version by G-Man undo
cur prev 07:2407:24, 19 August 2005 Pigsonthewing talk contribs 1,055 bytes +51 rv. (sigh) yes, it does undo
cur prev 00:0200:02, 19 August 2005 G-Man talk contribs 1,004 bytes −51 no it doesn't undo