Misplaced Pages

12 April 2008

• curprev 11:5011:50, 12 April 2008 ThePointblank talk contribs 7,714 bytes +886 Undid revision 205001230 by KimDabelsteinPetersen (talk) undo

11 April 2008

• curprev 21:0221:02, 11 April 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,828 bytes −507 Reverted to revision 204971628 by KimDabelsteinPetersen; rv For the last time - Inhofe's blog is *not* allowed here. (and i didn't remove anything else).. using TW undo
• curprev 20:5420:54, 11 April 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,335 bytes +507 Please explain why you are removing the other cited material~~~~Lawrence Solomon undo
• curprev 18:4018:40, 11 April 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,828 bytes −507 Reverted to revision 204918089 by KimDabelsteinPetersen; rv whatever you call it - its from a political party - its not government policy - Thus partisan and ruled out per WP:BLP. . using [[WP:TWINK undo
• curprev 18:2318:23, 11 April 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,335 bytes +507 The cite you complain of was not a political party blog. It is on government letterhead, and from the governing party. You also removed other cited material. ~~~~Lawrence Solomon undo
• curprev 13:5113:51, 11 April 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,828 bytes −507 Reverted to revision 204162144 by KimDabelsteinPetersen; rv Citing a minority political party blog is a) POV b) disallowed WP:SPS. WP:UNDUE to a unpublished critique.. using TW undo
• curprev 13:4813:48, 11 April 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,335 bytes +507 I provided references and needed weight. The reverter provided no justification for her claim of "undue weight." My cite is a gov't source. undo

8 April 2008

• curprev 06:0206:02, 8 April 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,828 bytes −507 Reverted to revision 204081386 by William M. Connolley; rv Uncited and undue weigth to a political opinion.. using TW undo

7 April 2008

• curprev 22:2122:21, 7 April 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,335 bytes +507 →Science and society essay: ~~~~Lawrence Solomon undo
• curprev 21:5121:51, 7 April 2008 William M. Connolley talk contribs 6,828 bytes −370 →Science and society essay: don't sign. rm appell - repeats, and broken link. dubious about other additions but leaving them for now undo
• curprev 21:0721:07, 7 April 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,198 bytes +306 →Science and society essay: I am making clear to readers that Oreskes had made a mistake in her abstract that then misled others. ~~~~Lawrence Solomon undo

29 March 2008

• curprev 10:2910:29, 29 March 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,892 bytes −571 Reverted to revision 201739172 by Dragons flight; rv POV and broke link. using TW undo
• curprev 03:5403:54, 29 March 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,463 bytes +571 This section deals with Oreskes' paper, not her. The immense controversy over her paper should not be trivialized. undo
• curprev 03:3603:36, 29 March 2008 Dragons flight talk contribs 6,892 bytes +874 elaborate on abstract distribution, 2007 publication undo
• curprev 03:0803:08, 29 March 2008 Raymond arritt talk contribs 6,018 bytes +13 →Science and society essay: ah, I see now undo
• curprev 03:0603:06, 29 March 2008 Raymond arritt talk contribs 6,005 bytes +4 →Science and society essay: need a cite for this undo
• curprev 03:0603:06, 29 March 2008 Raymond arritt talk contribs 6,001 bytes −299 fix and delete further undo
• curprev 03:0303:03, 29 March 2008 Raymond arritt talk contribs 6,300 bytes −741 →Science and society essay: too much detail for a paper that was never published - also the article is about Oreskes, not Peiser undo
• curprev 02:5002:50, 29 March 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,041 bytes −147 →Science and society essay: I have added specific information, rather than interpretations, to better allow readers to judge for themselves. undo

28 March 2008

• curprev 18:2618:26, 28 March 2008 Raymond arritt talk contribs 7,188 bytes −269 →Science and society essay: not our place to pick the winner undo
• curprev 18:2318:23, 28 March 2008 Raymond arritt talk contribs 7,457 bytes 0 →Science and society essay: NO NEED FOR ALL CAPS undo
• curprev 18:2218:22, 28 March 2008 Raymond arritt talk contribs 7,457 bytes +66 →Background: dejargonize undo
• curprev 03:3903:39, 28 March 2008 Childhoodsend talk contribs 7,391 bytes +229 I guess there's a part that is legitimate undo

27 March 2008

• curprev 16:0516:05, 27 March 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 7,162 bytes +42 Reverted to revision 201336013 by KimDabelsteinPetersen; rv WP:OR - we have a reliable source to this. What Peiser has said to *you* is irrelevant. using TW undo
• curprev 15:5415:54, 27 March 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,120 bytes −42 Tabletop is distorting Peiser. She does not speak for him. Peiser has approved my description of events concerning him. undo
• curprev 15:1615:16, 27 March 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 7,162 bytes +42 Reverted to revision 201073885 by KimDabelsteinPetersen; Same as before - the "you" checked is WP:OR.. using TW undo
• curprev 13:2413:24, 27 March 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,120 bytes −42 Tabletop's changes claim to represent Peiser's views. I have checked with Peiser and he disputes Tabletop's version. undo

26 March 2008

• curprev 15:3715:37, 26 March 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 7,162 bytes +42 Reverted to revision 198494083 by Tabletop; rv Back to NPOV version. Note that Peiser has retracted this critique and admits that he was wrong!. using TW undo
• curprev 15:2415:24, 26 March 2008 Lawrence Solomon talk contribs 7,120 bytes −42 →Science and society essay undo

15 March 2008

• curprev 21:5721:57, 15 March 2008 Tabletop talk contribs m 7,162 bytes +2 Spell Feburary => February undo

10 March 2008

• curprev 23:2923:29, 10 March 2008 Mlaffs talk contribs m 7,160 bytes +86 WikiCleaner 0.71 - Repairing link to disambiguation page - You can help! undo

5 February 2008

• curprev 18:4218:42, 5 February 2008 Djcapelis talk contribs 7,074 bytes +148 Just announced in an e-mail, I'll cite as soon as they put it on the web... undo
• curprev 18:4218:42, 5 February 2008 132.239.214.157 talk 6,926 bytes +83 No edit summary undo

10 January 2008

• curprev 20:2020:20, 10 January 2008 William M. Connolley talk contribs 6,843 bytes −107 rv: sorry, thats OR, as well as not being clearly relevant undo
• curprev 20:0520:05, 10 January 2008 90.130.2.31 talk 6,950 bytes +107 →Science and society essay undo

8 January 2008

• curprev 20:2020:20, 8 January 2008 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,843 bytes +61 Reverted to revision 179638209 by KimDabelsteinPetersen; AAPG is the Association of *Petroleum* Geologists - and the paper is indeed not peer-reviewed . using TW undo
• curprev 19:2119:21, 8 January 2008 Ungavan talk contribs 6,782 bytes −61 deleted statement that AAPG bulletin is"an oil industry publication which has no peer review system." It is not an oil-industry pub, and is in fact peer reviewed. undo

22 December 2007

• curprev 19:2119:21, 22 December 2007 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,843 bytes −2 Reverted 1 edit by 63.195.13.145 identified as vandalism to last revision by KimDabelsteinPetersen. using TW undo

21 December 2007

• curprev 05:0205:02, 21 December 2007 63.195.13.145 talk 6,845 bytes +2 →Science and society essay undo

28 November 2007

• curprev 16:4916:49, 28 November 2007 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,843 bytes +268 Reverted to revision 174289845 by Ianblair23; since there isn't any scientific disagreement with Oreskes - then the paragraph is entirely correct.. using TW undo
• curprev 16:2316:23, 28 November 2007 ThomDoughty talk contribs 6,575 bytes 0 I quesion the impartiality of this statement. please keep it factual. undo
• curprev 16:2116:21, 28 November 2007 ThomDoughty talk contribs 6,575 bytes −268 →Science and society essay undo
• curprev 03:2603:26, 28 November 2007 Ianblair23 talk contribs 6,843 bytes +6 corrected link to Media Watch (TV program) undo

22 November 2007

• curprev 14:1114:11, 22 November 2007 William M. Connolley talk contribs 6,837 bytes −936 as before. wait for it to appear, which appears unlikely since its been rejected undo
• curprev 14:0214:02, 22 November 2007 ThomDoughty talk contribs 7,773 bytes +936 No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:5213:52, 22 November 2007 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs m 6,837 bytes −936 Reverted to revision 168428451 by Zaslav; rv Unpublished paper - which btw. failed review at E&E . using TW undo
• curprev 13:2613:26, 22 November 2007 ThomDoughty talk contribs 7,773 bytes +936 →References undo

1 November 2007

• curprev 01:4601:46, 1 November 2007 Zaslav talk contribs m 6,837 bytes −4 Copyedit. undo
• curprev 00:5800:58, 1 November 2007 Zaslav talk contribs m 6,841 bytes +15 →Background: Copyedit. undo

26 October 2007

• curprev 18:5218:52, 26 October 2007 Cimbalom talk contribs m 6,826 bytes −1 →Science and society essay undo