Misplaced Pages

30 April 2008

• curprev 07:1207:12, 30 April 2008 Meco talk contribs 23,085 bytes +1 Comment to JzG. User who added that tag noted: Skeptical organizations dedicated to debunking paranormal claims are not sources for the scientific consensus- a consensus which has not been stated undo
• curprev 06:4206:42, 30 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 23,084 bytes −24 {{fact}} immediately followed by two references. Something wrong there. Perhaps {{prove a negative or else}} would be what you were looking for? undo

29 April 2008

• curprev 19:5319:53, 29 April 2008 Meco talk contribs 23,108 bytes −13 Category:Remote viewers -> Category:Remote viewing undo
• curprev 14:5014:50, 29 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 23,121 bytes +22 adding wikilink to the article on the project undo
• curprev 14:0014:00, 29 April 2008 SmackBot talk contribs m 23,099 bytes +16 Date the maintenance tags or general fixes undo
• curprev 02:0502:05, 29 April 2008 Martinphi talk contribs 23,083 bytes +8 Skeptical organizations dedicated to debunking paranormal claims are not sources for the scientific consensus- a consensus which has not been stated undo

28 April 2008

• curprev 22:4422:44, 28 April 2008 Art LaPella talk contribs m 23,075 bytes 0 restore a spelling correction lost in revert wars undo
• curprev 18:3318:33, 28 April 2008 Nealparr talk contribs 23,075 bytes +384 notability establishment undo
• curprev 18:3118:31, 28 April 2008 Nealparr talk contribs 22,691 bytes +34 proper flow, and giving credit to ideas (he earned his idea) WP:ATT undo
• curprev 15:1515:15, 28 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 22,657 bytes −380 Second para has also been screwed around with. As if Randi is the only person who thinks this is bullshit! undo
• curprev 15:0615:06, 28 April 2008 JzG talk contribs m 23,037 bytes −261 Reverted to revision 208711311 by JzG; "Western Insititute of Remote Viewing" - yup, that's sure to reflect the dominant world view and scientific consensus, and not the pro-RBV twaddle. . (TW) undo
• curprev 13:3213:32, 28 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 23,298 bytes +261 see long rant on talk page about this change, thanks undo
• curprev 08:1308:13, 28 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 23,037 bytes −43 Slipping back into poretending it's real,.there. Olive's wording was less tendentious. undo
• curprev 08:0808:08, 28 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 23,080 bytes −12 restoring original sentence, check the sources, seriously. This version is way more nearer to its intended meaning undo
• curprev 08:0208:02, 28 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 23,092 bytes −11 rv again, this is not what the source states, please find a source for the interpretation that you make, or look at the sources already used on the article so we can reuse it here undo
• curprev 07:5507:55, 28 April 2008 67.228.101.165 talk 23,103 bytes +11 their students weren't the subjects - this is what they found undo
• curprev 07:4707:47, 28 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 23,092 bytes −11 rv. no, that's not what they found according to the source: "their students were able to solve the locations", It leaves no place for uncertainty, It plainly states that they were able to do it. undo
• curprev 07:3507:35, 28 April 2008 67.228.101.165 talk 23,103 bytes +11 this is what they found undo
• curprev 03:1603:16, 28 April 2008 Art LaPella talk contribs m 23,092 bytes −2 "reexaminated" isn't in the dictionary undo
• curprev 02:1202:12, 28 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs m 23,094 bytes +1 one extra comma to separate the clause undo
• curprev 01:4101:41, 28 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 23,093 bytes +86 rewording so that it doesn't misquote the source, attributting to eliminate weasel wording "critics contend", and puting quotes around "other researches" because it's a direct quote from source undo

27 April 2008

• curprev 23:0923:09, 27 April 2008 67.228.101.165 talk 23,007 bytes −14 it is a claim undo
• curprev 21:3421:34, 27 April 2008 Littleolive oil talk contribs 23,021 bytes +13 researchers redundant .... adding "original" for redundancy reduction... undo
• curprev 21:3121:31, 27 April 2008 Littleolive oil talk contribs 23,008 bytes +13 copy edit ... other is weasely but by saying "on the original research" we imply "other researchers" undo
• curprev 21:2621:26, 27 April 2008 Littleolive oil talk contribs 22,995 bytes +1 copy edit syntax , misplaced modifier, etc. undo
• curprev 20:4120:41, 27 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 22,994 bytes +245 changing "ostensibly gathering" for "can apparently gather", and adding "without the use of the five senses". Source from Michael Shermer article from talk page undo
• curprev 20:3820:38, 27 April 2008 Nealparr talk contribs 22,749 bytes +34 proper flow, and giving credit to ideas undo
• curprev 19:3019:30, 27 April 2008 Martinphi talk contribs 22,715 bytes −749 Revert to revision 208525010 dated 2008-04-27 14:06:01 by Enric Naval using popups undo
• curprev 19:2919:29, 27 April 2008 Martinphi talk contribs 23,464 bytes +749 Better undo
• curprev 14:0614:06, 27 April 2008 Enric Naval talk contribs 22,715 bytes +70 totally re-wording sentence to adapt to what Randi's source actually says/means/implies. How did this sentence manage to wander so far from the original source.... undo
• curprev 12:2212:22, 27 April 2008 67.228.101.165 talk 22,645 bytes +7 matching claims to citations undo
• curprev 12:0812:08, 27 April 2008 67.228.101.165 talk 22,638 bytes −10 demonstrated??? undo
• curprev 12:0412:04, 27 April 2008 67.228.101.165 talk 22,648 bytes −11 physicists - see Wiki articles undo
• curprev 04:4504:45, 27 April 2008 Art LaPella talk contribs m 22,659 bytes 0 spelling undo
• curprev 03:0003:00, 27 April 2008 Mccready talk contribs 22,659 bytes +8 alleged undo

26 April 2008

• curprev 20:4620:46, 26 April 2008 Littleolive oil talk contribs 22,651 bytes −6 copy edit syntax for awkward language undo
• curprev 20:3420:34, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs m 22,657 bytes +27 Quick-adding category "Pseudoscience" (using HotCat) undo
• curprev 20:3320:33, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 22,630 bytes +144 If you must. undo
• curprev 20:2520:25, 26 April 2008 Nealparr talk contribs 22,486 bytes +70 again, WP:POINT. There is nothing pov about this intro. It says completely that science considers RV to have no objective validity. Stop being disruptive and remember WP:3RR undo
• curprev 20:2020:20, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs m 22,416 bytes −70 Reverted to revision 208382419 by JzG; Revert "in-universe" description of pseudoscience, violates WP:NPOV rather badly.. (TW) undo
• curprev 20:1120:11, 26 April 2008 HooperBandP talk contribs 22,486 bytes +70 rv, the previous intro correctly describes, new edit does not. undo
• curprev 20:0420:04, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 22,416 bytes −70 Sorry, you can't say it "is a process", because what it is is abject nonsense. undo
• curprev 19:5519:55, 26 April 2008 Nealparr talk contribs 22,486 bytes +13 repetitive "explain", plus a "may" because critics agree that out-and-out fraud may also be an explanation undo
• curprev 19:4919:49, 26 April 2008 Nealparr talk contribs 22,473 bytes +69 rv nonsense WP:POINT edits undo
• curprev 18:2118:21, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 22,404 bytes +15 not sure that's a proper word, so expand. undo
• curprev 18:1918:19, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 22,389 bytes −22 {{totally disputed}} is not fdor use when *one editor* considers their POV top be inadequately represented undo
• curprev 18:1918:19, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 22,411 bytes −62 try this undo
• curprev 18:1318:13, 26 April 2008 Martinphi talk contribs 22,473 bytes +22 Replacing tag. Tags mean there is a dispute. In this case, the dispute has been described completely on the talk page, so the tag should remain till the page is fixed undo
• curprev 18:0018:00, 26 April 2008 JzG talk contribs 22,451 bytes −22 Be interested to see if anyone other than a notorious POV-pusher thinks this is inaccurate. Me, I think it's a bit too pro-RV, but that's an artifact of the dearth of material by non-believers undo
• curprev 17:5717:57, 26 April 2008 Littleolive oil talk contribs 22,473 bytes 0 copy edit typos undo