Misplaced Pages

29 July 2009

• curprev 10:4810:48, 29 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs m 68,826 bytes −16 →Reception: Falun Gong also was also critiqued on several occasions.
• curprev 10:4110:41, 29 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs 68,842 bytes +2 →Reception: reorganized paragraphs, changed only this sentece: "Falun Gong also received critical public attention on several occasions." from "Falun Gong has garnered diverse public attention on
• curprev 06:5806:58, 29 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs m 68,840 bytes −1 →Reception: removing a redundant comma
• curprev 06:5706:57, 29 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs m 68,841 bytes +4 →Reception: wikifying "margin of appreciation"
• curprev 06:5506:55, 29 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs m 68,837 bytes 0 →Reception: nave -> have
• curprev 06:5406:54, 29 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 68,837 bytes +1,652 →Reception: Reference to Journal of Church and State, fixed
• curprev 06:3106:31, 29 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 67,185 bytes +1,683 →Reception

27 July 2009

• curprev 20:4820:48, 27 July 2009 Edward130603 talk contribs m 65,502 bytes +2 →Reception: claim
• curprev 00:5900:59, 27 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 65,500 bytes −348 Sorry, my bad. Seems like another organisation has taken over the name "American Family Foundation".
• curprev 00:5400:54, 27 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 65,848 bytes +348 →Reception: information about the sponsor named in the San Francisco Chronicle article
• curprev 00:4000:40, 27 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs m 65,500 bytes +5 →Reception: Margaret Singer is no longer alive

25 July 2009

• curprev 11:1311:13, 25 July 2009 PerEdman talk contribs 65,495 bytes −551 Edelman & Richardsson is available at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3244/is_2_47/ai_n29191609/ - I made no mistake, I read the source as it was quoted, and it was wrong. Please see talk.

24 July 2009

• curprev 17:4817:48, 24 July 2009 Edward130603 talk contribs m 66,046 bytes −2 →Reception: redundant word
• curprev 17:4717:47, 24 July 2009 Edward130603 talk contribs 66,048 bytes +245 →Reception: more reception
• curprev 17:3517:35, 24 July 2009 Edward130603 talk contribs m 65,803 bytes +15 →Reception: add the word psychologist
• curprev 17:2717:27, 24 July 2009 Colipon talk contribs 65,788 bytes +56 →Reception
• curprev 17:2017:20, 24 July 2009 Colipon talk contribs m 65,732 bytes +30 →Reception
• curprev 17:0617:06, 24 July 2009 Colipon talk contribs 65,702 bytes +1 →Reception
• curprev 17:0617:06, 24 July 2009 Colipon talk contribs 65,701 bytes +444 →Reception
• curprev 03:0103:01, 24 July 2009 99.236.24.69 talk 65,257 bytes 0 The word 'Canadians' should be capitalized.
• curprev 01:4601:46, 24 July 2009 Edward130603 talk contribs m 65,257 bytes 0 →Reception: misplaced quotation mark
• curprev 01:4401:44, 24 July 2009 Edward130603 talk contribs 65,257 bytes −44 this link is unneccesary, it is already in the flg infobox

23 July 2009

• curprev 13:1613:16, 23 July 2009 Marmro talk contribs 65,301 bytes −10 →Other sites
• curprev 01:3301:33, 23 July 2009 Edward130603 talk contribs 65,311 bytes +96 →Other sites: additionnal site from times

22 July 2009

• curprev 12:5412:54, 22 July 2009 Limtohhan talk contribs 65,215 bytes 0 →Outside mainland China

21 July 2009

• curprev 08:2608:26, 21 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 65,215 bytes +199 reference for 'spiritual practice'

20 July 2009

• curprev 08:3008:30, 20 July 2009 Dilip rajeev talk contribs 65,016 bytes −391 Presented like this in th lead,the stuff s misleading.Particularly since academics pnt out these have little to do as main teachings and are but among the vast array of things the teachings touch upon

19 July 2009

• curprev 14:2814:28, 19 July 2009 SmackBot talk contribs m 65,407 bytes +30 Date maintenance tags and general fixes

18 July 2009

• curprev 07:4007:40, 18 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs 65,377 bytes +714 restoring sourced material
• curprev 07:3907:39, 18 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs 64,663 bytes −139 simplify even more the lead
• curprev 07:3607:36, 18 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs 64,802 bytes +8 is it?
• curprev 07:3407:34, 18 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs 64,794 bytes −31 Salvation of all beings has to be properly context as well, I saw that Simon has a problem with it, and I can agree that slapping it to the lead is not a best practice
• curprev 07:3107:31, 18 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs 64,825 bytes −336 why is one controversial quote so relevant that it has to be in the lead? it can be addressed plenty in it's '''proper context''' on the Teachings page.
• curprev 07:2907:29, 18 July 2009 HappyInGeneral talk contribs 65,161 bytes +258 These things are not yet agreed upon the talk page. This is wikipedia, consensus is needed on disputed edits.

17 July 2009

• curprev 15:2315:23, 17 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 64,903 bytes −635 The statement about universal salvation is not consistent with Li Hongzhi's statements as quoted by New York Times. As such this is not truthful.
• curprev 15:1815:18, 17 July 2009 Dilip rajeev talk contribs 65,538 bytes +635 Simon, this lead is the product of several months of discussion - you may want to share why you intent to make these changes. This is completely in-line with mainstream perspectives on this topic.
• curprev 14:1714:17, 17 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 64,903 bytes −635 I am keeping the lede neutral. You don't want things that make FLG look bad in the lede. Fair enough. But don't bring up vague moral precepts in the lede when there is controversy surrounding one.
• curprev 13:5413:54, 17 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 65,538 bytes +635 "Meaningless moralising"? As long as you refuse to reply to legitimate concerns on the talk page, don't even try to hijack the lead. Thanks.
• curprev 13:3513:35, 17 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 64,903 bytes −635 If the negative teachings of FLG have no place in the lede neither do meaningless moralizing.
• curprev 02:0102:01, 17 July 2009 Enric Naval talk contribs 65,538 bytes +377 I think that Simonm23 wanted to write something more neutral and balanced like this, and put it in the paragraph about beliefs, with attribution to who is criticizing

16 July 2009

• curprev 21:4221:42, 16 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 65,161 bytes +329 Referting clear FLG POV pushing... again.
• curprev 21:2821:28, 16 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 64,832 bytes −329 See WP:Manual of Style, an important guideline on writing proper, encyclopaedic narratives, as well as evaluating the relative weight of references
• curprev 19:3619:36, 16 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 65,161 bytes +1 No edit summary
• curprev 19:3319:33, 16 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 65,160 bytes +150 No edit summary
• curprev 19:2919:29, 16 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 65,010 bytes +178 No edit summary

15 July 2009

• curprev 16:3716:37, 15 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 64,832 bytes +60,819 sorry, apparently something went wrong, i fixed it
• curprev 16:3516:35, 15 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 4,013 bytes −60,877 Removing blatant original research ("through the auspices..." blah blah). Also, the context for cracking down on Falun Gong comes in the 4th chapter. This lead follows an encyclopaedic narrative.
• curprev 14:3514:35, 15 July 2009 Simonm223 talk contribs 64,890 bytes +46 No edit summary
• curprev 12:1712:17, 15 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 64,844 bytes +37 clarifying the wording
• curprev 12:1612:16, 15 July 2009 Olaf Stephanos talk contribs 64,807 bytes −74 removing some unnecessary Chinese characters from the lead, adding quotation marks around "Truthfulness, Compassion and Forbearance"