Misplaced Pages

28 August 2010

• curprev 04:3104:31, 28 August 2010 Kww talk contribs m 161,304 bytes 0 Changed protection level of Intelligent design: Pending Changes trial is complete ( (indefinite) (indefinite))
• curprev 02:1402:14, 28 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 161,304 bytes −20 →Origin of the concept: already linked in a subhead below
• curprev 01:3601:36, 28 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 161,324 bytes +299 + image, links

27 August 2010

• curprev 22:0222:02, 27 August 2010 Dave souza talk contribs 161,025 bytes −59 Undid revision 381387991 by SlimVirgin (talk) so, remove the contradictory material as less accurate, avoid false "equal validity" per NPO
• curprev 21:5321:53, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 161,084 bytes +59 please use in-text attribution; otherwise you leave the lead contradicting itself
• curprev 21:4821:48, 27 August 2010 Anachronist talk contribs m 161,025 bytes −1 rm extra period
• curprev 21:4821:48, 27 August 2010 Anachronist talk contribs m 161,026 bytes −15 This is a quotation from the source, so it should be presented as a quotation, not plagiarized.
• curprev 21:3921:39, 27 August 2010 Dave souza talk contribs 161,041 bytes +363 per talk, note dubious if Bembski peer revd in support of idea, avoid geval
• curprev 21:3321:33, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 160,678 bytes +19 clarified
• curprev 21:3121:31, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,659 bytes +145 added counter-argument
• curprev 21:1721:17, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,514 bytes +196 add mention of the Dembski book
• curprev 20:5320:53, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 160,318 bytes −3 tweaked writing
• curprev 20:4120:41, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,321 bytes +620 added more about history of the movement to lead, plus ref
• curprev 19:5219:52, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 159,701 bytes −388 →History: trying to make text stick closer to the source
• curprev 18:5518:55, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,089 bytes −407 removed the claim that it was created in the 1980s, which is crazy and the source (a primary source) doesn't say that anyway; in fact one reading has the source saying the opposite
• curprev 17:2117:21, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 160,496 bytes −9 →Origin of the concept
• curprev 17:1417:14, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,505 bytes −85 →Origin of the concept: some copy editing
• curprev 17:0317:03, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 160,590 bytes +1 closed link
• curprev 17:0017:00, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,589 bytes −359 tightening refs some more
• curprev 16:5116:51, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 160,948 bytes −1 rmvd comma
• curprev 16:4916:49, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,949 bytes −12 removed "early text" from 1989 book
• curprev 16:4716:47, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,961 bytes +1 per Moxy
• curprev 16:1016:10, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 160,960 bytes −151 tightened lead a little more; finished for now, removed tag
• curprev 15:5715:57, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 161,111 bytes −218 →See also
• curprev 15:4915:49, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 161,329 bytes −300 fixed refs in lead, replaced a link that looked like a copyvio (not finished)
• curprev 15:3515:35, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 161,629 bytes −1,055 changing to horizontal refs in the lead (not finished yet; will fix any stray refs)
• curprev 15:0915:09, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 162,684 bytes +10 added in use tag again for a few more minutes
• curprev 15:0415:04, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 162,674 bytes −10 rmvd tag for now; will do more later
• curprev 15:0315:03, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 162,684 bytes −538 removing some repetitive or low-value blue per overlink, rmvd some more repetition, overwriting
• curprev 14:5014:50, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 163,222 bytes −1 tweaked writing (not finished)
• curprev 14:4814:48, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 163,223 bytes −451 →Raëlism: removed UFO section (not finished)
• curprev 14:4714:47, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 163,674 bytes −219 tidying FR etc (not finished)
• curprev 14:4014:40, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 163,893 bytes −24,511 rmdv some more repetition, overlinking, rmvd repetitive overview section (articles should not have two leads), created a history section (please respect the in-use tag; will not be long)
• curprev 14:1114:11, 27 August 2010 Dave souza talk contribs 188,404 bytes +12,416 incorporate additional sentence while restoring refs – please don't remove without discussion
• curprev 14:0714:07, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 175,988 bytes +10 + inuse tag briefly so avoid edit conflicts
• curprev 14:0214:02, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 175,978 bytes −12,009 added a sentence about what it is, tightened some more, rmvd some repetitive refs
• curprev 13:4213:42, 27 August 2010 Dave souza talk contribs 187,987 bytes +9,465 restore appropriate sources and well supported sentence
• curprev 13:3613:36, 27 August 2010 Raul654 talk contribs 178,522 bytes +37 This is an important qualifier
• curprev 13:2413:24, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 178,485 bytes +9 tweak to remove repetition of modern form
• curprev 13:0413:04, 27 August 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 178,476 bytes −9,511 removed some blue from lead, some repetition, an unsourced sentence, some unnecessary refs, some tightening of the writing

24 August 2010

• curprev 13:5613:56, 24 August 2010 Dave souza talk contribs 187,987 bytes +264 →Polls: TE ≠ ID
• curprev 13:2613:26, 24 August 2010 Plazak talk contribs 187,723 bytes +557 →Polls: + Gallup polls

22 August 2010

• curprev 12:3512:35, 22 August 2010 Lambiam talk contribs 187,166 bytes −2 Raëlism should not be subsection of Integral concepts

21 August 2010

• curprev 22:5122:51, 21 August 2010 76.98.125.199 talk 187,168 bytes +13 the point is to emphasize ID's only material difference from the trad. tele. arg (and if adverbs "didn't add value", they wouldn't exist).
• curprev 08:3808:38, 21 August 2010 Lambiam talk contribs 187,155 bytes +453 →Intelligent designer: add Raelism

19 August 2010

• curprev 18:4618:46, 19 August 2010 L Kensington talk contribs m 186,702 bytes −6 Reverted edits by 128.174.26.11 (talk) to last revision by WLU (HG)
• curprev 18:4518:45, 19 August 2010 128.174.26.11 talk 186,708 bytes +6 No edit summary

18 August 2010

• curprev 19:1019:10, 18 August 2010 WLU talk contribs 186,702 bytes +619 →Further reading: added Edis & Young, reformatted citations, removed pro-ID book by religious press

15 August 2010

• curprev 13:0613:06, 15 August 2010 RjwilmsiBot talk contribs m 186,083 bytes +77 CiteCompletion, dates: 1, locations: 1, works/pubs: 1, using AWB (7005)

14 August 2010

• curprev 01:0301:03, 14 August 2010 Anachronist talk contribs m 186,006 bytes −13 On second thought, restoring anon's edit. Adverbs generally don't add value to sentences, and this is one case where it's redundant. Just "avoids" implies "purposefully" already.