Misplaced Pages

3 March 2012

• curprev 15:0415:04, 3 March 2012 Spylab talk contribs m 47,011 bytes −8 →History and usage of the term: unlinked two terms that were already linked earlier undo
• curprev 14:5914:59, 3 March 2012 Spylab talk contribs 47,019 bytes +816 →History and usage of the term: added a more concise version of Sowell paragraph, and corrected placement of footnote undo
• curprev 14:5214:52, 3 March 2012 Spylab talk contribs 46,203 bytes +12 →History and usage: re-added "of the term" to the title undo
• curprev 14:5214:52, 3 March 2012 Spylab talk contribs 46,191 bytes −2 →History of the term: improved section title because the content isn't confined to just the history of the term undo
• curprev 06:0306:03, 3 March 2012 Hunnjazal talk contribs 46,193 bytes +49 →Notes undo
• curprev 03:1703:17, 3 March 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 46,144 bytes −60 no more discussion and seems to be solved undo

28 February 2012

• curprev 02:4002:40, 28 February 2012 The Four Deuces talk contribs 46,204 bytes −3,431 Rv unexplained changes undo
• curprev 01:4001:40, 28 February 2012 65.8.104.163 talk 49,635 bytes +2,426 No edit summary undo
• curprev 01:3801:38, 28 February 2012 65.8.104.163 talk 47,209 bytes +1,005 No edit summary undo

26 February 2012

• curprev 02:2402:24, 26 February 2012 The Four Deuces talk contribs 46,204 bytes −668 Undid revision 478878033 - we do not remove text because in our personal opinion the writers are "lying" undo
• curprev 02:1102:11, 26 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 46,872 bytes +668 If the lede is so overloaded, why add back in Tatalovich's falsehood about right wing = hierarchy? undo
• curprev 00:0500:05, 26 February 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 46,204 bytes −668 not the "consensus", the lede is overloaded undo

25 February 2012

• curprev 23:3123:31, 25 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 46,872 bytes +140 No edit summary undo
• curprev 23:2523:25, 25 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 46,732 bytes +528 Restored superior and consensus driven version of article. undo
• curprev 15:3515:35, 25 February 2012 Spylab talk contribs 46,204 bytes −1,004 Undid revision 478613607 by Rick Norwood (talk) undo

24 February 2012

• curprev 15:1315:13, 24 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 47,208 bytes +1,004 rv undo
• curprev 03:4003:40, 24 February 2012 Spylab talk contribs 46,204 bytes −1,004 One economist's quote does not deserve its own section. Please stop re-adding it. undo

22 February 2012

• curprev 13:2813:28, 22 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 47,208 bytes +412 restore version supported by quotations from sources. Additional sources are welcome, but please provide quotations to support added text. undo
• curprev 08:3008:30, 22 February 2012 Lihaas talk contribs 46,796 bytes +64 Disambiguated: Anglophone → English-speaking world, national defense → national security, Status quo ante → Status quo ante bellum undo
• curprev 04:2304:23, 22 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 46,732 bytes −476 Content is based on sources. See the Buckley quote below. undo

21 February 2012

• curprev 23:1923:19, 21 February 2012 The Four Deuces talk contribs 47,208 bytes +476 RV Falconclaw5000's edits - content must be based on sources not OR undo
• curprev 22:5322:53, 21 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 46,732 bytes −1,365 Eridu Dreaming has provided convincing evidence that defining the right wing by its attitude towards hierarchy is like defining a Muslim by his attitude towards pizza. It's not the crux of the matter. undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 21 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 48,097 bytes +889 My edits are supported by multiple sources, both from the article and the talk page. Exactly which edits do you have problems with? Discuss on talk page please. undo

20 February 2012

• curprev 00:1400:14, 20 February 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 47,208 bytes −681 this information should be spread though the article undo

19 February 2012

• curprev 21:4721:47, 19 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 47,889 bytes −208 Additions to the article should not be editorial opinions, but should be supported by references. undo
• curprev 20:5420:54, 19 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 48,097 bytes −37 No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:5420:54, 19 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 48,134 bytes +926 Undid revision by LittleJerry, no reason given. undo
• curprev 17:5117:51, 19 February 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 47,208 bytes −252 No edit summary undo
• curprev 17:4217:42, 19 February 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 47,460 bytes −674 Undid revision 477734071 by Falconclaw5000 (talk) undo
• curprev 17:0517:05, 19 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 48,134 bytes +674 No edit summary undo

18 February 2012

• curprev 23:1823:18, 18 February 2012 71.82.51.187 talk 47,460 bytes −127 says nothing about it undo
• curprev 22:1322:13, 18 February 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 47,587 bytes +37 No edit summary undo
• curprev 19:0819:08, 18 February 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 47,550 bytes −29 No edit summary undo
• curprev 19:0719:07, 18 February 2012 LittleJerry talk contribs 47,579 bytes +28 the lede has become an information dump, most of the information here should be spread thoughout the body of the article. undo
• curprev 15:5715:57, 18 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 47,551 bytes −6 →History of the term: I'm not sure about "often", the citation supports "once". undo
• curprev 15:0515:05, 18 February 2012 Collect talk contribs 47,557 bytes +53 →History of the term: adding non-controversial fact about his column's name undo
• curprev 13:5313:53, 18 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 47,504 bytes +10 →History of the term: The statement should reflect the source. The source says "conservative". undo
• curprev 13:5113:51, 18 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 47,494 bytes +871 →History of the term: Restore another referenced statement deleted in the many edits of Feb 18. undo
• curprev 13:4213:42, 18 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs m 46,623 bytes +1 fix comma error undo
• curprev 13:3913:39, 18 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 46,622 bytes +31 Avoid "some assert". Name names. undo
• curprev 13:3813:38, 18 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 46,591 bytes +636 Continue to restore referenced material. The article should not be US-centric. undo
• curprev 13:3413:34, 18 February 2012 Rick Norwood talk contribs 45,955 bytes +450 begin to restore referenced material that was deleted for reasons that are unclear. Is the Concise Oxford Dictionary "Marxist"? undo
• curprev 02:1702:17, 18 February 2012 R-41 talk contribs 45,505 bytes −1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 00:4100:41, 18 February 2012 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 45,506 bytes +19 Dating maintenance tags: {{Dubious}} undo
• curprev 00:2200:22, 18 February 2012 R-41 talk contribs m 45,487 bytes +1 Added a space between two sentences. undo
• curprev 00:2000:20, 18 February 2012 R-41 talk contribs 45,486 bytes −32 It doesn't say that in the source. undo
• curprev 00:0700:07, 18 February 2012 R-41 talk contribs 45,518 bytes +12 →History of the term: Where exactly does it say that he sought to reduce inequality. The classical liberal and neoliberal centre-right supports equality of opportunity, but does not support guaranteed equality of outcome. undo
• curprev 00:0400:04, 18 February 2012 R-41 talk contribs 45,506 bytes +1,156 Stop your edit-warring and discuss. I told you the multiple flaws with your interpretation and how it does not make sense. And this is backed by two scholarly sources. undo

17 February 2012

• curprev 23:4023:40, 17 February 2012 R-41 talk contribs 44,350 bytes +30 No edit summary undo
• curprev 23:3523:35, 17 February 2012 Falconclaw5000 talk contribs 44,320 bytes −1,126 The Buckley quote, which you keep removing, shows that this is not true. undo