Misplaced Pages

23 June 2012

• curprev 05:0305:03, 23 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 48,051 bytes +805 revert version which completely distorts the plain language of three out of the four literature reviews. The mediator has been asked for an opinion. Please use the talk page to discuss before making blanket reverts. undo

22 June 2012

• curprev 23:5623:56, 22 June 2012 WLU talk contribs 47,246 bytes −805 Undid revision 498901563 by 71.212.226.91 (talk) selective and undue weight undo
• curprev 22:2322:23, 22 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 48,051 bytes +805 revert: four out of four medical journal literature reviews is not "some individual sources" undo
• curprev 21:4321:43, 22 June 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 47,246 bytes −805 Undid revision 498791983 by 71.212.226.91 (talk) reverted + added more info about birth defects to lede undo
• curprev 06:3906:39, 22 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 48,051 bytes +944 revert per talk: all mention of birth defects in this edit were removed in favor of the third oldest review which found increases, but used non-quantitative language to try to hide them undo
• curprev 02:3502:35, 22 June 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 47,107 bytes −377 removing shelleh from lede...see talk undo
• curprev 02:3502:35, 22 June 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 47,484 bytes +40 →Birth defects: rewriting shellah to say what it actually says undo
• curprev 02:3302:33, 22 June 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 47,444 bytes −594 the review doesn't say that at all... undo
• curprev 02:2302:23, 22 June 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 48,038 bytes +76 →Birth defects: rewrite doyle for npov undo
• curprev 02:1902:19, 22 June 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 47,962 bytes −89 →Birth defects: this is what the review actually says... undo

21 June 2012

• curprev 18:3618:36, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 48,051 bytes −58 rm redundancy undo
• curprev 18:3518:35, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 48,109 bytes +202 re-include Doyle (2006) review per mediator request undo
• curprev 18:3418:34, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 47,907 bytes +263 →Birth defects: re-include Doyle for balance per mediator request undo
• curprev 18:2418:24, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 47,644 bytes +2 tighten prose in lead undo
• curprev 18:2118:21, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 47,642 bytes +956 per explicit request and discussion on talk, we prefer the Abu-Masa 2008 review to the Hindin 2005 review. Please do not remove WP:SECONDARY sources without discussion undo
• curprev 13:5013:50, 21 June 2012 Bobrayner talk contribs 46,686 bytes −956 No need to say it four times over. undo
• curprev 13:2813:28, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 47,642 bytes +1 →Uranium: fix ref undo
• curprev 13:2713:27, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 47,641 bytes −49 →Depleted uranium: fix ref, rm redundancy undo
• curprev 13:1613:16, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 47,690 bytes +1 →Birth defects: fix ref undo
• curprev 13:1313:13, 21 June 2012 71.212.226.91 talk 47,689 bytes +1,003 replace 2005 review with 2008 review undo

20 June 2012

• curprev 22:5922:59, 20 June 2012 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 46,686 bytes +15 Dating maintenance tags: {{POV}} undo
• curprev 22:3922:39, 20 June 2012 75.166.206.120 talk 46,671 bytes +1 →Depleted uranium: fix ref undo
• curprev 22:3922:39, 20 June 2012 75.166.206.120 talk 46,670 bytes +31 →Depleted uranium: the Shelleh (2012) literature review should be cited here too undo
• curprev 22:3322:33, 20 June 2012 75.166.206.120 talk 46,639 bytes +9 indicate that a dispute remains undo
• curprev 22:3222:32, 20 June 2012 75.166.206.120 talk 46,630 bytes −47 rv: please discuss major reversions. Mediation decided that a more recent literature review was needed, and that Hinden (2005) had been incorrectly excluded undo
• curprev 22:1622:16, 20 June 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 46,677 bytes +47 Reverted to revision 498269016 by DumbBOT: you can't be serious…hugely POV, and using non reliable sources. (TW) undo
• curprev 21:1221:12, 20 June 2012 75.166.206.120 talk 46,630 bytes +311 return the Hinden 2005 review conclusion to the summary and the section to which it pertains undo
• curprev 21:0921:09, 20 June 2012 75.166.206.120 talk 46,319 bytes −358 replace contested portions with 2012 and 2005 literature reviews undo

19 June 2012

• curprev 01:2201:22, 19 June 2012 DumbBOT talk contribs 46,677 bytes −35 removing a protection template from a non-protected page (info) undo

5 June 2012

• curprev 00:2900:29, 5 June 2012 CT Cooper talk contribs 46,712 bytes +35 + {{pp-dispute|expiry=19 June 2012}} undo
• curprev 00:2800:28, 5 June 2012 CT Cooper talk contribs m 46,677 bytes 0 Protected Gulf War syndrome: Edit warring / Content dispute: Disagreements need to be resolved on the talk page. (‎ (expires 00:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)) ‎ (expires 00:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC))) undo

4 June 2012

• curprev 19:0419:04, 4 June 2012 71.212.251.217 talk 46,677 bytes −93 rv per mediator decision: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Gulf_War_syndrome&diff=494381748&oldid=494323437 undo
• curprev 03:4303:43, 4 June 2012 Yobol talk contribs 46,770 bytes +93 Undid revision 495674264 by 71.212.251.217 (talk)restore, it appears that most via reverts and on talk seem to believe this is appropriate undo

2 June 2012

• curprev 21:0321:03, 2 June 2012 71.212.251.217 talk 46,677 bytes −93 →External links: no reply to the objection that this link should be avoided per WP:EL because it includes demonstrably unverifiable and inaccurate research. Please respect the mediator's decisions. undo

29 May 2012

• curprev 18:4318:43, 29 May 2012 Bobrayner talk contribs 46,770 bytes +292 restoring sourced content and a good EL undo
• curprev 18:0318:03, 29 May 2012 71.212.251.217 talk 46,478 bytes −292 rv: if you wish to withdraw your agreement to abide by the mediator's decisions, please do so on talk. Reverting without discussion is poor form undo
• curprev 17:5817:58, 29 May 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 46,770 bytes +292 Reverted to revision 494782836 by Sciencewatcher: consensus is that the Doyle review and va.gov links are good. please stop pov pushing. (TW) undo
• curprev 17:3817:38, 29 May 2012 71.212.251.217 talk 46,478 bytes −199 remove disputed introduction statement from outdated Doyle review per talk undo
• curprev 17:3717:37, 29 May 2012 71.212.251.217 talk 46,677 bytes −93 →External links: per mediator's decision and further discussion on talk, this link includes statements which are neither accurate nor verifiable, and therefore should be avoided according to WP:EL undo

28 May 2012

• curprev 14:2614:26, 28 May 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 46,770 bytes −28 Reverted to revision 494640341 by Bobrayner: you can't put a dispute tag on an entire article because of a single external link. (TW) undo

27 May 2012

• curprev 20:0020:00, 27 May 2012 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 46,798 bytes +14 Dating maintenance tags: {{Disputed}} undo
• curprev 19:4019:40, 27 May 2012 71.212.251.217 talk 46,784 bytes +14 if people aren't going to adhere to the decisions of the mediator, then of course a dispute tag is appropriate undo
• curprev 16:5116:51, 27 May 2012 Bobrayner talk contribs 46,770 bytes +93 looks like a good external link to me undo

26 May 2012

• curprev 06:5406:54, 26 May 2012 71.212.246.55 talk 46,677 bytes −93 →External links: agree with Doc James that only DMOZ EL is appropriate undo

23 May 2012

• curprev 17:4217:42, 23 May 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs m 46,770 bytes −1 remove stray linefeed undo
• curprev 17:4117:41, 23 May 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 46,771 bytes −46 removing rest of pov tags as there is no specific discussion on talk page, and seems to be based on WP:OR undo
• curprev 17:3217:32, 23 May 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 46,817 bytes −373 removing WP:OR undo
• curprev 17:2517:25, 23 May 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 47,190 bytes −22 you can't add a dispute tag based on your opinion over the MEDRS secondary sources. please stop. undo
• curprev 17:2317:23, 23 May 2012 Sciencewatcher talk contribs 47,212 bytes −439 Undid revision 494015331 by 71.212.246.55 (talk) these are obviously not MEDRS sources as discussed many times. please stop. undo
• curprev 17:0917:09, 23 May 2012 71.212.246.55 talk 47,651 bytes +17 →External links: including RAC-GWVI link without soldiers' support network links is not neutral, because the two groups have been at odds and the soldiers' have been proven correct time and again undo