Misplaced Pages

22 March 2013

• curprev 01:3801:38, 22 March 2013 24.5.104.46 talk 15,720 bytes −998 →Other studies Tag: section blanking

19 March 2013

• curprev 15:1415:14, 19 March 2013 Room429 talk contribs m 16,718 bytes +42 minor grammar/wikification tweaks throughout

7 March 2013

• curprev 22:4122:41, 7 March 2013 Charlesdrakew talk contribs 16,676 bytes −113 Reverted 1 edit by 67.191.76.73 (talk): Rv unsourced and dubious. (TW)
• curprev 22:1522:15, 7 March 2013 67.191.76.73 talk 16,789 bytes +113 No edit summary

4 March 2013

• curprev 18:5618:56, 4 March 2013 2a02:2f0a:504f:ffff::bc19:a174 talk 16,676 bytes −245 Undid revision 541925910 by Astrohoundy (talk) rv POV personal analysis of study (unsourced and WP:OR)

3 March 2013

• curprev 18:5218:52, 3 March 2013 Astrohoundy talk contribs m 16,921 bytes +245 →Lisak (2010): Further explained his study

23 February 2013

• curprev 03:3903:39, 23 February 2013 205.250.252.253 talk 16,676 bytes −2 →FBI statistics

31 January 2013

• curprev 07:1807:18, 31 January 2013 Roscelese talk contribs 16,678 bytes −37 Undid revision 535807643 by WikiHogan654 (talk) rv, not supported as false
• curprev 04:1104:11, 31 January 2013 WikiHogan654 talk contribs 16,715 bytes +37 →See also

15 January 2013

• curprev 06:5506:55, 15 January 2013 Torramine talk contribs 16,678 bytes +595 UK home office, Category:Hoaxes, criminology, copy edit

29 December 2012

• curprev 17:1817:18, 29 December 2012 2a02:2f01:1059:f003::bc19:9fb0 talk 16,083 bytes −1 Undid revision 530319562 by 70.194.66.56 (talk) rv vandalism
• curprev 17:0917:09, 29 December 2012 70.194.66.56 talk 16,084 bytes +1 →FBI statistics

6 December 2012

• curprev 18:0918:09, 6 December 2012 Charlesdrakew talk contribs 16,083 bytes −6,652 Reverted 1 edit by MilitaryTruthseeker (talk): Rv unsourced essay. (TW)
• curprev 18:0218:02, 6 December 2012 MilitaryTruthseeker talk contribs 22,735 bytes +6,652 No edit summary

5 December 2012

• curprev 04:4304:43, 5 December 2012 Khazar2 talk contribs m 16,083 bytes 0 →Lisak: clean up, replaced: ten year → ten-year using AWB (8564)

13 November 2012

• curprev 02:3202:32, 13 November 2012 Sue Gardner talk contribs 16,083 bytes −17 changed the lede to "A '''false accusation of rape''' is an allegation of rape that is not true." see talk

13 June 2012

• curprev 00:4300:43, 13 June 2012 GB fan talk contribs 16,100 bytes −70 Reverted 1 edit by 117.120.16.133 (talk): The article does not say that it was a hoax. (TW)
• curprev 00:3300:33, 13 June 2012 117.120.16.133 talk 16,170 bytes +70 →See also

8 June 2012

• curprev 10:5810:58, 8 June 2012 Penbat talk contribs 16,100 bytes +4 sexual assault
• curprev 10:1610:16, 8 June 2012 Penbat talk contribs 16,096 bytes +4 false allegation

7 June 2012

• curprev 20:4520:45, 7 June 2012 Dale Arnett talk contribs 16,092 bytes +77 →See also: Duke lacrosse case should be included.

28 April 2012

• curprev 19:5619:56, 28 April 2012 Sonicyouth86 talk contribs 16,015 bytes +566 + working links and format; rm 1.5-45% range as misleading, see rumney (2006) that shows that estimates over 25% are rare

14 April 2012

• curprev 03:5203:52, 14 April 2012 Kaldari talk contribs 15,449 bytes +19 →Rumney: min and max

5 April 2012

• curprev 23:4623:46, 5 April 2012 Sonicyouth86 talk contribs 15,430 bytes −110 Undid revision 485801327 by Godspiral (talk) no evidence that he used training key #571
• curprev 23:1723:17, 5 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 15,540 bytes +110 Undid revision 485795207 by Roscelese He cites the same name document from the same organization linked. Its blatant undue weight to hide from reader the bias in those standards.
• curprev 22:3522:35, 5 April 2012 Roscelese talk contribs 15,430 bytes −110 Undid revision 485790731 by Godspiral (talk) we know what guidelines Lisak used b/c he cites them, like a reasonable person. don't link a diff. doc b/c you think it'll help you make a point
• curprev 22:0322:03, 5 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 15,540 bytes +110 Undid revision 485788881 by Roscelese Lisak published in 2010. The most recent reference in these guidelines is 2001. No basis to speculate there would be material differences. Alternative:remove Lisak V/undue
• curprev 21:5221:52, 5 April 2012 Roscelese talk contribs 15,430 bytes −110 these are not the guidelines Lisak referred to, we can't link them as though they were
• curprev 21:0721:07, 5 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs m 15,540 bytes +110 →Lisak: restored link only to IACP guidelines previously removed inadvertantly
• curprev 19:4519:45, 5 April 2012 Charlesdrakew talk contribs 15,430 bytes −727 Reverted to revision 485710140 by Sonicyouth86: rv dubious content pending talk page discussion. (TW)
• curprev 18:2618:26, 5 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 16,157 bytes +110 →Lisak: Added ink only to IACP guidelines, without attempt at summary/synthesis
• curprev 18:2118:21, 5 April 2012 216.48.170.54 talk 16,047 bytes +617 Undid revision 485710140 by Sonicyouth86 The talk point referenced is invalid. McDowell study is verifiable.
• curprev 12:4112:41, 5 April 2012 Sonicyouth86 talk contribs 15,430 bytes −617 rm section per talk (section "McDowell, 1985")
• curprev 01:4801:48, 5 April 2012 Bielle talk contribs 16,047 bytes −424 Undid revision 485634141 by Godspiral (talk) removed synthesis; a summary contains nothing not clearly stated
• curprev 01:1701:17, 5 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 16,471 bytes +424 →Lisak: Link to IACP guidelines is necessary to understand Lisak's inability to find false rape claims. The summary of IACP guidelines is not OR. Everything on wikipedia is a summary. It does not contain inaccuracies.

4 April 2012

• curprev 23:4923:49, 4 April 2012 Roscelese talk contribs 16,047 bytes −358 no, we still can't insert personal analysis of stuff! this original analysis would be unacceptable *even if* it was an analysis of the same document Lisak actually used
• curprev 23:4323:43, 4 April 2012 Roscelese talk contribs m 16,405 bytes +10 clear
• curprev 21:2321:23, 4 April 2012 Sonicyouth86 talk contribs 16,395 bytes −396 rm dubious and irrelevant info about withdrawn reports; rm misrepresentation of rumney: stewart, not rumney, stated that; rumney merely noted that "little information as to the form or circumstances of these retractions"
• curprev 21:1321:13, 4 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 16,791 bytes +225 →Rumney: updated with additional info on the Stewart study
• curprev 20:5220:52, 4 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 16,566 bytes +184 →Kanin's report: Clarified important point in the study which included verifying recantations so that there were no likely false recantations.
• curprev 20:4220:42, 4 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 16,382 bytes +171 →Police in Victoria (Australia): Updated with statistics for withdrawn and "no further police action" to avoid UNDUE weight
• curprev 20:0720:07, 4 April 2012 Sonicyouth86 talk contribs 16,211 bytes +495 + rumney's review of kanin
• curprev 19:5519:55, 4 April 2012 Sonicyouth86 talk contribs 15,716 bytes +778 →Rumney: rewrite based on rumneys own summary of his "two conclusions"
• curprev 19:0719:07, 4 April 2012 Sonicyouth86 talk contribs 14,938 bytes +1,557 add actual table from rumney (2006)
• curprev 13:5613:56, 4 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 13,381 bytes +358 →Lisak: added summary and link to IACP guidelines necessary to understand context of Lisak's findings from a neutral point of view. (could be its own section with expanded description/criticism)
• curprev 13:3813:38, 4 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 13,023 bytes +799 →Lisak: replaced "thorough investigation" selective quote with full context of methodology for a false classification.
• curprev 04:0404:04, 4 April 2012 Bielle talk contribs 12,224 bytes −356 Undid revision 485436577 by Godspiral (talk)Checked source and can find nothing to back up the text inserted.
• curprev 02:1102:11, 4 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 12,580 bytes +356 Undid revision 485421235 by Roscelese Unacceptable selective quoting of self-described "thorough investigation" Details provided from author as to what he meant. (same paragraph as quote)
• curprev 00:2100:21, 4 April 2012 Roscelese talk contribs 12,224 bytes −356 Undid revision 485420104 by Godspiral (talk) no, really, you may not insert your own personal criticism of living people
• curprev 00:1200:12, 4 April 2012 Godspiral talk contribs 12,580 bytes +356 Undid revision 485418552 by Roscelese (talk) Biased vandalism to describe methodology as "thorough investigation". No personal opinion was injected. All was Lisak's own words.