Misplaced Pages

5 July 2014

• curprev 10:0510:05, 5 July 2014 Bishonen talk contribs 14,117 bytes +33 rv. "Label"? Berlet specializes in the study of extreme right-wing movements. The intro says so. And the mention of other anti-extremist writers gives perspective. Please don't impoverish the article. undo

2 July 2014

• curprev 04:3804:38, 2 July 2014 Two kinds of pork talk contribs 14,084 bytes −33 →Reception: no need to label Berlet, nor is the criticism of others helpful for this article. undo
• curprev 02:4602:46, 2 July 2014 Joe Bodacious talk contribs 14,117 bytes +23 →Books and other writings: replace broken link undo

1 July 2014

• curprev 23:3623:36, 1 July 2014 Two kinds of pork talk contribs 14,094 bytes +3 →Background: just a preference undo
• curprev 23:3423:34, 1 July 2014 Two kinds of pork talk contribs 14,091 bytes −4 Definite article undo
• curprev 23:1223:12, 1 July 2014 Joe Bodacious talk contribs 14,095 bytes +546 Undid revision 615217489 by Stephan Schulz (talk) Agree entirely that the WT is a Moonie rag, but it's no worse than any other publication being cited here. WP:RS doesn't play favorites undo
• curprev 22:4422:44, 1 July 2014 Stephan Schulz talk contribs 13,549 bytes −546 Undid revision 615142168 by Collect (talk) Don't see why an opinion published in the Moonie rag qualifies as notable or relevant. undo
• curprev 11:3511:35, 1 July 2014 Collect talk contribs 14,095 bytes +546 Undid revision 615099482 by Viriditas (talk)opinion properly cited as opinion is not removable as "extreme" AFAICT undo
• curprev 02:2802:28, 1 July 2014 Viriditas talk contribs 13,549 bytes −546 →Reception: Per NPOV concerns on talk, this claim from the Washington Times is extreme in and of itself. Removed undo

30 June 2014

• curprev 08:3508:35, 30 June 2014 Viriditas talk contribs 14,095 bytes +6 →top: fix image undo
• curprev 08:3108:31, 30 June 2014 Viriditas talk contribs 14,089 bytes −620 fix undo
• curprev 08:3008:30, 30 June 2014 Viriditas talk contribs 14,709 bytes +1,308 Restoring lead. Absolutely nothing wrong with it undo
• curprev 08:2908:29, 30 June 2014 Viriditas talk contribs 13,401 bytes −26 That's an unusual edit. The study of extreme right-wing groups exist independently of Berlet undo

29 June 2014

• curprev 13:1413:14, 29 June 2014 Collect talk contribs 13,427 bytes +26 seems the study is related to opinions not to objective facts qua facts undo
• curprev 11:1111:11, 29 June 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 13,401 bytes +15 Dating maintenance tags: {{Npov}} undo
• curprev 10:5110:51, 29 June 2014 Jayen466 talk contribs 13,386 bytes +9 npov dispute undo

28 June 2014

• curprev 23:3223:32, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 13,377 bytes +139 The fact that he specifically covers right-wing movements is absolutely key to his notability. Trim, don't hack. undo
• curprev 23:2823:28, 28 June 2014 Collect talk contribs 13,238 bytes −375 leads do not include every item in the body of the BLP -- they are SUMMARIES -- this number of "hats" approaches undue puffery at best undo
• curprev 23:0923:09, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 13,613 bytes −21 Note. undo
• curprev 23:0523:05, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 13,634 bytes +396 To not mention, in some form, what he specializes in studying (which is key to his notability) makes the biography poorer. undo
• curprev 21:3321:33, 28 June 2014 Collect talk contribs 13,238 bytes −851 shorten lead per guidelines - and note that the SPS source given is not RS for use in a lead for a BLP AFAICT - leads are required to be summaries, not laundry lists undo
• curprev 18:3518:35, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 14,089 bytes −2 →top: cropped version undo
• curprev 17:5317:53, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 14,091 bytes −343 →Background: already covered above undo
• curprev 17:1717:17, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 14,434 bytes −83 →Reception: BLP issues undo
• curprev 16:5916:59, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 14,517 bytes −785 →Reception: seems very much UNDUE - Berlet's critique is being disavowed by the COI publisher of the work being critiqued, and then the publisher is doing what Berlet said they should have done in the first pace undo
• curprev 16:4516:45, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 15,302 bytes +1 affiliation with a non notable org is clearly not leadworthy undo
• curprev 16:1316:13, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 15,301 bytes +9 →Reception undo
• curprev 16:1016:10, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 15,292 bytes +362 →Reception: Note the history. undo
• curprev 16:0816:08, 28 June 2014 55 Gators talk contribs 14,930 bytes +406 →Reception: quote undo
• curprev 16:0016:00, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 14,524 bytes +553 Undid revision 614723780 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) now with attribution undo
• curprev 15:3915:39, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 13,971 bytes +620 Partial restoration - the description of what he specializes in is clearly relevant to his notability. undo
• curprev 12:5312:53, 28 June 2014 Collect talk contribs 13,351 bytes −1,358 →top: depuffed lead which is supposed to be a simple summary of the BLP, not an exhaustive list of honours undo
• curprev 07:4707:47, 28 June 2014 74.46.254.174 talk 14,709 bytes +1 fix cite undo
• curprev 07:4007:40, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 14,708 bytes −148 →Background undo
• curprev 07:3907:39, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 14,856 bytes +565 Add to body. undo
• curprev 07:3607:36, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 14,291 bytes +426 OK, so now you're just edit-warring. undo
• curprev 06:1006:10, 28 June 2014 Badmintonhist talk contribs 13,865 bytes −426 Undid revision 614725178 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) The fact that it has what appears to be a reliable source doesn't mean it belongs in the lead. The lead previews the bod undo
• curprev 05:5605:56, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 14,291 bytes +426 Then it should be added to the body. It's reliably sourced. undo
• curprev 05:5005:50, 28 June 2014 Badmintonhist talk contribs 13,865 bytes −426 Once again deleted factoid in lead that that was restored by . . umhh . . the article's subject. If Berlet is truly "known for" this then it should be detailed in BODY of article. Otherwise it's just gratuitous puffery. undo
• curprev 05:3105:31, 28 June 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof talk contribs 14,291 bytes −244 →Reception: This section needs to be removed until we can describe who is making the allegations. undo
• curprev 04:4704:47, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 14,535 bytes −1,070 →Books and other writings: rearrange undo
• curprev 04:0104:01, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 15,605 bytes −4 →top: already linked and its generally bad practice to link portions of titles or in the middle of direct quotes undo
• curprev 03:5903:59, 28 June 2014 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 15,609 bytes +4 →top: caps, link term that may be unfamiliar undo
• curprev 02:3002:30, 28 June 2014 Chip.berlet talk contribs 15,605 bytes +426 Undid revision 614531267 by Badmintonhist (talk) undo

26 June 2014

• curprev 17:4317:43, 26 June 2014 Badmintonhist talk contribs 15,179 bytes −426 Deleted material in lead about the recruiting of farmers in the Midwest into white supremacist groups because I don't see anything about this in body of article. undo

17 June 2014

• curprev 16:0716:07, 17 June 2014 55 Gators talk contribs 15,605 bytes −36 →External links: self-serving category from self-published sources undo

13 June 2014

• curprev 16:5716:57, 13 June 2014 Serialjoepsycho talk contribs 15,641 bytes +670 →Books and other writings undo
• curprev 16:3316:33, 13 June 2014 Serialjoepsycho talk contribs 14,971 bytes +122 Used a SPS as acceptable under WP:BLPSPS to state that he is a Scholar and Investigative journalist undo

12 June 2014

• curprev 22:1022:10, 12 June 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs 14,849 bytes +186 Rescuing orphaned refs ("urlPublicEye.org - Statement Presented to British Coroners Inquiry" from rev 612676441) undo
• curprev 20:0120:01, 12 June 2014 Only in death talk contribs 14,663 bytes −1,542 →Books and other writings: Again, not notable biography material. undo