Misplaced Pages

29 July 2014

• curprev 01:0401:04, 29 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 18,961 bytes −364 Undid revision 618893441 by 0x0077BE (talk) Revd edit of previously discussed and consensus-obtained neutrality of intro paragraph. undo
• curprev 00:1300:13, 29 July 2014 0x0077BE talk contribs m 19,325 bytes +364 Reverted 1 edit by 188.167.90.109 (talk) to last revision by SCZenz. (TW) undo

28 July 2014

• curprev 23:5823:58, 28 July 2014 188.167.90.109 talk 18,961 bytes −364 Undid revision 618860801 by SCZenz (talk) I change it back because you and others folloow Holybeef on WIkipedia and changing his work " just because " (no reason). Want nasty? I show you nasty. undo
• curprev 19:3219:32, 28 July 2014 SCZenz talk contribs 19,325 bytes +364 modify lede to remove priority dispute and listing of sources. let's just say all 3 one the Kavli Prize for "pioneering...", as the prize citation said undo

27 July 2014

• curprev 16:5016:50, 27 July 2014 Primefac talk contribs 18,961 bytes +241 adding in an additional supporting reference undo

25 July 2014

• curprev 23:0823:08, 25 July 2014 0x0077BE talk contribs 18,720 bytes −155 Reverted to revision 618436670 by SCZenz (talk): Restoring what seems to be the consensus version. (TW) undo
• curprev 21:0121:01, 25 July 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 18,875 bytes +15 Dating maintenance tags: {{NPOV-section}} undo
• curprev 20:4020:40, 25 July 2014 SCZenz talk contribs 18,860 bytes +70 put back NPOV-section tag undo
• curprev 18:2618:26, 25 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 18,790 bytes +70 Undid revision 618436670 by SCZenz (talk) Revd since {{u|0x0077BE}} didn't give you green light to edit article, instead he/she asked for my input too. You edited immediately. Can't you keep your cool? undo
• curprev 16:4516:45, 25 July 2014 SCZenz talk contribs 18,720 bytes −70 With apologies to {{u|Dilaton}}, I restore the compromise wording of {{u|Primefac}} as suggested on talk page by {{u|0x0077BE}}. I don't think deemphasis is what we're going for here. undo
• curprev 16:4116:41, 25 July 2014 Dilaton talk contribs 18,790 bytes −149 →Inflationary theory: de-emphasized alleged recanting undo
• curprev 13:5313:53, 25 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 18,939 bytes −84 →Guth's recanting of inflation theory: Removed notability tag: you can't question notability of sections that contain reliable secondary sources alone and no interpretation; it would mean you question those reliable secondary sources w/o counter-refs. undo
• curprev 11:2811:28, 25 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 19,023 bytes +112 Undid revision 618313080 by Primefac (talk) Reved vandalism (attempt at substantial change/removal of a section) w/o counter-references. Also: don't interpret what Guth meant, that's your POV. undo
• curprev 11:2811:28, 25 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 18,911 bytes +191 Undid revision 618313497 by Primefac (talk) Reved vandalism (attempt at substantial change/removal of a section) w/o counter-references. Also: don't interpret what Guth meant, that's your POV. undo

24 July 2014

• curprev 19:2419:24, 24 July 2014 Primefac talk contribs m 18,720 bytes −191 reference modification undo
• curprev 19:2119:21, 24 July 2014 Primefac talk contribs 18,911 bytes −112 →Inflationary theory: hopefully I have made everyone happy - Guth found one theory was wrong, but continued working on inflation theory. Linde's interview is not necessary anymore undo
• curprev 17:4617:46, 24 July 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 19,023 bytes +15 Dating maintenance tags: {{NPOV-section}} undo
• curprev 17:2617:26, 24 July 2014 SCZenz talk contribs 19,008 bytes −14 This section has clear concerns stated in the talk page. Since I have already removed it 2x and Holybeef readded it 3x, time for a clear dispute tag so others can discuss & decide undo
• curprev 17:2217:22, 24 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 19,022 bytes +1,342 Undid revision 618294711 by SCZenz (talk) you're bordering on edit war. again, if you have something to say you can do so in article talk: provide refs that counter Linde's words or let it go. thanks undo
• curprev 16:4816:48, 24 July 2014 SCZenz talk contribs 17,680 bytes −1,342 Repeated mislabeling of edits as vandalism leaves me unimpressed. Undid revision 618287887 by Holybeef (talk) undo
• curprev 15:5115:51, 24 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 19,022 bytes +1,342 Undid revision 618272754 by 75.72.21.24 (talk) rev vandalism undo
• curprev 13:4713:47, 24 July 2014 75.72.21.24 talk 17,680 bytes −1,342 Undid revision 618261748 by Holybeef (talk) undo
• curprev 11:5411:54, 24 July 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 19,022 bytes +1,342 Undid revision 618259993 by SCZenz (talk) rev vandalism, this was already settled in talk. feel free to discuss in talk but don't try to impose argument from authority on the community. thanks undo
• curprev 11:4411:44, 24 July 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs 17,680 bytes +192 Rescuing orphaned refs ("LindeSciAm" from rev 616647182) undo
• curprev 11:3411:34, 24 July 2014 SCZenz talk contribs 17,488 bytes −1,342 Remove section. I know for a fact this "recantation" is inaccurate. The wording is slanted, and the talk page has clear objections. undo

12 July 2014

• curprev 12:2612:26, 12 July 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs m 18,830 bytes +7 upd age template => df=yes. undo
• curprev 12:2312:23, 12 July 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs m 18,823 bytes +3 upd dates - to be consistent. undo
• curprev 12:1812:18, 12 July 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs m 18,820 bytes 0 →See also: alphabetized listing - per WP:ALSO. undo
• curprev 12:1612:16, 12 July 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs m 18,820 bytes −13 adj wl undo
• curprev 03:1803:18, 12 July 2014 182.64.109.234 talk 18,833 bytes −3 No edit summary undo
• curprev 03:1703:17, 12 July 2014 182.64.109.234 talk 18,836 bytes +40 No edit summary undo

30 June 2014

• curprev 20:0220:02, 30 June 2014 Bibcode Bot talk contribs m 18,796 bytes +50 Adding 1 arxiv eprint(s), 1 bibcode(s) and 0 doi(s). Did it miss something? Report bugs, errors, and suggestions at User talk:Bibcode Bot undo

20 June 2014

• curprev 14:1814:18, 20 June 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs 18,746 bytes +327 added relevant text/ref - re lowered confidence in confirming cosmic inflation findings - per NYT - 19 June 2014. undo
• curprev 13:2513:25, 20 June 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs 18,419 bytes +73 added => |url=http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 undo
• curprev 12:2812:28, 20 June 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs 18,346 bytes +765 added relevant text/refs - re lowered confidence in confirming cosmic inflation findings - per Physical Review Letters, BBC News - a/o 19 June 2014. undo

15 June 2014

• curprev 00:2200:22, 15 June 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs m 17,581 bytes +438 adjs & added relevant ref => http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1370/article_20738.pdf - per JETP, 5 December 1979. undo

14 June 2014

• curprev 22:1222:12, 14 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 17,143 bytes +145 Edited intro paragraph to reflect talk sec.7 and a new ref. undo

11 June 2014

• curprev 16:0916:09, 11 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 16,998 bytes +254 →Guth's recanting of inflation theory undo

9 June 2014

• curprev 19:0119:01, 9 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 16,744 bytes +486 →Guth's recanting of inflation theory undo

8 June 2014

• curprev 22:4422:44, 8 June 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs 16,258 bytes +84 →Guth's recanting of inflation theory: added relevant => {{See also|Talk:Alan Guth#Guth's recanting of inflation theory|l1=talk discussion}} undo

5 June 2014

• curprev 15:0415:04, 5 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 16,174 bytes −1,902 Undid revision 611675500 by Drbogdan (talk) Sure, that's what you and I were doing. But burden of proof is on those disputing reputable sources like Linde who's only one who can take his words back undo
• curprev 13:0413:04, 5 June 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs 18,076 bytes +1,902 Reverted 4 edits by Holybeef (talk): Rv edits - text seems ok afaik - let's first discuss this on the talk page before reverting - seems better atm. (TW) undo
• curprev 12:5812:58, 5 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 16,174 bytes −514 Undid revision 611607578 by Csmallw (talk) "first incarnation" is POV. sorry but what's "although he technically did recant"? You can't be "half pregnant"! rev as no consensus, logic whatsoever. undo
• curprev 12:5812:58, 5 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 16,688 bytes −2 Undid revision 611609284 by Csmallw (talk) "first incarnation" is POV. sorry but what's "although he technically did recant"? You can't be "half pregnant"! rev as no consensus, logic whatsoever. undo
• curprev 12:5812:58, 5 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs 16,690 bytes −1,371 Undid revision 611637359 by Csmallw (talk) "first incarnation" is POV. sorry but what's "although he technically did recant"? You can't be "half pregnant"! rev as no consensus, logic whatsoever. undo
• curprev 12:5712:57, 5 June 2014 Holybeef talk contribs m 18,061 bytes −15 Undid revision 611664902 by Drbogdan (talk) "first incarnation" is POV. sorry but what's "although he technically did recant"? You can't be "half pregnant"! rev as no consensus, logic whatsoever. undo
• curprev 11:2311:23, 5 June 2014 Drbogdan talk contribs m 18,076 bytes +15 →Inflationary theory: several adjs. undo
• curprev 06:0106:01, 5 June 2014 Csmallw talk contribs 18,061 bytes +1,371 →Inflationary theory undo
• curprev 00:5600:56, 5 June 2014 Csmallw talk contribs m 16,690 bytes +2 →Inflationary theory undo
• curprev 00:3900:39, 5 June 2014 Csmallw talk contribs 16,688 bytes +514 →Inflationary theory: Guth has not recanted inflationary theory; he merely acknowledged the failure of the theory's first incarnation. undo