Misplaced Pages

24 June 2015

• curprev 11:5911:59, 24 June 2015 McGeddon talk contribs 142,368 bytes −24 Reverted 1 edit by 101.185.18.37 (talk): Edit warring, discuss on talk. (TW) undo
• curprev 11:5111:51, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,392 bytes +24 Parapsychology is not *generally* held to be a pseudoscience -- to say otherwise is absolutist. Parapsychologists, for example, regard parapsychology as a science. undo
• curprev 09:5409:54, 24 June 2015 76.107.171.90 talk 142,368 bytes −24 No edit summary undo
• curprev 05:3405:34, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,392 bytes +24 "so far from the water"??? Have you actually got an argument? undo
• curprev 05:3105:31, 24 June 2015 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 142,368 bytes −24 Undid revision 668424616 by 101.185.18.37 (talk) they are soooooooooo far from the mainstream they would die of thirst before they see the water undo
• curprev 05:2905:29, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,392 bytes +24 Known in the mainstream. That's what you asked for; that's what you got. Don't ask for something if you're only going to repudiate it when you get it. undo
• curprev 05:2605:26, 24 June 2015 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 142,368 bytes −24 Undid revision 668424115 by 101.185.18.37 (talk) known fringiphiles undo
• curprev 05:2405:24, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,392 bytes +24 Define mainstream? Biologist Dr. Rupert Sheldrake and Nobel-Prize winner Professor Brian Josephson both support parapsychological findings. undo
• curprev 05:1105:11, 24 June 2015 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 142,368 bytes −24 Undid revision 668422550 by 101.185.18.37 (talk) show me any mainstream scientist not proclaiming it undo
• curprev 05:1005:10, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,392 bytes +24 The references backing up this 'pseudoscience' claim are mostly by skeptics, especially Paul Kurtz and Terence Hines. None of them are parapsychologists. undo
• curprev 04:3404:34, 24 June 2015 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 142,368 bytes −24 Undid revision 668415494 by 101.185.18.37 (talk) naw, its regarded as such by pretty much everyone undo
• curprev 03:5503:55, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,392 bytes +24 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:1802:18, 24 June 2015 McSly talk contribs 142,368 bytes −24 revert unexplained change undo
• curprev 02:1102:11, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,392 bytes +12 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:1102:11, 24 June 2015 101.185.18.37 talk 142,380 bytes +12 No edit summary undo

10 June 2015

• curprev 00:3400:34, 10 June 2015 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 142,368 bytes −1 Undid revision 666263642 by 86.190.250.113 (talk) these are beyond small undo

9 June 2015

• curprev 23:4723:47, 9 June 2015 86.190.250.113 talk 142,369 bytes +1 →Psychokinesis on random number generators undo
• curprev 05:4405:44, 9 June 2015 Mann jess talk contribs 142,368 bytes +3 Reverted 1 edit by 65.78.8.141 (talk): Discuss on talk, please. (TW) undo
• curprev 03:4603:46, 9 June 2015 65.78.8.141 talk 142,365 bytes −3 No edit summary undo

28 May 2015

• curprev 21:3721:37, 28 May 2015 CecilWard talk contribs 142,368 bytes +4 →MKULTRA and The Stargate Project: added wikilink undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 16:3716:37, 28 May 2015 Mann jess talk contribs 142,364 bytes −1,071 Reverted 1 edit by 71.112.138.129 (talk): Section takes views of these two individuals entirely out of context. Neither supports/ed parapsychology. (TW) undo
• curprev 16:3116:31, 28 May 2015 71.112.138.129 talk 143,435 bytes +1,071 To add the "Skeptics who support parapsychological research" subsection undo

25 May 2015

• curprev 05:4705:47, 25 May 2015 Mann jess talk contribs 142,364 bytes +7,295 Reverted 1 edit by 103.17.220.74 (talk): Content removal with no edit summary. (TW) undo
• curprev 05:1405:14, 25 May 2015 103.17.220.74 talk 135,069 bytes −7,295 Deleted it undo Tags: section blanking Mobile edit Mobile web edit

18 May 2015

• curprev 02:1002:10, 18 May 2015 KasparBot talk contribs 142,364 bytes +22 embed authority control with wikidata information undo

16 May 2015

• curprev 12:0012:00, 16 May 2015 Jeraphine Gryphon talk contribs m 142,342 bytes 0 Reverted 1 edit by 106.78.107.144 (talk) to last revision by Mann jess. undo
• curprev 11:1111:11, 16 May 2015 106.78.107.144 talk 142,342 bytes 0 No edit summary undo

4 May 2015

• curprev 20:1020:10, 4 May 2015 Mann jess talk contribs 142,342 bytes −376 Reverted 1 edit by 74.95.43.249 (talk): No, not according to sources. (TW) undo
• curprev 19:5719:57, 4 May 2015 74.95.43.249 talk 142,718 bytes +376 No edit summary undo

21 April 2015

• curprev 00:0400:04, 21 April 2015 Johnuniq talk contribs 142,342 bytes +20 Undid revision 657401617 by 76.182.97.87 readers deserve to be told this is a different kind of investigation than, say, biology undo

20 April 2015

• curprev 23:5823:58, 20 April 2015 76.182.97.87 talk 142,322 bytes −20 No edit summary undo

17 April 2015

• curprev 15:4515:45, 17 April 2015 Mann jess talk contribs 142,342 bytes −33 Reverted 1 edit by 85.234.213.240 (talk): Take it to talk, please. (TW) undo
• curprev 15:4415:44, 17 April 2015 85.234.213.240 talk 142,375 bytes +33 No edit summary undo

16 April 2015

• curprev 06:1006:10, 16 April 2015 Mann jess talk contribs 142,342 bytes −56 More accurately reflect due weight. undo
• curprev 06:0806:08, 16 April 2015 Mann jess talk contribs 142,398 bytes −15 Reverted 1 edit by 85.234.213.240 (talk): No, not according to sources, this is the incorrect weight. (TW) undo
• curprev 05:3905:39, 16 April 2015 85.234.213.240 talk 142,413 bytes +15 No edit summary undo

12 March 2015

• curprev 15:4815:48, 12 March 2015 Knaveknight talk contribs m 142,398 bytes −1 →Rhine era undo
• curprev 15:4115:41, 12 March 2015 Knaveknight talk contribs m 142,399 bytes −1 →Rhine era undo

25 January 2015

• curprev 22:2022:20, 25 January 2015 TheRedPenOfDoom talk contribs 142,400 bytes −168 Undid revision 644158456 by SK infos (talk) nope, clearly not a science but a non science wrapping itself in a labcoat - ie psuedoscience per the sources undo
• curprev 21:4121:41, 25 January 2015 SK infos talk contribs 142,568 bytes +168 Parapsychology is a scientific discipline. The Parapsychological Association, the main body of Parapsychological research is a member of the American Association For The Advancement Of Science (AAAS) undo

20 January 2015

• curprev 16:4716:47, 20 January 2015 Sjö talk contribs 142,400 bytes +71 →The 1970s and 1980s undo

19 January 2015

• curprev 09:4509:45, 19 January 2015 Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs m 142,329 bytes +4 No edit summary undo

13 January 2015

• curprev 00:4800:48, 13 January 2015 Trappist the monk talk contribs m 142,325 bytes −31 Remove unnecessary |display-author= parameters from CS1 templates; using AWB undo

5 January 2015

• curprev 04:3904:39, 5 January 2015 Citation bot talk contribs m 142,356 bytes +90 Alter: url, issue. Add: displayauthors, date, isbn, author pars. 2-3. Removed redundant parameters. Formatted dashes. You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. undo

15 December 2014

• curprev 15:3015:30, 15 December 2014 Roxy the dog talk contribs 142,266 bytes 0 Reverted to revision 635482232 by 198.200.84.92 (talk): More accurate. (TW) undo
• curprev 15:2815:28, 15 December 2014 27.32.105.160 talk 142,266 bytes 0 No edit summary undo

26 November 2014

• curprev 07:1907:19, 26 November 2014 198.200.84.92 talk 142,266 bytes +15 No edit summary undo

13 November 2014

• curprev 19:3419:34, 13 November 2014 Zedshort talk contribs 142,251 bytes +36 →Rhine era: ce undo
• curprev 18:1318:13, 13 November 2014 Zedshort talk contribs 142,215 bytes +74 →Terminology: ce undo

10 November 2014

• curprev 07:4407:44, 10 November 2014 Schwede66 talk contribs 142,141 bytes −3 clean up using AWB undo