Misplaced Pages

5 August 2016

• curprev 01:1701:17, 5 August 2016 Electoralist talk contribs 3,579 bytes +20 It is a slur when the dictionary says it is "disparaging" undo
• curprev 00:5000:50, 5 August 2016 Poeticbent talk contribs 3,559 bytes −20 Undid revision 733043431 → person defined as not observing religious precepts is not a religious slur by itself undo
• curprev 00:1900:19, 5 August 2016 Electoralist talk contribs 3,579 bytes +20 According to Websters it also means "a Jewish girl or woman who does not observe Jewish precepts —" so it's by definition a religious slur undo

4 August 2016

• curprev 17:3717:37, 4 August 2016 Lembit Staan talk contribs 3,559 bytes −19 please provide reference which describes shiksa as religious slur undo
• curprev 04:0704:07, 4 August 2016 Poeticbent talk contribs 3,578 bytes +324 update from dictionary published in 1915 undo
• curprev 02:1302:13, 4 August 2016 Electoralist talk contribs 3,254 bytes +19 Undid revision 732900752 by Staszek Lem (talk) undo
• curprev 00:3500:35, 4 August 2016 Lembit Staan talk contribs 3,235 bytes −19 Reverted 1 edit by Electoralist (talk): Not religious. (TW) undo

3 August 2016

• curprev 23:1823:18, 3 August 2016 Electoralist talk contribs 3,254 bytes +19 →References undo

5 July 2016

• curprev 11:2111:21, 5 July 2016 MShabazz talk contribs 3,235 bytes −2 partial rv to restore punctuation -- please don't change quotations undo
• curprev 08:0108:01, 5 July 2016 Manytexts talk contribs m 3,237 bytes +1 →As contempt: punctuation undo
• curprev 08:0008:00, 5 July 2016 Manytexts talk contribs m 3,236 bytes +17 sorting html undo

22 May 2016

• curprev 18:4918:49, 22 May 2016 Malik Shabazz talk contribs 3,219 bytes +6 updating accessdates, adding reference to sentence undo
• curprev 18:4118:41, 22 May 2016 Malik Shabazz talk contribs m 3,213 bytes −248 duplicate reference undo
• curprev 18:3918:39, 22 May 2016 Malik Shabazz talk contribs 3,461 bytes −239 Reverted good faith edits by 75.81.17.193 (talk): Rv unsourced. (TW) undo
• curprev 18:3418:34, 22 May 2016 75.81.17.193 talk 3,700 bytes +1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:3418:34, 22 May 2016 75.81.17.193 talk 3,699 bytes +238 No edit summary undo

11 May 2016

• curprev 13:4913:49, 11 May 2016 Jobas talk contribs 3,461 bytes 0 No edit summary undo

17 April 2016

• curprev 23:4723:47, 17 April 2016 MRD2014 talk contribs m 3,461 bytes −65 Reverted edits by 220.245.252.38 (talk) (HG) (3.1.20) undo
• curprev 23:4723:47, 17 April 2016 220.245.252.38 talk 3,526 bytes +65 No edit summary undo

11 February 2016

• curprev 12:0412:04, 11 February 2016 MShabazz talk contribs m 3,461 bytes +29 Reverting unexplained content removal undo
• curprev 05:4505:45, 11 February 2016 AnomieBOT talk contribs 3,432 bytes +191 Rescuing orphaned refs ("Merriam" from rev 677480999) undo
• curprev 03:3803:38, 11 February 2016 98.88.165.241 talk 3,241 bytes −220 No edit summary undo

23 August 2015

• curprev 15:3915:39, 23 August 2015 188.146.82.37 talk 3,461 bytes −1 →Derivation: Better pronunciation undo

17 July 2015

• curprev 16:2016:20, 17 July 2015 Hipal talk contribs 3,462 bytes −119 remove section per EL - nothing here at all that couldn't be better incorporated directly into the article undo
• curprev 16:1816:18, 17 July 2015 Hipal talk contribs 3,581 bytes −62 →External Links: that is linkspam - nothing legit about it undo
• curprev 00:5200:52, 17 July 2015 Jayron32 talk contribs 3,643 bytes +181 Undid revision 671738368 by Ronz (talk) Seems legit... undo

16 July 2015

• curprev 17:4117:41, 16 July 2015 Hipal talk contribs m 3,462 bytes −181 Reverted edits by LiaElbaz (talk) to last version by 86.139.170.88 undo

9 July 2015

• curprev 17:5317:53, 9 July 2015 LiaElbaz talk contribs 3,643 bytes +181 No edit summary undo

2 July 2015

• curprev 22:3822:38, 2 July 2015 86.139.170.88 talk 3,462 bytes +528 Filling in 3 references using Reflinks undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 2 July 2015 86.139.170.88 talk 2,934 bytes −280 No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:3522:35, 2 July 2015 Giacomo1968 talk contribs 3,214 bytes +280 Undid revision 669697361 by 86.139.170.88 (talk) undo
• curprev 22:3422:34, 2 July 2015 86.139.170.88 talk 2,934 bytes −280 No edit summary undo

30 June 2015

• curprev 17:4217:42, 30 June 2015 23.251.187.56 talk 3,214 bytes +31 Add note that besides Polish the word is used in German (as also indicated in the German version of this article) undo

26 June 2015

• curprev 19:3419:34, 26 June 2015 MShabazz talk contribs 3,183 bytes −95 Undid revision 668797873 by Onexonexonex (talk) Removing unsourced content undo
• curprev 18:4918:49, 26 June 2015 Onexonexonex talk contribs 3,278 bytes +95 No edit summary undo

22 June 2015

• curprev 17:2717:27, 22 June 2015 Jayron32 talk contribs 3,183 bytes −425 remove random bit of trivia. There's no need to list random uses of the word, there is no evidence this usage in this one TV episode is particularly more important than any other. undo
• curprev 13:2613:26, 22 June 2015 93pawarshashank talk contribs 3,608 bytes +42 →Cultural References undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 13:2413:24, 22 June 2015 93pawarshashank talk contribs 3,566 bytes +383 →Derivation undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

9 April 2015

• curprev 20:0920:09, 9 April 2015 Malik Shabazz talk contribs 3,183 bytes +83 →Intro: clean-up, link to original essay instead of reprint, and fix quote to be more meaningful undo
• curprev 18:2518:25, 9 April 2015 Lembit Staan talk contribs 3,100 bytes +4 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:0318:03, 9 April 2015 Lembit Staan talk contribs 3,096 bytes +192 No edit summary undo
• curprev 17:4317:43, 9 April 2015 108.23.90.99 talk 2,904 bytes +199 "Shiksa" is no longer only derogatory. The Salon article well explains the evolution of meaning for "Shiksa". undo
• curprev 01:4901:49, 9 April 2015 Malik Shabazz talk contribs 2,705 bytes −120 Reverted good faith edits by PresentHere (talk): The source doesn't say that. (TW) undo
• curprev 01:4501:45, 9 April 2015 PresentHere talk contribs 2,825 bytes +120 Shiksa is just as often used with no disparagement intended. undo

30 January 2015

• curprev 01:4201:42, 30 January 2015 Avaya1 talk contribs 2,705 bytes −394 rm its not about the word, but about non-Jewish women undo
• curprev 01:4101:41, 30 January 2015 Avaya1 talk contribs 3,099 bytes −191 It's not referring to the term, but his opinion of how non-Jewish women in general are perceived by American Jewish culture - irrelevant content to the article which is about the terminology undo

22 January 2015

• curprev 20:1520:15, 22 January 2015 Lembit Staan talk contribs 3,290 bytes −13 →See also: rm used in text undo
• curprev 20:1520:15, 22 January 2015 Lembit Staan talk contribs 3,303 bytes +4 No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:1420:14, 22 January 2015 Lembit Staan talk contribs m 3,299 bytes +1 →Cultural impact undo
• curprev 20:1320:13, 22 January 2015 Lembit Staan talk contribs 3,298 bytes +199 →Cultural impact: yes, it is an opinion of a scholar known for Jewish studies and published 4 books. undo