Misplaced Pages

5 April 2019

• curprev 21:0021:00, 5 April 2019 Ozzie10aaaa talk contribs 112,427 bytes +517 Undid revision 891121148 by 92.195.216.165 (talk)agree w/ Doc James undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 20:1520:15, 5 April 2019 92.195.216.165 talk 111,910 bytes −517 Undid revision 891118613 by Doc James (talk). Again: Stop your edit-war. Discussion is in progress. Use the talk page or go for a walk. If I could, I'd have reported you for vandalism right this instance. undo Tags: Undo references removed
• curprev 19:5619:56, 5 April 2019 Doc James talk contribs 112,427 bytes +241 added another ref undo
• curprev 19:5019:50, 5 April 2019 Doc James talk contribs 112,186 bytes +307 restored ref undo
• curprev 19:4919:49, 5 April 2019 92.195.216.165 talk 111,879 bytes −15 According to source: (a) It is not merely "often", but it is /recurrent/. (b) It does not have to be /events/, which aren't remembered, but personal information is just as fine. (c) It's not mere /trouble/ in remembering (mere difficulty, delay, or distress cause thereby), but actual inability to do so (Quote from source: "gaps in the recall"). undo
• curprev 19:3619:36, 5 April 2019 92.195.216.165 talk 111,894 bytes +31 Capitalisation corrected: The commons box spells out as a full sentence, hence a small D. undo
• curprev 19:3319:33, 5 April 2019 92.195.216.165 talk 111,863 bytes +10 Wiktionary link corrected. undo
• curprev 19:2219:22, 5 April 2019 92.195.216.165 talk 111,853 bytes −319 Doc James's source does NOT support the notion of "split personality" being a /synonym/, proper. It merely corrobates "split personality" to be a common expression, ie a colloquialism or a layperson's term. A synonym has stronger requirements than that. Most applicable quote from source: "In dissociative identity disorder (DID), commonly called multiple personalty or split personality, two or more ...". MPD has no disambiguation page --> redirect feature removed. Again, discuss, stop EWing me. undo Tag: references removed
• curprev 19:1219:12, 5 April 2019 92.195.216.165 talk 112,172 bytes +13 Obscure redirect notice replaced with far more common one. Choice of words fix for style's sake. Doc James: Use discussion if you contest this. Your insistence on rarely used synonym (it is a lay person's expression, a colloquialism, not a synonym), or provide compelling reason for why this odd redirect should be featured so prominently other than an the fact an IP making a sensible edit in the medical namespace. We all know you hate IPs, just cut the crap. undo
• curprev 18:4418:44, 5 April 2019 Doc James talk contribs 112,159 bytes +23 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:4218:42, 5 April 2019 Doc James talk contribs 112,136 bytes +307 ref added undo
• curprev 18:3418:34, 5 April 2019 92.195.216.165 talk 111,829 bytes +2 Clarified: "Associated" how? Medical conditions can be associated in many ways, eg common cause or overlapping treatment. I did not use the more technical "comorbid" for the average reader's sake. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 06:3206:32, 5 April 2019 Oronsay talk contribs 111,827 bytes +28 added authorlink for Deborah Beidel undo
• curprev 02:1102:11, 5 April 2019 Doczilla talk contribs 111,799 bytes −59 It's true, actually. undo

4 April 2019

• curprev 21:3121:31, 4 April 2019 Doc James talk contribs 111,858 bytes +59 Reverted to revision 890683159 by Doc James (talk): It redirects here? (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:5511:55, 4 April 2019 92.195.220.101 talk 111,799 bytes −59 Clarifications and corrections: Lot's of stuff redirects here, and "split personality (disorder)" is not a synonym, it's a misleading lay-person's circumscription. Do not revert without authoritative source for that to be a proper synonym. undo

2 April 2019

• curprev 21:5721:57, 2 April 2019 Doc James talk contribs 111,858 bytes −135 fixed undo

1 April 2019

• curprev 18:2918:29, 1 April 2019 Paigewilson2020 talk contribs m 111,993 bytes +119 Went through article and just added acronyms and added their full names to help the readers have a clearer picture of what was being discussed. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 18:2518:25, 1 April 2019 Paigewilson2020 talk contribs m 111,874 bytes +6 →Borderline personality disorder: "(BPD)" was added to the title of this section to help this acronym used this section's paragraph to be better understood by readers. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 18:2218:22, 1 April 2019 Paigewilson2020 talk contribs m 111,868 bytes 0 →Signs and symptoms: Another small technical change of DSM-5 to DSM-V. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 18:2118:21, 1 April 2019 Paigewilson2020 talk contribs m 111,868 bytes 0 →Signs and symptoms: I changed DSM-5 to using the roman numeral orientation of DSM-V. This is more technically correct versus using the numerical 5. undo Tag: Visual edit

31 March 2019

• curprev 21:2021:20, 31 March 2019 Doc James talk contribs 111,868 bytes −195 Reverted to revision 888928383 by Esowteric (talk): Ref needed (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 17:1717:17, 31 March 2019 Editor-Plejer talk contribs m 112,063 bytes +195 Added one sentence regarding common misconception undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 March 2019

• curprev 08:3208:32, 22 March 2019 Esowteric talk contribs 111,868 bytes −87 Undid unsourced, dubious addition in revision 888927924 by 143.51.162.4 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:2508:25, 22 March 2019 143.51.162.4 talk 111,955 bytes +87 →Signs and symptoms undo
• curprev 06:0306:03, 22 March 2019 ClueBot NG talk contribs m 111,868 bytes +54 Reverting possible vandalism by 2405:800:8030:1604:43D5:D5CE:4F12:10AB to version by Laodah. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3611021) (Bot) undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 06:0206:02, 22 March 2019 2405:800:8030:1604:43d5:d5ce:4f12:10ab talk 111,814 bytes +19 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 06:0206:02, 22 March 2019 2405:800:8030:1604:43d5:d5ce:4f12:10ab talk 111,795 bytes −73 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

18 March 2019

• curprev 07:0007:00, 18 March 2019 Laodah talk contribs m 111,868 bytes −1 Resolved a disputed usage of "around". Cheers. undo

17 March 2019

• curprev 16:5716:57, 17 March 2019 General Ization talk contribs 111,869 bytes −279 Reverted 1 edit by 2806:10BE:A:5362:B5BA:39E4:282B:702B (talk): Uh, no. Unsourced (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 16:5616:56, 17 March 2019 2806:10be:a:5362:b5ba:39e4:282b:702b talk 112,148 bytes +279 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

11 March 2019

• curprev 19:3019:30, 11 March 2019 Florian Blaschke talk contribs m 111,869 bytes −1 →Therapist-induced: rm comma undo

28 February 2019

• curprev 20:0320:03, 28 February 2019 CLCStudent talk contribs m 111,870 bytes +29 Reverted edits by MADVAL TWO (talk) to last version by Fz29bot undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 20:0320:03, 28 February 2019 MADVAL TWO talk contribs 111,841 bytes −29 i just killed off nsfw,pls dont ban me,im 13 undo Tag: Visual edit

17 February 2019

• curprev 15:5515:55, 17 February 2019 Fz29bot talk contribs m 111,870 bytes 0 Moving Reference(s) out of Infobox undo

15 February 2019

• curprev 09:4609:46, 15 February 2019 Citation bot talk contribs m 111,870 bytes −129 Alter: last2, doi-broken-date. Add: doi, chapter-url. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated. undo

13 February 2019

• curprev 21:4521:45, 13 February 2019 DemocraticLuntz talk contribs m 111,999 bytes −27 Reverted 1 edit by 141.168.67.110 identified as test/vandalism using STiki undo Tags: STiki Rollback
• curprev 21:4321:43, 13 February 2019 141.168.67.110 talk 112,026 bytes +27 Proving to someone it can be edited undo

7 February 2019

• curprev 04:2704:27, 7 February 2019 Doc James talk contribs 111,999 bytes +32 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:1604:16, 7 February 2019 Doc James talk contribs 111,967 bytes +27 Reverted to revision 882145089 by Doc James (talk): Ref says ""In studies of the general population, a prevalence rate of DID of 1% to 3% of the population has been described"" (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 04:0804:08, 7 February 2019 Doczilla talk contribs 111,940 bytes −27 Actually, sources disagree too widely on frequency to claim any specific frequency here. Plenty say it's much, much rarer than that if it exists at all. The DSM-5, the book that defines this, mentions "a small community study" that showed 1.5%. undo
• curprev 03:2703:27, 7 February 2019 Doc James talk contribs 111,967 bytes −22 Reverted good faith edits by Timmaywoohoo: Ref says "In studies of the general population, a prevalence rate of DID of 1% to 3% of the population has been described" (TW) undo Tag: Undo

6 February 2019

• curprev 10:2010:20, 6 February 2019 Timmaywoohoo talk contribs 111,989 bytes +22 The article previously stated that 2% of people have DID, this is incorrect and not stated in the cited work. The cited work does state that 1% to 5% of psychiatric inpatient cases are DID related. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

30 January 2019

• curprev 05:1105:11, 30 January 2019 72.229.49.135 talk 111,967 bytes +10 Semantics undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 January 2019

• curprev 16:1316:13, 16 January 2019 Þjarkur talk contribs m 111,957 bytes −8 Reverted 1 edit by 24.244.248.107 (talk) to last revision by CLCStudent. (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 16:0716:07, 16 January 2019 24.244.248.107 talk 111,965 bytes +8 →Children undo
• curprev 16:0416:04, 16 January 2019 CLCStudent talk contribs m 111,957 bytes −94 Reverted edits by 24.244.248.107 (talk) to last version by Regulov undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 16:0416:04, 16 January 2019 24.244.248.107 talk 112,051 bytes +51 nothing much undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:5915:59, 16 January 2019 24.244.248.107 talk 112,000 bytes +33 No edit summary undo
• curprev 15:5615:56, 16 January 2019 24.244.248.107 talk 111,967 bytes +12 →Society and culture undo