Misplaced Pages

20 July 2019

• curprev 02:5702:57, 20 July 2019 Vsmith talk contribs 99,824 bytes −11 →Wave–particle duality and uncertainty principles: relative and default image sizing undo
• curprev 02:5502:55, 20 July 2019 Vsmith talk contribs 99,835 bytes −6 →Early objections: default undo
• curprev 02:5202:52, 20 July 2019 Vsmith talk contribs m 99,841 bytes 0 →top: decap undo
• curprev 00:3700:37, 20 July 2019 70.181.227.130 talk 99,841 bytes +4 Fixed grammar undo Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

18 July 2019

• curprev 01:3501:35, 18 July 2019 Gah4 talk contribs 99,837 bytes +8 sounds better this way undo
• curprev 00:5900:59, 18 July 2019 Dicklyon talk contribs m 99,829 bytes −1,852 Reverted 1 edit by Dan Harkless (talk): Per talk page, photon approach is not needed to explain the momentum of light (TW) undo Tag: Undo

16 July 2019

• curprev 06:4606:46, 16 July 2019 Dan Harkless talk contribs 101,681 bytes +1,852 Undid revision 906456954 by Mfb (talk). How is the photonic laser thruster not an application of photons as particles? The laser light doesn't get converted to electricity or anything; the propulsion is from the momentum of the photons. "Advertisement from the author" bit is a valid reason to remove, but in effect, *I* am now adding this text to the article, not the author. It's a great visual for general readers, and the company isn't named. undo Tags: Undo nowiki added

15 July 2019

• curprev 23:3623:36, 15 July 2019 Mfb talk contribs 99,829 bytes −1,852 →Technological applications: not an application of photons as particles, also advertisement from the author. undo

13 July 2019

• curprev 06:3506:35, 13 July 2019 El C talk contribs m 101,681 bytes +5 Reverted edits by 178.49.60.88 (talk) to last version by DVdm undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 06:3406:34, 13 July 2019 178.49.60.88 talk 101,676 bytes −5 No edit summary undo

11 July 2019

• curprev 19:5519:55, 11 July 2019 DVdm talk contribs 101,681 bytes −424 Undid good faith revision 905830479 by NikDrawing (talk) wp:unsourced, and wrong anyway undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 18:3218:32, 11 July 2019 NikDrawing talk contribs 102,105 bytes +424 I have made the changes over the statement that a photon has no actual 'mass'. undo Tag: Visual edit

9 July 2019

• curprev 02:1002:10, 9 July 2019 Dan Harkless talk contribs m 101,681 bytes −11 "Radio wave|radio waves]]" → "radio wave]]s". undo

8 July 2019

• curprev 00:1300:13, 8 July 2019 Jhertel talk contribs 101,692 bytes +31 Explicitly added the interesting and often overlooked fact that the photon is also the quantum of radio waves. By only mentioning light as an example, it perpetuates the mistaken belief in the general public that photons only have to do with light, likely because of the name "photon". undo Tag: Visual edit

4 July 2019

• curprev 15:1915:19, 4 July 2019 Yakme talk contribs 101,661 bytes +101 Reverted 1 edit by 2401:4900:36B7:261A:2:1:A2D2:2372 (talk) (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:1115:11, 4 July 2019 2401:4900:36b7:261a:2:1:a2d2:2372 talk 101,560 bytes −101 Ggb undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 July 2019

• curprev 17:1317:13, 3 July 2019 Dan Harkless talk contribs 101,661 bytes +28 →Physical properties: Wikilinked "its own antiparticle" to Truly neutral particle, as in W and Z bosons. undo

27 June 2019

• curprev 12:4112:41, 27 June 2019 Dan Harkless talk contribs 101,633 bytes +3 →Physical properties: Added paragraph break before "Seen another way, the photon can be considered as its own antiparticle (thus an "antiphoton" is simply a normal photon)", per discussion on Talk. undo

26 June 2019

• curprev 13:5213:52, 26 June 2019 Dan Harkless talk contribs 101,630 bytes +71 →Physical properties: Per discussion on Talk, added "{{anchor |antiphoton}}" before "Seen another way, the photon can be considered as its own antiparticle". After that, appended '(thus an "antiphoton" is simply a normal photon)'. About to change antiphoton to redirect to the new anchor, rather than doing a bare redirect to photon. undo

22 June 2019

• curprev 15:3515:35, 22 June 2019 DVdm talk contribs 101,559 bytes −239 Undid revision 902950444 by 71.135.44.46 (talk) bad "explanation", that does not explain why lights keeps its direction: "bouncing through the medium" would scatter it in all directions. And the "explanation" is not in the source anyway. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:0814:08, 22 June 2019 71.135.44.46 talk 101,798 bytes +239 →Photons in matter: Photons always travel at c... in any medium other than vacuum, the photon path length is increased, reducing apparent photon speed. undo

16 June 2019

• curprev 19:5319:53, 16 June 2019 Photon999 talk contribs m 101,559 bytes +30 →See also undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 19:4119:41, 16 June 2019 Photon999 talk contribs m 101,529 bytes +1,852 technological application addition undo Tags: nowiki added Visual edit

27 May 2019

• curprev 17:0817:08, 27 May 2019 Headbomb talk contribs 99,677 bytes −36 ce undo

14 May 2019

• curprev 08:3608:36, 14 May 2019 71.94.235.196 talk 99,713 bytes −97 inserted link to main article undo

6 May 2019

• curprev 14:2914:29, 6 May 2019 Incnis Mrsi talk contribs 99,810 bytes +7 →top: see talk:Photon #Uncritical article? The photon really massless? undo
• curprev 14:0714:07, 6 May 2019 Rbmq talk contribs 99,803 bytes +54 إضافة وصلات undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

3 May 2019

• curprev 20:0920:09, 3 May 2019 Rbmq talk contribs 99,749 bytes +17 إضافة وصلات undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

30 April 2019

• curprev 06:4606:46, 30 April 2019 DVdm talk contribs 99,732 bytes −135 Undid revision 894819846 by Somebody356 (talk) Error. Photon's don't have a rest frame, so no rest mass undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 06:3706:37, 30 April 2019 Somebody356 talk contribs 99,867 bytes +135 Some ambiguities have been fixed. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 March 2019

• curprev 13:5213:52, 22 March 2019 ClueBot NG talk contribs m 99,732 bytes −54 Reverting possible vandalism by 2A04:B2C2:804:7200:617C:7E2C:28E4:CE99 to version by 141.226.25.78. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3611086) (Bot) undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 13:5213:52, 22 March 2019 2a04:b2c2:804:7200:617c:7e2c:28e4:ce99 talk 99,786 bytes +54 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 09:5409:54, 22 March 2019 141.226.25.78 talk 99,732 bytes 0 →Experimental checks on photon mass undo

18 March 2019

• curprev 11:4311:43, 18 March 2019 2601:41:c101:9610:c979:b365:2af4:cbcf talk 99,732 bytes −4 Minor grammar fix: "Heisenberg's uncertainty principle" not "the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle" undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 08:5408:54, 18 March 2019 Yakme talk contribs m 99,736 bytes −25 Undid revision 888307378 by Moyom50 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:4208:42, 18 March 2019 Moyom50 talk contribs 99,761 bytes +25 →Historical development undo Tag: extraneous markup

9 March 2019

• curprev 22:3622:36, 9 March 2019 Minimumbias talk contribs 99,736 bytes +252 Details undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:2221:22, 9 March 2019 Minimumbias talk contribs 99,484 bytes +452 Sources undo Tag: Visual edit

8 March 2019

• curprev 11:4211:42, 8 March 2019 Gah4 talk contribs 99,032 bytes +2 Undid revision 886763737 by 165.225.104.96 (talk). this one has the file, not the other one. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:0211:02, 8 March 2019 165.225.104.96 talk 99,030 bytes −2 →Historical development undo Tag: missing file added

5 March 2019

• curprev 18:2518:25, 5 March 2019 Gah4 talk contribs 99,032 bytes +50 →Nomenclature: Ultraviolet Catastrophe is important, but yes he didn't ''solve'' it. undo
• curprev 13:5213:52, 5 March 2019 Yakme talk contribs 98,982 bytes −127 Undid revision 886297326 by 37.228.251.97 (talk) that wasn't inaccurate. He didn't "solve undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:3911:39, 5 March 2019 37.228.251.97 talk 99,109 bytes +127 →Nomenclature: It wasn't entirely accurate. In the original article it claimed that Max Planck was studying black-body radiation when in reality he was looking for how to optimize lightbulbs. It just so happened that one of the solutions he was considering for his electrical problem solved the ultraviolet catastrophe. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

9 February 2019

• curprev 14:1514:15, 9 February 2019 Attic Salt talk contribs 98,982 bytes −247 I'm not here to debate whether or not the photon has mass and charge, but the cited sources, here do not support that assertion, so remove the citations. undo
• curprev 14:0614:06, 9 February 2019 Attic Salt talk contribs m 99,229 bytes −3 →Experimental checks on photon mass: Remove unnecessary "do". undo
• curprev 03:2003:20, 9 February 2019 Gah4 talk contribs 99,232 bytes +254 Undid revision 882434551 by 80.209.142.194 (talk). mass is zero, add reference. As with everything, there is a measurement and QM uncertainty. As with charge, quote mass and uncertainty. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 01:4901:49, 9 February 2019 80.209.142.194 talk 98,978 bytes −5 mass is not 0 undo Tag: Visual edit

29 January 2019

• curprev 00:5200:52, 29 January 2019 Davemck talk contribs m 98,983 bytes +15 →Recent research: use display-authors=etal undo

27 January 2019

• curprev 00:3400:34, 27 January 2019 Kanguole talk contribs m 98,968 bytes 0 fix ISBN hyphenation undo

24 January 2019

• curprev 05:2705:27, 24 January 2019 Srich32977 talk contribs m 98,968 bytes 0 Copyedit (minor) undo