Misplaced Pages

22 June 2020

• curprev 15:5515:55, 22 June 2020 OXYLYPSE talk contribs 32,686 bytes +813 Reverted 1 edit by 92.8.159.208 (talk): Removal of cited material, edit warring? (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:5315:53, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 31,873 bytes −813 Undid revision 963920101 by Alexbrn (talk) The last edit was pure vandalism. It actually admits to being done because you oppose the diet. That's opinion and has no place in this article. The citations are opinion pieces and do not represent the anything you'll find in any of the source material. These reversions are pure vandalism in pursuit of an opnion. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:1615:16, 22 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,686 bytes +813 Reverted to revision 963918222 by Alexbrn (talk): Rv. removal of well-sourced material, necessary per policy to dubunk the daftness that is the Paleo diet. See Talk. (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:1215:12, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 31,873 bytes −813 Since the last attempt to qualify statements was removed as 'weasel words' I'll be more straightforward. The removed sections are purely opinion. The citations given are in fact wither opinion pieces or do NOT support the opinion stated. They consist of straw man arguments which claim mainstream proponents have made assertions which they have not. This entire article has been hijacked by dogma driven criticism rather than a simple reflection the actual diet. undo
• curprev 15:0215:02, 22 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,686 bytes −23 Reverted to revision 963916840 by Alexbrn (talk): Rv. honking great WP:weasel (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:0115:01, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,709 bytes −10 removed two typos. Please note that this whole article does not represent the views of proponents of the diet , but has been heavily skewed by vegans opposed to the diet. undo
• curprev 14:5714:57, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,719 bytes +33 The change refelects the citation. The view that digestion remins unchanged is aview of the critic, it is not an assertion you'll find anywhere in the Paleo Diet. The cited essay reflects the critics opinion and not the proponents. The cited essay itself lacks citations to prove it's assertion. undo
• curprev 14:5214:52, 22 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,686 bytes −210 Reverted to revision 963914626 by MrOllie (talk): Undue lede mangling, non-indepedent source (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:4914:49, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,896 bytes −1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:4814:48, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,897 bytes +3 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:4714:47, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,894 bytes −84 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:4514:45, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,978 bytes +47 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:4414:44, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,931 bytes −108 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:4314:43, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 33,039 bytes +353 Citation added for the period covered. undo
• curprev 14:3814:38, 22 June 2020 MrOllie talk contribs 32,686 bytes −274 Reverted to revision 963911817 by Blablubbs (talk): Misrepresents the academic consensus on this topic (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:3014:30, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,960 bytes +208 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:2314:23, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,752 bytes −1 removed typo undo
• curprev 14:2214:22, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,753 bytes +60 Removed some bias and corrected the focus to pre-Neolithic diet. undo
• curprev 14:1914:19, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 32,693 bytes +7 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:1914:19, 22 June 2020 Blablubbs talk contribs 32,686 bytes −368 Rollback edit(s) by 92.8.159.208 (talk) to rev. 963174507 by William M. Connolley: Not providing a reliable source (RedWarn rev14) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:1614:16, 22 June 2020 92.8.159.208 talk 33,054 bytes +368 Removed some bias. undo

18 June 2020

• curprev 09:0809:08, 18 June 2020 William M. Connolley talk contribs m 32,686 bytes −2,062 Reverted edits by Silkfrey (talk) to last version by Alexbrn undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 09:0009:00, 18 June 2020 Silkfrey talk contribs 34,748 bytes +2,062 No edit summary undo

12 June 2020

• curprev 07:0907:09, 12 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,686 bytes +41 freshen URL undo
• curprev 03:1703:17, 12 June 2020 HappyWanderer15 talk contribs 32,645 bytes −10 re-arrange paragraphs for better flow of information undo

11 June 2020

• curprev 16:5116:51, 11 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,655 bytes +3 →Health effects: sense undo
• curprev 16:4916:49, 11 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,652 bytes +426 →Health effects: add newer review undo
• curprev 16:1816:18, 11 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,226 bytes −11 we say this below undo
• curprev 16:1616:16, 11 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,237 bytes −16 →top: fix grammar and sense undo
• curprev 06:3206:32, 11 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,253 bytes +3 →Adaptation: fix markup, ty undo
• curprev 06:3006:30, 11 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,250 bytes +157 perform verification and restore NPOV undo
• curprev 06:2706:27, 11 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,093 bytes −26 the lede summarizes the body and strictly doesn't require *any* citations undo
• curprev 02:3402:34, 11 June 2020 Hipal talk contribs 32,119 bytes −3 according to talk page, the first ref is being totally ignored - let's confirm the verification first undo
• curprev 00:3400:34, 11 June 2020 Hemiauchenia talk contribs 32,122 bytes +35 Added improper synthesis tag, discuss on the talk page undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 00:3200:32, 11 June 2020 Vsmith talk contribs 32,087 bytes +25 →See also: shift undo

10 June 2020

• curprev 22:5922:59, 10 June 2020 Hipal talk contribs 32,062 bytes −30 Undid revision 961883857 by Hemiauchenia (talk) you'll need to explain on talk page, and read the refs supporting this undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 22:4122:41, 10 June 2020 Hemiauchenia talk contribs 32,092 bytes +30 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit

9 June 2020

• curprev 18:0218:02, 9 June 2020 Roxy the dog talk contribs 32,062 bytes +11 Reverted to revision 961485516 by Hipal (talk): Better before (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 18:0118:01, 9 June 2020 BradVesp talk contribs 32,051 bytes −11 The phrase "mistakenly assume" is redundant or incorrect. Any assumption is, by definition, not proven. Thus, until proven, the assumption has the potential to be either a mistake or correct. If the assumption is proven wrong then the phrase "mistakenly assume" is redundant. If the assumption is proven correct then the phrase "mistakenly assume" is a contradiction. Redundancies and contradictions both tend to distract a reader from comprehending a fact based article; that's my opinion. undo

8 June 2020

• curprev 19:1019:10, 8 June 2020 Hipal talk contribs 32,062 bytes +11 Undid revision 961481269 by Liberty5651 (talk) change in pov without comment undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 18:4018:40, 8 June 2020 BradVesp talk contribs 32,051 bytes −11 No edit summary undo

6 June 2020

• curprev 17:0517:05, 6 June 2020 אקראי אחר talk contribs 32,062 bytes +27 No edit summary undo

4 June 2020

• curprev 18:5118:51, 4 June 2020 Hipal talk contribs 32,035 bytes +217 Undid revision 960753930 by Liberty5651 (talk) appears to be aspect of notability of the topic undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 18:3818:38, 4 June 2020 BradVesp talk contribs 31,818 bytes −217 Removed opinion and contrary arguments from article's headding. The beginning sections should describe the subject. Any argument should be in a later section. undo
• curprev 18:3618:36, 4 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,035 bytes +150 Reverted to revision 960746012 by Alexbrn (talk): Well-sourced; take it to talk rather than edit war if you want to change this (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 18:3418:34, 4 June 2020 85.65.231.171 talk 31,885 bytes −150 Undid revision 960746012 by Alexbrn (talk). THIS IS TURE TO ANY DIET (nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/wecan/healthy-weight-basics/balance.htm). It seems like this sentence only stands to make the paleolithic diet look bad to people without this basic nutrition knowledge. If despite this it's still retrieved, please mention that this is true for every diet. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 17:4517:45, 4 June 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,035 bytes +150 Reverted to revision 958025117 by Alexbrn (talk): Was well-sourced (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 17:3017:30, 4 June 2020 85.65.231.171 talk 31,885 bytes −150 Deleted the sentence: "Any weight loss caused by the diet was merely the result of calorie restriction, rather than a special feature of the diet itself.<ref name=four/>" undo

21 May 2020

• curprev 17:1717:17, 21 May 2020 Bon courage talk contribs 32,035 bytes −654 Reverted to revision 958000180 by Alexbrn (talk): Already cited/summarized above (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 17:1117:11, 21 May 2020 Tylotyler talk contribs m 32,689 bytes +654 I added research on the paleolithic diet health effects. undo Tag: Visual edit