Misplaced Pages

18 July 2023

• curprev 17:2817:28, 18 July 2023 Satnam2408 talk contribs 24,966 bytes −557 Ekdalian I am seeing at this moment You don't have consensus on this source. LukeEmily and Trangabellum only accepted this due to Sitush but they have not given a reasonable consensus on this contensus racial theory. Keeping in mind that Sitush gave the consensus 10 years ago(I may be not accurate) and none of the modern scholars have repeated this and another experienced editor fiveby has reverted the part, I am reverting this. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 16:3116:31, 18 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,523 bytes +557 Undid revision 1165962857 by CharlesWain (talk):LukeEmily had clearly written that this is the consensus version approved by Sitush; TB had accepted on their talk page; wait for TB, that's how consensus works; WP:CASTE Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 14:3714:37, 18 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 24,966 bytes −557 Undid revision 1165954891 by Ekdalian (talk) Checked editing history. TB removed Akter Banu's whole content with edit summary "More (outdated and) fringe racist nonsense" on February 26, 2022. It was removed multiple times by Other editors like Wkilinuz, Chanchaldm, Satnam, before and after the mentioned date. You haven't participated in the discussion and counter Fiveby's very logical and valid points, WP: STONEWALLING. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 13:2613:26, 18 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,523 bytes +557 Reverted good faith edits by Fiveby (talk): You have achieved consensus with a suspected sock; wait for TB's opinion; discussion is still going on regarding the consensus version approved by Sitush! Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• curprev 12:4912:49, 18 July 2023 Fiveby talk contribs 24,966 bytes −557 →History: rm Akter, see talk Tag: Reverted

12 July 2023

• curprev 17:1117:11, 12 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,523 bytes +12 →History: using the conventional wording; you cannot mention simply 'scholars' which signifies there's no other view
• curprev 17:0617:06, 12 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs m 25,511 bytes 0 →Colonial era: reverting to exact consensus version
• curprev 17:0317:03, 12 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,511 bytes −8 Undid revision 1165041511 by CharlesWain (talk): this was drafted by LukeEmily & represents the consensus version after review by experienced editors; please achieve a fresh consensus on talk page for such changes Tag: Undo
• curprev 16:5716:57, 12 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,519 bytes +8 →Colonial era: It's much better to mention what Tagore exactly said, considering his stature. "believes" is a kind of poor word to use here. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 16:5216:52, 12 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,511 bytes −5 →History: Please avoid some, few , many or these words, write simply scholars or historians. I have seen you using these words. There are half a dozen more sources I can cite right now . Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 07:1107:11, 12 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,516 bytes 0 →History: CharlesWain, the text was discussed and frozen at DRN; moreover we generally use the terms 'few' & 'some', not 'many' even though you cite multiple sources because you never know how many scholars do not agree
• curprev 07:0407:04, 12 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs m 25,516 bytes −1 →Colonial era: wording
• curprev 06:5906:59, 12 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,517 bytes −12 →Colonial era: Again, another one; it's not Tagore's statement; it's all about what Bellenoit says; Bellenoit clearly mentions that Tagore had Bengal in mind i.e. Bengali Kayasthas in the context of the statement

11 July 2023

• curprev 11:5911:59, 11 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,529 bytes −11 →Origin myths: Improved poor wording; consecutive use of 'According to this legend'
• curprev 11:4611:46, 11 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,540 bytes −37 →Modern views: You are fully aww aware that we don't keep duplicate wikilinks; already present above; playing Nobita's game won't help; I shall take necessary action
• curprev 11:4111:41, 11 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,577 bytes +63 Undid revision 1164745775 by CharlesWain (talk): Specific objection; removal of long term consensus version's sourced content; earlier reviewed by experienced editors including Sitush! Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:4208:42, 11 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,514 bytes +353 Undid revision 1164816222 by Ekdalian (talk) please avoid blanket reverts. I have added source, did minor edits- like change of wordings, aligning with source. Which you admitted may be correct. If you have objections to specific edits , explain, so that we can discuss in the talk page. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 08:2008:20, 11 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,161 bytes −353 Reverted 9 edits by CharlesWain (talk): Unilateral changes (multiple, some may be correct) in consensus version; discuss on talk page, minor changes like aligning with sources are okay; you may incorporate; removing content from consensus version requires discussion; edit warring will be reported; WP:CASTE Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

10 July 2023

• curprev 21:2121:21, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,514 bytes +25 Little more details, per source Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 21:1921:19, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,489 bytes +9 Aligning with the source , WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Tagore hasn't argued for whole Kayastha caste, we should write what he exactly said. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 21:0821:08, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,480 bytes +37 Wikilink, not present in this section Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 21:0321:03, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,443 bytes −63 Eaton's opinion about "old hindu rulers" absorption has already been discussed in this section above. It's a sing sentence. WP:Undue Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 20:5020:50, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,506 bytes −10 Source doesn't mention so. Those who want to be "politically correct" use "so called", not scholars or historians Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 20:4420:44, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,516 bytes 0 No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 20:4120:41, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,516 bytes +344 This opinion is held by many scholars. These two terms have been mentioned multiple times in Bhaumik's book as synonymous. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 20:3420:34, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,172 bytes +5 Majumder give different explanation of these two texts, and claimed connection with Bagara Brahmins. Need to mention that to maintain WP:NPOV Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 07:5607:56, 10 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 25,167 bytes +6 →References: This need to be replaced. It's not a surname article anymore. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 07:4807:48, 10 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs m 25,161 bytes −3 Cleanup; removed irrelevant wikilink
• curprev 07:4207:42, 10 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,164 bytes −25 →Modern views: removed duplicate wikilinks, already existing ones
• curprev 07:3807:38, 10 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs m 25,189 bytes +4 →Varna status: wikilink
• curprev 07:3207:32, 10 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 25,185 bytes 0 →Modern views: Moving the newly added information to the top of the section; more appropriate, and generic information on Kayasthas should ideally come before the detailed views on Bengali Kayasthas

8 July 2023

• curprev 23:4823:48, 8 July 2023 Chamaemelum talk contribs 25,185 bytes +1,371 →History: modern study Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 23:3523:35, 8 July 2023 Chamaemelum talk contribs 23,814 bytes +1 →History: in context, this works Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 23:3323:33, 8 July 2023 Chamaemelum talk contribs 23,813 bytes +509 →History Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 23:2823:28, 8 July 2023 Chamaemelum talk contribs 23,304 bytes −8 "represents" is confusing wording Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 23:2823:28, 8 July 2023 Chamaemelum talk contribs 23,312 bytes −8 subgroups implies the group is broader than subgroup Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 23:2623:26, 8 July 2023 Chamaemelum talk contribs 23,320 bytes +3 →Modern views: Compromise between two editors Tag: Visual edit

5 July 2023

• curprev 17:5617:56, 5 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 23,317 bytes +31 Undid revision 1163593234 by CharlesWain (talk): Were you part of the discussion? No, right; Nobita had opposed and I removed just to avoid lengthy discussions, since we were busy with Baidya article; achieve consensus on talk page since this was part of the consensus version; edit warring will be reported; WP:CASTE Tag: Undo
• curprev 17:4817:48, 5 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 23,286 bytes +8 →History: edit Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 17:4717:47, 5 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 23,278 bytes +23 Specific names of the texts and available link Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 17:4417:44, 5 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 23,255 bytes −5 It's Majumder's opinion. His book has been cited. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 17:4117:41, 5 July 2023 CharlesWain talk contribs 23,260 bytes −31 Undid revision 1163494785 by Ekdalian (talk) If it was removed after discussion, I don't believe it should be removed. As per majority of the scholars Baidyas rank next to Brahmins in Bengal. We should include that opinions too, if we include this, as as per WP:DUE Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 06:4006:40, 5 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs 23,291 bytes +31 →Modern views: Restoring the part removed due to the concern of blocked user Nobita456; the part is not a conclusion of their actual rank, rather clearly mentioned as the author John Henry Hutton's opinion; WP:DUE Tag: Reverted

4 July 2023

• curprev 17:2917:29, 4 July 2023 Ekdalian talk contribs m 23,260 bytes +38 Better language

29 May 2023

• curprev 17:4917:49, 29 May 2023 Fylindfotberserk talk contribs m 23,222 bytes +86 script-assisted date audit and style fixes per MOS:NUM, EngvarB
• curprev 17:4717:47, 29 May 2023 Fylindfotberserk talk contribs 23,136 bytes +15 →Notable people
• curprev 17:4317:43, 29 May 2023 Fylindfotberserk talk contribs 23,121 bytes +317 →Notable people: moved from this article, relevant here

26 May 2023

• curprev 22:3322:33, 26 May 2023 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 22,804 bytes −37 Substing templates: {{Format ISBN}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.
• curprev 21:5321:53, 26 May 2023 Trappist the monk talk contribs m 22,841 bytes +7 cite repair;

20 March 2023

• curprev 18:5818:58, 20 March 2023 Citation bot talk contribs 22,834 bytes −132 Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_CommandLine