Misplaced Pages

Comparison of programming languages: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 January 2025

31 July 2024

2 July 2024

1 July 2024

25 June 2024

28 May 2024

27 April 2024

26 April 2024

19 April 2024

14 April 2024

9 April 2024

2 April 2024

22 March 2024

17 March 2024

27 February 2024

29 January 2024

  • curprev 17:5117:51, 29 January 2024 GregxHelton talk contribs m 71,962 bytes +2 I changed the value in the Procedural column of the table for the entry of Visual FoxPro from no to yes so that it agrees with the description of Visual FoxPro in the wikipedia article. I changed the value in the Imperative column because Procedural is a subset of Imperative so if it is procedural it must be imperative. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/Visual_FoxPro</ref> undo

19 December 2023

16 December 2023

5 December 2023

3 November 2023

23 October 2023

21 October 2023

17 October 2023

6 October 2023

27 September 2023

19 September 2023

5 September 2023

25 August 2023

  • curprev 02:1002:10, 25 August 2023 89.146.4.169 talk 75,874 bytes +102 Standard ML has a formal specification. And this information is more important than the explicit hint that its name is confusing in this context. There we should replace the latter by the former. undo Tag: Reverted

22 August 2023

18 August 2023

15 August 2023

11 August 2023

7 August 2023

3 July 2023

  • curprev 18:2018:20, 3 July 2023 Gcanyon talk contribs 75,776 bytes +5 HyperTalk is a simple imperative, procedural language. It is reflective in that the script of a control can be modified at runtime. It is not object-oriented in the traditional sense. The same applies to LiveCode, except that LiveCode has "behaviors" making it somewhat object-oriented. undo Tag: Visual edit: Switched

17 June 2023

  • curprev 14:0114:01, 17 June 2023 B33198218 talk contribs 75,771 bytes −18 Forth is Functional (Forth Words are actually functions, they're just called "Words.") Forth is also Reflective. Even a cursory glance into Forth documentation would demonstrate both of these points.n undo

29 May 2023

27 May 2023

18 May 2023

29 April 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)