Misplaced Pages

Immersion lithography: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

29 October 2024

16 October 2024

19 August 2024

14 June 2024

5 April 2024

29 December 2023

17 September 2023

12 April 2023

2 February 2023

19 January 2023

9 November 2022

22 October 2022

28 September 2022

26 October 2021

  • curprev 16:3416:34, 26 October 2021 TheKanter talk contribs 7,735 bytes −281 Factually incorrect statement. See https://www.eetimes.com/tsmc-to-accelerate-immersion-litho-in-production/ TSMC did not use 193i in 90nm production and I don't think they even used it for 65nm. https://www.design-reuse.com/news/12662/tsmc-immersion-lithography-nearly-ready.html as more evidence. In 90nm they ran test wafers with 193i, but did not actually use it in production. undo Tag: Visual edit

29 January 2021

29 November 2020

4 May 2020

22 January 2020

22 September 2019

16 September 2019

30 June 2019

13 April 2019

13 January 2019

2 December 2018

31 July 2018

26 July 2018

21 July 2018

18 July 2018

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)