Misplaced Pages

Philosophical zombie: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

26 December 2024

  • curprev 14:4714:47, 26 December 2024 Dogod talk contribs 37,824 bytes +2 History: Changed the order that survey responses are presented in for the 2020 survey to match the order that survey responses are presented in for the 2013 survey. Also added quotes around "conceivable but impossible" for the 2020 survey to match the quotes around the other three options for that survey. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

4 December 2024

15 November 2024

7 October 2024

2 October 2024

  • curprev 04:4904:49, 2 October 2024 Ohphooeyfui talk contribs m 37,718 bytes 0 Changed “Mclaughlin” to “McLaughlin” undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 04:1504:15, 2 October 2024 Ohphooeyfui talk contribs 37,718 bytes −239 Zombie arguments: I deleted the second half of the paragraph whose first half discussed the counterfeit bill example, because the second half of this paragraph introduced the idea, unrelated to that example, that when philosophers say something is conceivable, they underestimate what it takes to conceive of something. This idea was out of place in this section, and it already appears in the section below on responses to zombie arguments. It also lacked a citation in this section, while in... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 03:5503:55, 2 October 2024 Ohphooeyfui talk contribs 37,957 bytes +43 Responses: At the end of this section, there was a sentence saying that the fact that Chalmers’s conceivability principle leads to the conclusion that we have epiphenomenal mental states “seems to be a reason to reject his principle,” which was a controversial claim as it stood, so I revised it to say simply that this was the case according to Hill and Mclaughlin. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 August 2024

12 August 2024

18 July 2024

4 July 2024

3 July 2024

2 July 2024

7 June 2024

30 April 2024

15 April 2024

7 April 2024

3 April 2024

24 March 2024

20 March 2024

4 March 2024

3 March 2024

2 March 2024

1 March 2024

22 February 2024

12 February 2024

22 January 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)