Misplaced Pages

Problem of time: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

27 November 2024

15 November 2024

11 November 2024

9 November 2024

8 September 2024

7 September 2024

2 September 2024

20 August 2024

18 August 2024

  • curprev 22:2822:28, 18 August 2024 DVdm talk contribs 19,133 bytes +175 Undid revision 1241017721 by Bjngobkngo (talk) But the cited source EXPLICITELY says that they confirmed it. If you remove that sentence, you mist also remove the source and perhaps some of the context. If you don't agree with the source, bring it to the talk page and discuss this, instead of repeatedly removing it. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 21:0321:03, 18 August 2024 Bjngobkngo talk contribs m 18,958 bytes −175 top: the claim that the experiment discussed "proved" time is emergent is not correct. it is explicitly stated in the cited materials that the experiment isn't proof of anything. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
  • curprev 14:4914:49, 18 August 2024 DVdm talk contribs 19,133 bytes +176 Undid revision 1240928171 by 205.178.3.242 (talk) Restore sourced content. The cited source *literally* says "And they confirm that time is indeed an emergent phenomenon for ‘internal’ observers but absent for external ones." undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 09:1809:18, 18 August 2024 205.178.3.242 talk 18,957 bytes −176 Proposed solutions to the problem of time: Article previously stated the INRIM group "proved that time is an emergent property." They most certainly did not. They showed a toy example of how it could work in a quantum system behaving exactly how one should. Nothing about it proved or even gave evidence that time emerges from entanglement in our universe. Both the cited article (written by a doofus) and the actual paper acknowledge the same thing. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

24 June 2024

27 May 2024

25 May 2024

17 May 2024

23 March 2024

2 February 2024

26 December 2023

16 November 2023

13 November 2023

22 October 2023

13 September 2023

17 August 2023

5 August 2023

4 August 2023

3 January 2023

28 November 2022

17 October 2022

15 October 2022

30 September 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)