Misplaced Pages

3 March 2024

• curprev 04:1404:14, 3 March 2024 Cewbot talk contribs m 89,414 bytes −16 Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance. undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

14 January 2024

• curprev 01:5301:53, 14 January 2024 Cewbot talk contribs m 89,430 bytes −16 Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Albums}}, {{WikiProject Alternative music}}, {{WikiProject Electronic music}}. undo

22 October 2023

• curprev 03:5403:54, 22 October 2023 TangoTizerWolfstone talk contribs 89,446 bytes +56 + WikiProject undo

13 February 2022

• curprev 16:5916:59, 13 February 2022 WOSlinkerBot talk contribs m 89,390 bytes 0 Fix misnested tag lint errors undo

3 August 2021

• curprev 01:4801:48, 3 August 2021 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 89,390 bytes +129 →RfC: Should interview articles/profile pieces be incorporated into this article's reception section?: r undo

30 September 2017

• curprev 00:3200:32, 30 September 2017 NihlusBOT talk contribs 89,261 bytes +13 →External links modified: fixing Lint errors in signatures (Task 2) undo

20 July 2016

• curprev 21:1421:14, 20 July 2016 InternetArchiveBot talk contribs 89,248 bytes +1,107 Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.1) undo

30 April 2016

• curprev 09:5409:54, 30 April 2016 JJMC89 bot talk contribs m 88,141 bytes +717 subst /Comments to discontinue comments subpage) (AWB undo

12 April 2016

• curprev 01:0101:01, 12 April 2016 Cyberbot II talk contribs 87,424 bytes +1,102 Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot undo

31 March 2016

• curprev 09:1409:14, 31 March 2016 Cyberbot II talk contribs 86,322 bytes +1,292 Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot undo

19 October 2015

• curprev 08:0008:00, 19 October 2015 Cyberbot II talk contribs 85,030 bytes +1,498 Notification of altered sources needing review (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) undo

6 April 2015

• curprev 22:1722:17, 6 April 2015 AlbinoFerret talk contribs 83,532 bytes −7 →RfC: Is this revision an improvement to the article? undo
• curprev 22:1722:17, 6 April 2015 AlbinoFerret talk contribs 83,539 bytes +308 →RfC: Is this revision an improvement to the article? undo
• curprev 22:0522:05, 6 April 2015 AlbinoFerret talk contribs 83,231 bytes +11 →RfC: Is this revision an improvement to the article?: closing undo

15 March 2015

• curprev 04:0004:00, 15 March 2015 Legobot talk contribs 83,220 bytes −56 Removing expired RFC template. undo

14 March 2015

• curprev 06:0006:00, 14 March 2015 Legobot talk contribs 83,276 bytes −56 Removing expired RFC template. undo

2 March 2015

• curprev 14:0014:00, 2 March 2015 Legobot talk contribs 83,332 bytes −28 Removing expired RFC template. undo

23 February 2015

• curprev 16:2416:24, 23 February 2015 Damotclese talk contribs 83,360 bytes +1,422 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo

20 February 2015

• curprev 21:0921:09, 20 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 81,938 bytes +138 →RfC: Should interview articles/profile pieces be incorporated into this article's reception section? undo

19 February 2015

• curprev 05:5305:53, 19 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 81,800 bytes +941 →RfC: Should interview articles/profile pieces be incorporated into this article's reception section? undo
• curprev 05:2505:25, 19 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 80,859 bytes +766 →RfC: Which source is most reliable/appropriate for verifying this album's reception? undo

17 February 2015

• curprev 02:5702:57, 17 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 80,093 bytes +26 →RfC: Should interview articles/profile pieces be incorporated into this article's reception section? undo
• curprev 02:5102:51, 17 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs m 80,067 bytes +3 →RfC: Should interview and profile articles be incorporated into this article's reception section? undo
• curprev 02:5102:51, 17 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 80,064 bytes +1,360 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:4902:49, 17 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 78,704 bytes +181 →RfC: Which source is most reliable/appropriate for verifying this album's reception? undo

16 February 2015

• curprev 01:0001:00, 16 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 78,523 bytes +496 →RfC: Which source is most reliable/appropriate for verifying this album's reception? undo
• curprev 00:3200:32, 16 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 78,027 bytes +739 →RfC: Which source is most reliable/appropriate for verifying this album's reception? undo

15 February 2015

• curprev 15:5915:59, 15 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 77,288 bytes +133 →RfC: Which source is most reliable/appropriate for verifying this album's reception? undo
• curprev 15:5715:57, 15 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 77,155 bytes +365 →RfC: Which source is most reliable/appropriate for verifying this album's reception?: WP:SOURCEACCESS undo

13 February 2015

• curprev 06:5906:59, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 76,790 bytes +409 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 06:2706:27, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 76,381 bytes +348 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 06:1706:17, 13 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 76,033 bytes +139 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 06:0906:09, 13 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 75,894 bytes +433 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 06:0506:05, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 75,461 bytes +265 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 05:5805:58, 13 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 75,196 bytes +4 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 05:5605:56, 13 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 75,192 bytes +174 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 05:2305:23, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 75,018 bytes −611 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate?: - repeated comment (error) undo
• curprev 05:0805:08, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 75,629 bytes +227 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 05:0305:03, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 75,402 bytes +443 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 04:3404:34, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs m 74,959 bytes +3 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 04:3304:33, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 74,956 bytes +597 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 04:2604:26, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs m 74,359 bytes +92 →RfC: Does the source cited verify the statement?: sign undo
• curprev 04:2604:26, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 74,267 bytes +387 →RfC: Does the source cited verify the statement? undo
• curprev 04:2404:24, 13 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 73,880 bytes +193 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 04:1404:14, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 73,687 bytes +1,360 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate?: cmt undo
• curprev 04:0804:08, 13 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 72,327 bytes +223 →RfC: Does the source cited verify the statement? undo
• curprev 04:0204:02, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 72,104 bytes +160 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 04:0004:00, 13 February 2015 Legobot talk contribs 71,944 bytes +14 Adding RFC ID. undo
• curprev 03:5903:59, 13 February 2015 Teflon Peter Christ talk contribs 71,930 bytes +287 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate? undo
• curprev 03:5503:55, 13 February 2015 Lapadite talk contribs 71,643 bytes +613 →RfC: Which paraphrase of NME's review of the album is more appropriate?: cmt undo