Misplaced Pages

25 December 2024

• curprev 11:3911:39, 25 December 2024 2001:7d0:8c60:b080:e5cf:ca45:38fb:bcd0 talk 39,611 bytes −214 Removed claim that Utahraptor and other large dromaeosaurs are part of Dromaeosaurinae. Dromaeosaur taxonomy is still heavily disputed, so these claims shouldn’t be stated as fact in the introduction to an article undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

18 December 2024

• curprev 22:3322:33, 18 December 2024 45.234.81.78 talk 39,825 bytes +4 →Description: Fixed image thumb undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 December 2024

• curprev 02:5702:57, 16 December 2024 OAbot talk contribs m 39,821 bytes +17 Open access bot: hdl updated in citation with #oabot. undo

14 December 2024

• curprev 15:2115:21, 14 December 2024 ExplorerKing talk contribs m 39,804 bytes +19 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 December 2024

• curprev 21:1521:15, 13 December 2024 ExplorerKing talk contribs m 39,785 bytes −2 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 21:1521:15, 13 December 2024 ExplorerKing talk contribs m 39,787 bytes −8 Fixing the social behavior section undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 November 2024

• curprev 21:5921:59, 17 November 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs 39,795 bytes +20 correction to what the sources actually suggest undo

9 November 2024

• curprev 19:4619:46, 9 November 2024 91.80.95.194 talk 39,775 bytes −5 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 19:4419:44, 9 November 2024 91.80.95.194 talk 39,780 bytes −68 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 November 2024

• curprev 00:5200:52, 8 November 2024 GreenC bot talk contribs 39,848 bytes +210 Rescued 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#deseretnews.com undo

2 November 2024

• curprev 23:5123:51, 2 November 2024 Citation bot talk contribs 39,638 bytes −35 Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Eudromaeosaurs | #UCB_Category 13/30 undo

24 October 2024

• curprev 00:3400:34, 24 October 2024 Arcturus95 talk contribs 39,673 bytes +2 →Description: Switch to vertical multiple image undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 00:3000:30, 24 October 2024 Arcturus95 talk contribs m 39,671 bytes −3 CE - Fix grammar undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 00:2700:27, 24 October 2024 Arcturus95 talk contribs 39,674 bytes +109 →Description: MOS:SANDWICH undo Tag: Visual edit

30 September 2024

• curprev 14:1014:10, 30 September 2024 MusikBot II talk contribs m 39,565 bytes −17 Removing protection templates from unprotected page (more info) undo Tag: Manual revert

8 September 2024

• curprev 06:0406:04, 8 September 2024 Daniel Case talk contribs 39,582 bytes +17 +protection notice undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 06:0306:03, 8 September 2024 Daniel Case talk contribs m 39,565 bytes 0 Protected "Utahraptor": Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content: per RFPP ( (expires 06:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)) (expires 06:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC))) undo
• curprev 05:1705:17, 8 September 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs 39,565 bytes +87 No edit summary undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 01:0201:02, 8 September 2024 2a01:827:2d41:ba01:b93a:c57c:7f70:74eb talk 39,478 bytes −4 No edit summary undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

7 September 2024

• curprev 16:2316:23, 7 September 2024 91.80.94.213 talk 39,482 bytes −10 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 16:2316:23, 7 September 2024 91.80.94.213 talk 39,492 bytes −73 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

1 September 2024

• curprev 15:1115:11, 1 September 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs 39,565 bytes +88 you do realise that these sources are actually considered problematic? Further additions will be seen as disruptive + you still didn't cite it within the article https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dinosaurs/Archive_32#Sauropod_Encyclopedia ; https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dinosaurs/Archive_31#Issues_for_discussion undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted

31 August 2024

• curprev 00:0600:06, 31 August 2024 91.80.91.213 talk 39,477 bytes −1 Here’s the book’s DOI: 10.2307/j.cdb2hnszb undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

30 August 2024

• curprev 23:0423:04, 30 August 2024 91.80.91.213 talk 39,478 bytes −10 Here’s the book where they published the studies that they made for it, including Utahraptor’s correct estimates. I really recommend you this book, it’s a really good lecture. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 23:0023:00, 30 August 2024 91.80.91.213 talk 39,488 bytes −77 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 August 2024

• curprev 04:4304:43, 29 August 2024 183.91.7.121 talk 39,565 bytes −14 →Discovery and naming: Minor wording edit, last paragraph in sentence more cohesive undo Tag: Visual edit

28 August 2024

• curprev 13:3313:33, 28 August 2024 2601:204:cf81:9ed0:1896:4028:fd0e:2e99 talk 39,579 bytes +22 No edit summary undo

26 August 2024

• curprev 12:0612:06, 26 August 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs m 39,557 bytes +87 unless you actually learn how to cite the sources that you suggest and include them, this shouldn't change as the already cited sources state the opposite info from you undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 09:4609:46, 26 August 2024 91.80.91.187 talk 39,470 bytes −77 And probably the 777kg estimate is a mistake or a case of gigantism so saying that some could reach that size would be in my opinion quite unprobable. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 09:4309:43, 26 August 2024 91.80.91.187 talk 39,547 bytes −10 Sorry but it doesn’t let me cite it but it’s the last studio on the taxon’s size, and it was done with the right material, so it’s the one that right now is more accurate. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 August 2024

• curprev 21:4521:45, 25 August 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs m 39,557 bytes +87 whatever the case is, please will you cite the study that explicitly states 5-6 m? that's what I also asked in the first place undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted

23 August 2024

• curprev 16:1416:14, 23 August 2024 5.91.170.78 talk 39,470 bytes −63 Average around 450-500kg, with the 777kg speciment probably being a mistake in measuring or a case of gigantism, but these new estimates are only about the mass and not the length, for this reason the 2016 estimates should be considered accurate. And the last article you cited didn’t make a new estimate, it just cited the outdated one from 1993. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 16:0016:00, 23 August 2024 5.91.170.78 talk 39,533 bytes −10 The sources that estimate the taxon at around 7m are now outdated, the 1993 and 2007 articles had some error in analysing the bones, mixing different specimens, in 2016 the article by Molina-Perez and Asier estimated the taxon with the correct material, with a length between 5 and 6 m and a weight around 350kg, now in 2024 a new article estimated the weight/body mass around 390kg for BYU 2586, 480kg for BYU 1833 and a whopping 777kg for BYU 7510-18078; from these estimates we can think of an- undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 15:4615:46, 23 August 2024 91.80.13.129 talk 39,543 bytes −14 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:0505:05, 23 August 2024 Apokryltaros talk contribs m 39,557 bytes +1 Reverted 1 edit by 65.51.41.3 (talk) to last revision by Junsik1223 undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 02:2202:22, 23 August 2024 65.51.41.3 talk 39,556 bytes −1 Sorry do you have maybe a Reddit username to discuss on how to change this page in better and if maybe you can tell me what the last article on the taxon says? (I cannot read it). Thanks. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 August 2024

• curprev 21:1821:18, 22 August 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs m 39,557 bytes +342 other source for 6 or 7 m length estimate undo
• curprev 18:3818:38, 22 August 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs m 39,215 bytes +87 at least cite a source that says 5-6 m, since the sources already cited here only state 6m or 7 m (chiappe 2007 state 6 m, kirkland state 7 m) undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 15:2315:23, 22 August 2024 5.90.223.184 talk 39,128 bytes −63 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 15:0715:07, 22 August 2024 5.90.223.184 talk 39,191 bytes −10 The new article “The evolution of femoral morphology in giant non-avian theropod dinosaurs” doesn’t suggest a general increase in the size of the taxon, it only suggest an increase in body mass of the animal, for this reason the older estimates for the length and height of the taxon should be considered accurate. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 15:0315:03, 22 August 2024 5.90.223.184 talk 39,201 bytes −14 The new article “The evolution of femoral morphology in giant non-avian theropod dinosaurs” doesn’t suggest a general increase in the size of the taxon, it only suggest an increase in body mass of the animal, for this reason the older estimates for the length and height of the taxon should be considered accurate. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

18 August 2024

• curprev 22:2522:25, 18 August 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs m 39,215 bytes +26 the sources clearly state 6-7 m length estimates undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 18:1918:19, 18 August 2024 109.118.33.88 talk 39,189 bytes −2 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 18:0818:08, 18 August 2024 109.118.33.88 talk 39,191 bytes −2 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 01:3001:30, 18 August 2024 37.159.72.94 talk 39,193 bytes −13 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 01:2001:20, 18 August 2024 37.159.72.94 talk 39,206 bytes −9 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 August 2024

• curprev 11:4411:44, 13 August 2024 Junsik1223 talk contribs 39,215 bytes +198 No edit summary undo

12 August 2024

• curprev 06:2806:28, 12 August 2024 Zipforth talk contribs 39,017 bytes +15 Clarifying that the length of the claw given is the outside curve length. This is the measurement method used in Kirkland, J. I.; Burge, D.; Gaston, R. (1993) Page 10. undo

6 June 2024

• curprev 01:3401:34, 6 June 2024 112.184.39.88 talk 39,002 bytes −1 →Description undo
• curprev 01:3301:33, 6 June 2024 112.184.39.88 talk 39,003 bytes −65 →Description undo