Misplaced Pages

:Petition against kitten abuse: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:42, 22 January 2010 editCapitalQ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users524 edits Signed← Previous edit Revision as of 03:54, 22 January 2010 edit undoMickMacNee (talk | contribs)23,386 edits of courseNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
#I support this, even though Lara has implicitly pointed out that supporting it is probably blasphemous. Just as well I no longer live in ]-<font face="cursive" color="#808080">]</font> 03:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC) #I support this, even though Lara has implicitly pointed out that supporting it is probably blasphemous. Just as well I no longer live in ]-<font face="cursive" color="#808080">]</font> 03:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
#Down with meanie administrators who ignore all rules by abusing kittens! -] (]) 03:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC) #Down with meanie administrators who ignore all rules by abusing kittens! -] (]) 03:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
#There are certainly a few cluless admins who would freely abuse kittens if only you phrased the reason for doing so in just the right way. So yes, duly condemned. Now, if you could get an ambiguous arbcom motion and a Jimbo half-quote to sort of endorse kitten abuse as Doing Good Work despite what the rest of the right thinking kitten loving world thinks....my God, the inhumanity. ] (]) 03:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:54, 22 January 2010

Petition against kitten abuseAny administrator who abuses kittens is a meanie, especially if they do so in the name of Misplaced Pages. After all, kittens are adorable, and abusing them doesn't benefit Misplaced Pages. Therefore:
  • We the undersigned, condemn in the strongest possible terms, any administrator that abuses kittens. (And please note that anyone who doesn't sign this obviously condones kitten abuse.)
I can has signachurs?
  1. David Levy 03:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. THINK OF THE KITTENS. –Juliancolton |  03:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
  3. @harej 03:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
  4. Just look at that image!!! Aw... we all know that most of you are causing God to kill kittens... don't contribute to the problem further by abusing them too! Lara 03:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
  5. I support this, even though Lara has implicitly pointed out that supporting it is probably blasphemous. Just as well I no longer live in Ireland-gadfium 03:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
  6. Down with meanie administrators who ignore all rules by abusing kittens! -CapitalQ (talk) 03:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
  7. There are certainly a few cluless admins who would freely abuse kittens if only you phrased the reason for doing so in just the right way. So yes, duly condemned. Now, if you could get an ambiguous arbcom motion and a Jimbo half-quote to sort of endorse kitten abuse as Doing Good Work despite what the rest of the right thinking kitten loving world thinks....my God, the inhumanity. MickMacNee (talk) 03:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)