Misplaced Pages

User talk:Neotarf: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:23, 9 September 2014 view sourceNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits Your edit: sig← Previous edit Revision as of 09:44, 9 September 2014 view source Callanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators72,946 edits Arbitration case request: new sectionNext edit →
Line 50: Line 50:


Knowledgekid87 . So much for keeping things out of spotlights.—] (]) 04:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC) Knowledgekid87 . So much for keeping things out of spotlights.—] (]) 04:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

== Arbitration case request ==

Hi Neotarf, I've added you as a party to a case request currently before the Committee by request of an arbitrator. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
* ];
* ].

Thanks, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 09:44, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:44, 9 September 2014

How to disable Media Viewer:

  • At the top of your page when you are logged in: Preferences > Appearance > Files.

Subpages:

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.


ANI closure revert

I noticed that you reverted the closure of a thread on ANI that I had previously closed. That is generally discouraged, particularly if you are involved in the dispute. I closed the thread because, as an uninvolved and unbiased observer, it was clear to me that the discussion would not result in any consensus to take any action. Then, you reverted the closure and started a proposal to ban certain users from a wikiproject, which predictably elicited roughly equal numbers of support and oppose votes. This should elucidate why I closed the thread in the first place. Please don't re-open it. ‑Scottywong| express _ 15:04, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page. —Neotarf (talk) 20:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

RFAR

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gender Gap Task Force Issues and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Robert McClenon (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

No I am not "involved", Robert, but thanks for letting me know. —Neotarf (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your edit

Do you really need to put "Comparisons with mental disorders are not going to be very constructive here." ? Yes passive aggressiveness is a mental disorder but you do not have to elaborate on it and throw it into the spotlight. This I not helping an already tense talkpage. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

I did not "throw" it in the spotlight, it was already in the spotlight. It is not uncivil to point out that someone else is being uncivil. And it is really quite an unacceptable thing to say. I know the men's rights group on Reddit talks like that all the time, but that's no excuse for it on Misplaced Pages. —Neotarf (talk) 04:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
It was not in the spotlight though, it is just like someone else calling someone the N word and then going to describe it, it just adds salt into the wounds. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
What do you mean "not in the spotlight"? It is watchlisted by 77 people, and has been viewed 1743 times in the last 30 days. And you want to leave that up unchallenged? —Neotarf (talk) 04:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Curious where you see discussion of mental disorders (or where the personal attack is for that matter) on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force#Request_for_Arbitration_on_this_Task_force. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Im not the one who brought it up, the personal attack was blowing up the comment of what another editor had put down and throwing it into the spotlight. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
So it's okay to make a personal attack, but not okay to object to a personal attack? Do you have a link to the policy for that? —Neotarf (talk) 04:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Knowledgekid87 has now introduced the "passive aggressive/mental disorder" meme on the arbitration page. So much for keeping things out of spotlights.—Neotarf (talk) 04:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration case request

Hi Neotarf, I've added you as a party to a case request currently before the Committee by request of an arbitrator. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case# and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:44, 9 September 2014 (UTC)