Misplaced Pages

Terri Schiavo case: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:07, 12 May 2005 editGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 editsm Issues of dispute← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:01, 17 December 2024 edit undoBrenont (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,787 editsm Disability rights 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American right-to-die legal case}}
{{CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC - please read the talk page discussion before making substantial changes}}
{{Pp-move}}
]
{{Good article}}
'''Theresa Marie Schiavo''' (], ]–], ]), commonly known as '''Terri Schiavo''' (pronounced ''SHY-voh'', ]: {{IPA|/'ʃaɪvoʊ/}}), was an ] woman from ], ].
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2017}}
{{Infobox person
|name = Terri Schiavo
|image = Schiavo.jpg
|caption = Terri Schiavo with her mother in 2001
|birth_name = Theresa Marie Schindler
|birth_date = {{birth date|1963|12|3}}
|birth_place = ], U.S.
|death_date = {{death date and age|2005|3|31|1963|12|3}}
|death_place = ], U.S.
|spouse = {{marriage|Michael Schiavo|1984|<!--Omission is per Template:Marriage instructions-->}}
}}
{{Terri Schiavo}}
The '''Terri Schiavo case''' was a series of court and legislative actions in the United States from 1998 to 2005, regarding the care of '''Theresa Marie Schiavo''' (née '''Schindler''') ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ʃ|aɪ|v|oʊ}}; December 3, 1963&nbsp;– March 31, 2005), a woman in an irreversible ]. Schiavo's husband and legal guardian argued that Schiavo would not have wanted prolonged artificial life support without the prospect of recovery, and, in 1998, he elected to remove her ]. Schiavo's parents disputed her husband's assertions and challenged Schiavo's medical diagnosis, arguing in favor of continuing artificial nutrition and hydration.<ref name="tbo"/><ref name="abstract">{{Cite web|url=http://bioethics.miami.edu/research-and-clinical-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/part-1/index.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141116010101/http://bioethics.miami.edu/research%2Dand%2Dclinical%2Dethics/terri%2Dschiavo%2Dproject/timeline%2Dof%2Dkey%2Devents/part%2D1/index.html|title=Schiavo Timeline, Part 1|publisher=The University of Miami Ethics Programs|archive-date=November 16, 2014|url-status=dead|access-date=December 5, 2014}}</ref> The highly publicized and prolonged series of legal challenges presented by her parents, which ultimately involved state and federal politicians up to the level of ], the then ], caused a seven-year (1998 to 2005) delay before Schiavo's feeding tube was ultimately removed.


On February 25, 1990, at age 26, Schiavo went into ] at her home in ]. She was resuscitated, but had severe ] due to ] and was left ]tose. After two and a half months without improvement, her diagnosis was changed to that of a persistent vegetative state. For the next two years, doctors attempted occupational therapy, speech therapy, physical therapy and other experimental therapy, hoping to return her to a state of awareness, without success. In 1998, Schiavo's husband Michael Schiavo petitioned the ] to remove her feeding tube pursuant to Florida law.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://law.onecle.com/florida/civil-rights/765.401.html|title=§ 765.401 of Florida Statutes – Health Care Advance Directives – The proxy|publisher=]|date=November 22, 2006|access-date=January 1, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081208005258/http://law.onecle.com/florida/civil-rights/765.401.html|archive-date=December 8, 2008|df=mdy-all}}</ref> He was opposed by Terri's parents, Robert and Mary Schindler. The court determined that Schiavo would not have wished to continue life-prolonging measures,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/08/Tampabay/Schiavo_s_wishes_reca.shtml|title=Schiavo's wishes recalled in records |url-status=dead |first=William R. |last=Levesque|newspaper=] |date=November 8, 2003|access-date=January 5, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060106010646/http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/08/Tampabay/Schiavo_s_wishes_reca.shtml|archive-date=January 6, 2006|df=mdy-all}}</ref> and on April 24, 2001, her feeding tube was removed for the first time, only to be reinserted several days later. On February 25, 2005, a Pinellas County judge again ordered the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. Several appeals and federal government intervention followed, which included Bush returning to Washington, D.C., to sign legislation moving the case to the federal courts. After appeals through the federal court system that upheld the original decision to remove the feeding tube, staff at the ] hospice facility disconnected the feeding tube on March 18, 2005, and Schiavo died on March 31, 2005.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8225637|title=Schiavo autopsy shows irreversible brain damage|date=2005-06-15 |website=] |agency=] |language=en|access-date=2019-06-18}}</ref>
On ], ], Schiavo suffered severe ] from ] caused by ]-induced ]. She went into a coma for two and a half months, and was later diagnosed as being in an irreversible ] (PVS),<!--Unless you can prove that she was not diagnosed as being in a PVS, do not change this.--> a state that lasted until her death 15 years later. Schiavo's medical diagnosis of being in a persistent vegetative state was a source of major dispute between her parents (Bob and Mary Schindler) and her husband (Michael Schiavo, Schiavo's legal guardian). This dispute led to numerous court cases over the course of several years. Six doctors that examined Schiavo (her family physician, three doctors selected by the courts, and two doctors selected by Michael) diagnosed her to be in a persistent vegetative state. Two ] concurred with this decision. Two doctors selected by Schiavo's parents diagnosed her to be in a "minimally conscious state." The court determined that Schiavo was indeed in a PVS, and this ruling was upheld on every appeal, by 19 different judges, both in state courts and later in federal courts.


The Schiavo case involved 14 appeals and numerous ], petitions, and hearings in the Florida courts; five suits in ]; ] at the levels of the Florida state legislature, Governor ], the U.S. Congress, and President George W. Bush; and four denials of '']'' from the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/32405acluopp.pdf|title="Respondent Michael Schiavo's opposition to application for injunction", Case No.: 04A-825|page=9|last=Felos |first=George J.|publisher=Blue Dolphin Publishing|date=March 24, 2005|access-date=January 15, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060113153024/http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/32405acluopp.pdf|archive-date=January 13, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The case also spurred highly visible activism from the ], the ], and ] groups.<ref name="disability rights">{{cite news|url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-7894575.html|title=Rights groups for disabled join in fight|first=Nina |last=Easton|date=March 23, 2005|access-date=January 10, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140610054140/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-7894575.html|archive-date=June 10, 2014|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Since Schiavo's death, both her husband and her family have written books on their sides of the case, and both have also been involved in activism over related issues.<ref name="Schiavo books"/><ref name="TSSF dispute"/><ref name="TerriPAC OS"/>
The judicial and legislative battles to prevent the disconnect of her ] generated tremendous media coverage during the last few weeks of her life and sparked a fierce debate over ], ]ship, ], ] and ]. Michael Schiavo contends that he carried out his wife's wishes not to be kept alive in a state such as a persistent vegetative state. This became another source of major dispute between Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers. Mrs. Schiavo had no ], and both sides brought their case before the courts. Mrs. Schiavo's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, vigorously appealed the judicial decisions, leading to the reinsertion of the feeding tube on two separate occasions after its removal. The courts all ruled in favor of Schiavo's husband, and the feeding tube was removed a third and final time. On ], 2005, with the Schindlers having exhausted their legal options in ], they brought their dispute to ] ], the ], ] ], and the ] as her feeding tube was removed a third and final time. Schiavo died on ], ] at around 9:05 a.m. ]. An ] has been performed, but the results have not yet been released.


==Background==
''Related article: ]''
===Early life===
Terri Schiavo was born Theresa Marie Schindler to Mary (born 1941)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-xpm-2003-10-26-0310260400-story.html | title=How to Deal with Terri Schiavo's Tragedy Splits Family | date=October 26, 2003 }}</ref> and Robert Schindler (1937–2009)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.archbalt.org/robert-schindler-who-fought-to-care-for-daughter-terri-schiavo-dies/?print=print | title=Robert Schindler, who fought to care for daughter Terri Schiavo, dies – Archdiocese of Baltimore }}</ref> on December 3, 1963, in ], a suburb of ]. She was the oldest of three children. Her mother reported that, as a child, Schiavo would spend hours in her bedroom arranging her collection of stuffed animals.<ref>{{Cite web |title=CNN.com - Terri Schiavo's life, death sparked national debate - Mar 31, 2005 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/31/obit.schiavo/ |access-date=2024-02-29 |website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> As a teen, she enjoyed listening to ] and reading ] romances.<ref>{{Cite web |title=CNN.com - Terri Schiavo's life, death sparked national debate - Mar 31, 2005 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/31/obit.schiavo/ |access-date=2024-02-29 |website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> She attended ], where she met Michael Schiavo in 1982. The two began dating and married on November 10, 1984. They moved to ] in 1986, following her parents. Michael worked as a restaurant manager, while Terri took up a ] job with an insurance company.<ref name="WashPostFrey">{{cite news|last=Frey|first=Jennifer|title=Terri Schiavo's Unstudied Life|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64459-2005Mar24.html|access-date=July 30, 2010|newspaper=Washington Post|date=March 25, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628233930/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64459-2005Mar24.html|archive-date=June 28, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> She had naturally dark hair, but dyed it blonde.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Staff Reports |date=2005-03-27 |title=Before tragedy, an ordinary life |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/2005/03/27/before-tragedy-an-ordinary-life/ |access-date=2024-02-29 |website=Chicago Tribune |language=en-US}}</ref>


===Initial medical crisis: 1990===
==Early life==
In the early morning of February 25, 1990, Schiavo collapsed in a hallway of her ] apartment. Firefighters and ], arriving in response to her husband Michael's ] call, found her face-down and unconscious. She was not breathing and had no ]. They attempted to resuscitate her and she was transported to the Humana Northside Hospital. Paramedics had her ] and ].<ref name="wolfson">{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/WolfsonReport.pdf|title=A report to Governor Jeb Bush and the Sixth Judicial Circuit in the matter of Theresa Marie Schiavo|author=Wolfson, Jay|publisher=abstractappeal.com|pages=2, 8, 10|date=December 1, 2003|access-date=September 21, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707075525/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/WolfsonReport.pdf|archive-date=July 7, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
Schiavo was born '''Theresa Marie Schindler'''. Her parents named her after Saint ]. She grew up in the Huntingdon Valley area of ], a suburb of ], as the eldest of three children; her younger siblings are Robert Jr. (Bobby) and Suzanne.


====Initial medical assessments====
By her senior year in ], Schiavo was ], with a height of 5'3" (1.57 m) and a weight of around 200 pounds. Schiavo went on a NutriSystem ] and lost about 55 pounds (25 kg). Schiavo may have developed an eating disorder around this time in order to cope with her perceived weight problem. In 1981, she graduated from Archbishop Wood High School, a private ] in nearby ].
The cause of Schiavo's collapse was determined to be ].<ref name="Cranford">{{cite journal|last=Cranford|first=Ronald|date=Summer 2005|title=Facts, Lies, and Videotapes: The Permanent Vegetative State and The Sad Case of Terri Schiavo|journal=The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics|volume=33|issue=2|pages=363–71|doi=10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00501.x|pmid=16083094|s2cid=13039529|issn = 1073-1105 }}<!-- no url, so accessdate=2013-11-07 caused error --></ref> Her medical chart contained a note that "she apparently has been trying to keep her weight down with dieting by herself, drinking liquids most of the time during the day and drinking about 10–15 glasses of ]."<ref name="UStoday">{{cite news|title=Schiavo case highlights eating disorders|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-02-25-schiavo-eating-disorder_x.htm|access-date=November 28, 2011|newspaper=USA Today|date=February 26, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111129064653/http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-02-25-schiavo-eating-disorder_x.htm|archive-date=November 29, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Upon admission to the hospital, she was noted as suffering from ] (low potassium levels): her serum ] level was an abnormally low 2.0&nbsp;]/] (the normal range for adults is 3.5–5.0&nbsp;mEq/L). Her ] and ] levels were normal.<ref name="SilentWitness">{{cite book|title=Silent Witness|author=Mark Fuhrman|publisher=William Morrow|year= 2005|page=|isbn=0-06-085337-9|url=https://archive.org/details/silentwitnessunt00fuhr/page/67}}</ref> ] is often caused by ], and a serious consequence of hypokalemia can be heart rhythm abnormalities, including ].<ref name="quote">Meyer J, et al. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120502033511/http://www.aafp.org/afp/2003/0801/p483.html |date=May 2, 2012 }} ''Am Fam Physician''. 2003 Aug 1;68(3):483–488. Retrieved July 26, 2011.</ref> Schiavo was eventually switched from being fed by a ] to a ] (PEG) feeding tube. Garcia J. DeSousa, a board-certified ] in St. Petersburg, Florida, who had previously treated Schiavo, cared for her during her initial admission to Humana Northside; both he and Victor Gambone, an internist and Schiavo family physician, independently made the diagnosis of persistent vegetative state within approximately one year after her sudden cardiac arrest.<ref name="Cranford" />


===Relationship between Terri's husband and parents===
She met Michael Schiavo in 1982 in a ] class at ] in ], Pennsylvania, where they were both students. He was her first boyfriend. After dating for five months, the couple got engaged and were married on ], ], at Our Lady of Good Counsel Church in ]. They moved to St. Petersburg, Florida in April 1986. Schiavo's parents also moved to St. Petersburg three months later. In Florida, Schiavo worked as an insurance claims clerk for the ] ], and her husband was a restaurant manager. Schiavo's friends began to have suspicions about her eating habits. After meals out, she would immediately excuse herself to go to the bathroom. Michael Schiavo was aware of her unusual eating patterns, but did not realize their potential danger.
From 1990 to 1993, Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers (Terri Schiavo's parents) enjoyed an amicable relationship,<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121031031338/http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/justices/pariente.shtml |date=October 31, 2012 }} (for The Court). "Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, et al., vs. Michael Schiavo, Guardian of Marissa Brown", Case Number: SC04-925, '']'', September 23, 2004 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050416021236/http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/flsupct/sc04-925/op-sc04-925.pdf |date=April 16, 2005 }}</ref><!--Pg 3 of 30--> with the Schindlers allowing Michael to live rent-free in their condominium for several months.<ref name="pearse"/>


===Rehabilitation efforts: 1990–1993===
In 1989, the Schiavos began visiting an ] and receiving fertility services and counseling in the hopes of having a child. At this time, Schiavo's weight had dropped to 120 pounds, and she had stopped ]. However, the physician who examined Schiavo did not take a complete ], which would have indicated an eating disorder.
In November 1990, Michael Schiavo took Terri to the ], for experimental nerve stimulation with a ]. The treatment took several months and was unsuccessful. He returned to Florida with her in January 1991 and admitted her as an inpatient to the Mediplex Rehabilitation Center in ]. On July 19, 1991, Schiavo was transferred to the Sabal Palms Skilled Care Facility, where she received neurological testing and regular ] and ] until 1994.<ref name=abstract/> In mid-1993, Michael Schiavo requested a ] order for her after she contracted a ].


==Legal cases 1992–2005==
==Initial medical crisis==
On the morning of ], ], at about 5:30 a.m. EST, Schiavo collapsed in the hallway of the St. Petersburg ] she shared with her husband. The noise awoke Michael Schiavo and he immediately called his wife's parents and ] emergency services. The cause of the collapse was determined to be ]. While waiting for the paramedics to arrive she experienced a loss of ] to the ], causing catastrophic brain damage and total loss of cognitive function, resulting in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). The collapse also left her partially blind.


===Malpractice===
]s and paramedics found Schiavo face down and unconscious, in the hallway outside her bathroom. There were no signs of violence or a struggle. Attempts were made to resuscitate Schiavo, but she remained ] and slipped into a ]. She was taken to the Humana Northside Hospital, and in order to keep her alive, she was ], ventilated, and given a ]; she also received a ] (PEG), a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall. Schiavo emerged from her coma two and a half months later at Humana Northside Hospital, but never fully recovered or exhibited any evidence of higher cortical function.
In 1992, Michael filed a ] suit against Terri's ] on the basis that he failed to diagnose ] as the cause of her infertility.<ref>Greer, George W., Circuit Judge. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707075544/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder02-00.pdf |date=July 7, 2011 }} File No. 90-2908GD-003, '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110926072401/http://www.jud6.org/ |date=September 26, 2011 }}'', February 11, 2000</ref> Terri had gone to the doctor because she had stopped ] but the doctor had failed to take her medical history into account which might have revealed an eating disorder. During the case, one of Terri's friends testified that she knew Schiavo was bulimic. In November 1992, Michael won the case and was awarded $6.8 million by the jury, later reduced to $2 million as Terri was found partly at fault for her condition.<ref name="UStoday"/> After attorneys' fees and other expenses, Michael received $300,000 and $750,000 was put in a trust fund for Terri's medical care. According to Michael, in early 1993 the Schindlers demanded that he share the malpractice money with them.<ref name=abstract />


===Petition to remove feeding tube===
The St. Petersburg police report revealed that no illegal drugs or alcohol were found in Schiavo's system; a physical inspection did not find any sign of trauma to her head or face.
On June 18, 1990, the court appointed Michael Schiavo as Terri Schiavo's legal guardian; this appointment was not disputed by the Schindlers at the time.<ref name="wolfson" /> In May 1998, Michael Schiavo filed a petition to remove Terri Schiavo's feeding tube, which her parents opposed. Richard Pearse was appointed by the court as a second ], and on December 29, 1998, reported "Dr. Jeffrey Karp's opinion of the ]'s condition and prognosis is substantially shared among those physicians who have recently been involved in her treatment." Pearse concluded from Karp's and Vincent Gambone's diagnosis of ''Persistent Vegetative State'' that Schiavo was legally in a persistent vegetative state as defined by Florida Statutes, Title XLIV, Chapter 765, ]101(12). This includes the "absence of voluntary action" and an "inability to communicate or interact purposefully".<ref name="pearse">{{cite web|url=http://www.hospicepatients.org/richard-pearse-jr-12-29-98-report-of-guardianadlitem-re-terri-schiavo.pdf|title=Report of guardian ad litem", for "In re: the guardianship of Theresa Schiavo, an incapacitated person, Case No. 90-2908GD-003|author=Pearse, Richard L. Jr. P.A. Guardian Ad Litem.|pages=2, 8–11|publisher=Hospice Patients Alliance|date=December 29, 1998|access-date=February 1, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060211023027/http://www.hospicepatients.org/richard-pearse-jr-12-29-98-report-of-guardianadlitem-re-terri-schiavo.pdf|archive-date=February 11, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/765.101|title=State of Florida. Florida Statutes, Citation of Law, §765.101(12), Florida Statutes|publisher=]|date=June 1, 2005|access-date=February 3, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130517122147/http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/765.101|archive-date=May 17, 2013|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>


Pearse found that there was no possibility of improvement but that Michael Schiavo's decisions might have been influenced by the potential to inherit what remained of Terri Schiavo's estate as long as he remained married to her. Due to a lack of a ] and questions regarding Michael's credibility, Pearse recommended denying his petition to remove her feeding tube. Pearse reported that the issue of conflict of interest applied to the Schindlers as well, since, had Michael divorced Terri as they wanted him to, they would have inherited the remainder of Terri Schiavo's estate upon her death.<ref name="pearse" />
According to her discharge summary from Humana Hospital, Schiavo suffered a cardiac arrest and anoxic brain damage, accompanied by ]s, ], and an injured knee from the fall. Her cardiac arrest is believed to have been caused by bulimia-induced ] (abnormally low levels of ] in the blood). At the time of her hospital admission, her blood potassium level was 2.0 mEq/L; the normal range for adults is 3.5-5.0. Medical records noted that "she apparently has been trying to keep her weight down with dieting by herself, drinking liquids most of the time during the day and drinking about 10-15 glasses of ]."


===Schiavo end-of-life wishes===
==Rehabilitation efforts==
Given the lack of a ], a trial was held before Pinellas County Judge ] during the week of January 24, 2000, to determine what Schiavo's wishes would have been regarding life-prolonging procedures.<ref name="greer-02-00"/> Michael Schiavo was represented by attorney ], who had won a landmark right-to-die case before the ] in 1990.<ref name="Browning AP">{{cite news|title=Florida Woman Dies Attached to a Tube; Legal Fight Goes On|work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/19/us/florida-woman-dies-attached-to-a-tube-legal-fight-goes-on.html|agency=Associated Press|date=July 19, 1989|access-date=February 13, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170312202203/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/19/us/florida-woman-dies-attached-to-a-tube-legal-fight-goes-on.html|archive-date=March 12, 2017|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name="Browning Schiavo">{{cite web|last=Levesque|first=William R.|title=Right-to-die law defined by local case|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2003/10/13/Tampabay/Right_to_die_law_defi.shtml|work=St. Petersburg Times|date=October 13, 2003|access-date=November 23, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203001552/http://www.sptimes.com/2003/10/13/Tampabay/Right_to_die_law_defi.shtml|archive-date=December 3, 2013|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
On ], 1990, Schiavo was discharged to the College Park Skilled Care and Rehabilitation Facility. On ], the court appointed Michael Schiavo as his wife's legal guardian, without objection from the Schindlers. Schiavo was transferred to Bayfront Hospital for further rehabilitation efforts on ]. She came home to her family in September; however, after becoming overwhelmed with her needs, the family sent her back to the College Park facility. In November, Mr. Schiavo took his wife to the ] for an experimental procedure involving the placement of a ] implant in her brain. The experimental treatment took several months but was unsuccessful. Mr. Schiavo returned to Florida with her in January ] and admitted his wife to the Mediplex Rehabilitation Center (specializing in brain injuries) in ], often "taking her to parks and public places in hopes of sparking some recovery." There she recieved 24-hour care. On ], 1991, Schiavo was transferred to the Sable Palms Skilled Care Facility, where she neurological testing and regular speech and occupational therapy are done until 1994.


The trial included testimony from 18 witnesses regarding her medical condition and her end-of-life wishes. Michael Schiavo claimed that his wife would not want to be kept on a machine where her chance for recovery was minuscule. According to Abstract Appeal Trial Order, her parents "claimed that Terri was a devout ] who would not wish to violate the Church's teachings on ] by ]." Judge Greer issued his order granting the petition for authorization to discontinue artificial life support for Terri Schiavo in February 2000. In this decision, the court found that Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed.<ref name="greer-02-00">{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder02-00.pdf|title=In re: the guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated", File No. 90-2908GD-003|author=Greer, George W. Circuit Judge|pages=9–10|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit|date=February 11, 2000|access-date=January 8, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707075544/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder02-00.pdf|archive-date=July 7, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> This decision was upheld by the ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/2dcaorder01-01.txt|title=In re Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee, Case Number: 2D00-1269|author=Altenbernd, Chris W. (for The Court)|publisher=Florida Second District Court of Appeal|date=January 24, 2001|access-date=February 6, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707075621/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/2dcaorder01-01.txt|archive-date=July 7, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> (2nd DCA) and came to be known by the court as ''Schiavo I'' in its later rulings.<ref>See, for instance p. 6 of {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060213190403/http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/32205fjord.pdf |date=February 13, 2006 }} p. 6</ref>
Around this time, Mr. Schiavo began studying ] at ] to better care for his wife; eventually, he became a ] and ] nurse.


===Oral feeding and the second guardianship challenge===
==Family relationship and malpractice suit==
In March 2000, the Schindlers filed a motion to permit assisted feeding of Terri, which is not considered a life-prolonging procedure under Florida law. Since clinical records indicated that Terri Schiavo was not responsive to ] tests and required a feeding tube,<ref name="wolfson" /> Judge Greer ruled that she was not capable of orally ingesting sufficient nutrition and hydration to sustain life, and denied the request.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0300.pdf|title=In re: the guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated, File No. 90-2908GD-003|author=Greer, George W. Circuit Judge|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit|date=March 7, 2000|access-date=February 9, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707075633/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0300.pdf|archive-date=July 7, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Medical Examiner in his postmortem report was more definitive and reaffirmed that Schiavo could not have swallowed.<ref name="thogmartin">{{cite web|url=http://www.abstractappeal.com/schiavo/autopsyreport.pdf|title="Report of Autopsy" for Theresa Schiavo, Case #5050439|author=Thogmartin, Jon R.|page=34|publisher=co.pinellas.fl.us/forensics/|date=June 13, 2005|access-date=November 7, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130618073323/http://www.abstractappeal.com/schiavo/autopsyreport.pdf|archive-date=June 18, 2013|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Schiavo and the Schindlers enjoyed an amicable relationship. <!-- quoting from page 3 of 30, Wolfson report --> The Schindlers even allowed Mr. Schiavo to live rent-free in their condominium for several months. <!-- I ran out of time, anyone have a specific quote from a report for this? -->
On June 18, 1990, the court appointed Mr. Schiavo as Mrs. Schiavo's legal guardian, without objection from the Schindlers. During this time, the Schindlers actively encouraged Mr. Schiavo to "get on with his life." He was encouraged by the Schindlers to date, and he introduced his in-law family to women he was dating. <!-- quoting from page 11 of 38 of Wolfson report -->


In 2000, the Schindlers again challenged Michael Schiavo's guardianship. The Schindlers suggested that he was wasting the assets within the guardianship account by transferring Terri Schiavo to a ], ] "after it was clear that she was not 'terminal' within Medicare guidelines" for hospices. By this time, while still legally married to Terri Schiavo, Michael Schiavo was in a relationship with Jodi Centonze, and had fathered their first child. He said he chose not to divorce his wife and relinquish guardianship because he wanted to ensure her final wishes (not to be kept alive in a PVS) were carried out. The court denied the motion to remove the guardian, allowing that the evidence was not sufficient and, in some instances, not relevant. It set April 24, 2001, as the date on which the tube was to be removed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/petitiontoremoveguardian_amended.html|title=Second amended petition to remove guardian|author=Anderson, Patricia F.|publisher=libertytothecaptives.net|date=January 1, 2003|page=14|access-date=February 10, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060206190623/http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/petitiontoremoveguardian_amended.html|archive-date=February 6, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
In ], Mr. Schiavo, on behalf of Schiavo and himself, brought a ] lawsuit against the ] who had been treating Schiavo for ], claiming that the doctor's failure to diagnose Schiavo's eating disorder caused her current condition. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury found that Schiavo was bulimic and that the obstetrician's failure to diagnose this condition caused her hypokalemia and subsequent cardiac arrest. While on appeal, the case was settled (May 1992) and provided that Mrs. Schiavo receive $700,000 in damages and Mr. Schiavo receive $300,000 for ] . The court placed Mrs. Schiavo's award in a ], which was controlled by a third party and covered her medical and legal expenses.


==Legal disputes== ===''Schiavo II''===
In April 2001, the Schindlers filed a motion for relief from judgment citing new evidence of Terri Schiavo's wishes. Judge Greer denied the motion as untimely under Rule 1.540(b)(5) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://floridacivpro.com/rules/1-540-relief-from-judgment-decrees-or-orders/|title=Florida Rules of Civil Procedure|publisher=The Florida Bar|date=December 1, 2005|access-date=November 22, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121031140659/http://floridacivpro.com/rules/1-540-relief-from-judgment-decrees-or-orders/|archive-date=October 31, 2012|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Second District Court of Appeal upheld Greer's decision but ] the issue in order to give the Schindlers an opportunity to file a new motion. On April 24, 2001, Terri's feeding tube was removed for the first time. The Schindlers filed a civil suit against Michael Schiavo alleging ], which was assigned to another court. The judge, Frank Quesada, issued an injunction against the removal of feeding tube until this was settled. The feeding tube was reinserted on April 26, 2001. On appeal by Michael Schiavo, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed Judge Quesada's order. In the same time frame, Michael Schiavo filed a motion to enforce the mandate of the guardianship court (that the feeding tube be removed). The Second District Court of Appeal denied the motion. These three decisions, all published in a single order by Florida's Second District Court of Appeal,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/2dcaorder07-01.txt|title="In re Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee", ''and'' "Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellant, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellees", Case Numbers: 2D00-1269, 2D01-1836, and 2D01-1891|author=Altenbernd, Chris W. Judge (for The Court)|publisher=Florida Second District Court of Appeal|date=July 11, 2001|access-date=February 11, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110709123352/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/2dcaorder07-01.txt|archive-date=July 9, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> came to be known by the court as ''Schiavo II'' in its later rulings.
On ], ], Mr. Schiavo and the Schindlers had a falling-out. Mr. Schiavo claims the argument arose because he refused to share the settlement money with the Schindlers. The Schindlers claim that he failed to honor commitments he had previously made to seek aggressive treatments for his wife's condition. <!-- quote is on page 4 of 14, Pearse report--> The amicable relationship ended, and Mr. Schiavo and the Schindlers literally stopped speaking to each other. <!--quoting from page 3 of 30 of report --> Mr. Schiavo placed limits on how much time the Schindlers could spend with Schiavo.


===''Schiavo III and IV'': PVS diagnosis challenge===
In July 1993, the Schindlers began their first challenge to Mr. Schiavo's guardianship and attempted to remove him as legal guardian.
] of normal brain; Right: Schiavo's 2002 CT scan provided by ], showing loss of brain tissue. The black area is liquid, indicating ].<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/511647|title=In Brief: The Afterlife of Terri Schiavo|last=Fins|first=Joseph|author2=Nicholas Schiff|journal=The Hastings Center Report|publisher=The Hastings Center|volume=35|issue=4|page=8|date=September 1, 2005|access-date=October 1, 2005|doi=10.1353/hcr.2005.0038|pmid=16225295|s2cid=44800298|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121211012736/http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/511647|archive-date=December 11, 2012|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}} Quote: "She had developed hydrocephalus ex vacuo, a condition marked by enlarged ventricles filled with cerebrospinal fluid, because of this profound loss of cortical volume."</ref> The small white piece in the right image is the ] implanted in her brain.]]
On August 10, 2001, on remand from the ], Judge Greer heard a motion from the Schindlers claiming that new medical treatment could restore sufficient cognitive ability such that Terri Schiavo herself would be able to decide to continue life-prolonging measures. The court also heard motions from the Schindlers to remove the guardian (Michael Schiavo) and to require Judge Greer to ] himself. Judge Greer denied the motions and the Schindlers appealed to the Second District Court of Appeals. On October 17, 2001, the Court of Appeal affirmed the denials of the motions to remove and recuse. The Court of Appeals acknowledged that their opinion misled the trial court, and they remanded the question of Terri Schiavo's wishes back to the trial court and required an evidentiary hearing to be held. The court specified that five board certified neurologists were to testify. The Schindlers were allowed to choose two doctors to present findings at an evidentiary hearing while Schiavo could introduce two rebuttal experts. Finally, the trial court itself would appoint a new independent physician to examine and evaluate Terri Schiavo's condition. These decisions, all published in a single order by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.2dca.org/opinion/October%2017,%202001/2d01-3626.pdf|title=In re: Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee, Case Number: 2D01-3626|author=Altenbernd, Chris W. Judge (for The Court)|publisher=Florida Second District Court of Appeal|date=October 17, 2001|page=12|access-date=February 22, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060311110308/http://www.2dca.org/opinion/October%2017,%202001/2d01-3626.pdf|archive-date=March 11, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> came to be known by the court as ''Schiavo III'' in its later rulings. In October 2002, on ] by the Second District Court of Appeal, an evidentiary hearing was held in Judge Greer's court to determine whether new therapy treatments could help Terri Schiavo restore any cognitive function. In preparation for the trial, a new ] scan (CAT scan) was performed, which showed severe ]. An ] showed no measurable brain activity. The five physicians chosen were William Maxfield, a ], and four ]: William Hammesfahr, Ronald Cranford, Melvin Greer and Peter Bambakidis.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/10/Tampabay/Schiavo_tapes__snippe.shtml|title=Schiavo tapes: snippets, then not much|last=Nohlgren|first=Stephen|work=St. Petersburg Times|date=November 10, 2003|access-date=April 5, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080111053415/http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/10/Tampabay/Schiavo_tapes__snippe.shtml|archive-date=January 11, 2008|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>


The five doctors examined Terri Schiavo's medical records, brain scans, the videos, and Terri herself. Cranford, Greer, and Bambakidis testified that Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). Drs. Maxfield and Hammesfahr testified that she was in a ]. As part of the court-ordered medical exam, six hours of video of Terri Schiavo were taped and filed at the Pinellas County courthouse. The tape included Terri Schiavo with her mother and neurologist William Hammesfahr. The entire tape was viewed by Judge Greer, who wrote, Terri "clearly does not consistently respond to her mother". From that six hours of video, the Schindlers and their supporters produced six video clips intended to support their case, totaling less than six minutes, and released those clips to public websites.<ref name="tbo">{{cite news|url=http://news.tbo.com/news/MGBQ67CTI6E.html|title=Schiavo Videotapes Offer Powerful But Misleading Evidence|last=Smith|first=Brad|work=Tampa Tribune|date=March 20, 2005|access-date=February 17, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050320120815/http://news.tbo.com/news/MGBQ67CTI6E.html |archive-date=March 20, 2005 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Judge Greer ruled that Terri Schiavo was in a PVS, and was beyond hope of significant improvement. The trial court order was particularly critical of Hammesfahr's testimony, which claimed positive results in similar cases by use of ] therapy, the success of which is unsupported in the medical literature.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder11-02.txt|title=In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GB-003|author=Greer, George W. Circuit Judge|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit|date=November 22, 2002|access-date=February 4, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110709123342/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder11-02.txt|archive-date=July 9, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> This ruling was later affirmed by Florida's Second District Court of Appeal, which stated that "this court has closely examined all of the evidence in the record", and "we have&nbsp;... carefully observed the video tapes in their entirety." The court concluded that "if we were called upon to review the guardianship court's decision '']'', we would still affirm it." This decision by the Second District Court of Appeals<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.2dca.org/opinion/June%2006,%202003/2D02-5394.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040726042921/http://www.2dca.org/opinion/June%2006,%202003/2D02-5394.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 26, 2004|title="In re: Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee", Case Number: 2D02-5394|author=Altenbernd, Chris W. Judge (for The Court)|publisher=Florida Second District Court of Appeal|date=June 6, 2003|pages=9–10|access-date=February 22, 2006|df=mdy-all}}</ref> came to be known as ''Schiavo IV'' in later rulings.
In ], after three years of trying traditional and experimental therapies, Mr. Schiavo accepted the diagnosis of an irreversible persistent vegetative state. At this point, he began to accept the idea of allowing his wife to die naturally, rather than remaining in a persistent vegetative state. In consultation with his wife's physician, he halted most therapy for his wife and entered a "do-not-resuscitate" order, which he later rescinded after the Schindlers and the nursing home protested. Wolfson wrote in his report that:
:''In early 1994 Theresa contracted a urinary tract infection and Michael, in consultation with Theresa's treating physician, elected not to treat the infection and simultaneously imposed a do-not-resuscitate order should Theresa experience cardiac arrest. When the nursing facility initiated an intervention to challenge this decision, Michael cancelled the orders. Following the incident involving the infection, Theresa was transferred to another skilled nursing facility...''
:''Michael's decision not to treat was based upon discussions and consultation with Theresa's doctor, and was predicated on his reasoned belief that there was no longer any hope for Theresa's recovery. It had taken Michael more than three years to accommodate this reality and he was beginning to accept the idea of allowing Theresa to die naturally rather than remain in the non-cognitive, vegetative state.''


Around the start of 2003, the Schindlers began to create more publicity by lobbying for their case to keep their daughter alive. On September 11, 2003, the Schindlers petitioned the court to forestall removal of the feeding tube in order to provide for "eight weeks' therapy". Accompanying the petition were four affidavits from members of the Schindler family and one from Dr. Alexander T. Gimon. At the hearing, the Schindlers' counsel read into the record additional affidavits from three speech professionals and two nurses. In particular, nurse Carla Sauer Iyer asserted that she was able to feed Terri Schiavo orally but that Michael characterized any such interaction as "therapy" and ordered her not to do so. Iyer claimed in her affidavit that her initial training in 1996 consisted solely of the instruction, "Do what Michael Schiavo tells you or you're terminated", and that standing orders were not to contact the Schindler family, but that she "would call them anyway".<ref name=":0" />
On March 1, 1994, guardian ''ad litem'' John H. Pecarek submitted his report, writing that Mr. Schiavo had acted appropriately and attentively toward Schiavo. Michael remained his wife's guardian. In May 1998, Mr. Schiavo filed a petition to discontinue life support for Schiavo. Her parents opposed it. Richard Pearse was appointed as a second ''ad litem''.


On September 17, 2003, Judge ] denied the petition, and wrote that "the Petition is an attempt by Mr. and Mrs. Schindler to re-litigate the entire case. It is not even a veiled or disguised attempt. The exhibits relied upon by them, clearly demonstrate this to be true." Regarding Iyer's<ref name=Iyer>{{cite web|url=http://treyjackson.typepad.com/junction/2005/03/carla_sauer_i_w.html|title=Fox interview of Carla Sauer Iyer|publisher=Fox News via American Patriot Friends Network (APFN)|date=March 25, 2005|access-date=July 25, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050326040947/http://treyjackson.typepad.com/junction/2005/03/carla_sauer_i_w.html |archive-date=March 26, 2005 |url-status=dead}}</ref> statements,<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=http://www.apfn.org/Schiavo/CIyerAffidavit090203.htm|title=Affidavit|date=March 2, 2005|author=Carla Sauer Iyer|access-date=July 25, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927202855/http://www.apfn.org/Schiavo/CIyerAffidavit090203.htm|archive-date=September 27, 2007|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ocregister.com/ocr/sections/news/news/article_456712.php|title=Michael Schiavo's character is mixed portrait|last=Breed|first=Allen G.|publisher=Orange County Register|date=March 25, 2005|access-date=March 1, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090706204126/http://www.ocregister.com/ocr/sections/news/news/article_456712.php |archive-date=July 6, 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hospicepatients.org/heidi-law-09-03-affidavit-re-terri-schiavo-michael.html|title=Heidi Law Affidavit|author=Heidi Law|publisher=self|date=January 1, 2002|access-date=January 1, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061027174433/http://www.hospicepatients.org/heidi-law-09-03-affidavit-re-terri-schiavo-michael.html|archive-date=October 27, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Greer wrote that they were "incredible to say the least" and that "Ms. Iyer details what amounts to a 15-month cover-up from April 1995 through July 1996, which include the staff of Palm Garden of Largo Convalescent Center, the Guardian of the Person, the guardian ''ad litem'', the medical professionals, the police and, believe it or not, Mr. and Mrs. Schindler&nbsp;... It is impossible to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Schindler would not have subpoenaed Ms. Iyer for the January 2000 evidentiary hearing had Iyer contacted them in 1996 as her affidavit alleges."<ref>{{cite book|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0903.pdf|title=In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908GD-003|author=Greer, George W. Circuit Judge|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit|date=September 17, 2003|access-date=July 25, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070710115626/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0903.pdf|archive-date=July 10, 2007|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}} Direct quote from pages 5–6 of this 9-page Order.</ref>
The same year, Dr. Jeffrey Karp and Dr. Victor Gambone, Schiavo's primary care physician, determined that she was in an irreversible ] (PVS). On December 29, 1998, Pearse concluded that Schiavo was legally in a persistent vegetative state as defined by State Law 765.101, section 12:
:''(12) "Persistent vegetative state" means a permanent and irreversible condition of unconsciousness in which there is:''
::''(a) The absence of voluntary action or cognitive behavior of any kind.''
::''(b) An inability to communicate or interact purposefully with the environment.''
Pearse found that there was no possibility of improvement and that Mr. Schiavo's decisions may have been influenced by the potential to inherit what remains of Schiavo's estate. Due to a perceived lack of evidence for Schiavo's wishes, and questions regarding Mr. Schiavo's credibility, Pearse recommends denying his petition to remove her feeding tube. According to Jay Wolfson, one of Schiavo's court-appointed guardians, due to the attention Schiavo has received in the 15 years she has been bedridden, she has never developed any bedsores. <!--year report came out? -->


==Terri's Law and other government delays==
Dr. Ron Cranford, a ] at the ], assessed Schiavo's brain function in ] as part of a court-ordered examination. His exam showed that Schiavo's ] had been completely destroyed and replaced by ]. The upper brain was about 80 percent destroyed, and there was also damage to the lower brain. The only part of the brain that remained intact was the ], which controls involuntary functions such as breathing and heartbeat&mdash;allowing Schiavo to survive (with a feeding tube) even though she no longer had any cognitive function. He was quoted in ''Florida Today'' as saying, " has no electrical activity in her cerebral cortex on an EEG (]), and a CT (]) scan showed massive ] in that region." <!--Cranford's potential bias keeps getting brought up on talk page. Also, a lot of misinformation about Cranford has been spread around on other sites. Cranford's background should be clarified to readers. But this information is out of date. Either update the info and put it in the article, or leave the notes in place until someone does. Dr. Cranford has been a board member of Choice In Dying, which helps prepare end-of-life wishes and living wills, since ]. Choice in Dying became Partnership for Caring: America's Voices for the Dying http://www.partnershipforcaring.org/HomePage/ in 2000. This hasn't been substantiated. The partnershipforcaring.org website is a dead URL. This is also turning into bloat, and since it's unsubstantiated, leaving it out of the article, but in the notes for future researchers. The article should reflect whatever "choices in dying" calls itself currently (2005) and point to a current, working URL, not some old archived version of the site -->
{{Main|Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case}}


On October 15, 2003, Schiavo's feeding tube was removed. Within a week, when the Schindlers' final appeal was exhausted, State Rep. ] and the ] passed "Terri's Law" in an ] giving Governor ] the authority to intervene in the case. Governor Bush immediately ordered the feeding tube be reinserted. Governor Bush sent the ] (FDLE) to remove Schiavo from the hospice. She was taken to Morton Plant Rehabilitation Hospital in Clearwater, where her feeding tube was surgically reinserted.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=584124&page=1|title=Transcript: Michael Schiavo on 'Nightline': Husband at the Heart of the 'Right to Die' Case Speaks to Chris Bury|author=Bury, Chris|website=]|date=March 15, 2005|access-date=February 21, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051226203013/https://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=584124&page=1|archive-date=December 26, 2005|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> She was then returned to the hospice. Part of the legislation required the appointment of a ], Jay Wolfson, to "deduce and represent the best wishes and best interests" of Schiavo, and report them to Governor Bush. Wolfson's report did not change Michael's role as her legal guardian and did not otherwise obstruct him legally.<ref name="wolfson" />
In ], a trial was held to determine whether new therapy treatments would help Schiavo restore any cognitive function. A new ] scan (CAT scan) was done, and showed severe ]. An EEG showed no measurable brain activity.


Michael Schiavo opposed the Governor's intervention in Schiavo's case, and was represented, in part, by the ] (ACLU). At the same time, Robert and Mary Schindler, her parents, attempted to intervene and participate in the "Terri's Law" case but were denied by Judge W. Douglas Baird, a Circuit Judge in the Florida Sixth Circuit. They appealed, and, on February 13, 2004, the ] (Second District Court of Appeals) ordered Baird to hold further hearings on the issue.<ref>{{cite web|access-date=2020-09-09|title=Schiavo Case Still In Court|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/schiavo-case-still-in-court/|website=www.cbsnews.com|date=May 6, 2004 }}</ref> On March 17, 2004, Baird denied the Schindlers the right to intervene a second time.<ref>{{cite web|access-date=2020-09-09|title=Judge: Schiavo's parents can't join fight over law|url=https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2004/03/13/judge-schiavo-s-parents-can-t-join-fight-over-law/|website=Tampa Bay Times}}</ref> The Schindlers, represented by the ] (ACLJ), appealed the right to participate in the "Terri's Law" case, with the court scheduling an ] date for June 14.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://199.242.69.70/pls/ds/ds_docket?p_caseyear=2004&p_casenumber=1528&psCourt=2&psSearchType=|title=State of Florida "Case Docket", Case Number: 2D04-1528|publisher=]|date=January 1, 2004|access-date=March 2, 2006}}</ref> The Schindlers' other attorney, Pat Anderson, was concurrently challenging Michael Schiavo's right to be her guardian, and, on June 16, 2004, she made a petition for writ of '']''.
Five doctors were selected to provide their expert testimony to the trial: two by Schiavo's parents, two by Mr. Schiavo, and one by the court. The Schindler family selected Dr. William Maxfield (the Schindlers' family doctor, who was a radiologist) and Dr. ] (who made claims about vasodilation therapy that the court found spurious, and who later falsely claimed to be a ], being "nominated" by someone who was ineligible to nominate him. ). Michael Schiavo selected Dr. Cranford and Dr. James Barnhill. The court selected Dr. Peter Bambakidis. These five doctors examined Schiavo's medical records, brain scans, the videos, and Schiavo herself. Cranford, Barnhill, and Bambakidis said Schiavo was in a PVS. Maxfield and Hammesfahr said Schiavo was in a "minimally conscious state." Greer ruled that Schiavo was in a PVS and was beyond hope of significant improvement. Florida's ] reviewed all the evidence and upheld the trial court's decision, saying had they heard the case themselves they would have ruled the same as Greer. Judge Greer reviewed a six-hour tape of Schiavo and concluded that her vegetative condition was factual and not subject to legal dispute.


On May 5, 2004, Baird found "Terri's Law" ], and struck it down.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder05-04.txt|title=Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Jeb Bush, Governor of the State of Florida, and Charlie Crist, Attorney General of the State of Florida, Respondents, Case No. 03-008212-CI-20|author=Baird, W. Douglas Circuit Judge|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit|date=May 5, 2005|access-date=February 3, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110623023112/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder05-04.txt|archive-date=June 23, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Bush appealed this order to the Second District Court of Appeals, but on May 12, 2004, the court issued an "Order Relinquishing Case for Entry of Final Judgment and Order to Show Cause Why this Proceeding Should Not be Certified to the Supreme Court As Requiring Immediate Resolution".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/summaries/briefs/04/04-925/Filed_06-04-2004_SchiavoOpposition.pdf|title=Order Relinquishing Case for Entry of Final Judgment and Order to Show Cause Why this Proceeding Should Not be Certified to the Supreme Court As Requiring Immediate Resolution", Case Number: 2D04-2045|author=Birkhold, James Clerk (for The Court)|publisher=]|date=May 12, 2004|pages=6–7|access-date=April 1, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050514100614/http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/summaries/briefs/04/04-925/Filed_06-04-2004_SchiavoOpposition.pdf|archive-date=May 14, 2005|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Second District Court of Appeals, in sending it directly to the Florida Supreme Court, invoked "pass through" jurisdiction.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/schiavoposts2004.html|title=Schiavo News|author=Conigliaro, Matt|website=abstractappeal.com|date=June 10, 2004|access-date=April 7, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060425105513/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/schiavoposts2004.html|archive-date=April 25, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
==Schiavo's condition in 2005==
] ] at age 38.]]
===Persistent vegetative state (PVS)===
Patients in a persistent vegetative state have severe brain damage and are in a state of "wakefulness without awareness." In many cases, the persistent vegetative state occurs after a ], which is consistent with Schiavo having been in a coma following her collapse. Patients in a persistent vegetative state are usually considered to be unconscious and unaware. They may experience sleep-wake cycles or be in a state of chronic wakefulness. They may exhibit some behaviors that can be construed as arising from partial consciousness, including ] or random behaviors such as grinding of teeth, swallowing, smiling, shedding tears, grunting, moaning or screaming without any apparent ]. They are unresponsive to external stimuli, except, possibly, painful stimuli.


The Florida Supreme Court then overturned the law as unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/summaries/briefs/04/04-925/Filed_09-23-2004_Opinion.pdf|title=Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, et al., Appellants, vs. Michael Schiavo, Guardian of Theresa Schiavo, Appellee, Case Number: SC04-925|author=Pariente, Barbara Chief Justice (for The Court).|publisher=]|date=September 23, 2004|access-date=April 15, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060505022334/http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/summaries/briefs/04/04-925/Filed_09-23-2004_Opinion.pdf|archive-date=May 5, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
The prognosis for recovery of awareness in PVS has been quantified. In general, the prognosis depends on the cause and duration of PVS. It is worse after cardiac arrest and after a long duration of PVS. Patients remaining in PVS for greater than three months after cardiac arrest have only a slight chance of recovery of awareness. Recovery of awareness is unprecedented after two years. With head injury causing PVS, the times necessary to show these levels of prognostic certainty are one year and five years, respectively. <!-- This paragraph is a direct quote from Dr. Bernat's testimony before the U.S. Senate in April 2005. Dr. Bernat's testimony was approved by the AAN Executive Committee. The two links provided document the testimony and the AAN approval.-->


==Final feeding tube removal and federal involvement==
Nonetheless, some dispute exists over the reliability of a PVS diagnosis. One British study found that 43 percent of patients in the study classified as being in a PVS were misdiagnosed and another 33 percent were able to recover while the study was underway.


===Early 2005 motions===
Three Florida neurologists viewed 12 of Schiavo's CT scans on ], ]. After viewing the scans, Dr. Leon Prockop (a professor and former chairman of the neurology department at the ]'s College of Medicine) was quoted by the '']'' as saying that Schiavo's scan exhibits the "most severe brain damage as I've ever seen." Dr. Walter Bradley, the chairman of neurology at the ]'s Miller School of Medicine, said that he "doubts there's any activity going on in the higher levels of her brain." Dr. Michael T. Pulley said, "The chance that this person is going to recover is about zero."
On February 23, 2005, the Schindlers filed a motion for relief from judgment pending medical evaluations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://floridasky.us/terri/022305med.pdf|title="Resondents' Fla.R.Civ.P.1.540(b)(5) Motion for relief from judgment pending contemporary medical/psychiatric/rehabilitative evaluation of Theresa Marie Schiavo", File Number: 90-2908GD-003|author=Gibbs, David C. III|date=February 23, 2005|access-date=May 1, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060526191644/http://floridasky.us/terri/022305med.pdf|archive-date=May 26, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Schindlers wanted Schiavo to be tested with an ] and given a swallowing therapy called VitalStim. The motion was accompanied by 33 affidavits from doctors in several specialties, speech-language pathologists and therapists, and a few neuropsychologists, all urging that new tests be undertaken.<ref name="Greer-PDF6th">{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder030905.pdf|title=In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GD-003|page=2|author=Greer, George W. Circuit Judge|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit|date=March 9, 2005|access-date=May 28, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725081338/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder030905.pdf|archive-date=July 25, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>''Face the Nation'', CBS: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629052819/http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/face_32705.pdf |date=June 29, 2011 }}.</ref> Patricia Fields Anderson, the Schindler family attorney, still held out hope "that Terri might be able to take nourishment orally, despite past findings that she is incapable".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2003/09/15/Columns/Too_thin_a_line_betwe.shtml|title=Too thin a line between life, death for Schiavo|author=Troxler, Howard|work=]|date=September 15, 2003|access-date=March 8, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060509142758/http://www.sptimes.com/2003/09/15/Columns/Too_thin_a_line_betwe.shtml|archive-date=May 9, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Judge Greer formally denied the motion and ordered the "removal of nutrition and hydration from the ward" and set the time and date for the removal of the feeding tube as "1:00 p.m. on Friday, March 18, 2005".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder02-05.pdf|page=3|title=In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GD-003|author=Greer, George W. Circuit Judge|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit]|date=February 25, 2005|access-date=June 26, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725081249/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder02-05.pdf|archive-date=July 25, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>


On February 28, 2005, the Schindlers filed a motion, asking for permission to attempt to provide Schiavo with "Food and Water by Natural Means". This second motion asked for permission to "attempt to feed" Schiavo by mouth.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://floridasky.us/terri/022805EmMotionNaturalFeeding.pdf|title=Emergency expedited motion for permission to provide Theresa Schiavo with food and water by natural means, File Number: 90-2908GD-003|page=1|author=Gibbs, David C. III|date=February 27, 2005|access-date=March 25, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060325011812/http://floridasky.us/terri/022805EmMotionNaturalFeeding.pdf|archive-date=March 25, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Judge Greer denied the second motion on March 8, saying "it has become clear that the second motion is part and parcel of the previous motion on medical evaluations. The same declarations are being used for both motions and the motion appears to be an alternative pleading to the previous motion. Both are asking for an experimental procedure."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder030805.pdf|title=In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GD-003|author=Greer, George W. Circuit Judge|publisher=Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit|date=March 8, 2005|access-date=March 25, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725081234/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder030805.pdf|archive-date=July 25, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The following day, Greer denied the first motion as well, citing that an affiant doctor for Michael cautioned that fMRI was an experimental procedure that should be conducted in an academic setting, because Schiavo had already undergone swallowing tests and failed, and because VitalStim had only been performed on patients who were not in a PVS. Greer noted that "most of the doctor affidavits submitted are based on their understanding of Schiavo's condition from news reports or video clips they have seen. Many are obviously not aware of the medical exams undertaken for the 2002 trial."<ref name="Greer-PDF6th"/>
On ], ], Dr. William Cheshire Jr., a neurologist and consultant at the ] in Jacksonville and Assistant Professor of Neurology at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, filed an affidavit in which he explains that he had been asked by the Florida Dept. of Children and Families to investigate allegations of abuse of Schiavo. Although no such abuse was found, Cheshire goes on to say that he believed he had found reason to doubt the PVS diagnosis and to prefer a diagnosis of "minimally conscious state" or MCS. He notes that the MCS diagnosis is recent, and cites a 2002 article to show its recent establishment. Of note is that one of the authors of that article ("The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria," Neurology 58 (2002): 349-353) is Ronald Cranford, who, in his testimony in the 2002 trial on Schiavo's medical condition, had rejected the MCS diagnosis in favor of re-affirming the PVS diagnosis which had stood for 12 years. Of further note is that in reviewing Schiavo's medical records, Cheshire does not mention the EEG tests that had played a role in establishing and re-affirming the PVS diagnosis. Cheshire visited Schiavo five days after her feeding tube had been removed. His visit lasted 90 minutes and consisted only of visual observation, not a formal medical exam. During his visit, he observed what he interpreted to be purposeful behavior, as when Schiavo appeared to be watching him for "about half a minute."


Following Greer's order on March 18, 2005, to remove the feeding tube, Republicans in the ] ]ed both Michael and Terri Schiavo to testify at a congressional hearing.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/HouseSubpoenas.pdf|title="Subpoena", Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives|author=Davis, Tom Chairman (for The Committee)|date=March 18, 2005|access-date=September 1, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050904000602/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/HouseSubpoenas.pdf|archive-date=September 4, 2005|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Greer told congressional attorneys, "I have had no cogent reason why the (congressional) committee should intervene." He also stated that last-minute action by Congress does not invalidate years of court rulings.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-03-18-congress-schiavo_x.htm|title=Schiavo's feeding tube removed despite congressional intervention|agency=Associated Press|date=March 18, 2005|access-date=February 24, 2006|work=USA Today|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060217011532/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-03-18-congress-schiavo_x.htm|archive-date=February 17, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.tbo.com/news/MGBLXWESG6E.html|title=Schiavo's Feeding Tube Removed|agency=Associated Press|date=March 18, 2005|access-date=October 1, 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051215160223/http://news.tbo.com/news/MGBLXWESG6E.html |archive-date=December 15, 2005 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
He noted that her hospice records suggested that she exhibited what might have been discomfort during menstruation. He notes that "three years have passed since Schiavo has had the benefit of neurologic consultation." Because her early brain examinations had been structural, not functional, he recommended functional examinations using new technologies, and in light of current research. He argues that a diagnosis of MCS would make "an enormous difference in making ethical decisions on Terri's behalf." If she were in an MCS, his judgment is that "it would be wrong to bring about her death by withdrawing food and water." Based on Cheshire's affidavit, Governor Jeb Bush filed a petition to have Schiavo's feeding tube restored. Criticism of Dr. Cheshire includes his writing of opinion articles on stem-cell research and other scientific debates that reveal a conservative Christian viewpoint.<!--this line was originally a quote from Kansas City Star, "espouse" was the word they used. If it gets changed around enough, the link to the Kansas City Star will be pointless.-->


===Issues of dispute=== ===Palm Sunday Compromise===
{{Main|Palm Sunday Compromise}}
] or ]ive actions.]]
President ] and Congressional Republicans anticipated Greer's adverse ruling well before it was delivered and worked on a daily basis to find an alternative means of overturning the legal process by utilizing the authority of the ]. On March 20, 2005, the Senate, by ], passed their version of a relief bill; since the vote was taken by voice vote, there was no official tally of those voting in favor and those opposed. Soon after Senate approval, the House of Representatives passed an identical version of the bill S.686, which came to be called the "]" and transferred jurisdiction of the Schiavo case to the federal courts. The bill passed the House on March 21, 2005, at 12:41&nbsp;a.m. (]). Bush flew to ] from his vacation in ] in order to sign the bill into law at 1:11&nbsp;a.m.


While the bill had been proposed by Republican Senators ] and ], it also had the support of Democratic Senator ] due to ] concerns in the Schiavo case. Harkin had worked with disability rights groups for years and co-authored the 1990 ].<ref name="disability rights"/> American disability rights groups traditionally tend to ally themselves with Democrats and the political left;<ref name="disability rights"/> however, in the Schiavo case, they joined pro-life organizations in opposing the removal of her feeding tube and supporting the Palm Sunday Compromise.<ref name="Congress Debate"/> According to ], Harkin's support was necessary for passage of the bill, as any voice opposition by Democrats would have delayed it.<ref name="disability rights"/>
Patients in a may exhibit some behaviors that can be construed as arising from partial consciousness&#8212;reflex or random behaviors such as grinding of teeth, swallowing, smiling, shedding tears, grunting, moaning or screaming without any apparent external stimulus. They are unresponsive to external stimuli, except, possibly, painful stimuli.


As in the state courts, all of the Schindlers' federal petitions and appeals were denied, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant '']'', effectively ending the Schindlers' judicial options. At the same time, the so-called ] surfaced, causing a political firestorm. The memo was written by ], the legal counsel to Florida Republican senator Mel Martínez. It suggested the Schiavo case offered "a great political issue" that would appeal to the party's ] (core supporters) and could be used against Senator ], a ] from ], because he had refused to co-sponsor the bill.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002213728_memo20.html|title=GOP memo says issue offers political rewards|newspaper=]|date=April 4, 2005|access-date=March 2, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110306125620/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002213728_memo20.html|archive-date=March 6, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Nelson easily won re-election in 2006.
Schiavo's parents claim that their daughter did not meet the definition of a persistent vegetative state and was in a "minimally conscious state" instead. Her parents argue that at times her actions were indicative of responses to external stimuli, not reflex or instinctive behavior. For example, the Schindlers claim that their daughter smiled, laughed, cried, moved, made childlike attempts at speech, and attempted to say "Mom" or "Dad"; or "yeah" when they asked her a question. They claim that when they kissed her she looked at them and sometimes puckered her lips.


Republican majority leader and physician ] opposed the removal of her feeding tube and, in a speech delivered on the Senate floor, challenged the diagnosis of Schiavo's physicians of Schiavo being in a persistent vegetative state (PVS): "I question it based on a review of the video footage which I spent an hour or so looking at last night in my office."<ref>{{cite book|last=Frist|first=Bill|title=Bill Frist : a senator speaks out on ethics, respect and compassion|year=2005|publisher=Monument Press|location=Washington, D.C.|isbn=0-9769668-3-2|page=195|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0aFiYpPzsgYC&q=%22I+question+it+based+on+a+review%22&pg=PA195}}</ref> After her death, the autopsy showed signs of long-term and irreversible damage to her brain consistent with PVS.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161013124733/http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/61305autopsyrpt.pdf |date=October 13, 2016 }} June 13, 2005</ref> Frist defended his actions after the autopsy.<ref>] (2005). "Schiavo Autopsy Renews Debate on G.O.P. Actions". '']'', June 16, 2005</ref>
Schiavo's parents videotaped her for four and a half hours and produced six video segments totaling four minutes and twenty seconds. Her parents cite the testimony and affidavits of 33 physicians and therapists (including 15 neurologists) who, after reviewing these four and a half minutes of video segments, believe that Schiavo should have received further tests and/or would have likely responded to therapy. Some of these physicians have claimed that there was a "strong likelihood that Mrs. Schiavo is in a "minimally conscious state." None of the physicians saw the full four and a half hours of video. (The six video segments have been released publicly. The rest of the recorded video has not been released by Schiavo's parents.)


==Final local motions, death, autopsy, and burial==
An emergency motion to restore the feeding tube was filed by Barbara Weller, the Schindlers' co-attorney who stated that 20 minutes before the tube was removed on ], ], and in response to their attempts to coach her, "she managed to articulate the first two vowel sounds, first articulating AHHHHHHH and then virtually screaming WAAAAAAAA." Schiavo had been unable to speak since her heart attack in ]. Weller asserted that she had told Schiavo that she would die unless she said, "I want to live." The alleged incident occurred only in the presence of family members and has not been independently confirmed; the police officer stationed outside the room said she could not recall hearing the vocalization. Judge ] said that Schiavo's utterances came only after being touched, which was consistent with evidence presented in ]. "All of the credible medical evidence this court has received over the last five years is that this is not a cognitive response, but rather something akin to a person jerking his/her hand off a hot stove long before he/she has thought about it," Greer wrote.
On March 24, 2005, Judge Greer denied a petition for intervention by the ] (DCF) and signed an order forbidding the department from "taking possession of Theresa Marie Schiavo or removing her" from the hospice and directed "each and every and singular sheriff of the state of Florida" to enforce his order. The order was appealed to the Second District Court of Appeals the following day, which resulted in an automatic stay under state law. While the stay was in effect, Florida Department of Law Enforcement personnel prepared to take custody of Terri Schiavo and transfer her to a local hospital for reinsertion of the feeding tube. Once Greer was made aware of the stay, he ordered it lifted and all parties stood down. Governor Bush decided to obey the court order despite enormous pressure from the political right. If Bush (or the Florida Legislature) had ignored Greer's order by attempting to remove her from the hospice, a confrontation between the Pinellas Park Police Department and the FDLE agents could have ensued. In jest, one official said local police discussed "whether we had enough officers to hold off the National Guard."<ref>{{cite news|agency=Associated Press|title=Report: State Tried Schiavo Grab|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-state-tried-schiavo-grab/|date=March 26, 2005|access-date=February 23, 2006|work=CBS News|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060829074721/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/26/national/main683300.shtml|archive-date=August 29, 2006|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>


Terri Schiavo died at a ] ] on March 31, 2005.
According to a ], ] report submitted by the second guardian ''ad litem'', Richard Pearse, ] staff members observed the same reactions claimed by the Schindlers, except the staff noted that Schiavo's responses were random, coincidental, and unrelated to any external stimuli. However, the report did note two consistent responses: Schiavo responded to deep pain stimuli by moaning, and she opened her eyes in response to noise.


===Autopsy===
===Life-prolonging procedures===
Schiavo's body was taken to the Office of the District 6 Medical Examiner for Pinellas and Pasco counties, based in Largo, Florida. The ] was conducted on April 1, 2005, and revealed extensive brain damage. The manner of death was certified as "undetermined." The autopsy was led by Chief Medical Examiner Jon R. Thogmartin. In addition to consultation with a neuropathologist (Stephen J. Nelson), Thogmartin also arranged for specialized cardiac and genetic examinations to be made. The official autopsy report<ref name="thogmartin" /> was released on June 15, 2005. In addition to studying Terri Schiavo's remains, Thogmartin scoured court, medical and other records and interviewed her family members, doctors and other relevant parties. Examination of Schiavo's nervous system by neuropathologist Stephen J. Nelson, revealed extensive injury. The ] itself weighed only {{convert|615|g|abbr=on}}, only half the weight expected for a female of her age, height, and weight, due to the loss of a massive number of neurons. Microscopic examination revealed extensive damage to nearly all ], including the ], the ], the ], the ], the ], and the ]. The neuropathologic changes in her brain were precisely of the type seen in patients who enter a PVS following cardiac arrest. Throughout the cerebral cortex, the large pyramidal ] that comprise some 70% of cortical cells – critical to the functioning of the cortex – were completely lost. The pattern of damage to the cortex, with injury tending to worsen from the front of the cortex to the back, was also typical. There was marked damage to important relay circuits deep in the brain (the thalamus) – another common pathologic finding in cases of PVS. The damage was, in the words of Thogmartin, "irreversible, and no amount of therapy or treatment would have regenerated the massive loss of neurons."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/HEALTH/06/15/schiavo.autopsy|title=Autopsy: No sign Schiavo was abused: Findings show woman's brain 'profoundly atrophied'|website=CNN|date=June 7, 2005|access-date=May 3, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060421071228/http://www.cnn.com/2005/HEALTH/06/15/schiavo.autopsy/|archive-date=April 21, 2006|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
Under Florida law, every person&mdash;competent and incompetent&mdash;has the right to refuse medical treatment. When a person is in a persistent vegetative state and there is no living will, the decision to withhold or withdraw life-prolonging procedures may be made by another. Life-prolonging procedures are defined to be, "any medical procedure, treatment, or intervention, including artificially provided sustenance and hydration, which sustains, restores, or supplants a spontaneous vital function or functions." Thus, a feeding tube would be considered a life-prolonging procedure (also known as life support), while feeding by hand would not. Clinical records indicate that that Schiavo was not responsive to swallowing tests and required a feeding tube.
Schiavo did not have a living will; therefore, in May 1998, Mr. Schiavo petitioned the Pasco-Pinellas Circuit Court for authority to remove her feeding tube. The case, ''In re Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Schiavo v. Schindler'', was randomly assigned to probate judge George Greer. The court appointed a guardian ad litem, Pearse, who produced a report concluding that Schiavo was in a permanent vegetative state. Pearse also noted that neither side was exempt from possible conflicts of interest, as Mr. Schiavo would be the sole inheritor of her money and the Schindlers hoped that they would be granted guardianship, that Mr. Schiavo would divorce their daughter, and that they would become Schiavo's "heirs-at-law." A trial was held and testimony was heard from eighteen witnesses, with evidence pertaining to her medical condition and to her end of life wishes. Judge Greer issued his order granting Mr. Schiavo’s petition for authorization to discontinue artificial life support for his wife in February 2000. In this decision, the court found that Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed. (This decision would be upheld by nineteen separate judges.)


The cardiac pathologist who studied Schiavo's heart found it and the ] to be healthy, which excludes the possibility that her initial collapse was the result of ], although there was a localized area of healed inflammation (opening the possibility of ]). Thogmartin found that "there was no proof that Terri Schiavo ever had an eating disorder such as bulimia." Regarding the possibility of strangulation or domestic violence as a cause of Schiavo's initial collapse, the report states: "No trauma was noted on any of the numerous physical exams or radiographs performed on Mrs. Schiavo on the day of, in the days after, or in the months after her initial collapse. Indeed, within an hour of her initial hospital admission, radiographic examination of her cervical spine was negative. Specifically, external signs of strangulation including cutaneous or deep neck injury, facial/conjunctival petechiae, and other blunt trauma were not observed or recorded during her initial hospital admission. Autopsy examination of her neck structures 15 years after her initial collapse did not detect any signs of remote trauma, but, with such a delay, the exam was unlikely to show any residual neck findings."<ref name="thogmartin" />
On ], the Schindlers filed an expedited motion for "Relief from Judgement Pending Contemporary Medical-Psychiatric-Rehabilitative Evaluation." The Schindlers wanted to reinsert Schiavo's feeding tube so that she could be tested with an ] and given a swallowing therapy called ]. They included the affidavits of doctors and speech therapists to support their case.


Regarding the cause and manner of Schiavo's death, Thogmartin wrote, "Mrs. Schiavo suffered severe anoxic brain injury. The cause of which cannot be determined with reasonable medical certainty. The manner of death will therefore be certified as undetermined."<ref name="thogmartin" />
On ], the Schindlers filed an "Expedited Motion for Permission to Provide Terri with Food and Water by Natural Means." This second motion asked for permission to "attempt to feed" Schiavo by mouth. <!--"attempt to feed" is A direct quite from the motion. Do not change unless there is agreement on talk. If direct quote, put in quote marks-->


===Burial===
On ], Judge Greer denied the second motion, saying "it has become clear that the motion is part and parcel of motion on medical evaluation. The same declarations are being used for both motions and the motion appears to be an alternative pleading to the motion. Both are asking for an experimental procedure." The first motion requests that Schiavo be given VitalStim swallowing therapy, which had never been performed on a patient who was in a PVS. The second motion simply asked permission to attempt to feed her by mouth, asserting that she might be able to swallow naturally. Greer then explained that if the first motion is approved, then the second one isn't needed, and if the first one is denied, the second one would be denied as well.
]


Schiavo's body was ]. Her parents organized a memorial ] for her at the Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Church in ] on April 5, 2005. Father ], the founder of the ] anti-abortion organization,<ref>Pavone, Frank A. "Father Frank A. Pavone – Biography", '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190102072458/http://priestsforlife.org/ |date=January 2, 2019 }}'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050206221734/http://www.priestsforlife.org/intro/ffbio.html |date=February 6, 2005 }}</ref> delivered the homily.<ref>"Schiavo's parents planning a funeral Mass for today", '']'', April 5, 2005 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050906130846/http://www.sptimes.com/2005/04/05/Tampabay/Schiavo_s_parents_pla.shtml |date=September 6, 2005 }}</ref>
On ], Judge Greer denied the first motion by the Schindlers, for the experimental testing and swallowing therapy. He denied the motion because an affiant doctor for Mr. Schiavo cautioned that fMRI was an experimental procedure that should be conducted in an academic setting<!-- quote is on page 4/5 of PDF-->, because Schiavo had already undergone swallowing tests and failed, and because VitalStim had only been performed on patients who were not in PVS. Greer noted that "most of the doctor affidavits submitted are based on their understanding of Schiavo's condition from news reports or video clips they have seen. Many are obviously not aware of the medical exams undertaken for the 2002 trial.... The Court cannot see how the have met the burden established by ''Schiavo III''... They are not alleging that any new treatment exists that would significantly improve the quality of her life so that would reverse the prior decision to withdraw life-prolonging procedures."


Michael Schiavo had his wife's cremated remains interred in a cemetery on June 20, 2005. The Schindlers' attorney stated that the family was notified by ] only after the memorial service; by then, the family had already started getting calls from reporters.<ref>Stacy, Mitch. "Schiavo's Remains Buried Amid Acrimony: Acrimony Between Terri Schiavo's Parents and Husband Continues As Her Remains Buried in Florida", '']'', June 21, 2005 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629113922/https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=867050 |date=June 29, 2011 }}</ref> The ashes were interred at Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park in ].
The court-appointed guardian ad litem, Dr. Jaw Wolfson, however, did feel that swallowing tests would be appropriate to get to the bottom of the dispute. In his report, he stated:


The epitaph (pictured) reads:
"Is there feasibility and value in swallowing tests and swallowing therapy given the totality of circumstances?
a. Yes. There is feasibility and value in swallowing tests and swallowing therapy being administered if the parties agree in advance as to how the results of these tests will be used with respect to the decision about Theresa’s future."


{{Poem quote|Schiavo / Theresa Marie / Beloved Wife
On ], Mr. Schindler told the media that his daughter's lips and eyes were "bleeding" from lack of hydration, that her skin was "peeling," and that she was "fighting like hell to stay alive." In a ] the following day, Mr. Schiavo's attorney, George Felos, described her differently, saying "she looked beautiful. In all the years I've seen Mrs. Schiavo, I've never seen such a look of peace and beauty upon her."
Born December 3, 1963
Departed this Earth / February 25, 1990
At peace March 31, 2005
] with ] image'']<!-- editor added descriptive text -->
I kept my promise}}


==Ethical and legal issues==
Neurologists have noted that if Schiavo was indeed in a persistent vegetative state, she did not experience pain, hunger or thirst due to the removal of the feeding tube. Perry G. Fine, the vice president of medical affairs at the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, was quoted in the ''Los Angeles Times'' as saying: &#8220;What my patients have told me over the last 25 years is that when they stop eating and drinking, there's nothing unpleasant about it. In fact, it can be quite blissful and euphoric... the word 'starve' is so emotionally loaded. People equate that with the hunger pains they feel or the thirst they feel after a long, hot day of hiking. To jump from that to a person who has an end-stage illness is a gigantic leap.&#8221;
===Right to die===
The Schiavo case has been compared to the ] and ], two landmark right-to-die cases.<ref>{{cite book|last=Shepherd|first=Lois L.|title=If That Ever Happens to Me: Making Life and Death Decisions After Terri Schiavo|year=2009|publisher=Univ of North Carolina Press|pages=–6|url=https://archive.org/details/ifthateverhappen00shep|url-access=registration|isbn=978-0-8078-8864-3}}</ref><ref name="M Stonecipher">{{cite journal|last=Stonecipher|first=Matthew|title=The evolution of surrogates' right to terminate life-sustaining treatment|journal=Virtual Mentor|date=September 2006|volume=8|issue=9|pages=593–98|url=https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/evolution-surrogates-right-terminate-life-sustaining-treatment/2006-09 |access-date=July 5, 2021|doi=10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.9.hlaw1-0609|pmid=23234711|doi-access=free}}</ref> Quinlan entered a persistent vegetative state in 1975, and her family was allowed to remove her from a ventilator in 1976 after a ruling by the ] based on her right of privacy. She died of ] in 1985.<ref name="quinlan death">{{cite web|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=qwgjAAAAIBAJ&pg=4910,299074&dq=karen-ann-quinlan&hl=en|title=Karen Ann Quinlan dies after 10 years in a coma|work=St. Petersburg (FL) Evening Independent|date=June 12, 1985}}{{dead link|date=September 2023}}</ref> Cruzan was diagnosed with PVS in 1983 and her legal case reached the Supreme Court, which ruled that "clear and convincing evidence" of her wishes to die under such circumstances was needed. Cruzan's family did not have enough evidence of that, but later produced more. She died after being removed from life support in 1990.<ref name="cruzan death">{{cite web|title=The Death of Nancy Cruzan|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/programs/transcripts/1014.html|work=Frontline, PBS|date=March 24, 1992|access-date=September 15, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160514022938/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/programs/transcripts/1014.html|archive-date=May 14, 2016|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>


The "Terri Schiavo case" actually refers to a series of cases. It differed from the Quinlan and Cruzan cases by involving settled law rather than breaking new legal ground on the right-to-die issue. In 2006, Professor Lois Shepherd, PhD JD, states it was "unclear" whether the Schiavo case represents a ].<ref>{{cite journal |first=Lois |last=Shepherd |url=http://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/law/students/publications/llj/pdfs/shepherd.pdf |title=Terri Schiavo: Unsettling The Settled |journal=Loyola University Chicago Law Journal |year=2006 |volume=37 |page=297 |access-date=October 18, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160502171024/http://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/law/students/publications/llj/pdfs/shepherd.pdf |archive-date=May 2, 2016 |url-status=live |df=mdy-all }}</ref> The Terri Schiavo affair involved a dispute between family members and her legal guardian over her wishes when there is no documented desire. According to medical ethicist Matthew Stonecipher, "The movement to challenge the decisions made for Terri Schiavo threatened to destabilize end-of-life law that had developed over the last quarter of the 20th century, principally through the cases of Karen Ann Quinlan and Nancy Cruzan."<ref name="M Stonecipher"/> The outcome of the Schiavo case was also in part determined by a 1990 Florida case, ''Guardianship of Estelle Browning''.<ref name="Browning Schiavo"/><ref name="Browning TBO">{{cite news|last=Sommer|first=David|title=Schiavo Case Could Cause Change In Law|url=http://news.tbo.com/news/MGA1IEYHYLD.html|access-date=November 30, 2012|newspaper=Tampa Bay Online|date=October 19, 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031023002811/http://news.tbo.com/news/MGA1IEYHYLD.html |archive-date=October 23, 2003 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In that case, attorney George Felos, representing a Browning relative, successfully argued that Browning's feeding tube should be removed before the ]. The elderly Browning had expressed, in a living will, her wish not to be kept alive by any artificial means, including receiving food and water "by a gastric tube or intravenously." At that time, it was common to remove people from ventilators, but the law in Florida was not clear on removing them from feeding tubes. In a landmark ruling, the Florida Supreme Court decided that Browning had "the constitutional right to choose or refuse medical treatment, and that right extends to all relevant decisions concerning one's health."<ref name="Browning Schiavo"/>
On ], Mr. Schindler told reporters, "I was pleasantly surprised by what I saw and encouraged that she's still fighting" and that Schiavo was "failing" but "doing darn good under the circumstances."


===Disability rights===
On ], 13 days after her feeding tube was removed, Schiavo went into cardiac arrest and died.
During the years of legal proceedings, ] groups and activists closely monitored and involved themselves in the case. In March 2003, 12 disability rights groups, led by Not Dead Yet, along with four other ''amici'' filed an '']'' brief in which they opposed the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube.<ref name="amicus brief">{{cite web|last=Townsend|first=Liz|title=Disability Rights Groups File Amicus Brief in Terri Schiavo Case''|url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-98775346.html|publisher=National Right to Life News|access-date=November 20, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140610055842/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-98775346.html|archive-date=June 10, 2014|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> They also used the Schiavo case to advocate for federal review in cases where third parties decide to withdraw life support from patients unable to give consent.<ref name="disability rights"/><ref name="Congress Debate">{{cite news|last=Stolberg|first=Sheryl Gay|title=Congress Ready to Again Debate End-of-Life Issues|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/28/politics/28cong.html?pagewanted=print&position=&_r=0|newspaper=The New York Times|date=March 28, 2005|access-date=February 13, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402132316/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/28/politics/28cong.html?pagewanted=print&position=&_r=0|archive-date=April 2, 2015|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
They argued that persistent vegetative state is frequently misdiagnosed, and that the reasons for withdrawal of life support from a patient should be scrutinized since even family member surrogates can have conflicts of interest. The Palm Sunday Compromise granted the federal review they sought, but it was limited to only the Schiavo case.<ref name="disability rights"/>


==Public opinion and activism==
===Bone scan===
{{Main|Public opinion and activism in the Terri Schiavo case}}
A bone scan performed in March 1991 showed, according to the radiologist who evaluated it, that Schiavo had suffered prior traumatic injuries to multiple ribs (on both sides), to both sacroiliac joints, both knees, both ankles, several thoracic ]e, and to her right thigh, in addition to a minor compression fracture of the L1 vertebra. Schiavo's parents did not know of the existence of this scan until ] ], twelve years after her brain damage and entry into an incapacitated state. ] Dr. ], provided with the scan but not with her history, suggested that physical trauma, specifically a head injury, probably caused Schiavo's collapse , though in a later interview , after learning her history, he agreed that the bulimia/hypokalemia explanation was also possible. Others argue that the trauma is consistent with her cardiac arrest, fall, CPR attempts and eventual resuscitation.


The seven-year case generated a great deal of public attention and activism.<ref name="Lois Shepherd">{{cite book|last=Shepherd|first=Lois|title=If That Ever Happens to Me: Making Life and Death Decisions after Terri Schiavo (Studies in Social Medicine)|year=2009|publisher=The University of North Carolina Press|isbn=978-0-8078-3295-0|pages=|url=https://archive.org/details/ifthateverhappen00shep/page/1}}</ref><ref name="Stolberg NYT">{{cite news|last=Stolberg|first=Sheryl Gay|title=Schiavo's Case May Reshape American Law|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/01/politics/01legacy.html|newspaper=The New York Times|date=April 1, 2005|access-date=February 13, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316023351/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/01/politics/01legacy.html|archive-date=March 16, 2015|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> There was extensive media coverage and both sides courted public opinion.<ref name="Public opinion">{{cite news|title=Schiavo's parents turn to court of public opinion|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/15/Hillsborough/Schiavo_s_parents_tur.shtml|agency=Associated Press|date=February 15, 2005|access-date=November 25, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120927011713/http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/15/Hillsborough/Schiavo_s_parents_tur.shtml|archive-date=September 27, 2012|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name="Case Didion">{{cite magazine|last=Didion|first=Joan|author-link=Joan Didion |title=The Case of Theresa Schiavo|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2005/jun/09/the-case-of-theresa-schiavo/?pagination=false|magazine=The New York Review of Books|date=June 9, 2005|access-date=November 25, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130120105359/http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2005/jun/09/the-case-of-theresa-schiavo/?pagination=false|archive-date=January 20, 2013|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> In 2000, the Schindlers created the Terri Schindler-Schiavo Foundation to garner support.<ref name="Funding sources">{{cite news|last1=Nohlgren|first1=Stephen|last2=Zucco|first2=Tom|title=Schiavo case has myriad fund sources|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2005/03/28/news_pf/State/Schiavo_case_has_myri.shtml|newspaper=St. Petersburg Times|date=March 28, 2005|access-date=November 27, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130829211725/http://www.sptimes.com/2005/03/28/news_pf/State/Schiavo_case_has_myri.shtml|archive-date=August 29, 2013|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name="TS press release">{{cite press release|title=Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation Changes Name; Hones Mission|url=http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/94375568.html|publisher=Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network press release|access-date=November 25, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101130032038/http://standardnewswire.com/news/94375568.html|archive-date=November 30, 2010|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> During the weeks when Schiavo's feeding tube was removed in 2005, activists kept up an around-the-clock vigil outside her hospice. The protests were described as loud but non-violent. There were dozens of arrests, with most being for crossing a police line with water for Schiavo.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/28/national/28cnd-schiavo.html|work=]|title=Schiavo Protesters Have Hearts on Sleeves and Anger on Signs|date=March 28, 2005|access-date=July 24, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111210115900/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/28/national/28cnd-schiavo.html|archive-date=December 10, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name="Protests CBS">{{cite web|title=Schiavo Protesters' Passions Rise|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/schiavo-protesters-passions-rise/|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130119040530/http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-683326.html|archive-date=January 19, 2013|url-status=live|website=CBS News|date=March 27, 2005 |access-date=November 24, 2012}}</ref>
Schiavo's parents and Dr. ], a neurologist they hired to examine her in ], claim that she had been ] by her husband. <!-- Please put criticism of Hammesfahr around the first mention of him in the article, not here. --> Upon becoming aware of the bone scan report possibly suggesting previous abuse, the Schindlers petitioned the ] for a full evidentiary hearing to evaluate the new evidence.


Two ] conducted shortly after Schiavo's feeding tube was removed for the final time in 2005 showed that a large majority of ] believed that Michael Schiavo should have had the authority to make decisions on behalf of his wife and that the ] overstepped its bounds with its intervention in the case.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/schiavo-politics-up-close/|work=CBS News|title=Schiavo Politics, Up Close|date=March 25, 2005|access-date=July 23, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629123138/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/25/opinion/lynch/main683233.shtml|archive-date=June 29, 2011|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
Matt Conigliaro comments that "o believe that Michael caused Terri's collapse by beating her requires that Michael initiated a medical malpractice lawsuit against a doctor for causing her collapse, opening the whole matter to serious inquiry and greatly increasing the risk that someone would discover his role as abuser. No evidence of abuse was presented by the obstetrician in the 1992 malpractice lawsuit even though the bone scan had been performed one year earlier." On ], ], probate judge ] denied the motion, stating that the issue of trauma 12 years earlier was irrelevant to the current case.


==Developments since Schiavo's death==
Florida's Department of Children and Families investigated 89 complaints of abuse dating back to 2001, when Schiavo's feeding tube was removed for the first time. In a report released on ], 2005, state investigators concluded that "there is no evidence to support allegations of any neglect or abuse."
Since Terri Schiavo's death in March 2005, her family and Michael Schiavo have clashed a number of times. Each side has also worked to promote their own causes related to the case. In April 2005, the families disagreed over Schiavo's burial. The Schindlers had wanted her body to be buried in Florida, while Michael Schiavo said at the time that he would cremate her body and then have her ashes buried in her home state of ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Parents Hold Funeral Mass for Terri Schiavo|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,152578,00.html|agency=Associated Press|date=April 6, 2005|access-date=November 27, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121017162549/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,152578,00.html|archive-date=October 17, 2012|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> In June 2005, however, Schiavo's ashes were buried in Florida instead. The words "I kept my promise" were included on the marker, referring to his promise to follow what he said was her wish not to be kept alive artificially. The statement angered the Schindlers.<ref>{{cite news|title=Even in Death, Acrimony over Schiavo|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8299372|agency=Associated Press|date=June 21, 2005}}</ref>


In December 2005, Michael Schiavo created a ], TerriPAC. It was formed to raise money to support right-to-die candidates and oppose candidates who had voted for government involvement in the Schiavo case.<ref name="TerriPAC OS">{{cite web|last=Lytle|first=Tamara|title=Schiavo turns rage into TerriPAC|url=https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2005/12/08/schiavo-turns-rage-into-terripac/|newspaper=Orlando Sentinel|date=December 8, 2005|access-date=November 29, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016002224/http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2005-12-08/news/SCHIAVO08_1_weldon-feeding-tube-congressional-action|archive-date=October 16, 2013|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref> In 2007, TerriPAC paid a $1,350 fine to the ] for failing to file complete and timely records.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bioethics.miami.edu/research-and-clinical-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/part-2/index.html|title=Schiavo Timeline, Part 2|publisher=University of Miami Ethics Programs|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180109181156/http://bioethics.miami.edu/research-and-clinical-ethics/terri-schiavo-project/timeline-of-key-events/part-2/index.html|archive-date=January 9, 2018|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Schiavo shut down the PAC later that year.<ref>{{cite web|title=TerriPAC|url=http://www.terripac.com/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071010233255/http://www.terripac.com/|archive-date=October 10, 2007|access-date=November 26, 2012}}</ref>
===2003 petition===
On ], ], the Schindlers petitioned the Pinellas County Circuit court for the Sixth District. The petition asked the court to forestall any removal of the feeding tube for "eight weeks' therapy." Accompanying the petition were five affidavits: four from members of the Schindler family (presumably her mother, father, brother, and sister) and one from Dr. Alexander T. Gimon. At the hearing in which the petition was presented, Patricia Fields Anderson was the attorney for the Schindlers and Felos was the attorney for Mr. Schiavo. During the hearing, Anderson read into the record affidavits from three "speech professionals" and two nurses, Heidi Law and Carla Sauer Iyer.


The Schindlers continued operation of the Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation, with a new goal of helping individuals in situations similar to Terri's. In April 2010, Michael Schiavo charged that the Schindlers were improperly using Terri's name, as he held the rights to it, and that the family was using the foundation in order to make money. A Florida television station looked at the foundation's tax records and found that for 2008, it paid 64% of the $91,568 it raised in salaries to Terri's father, Robert Schindler Sr., her sister, Suzanne Vitadamo, and her brother, Robert Schindler Jr. Their attorney said the foundation does its work effectively and that the high percentage for salaries was due to the small amount of money the foundation raises. He also said that the Schindlers had the right to use Terri's name as she is a public figure.<ref name="TSSF dispute">{{cite web|last=Wade|first=Jake|title=Terri Schiavo's Family Profiting From Foundation|date=April 30, 2010|url=http://www.13wmaz.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=78447&catid=28|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130116011751/http://www.13wmaz.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=78447&catid=28|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 16, 2013|website=WMAZ}}</ref> The foundation had been fined $1,000 shortly before Schiavo's death for failing to file timely paperwork.<ref name="Funding sources"/> In September 2010, the Schindlers renamed the organization the "Terri Schiavo Life and Hope Network". (Page headers in the web publication show the name change occurred in 2010, compare volume 1 to 2 for 2010)<ref name="life & hope Volume 2 / 1st Edition">{{Cite web|website = About us – Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network|at = from https://www.lifeandhope.com/about, "Vol. 2 – 2010, Issue 1"|title = life&hope Volume 2 / 1st Edition|publisher = Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network|author = <!--Not stated-->|date = 2010|accessdate = 2023-02-11|url = https://terrischiavoorg.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/vol-2-issue-11.pdf|url-status = live|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230211202636/https://terrischiavoorg.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/vol-2-issue-11.pdf|archive-date = 2023-02-11
Iyer claimed in her affadavit that her initial training in 1996 consisted solely of the instruction "Do what Michael Schiavo tells you or you're terminated." She also claimed that Mr. Schiavo said "When is that bitch gonna die?" and that he made many other similar statements. She states that on five different occasions, she tested Schiavo's blood sugar levels after Mr. Schiavo visited her, and she found that that her blood sugar levels were so low it wouldn't even register a number. She stated that it was medically possible that Michael injected his wife with insulin in an attempt to kill her. Iyer states that standing orders were not to contact the Schindler family, but that she "would call them anyway." Iyer states that she eventually called the police and was fired the next day. Despite her claims that she called the Schindlers multiple times in 1996, there is no evidence the Schindlers did anything at the time to demand that the nursing home or police investigate the supposed incidents. Nor did they subpoena Iyer during their 2000 court battle with Mr. Schiavo. However, to date there have been no records found of any police reports filed in Iyer's name, and none of the other workers at Palm Garden or any medical staff reported any wrong-doing, and were shocked to learn of Iyer's accusations.
}}</ref><ref name="life & hope Volume 2 / 2nd Edition">{{Cite web
|website = About us – Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network |at = from https://www.lifeandhope.com/about, "Vol. 2 – 2010, Issue 2"
|title = life&hope Volume 2 / 2nd Edition
|publisher = Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network
|author = <!--Not stated-->
|date = 2010
|accessdate = 2023-02-11
|url = https://terrischiavoorg.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/vol-2-issue-21.pdf
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230211202726/https://terrischiavoorg.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/vol-2-issue-21.pdf
|archive-date = 2023-02-11
}}</ref>


In 2006, both Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers released books telling their sides of the story. Schiavo's was called ''Terri: The Truth'', while the Schindlers' was titled ''A Life that Matters: The Legacy of Terri Schiavo – A Lesson for Us All''.<ref name="Schiavo books">{{cite news|last=Neuman|first=Clayton|title=Another Schiavo Skirmish|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1177007,00.html|url-status=dead|magazine=Time|date=March 27, 2006|access-date=November 27, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121126233634/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1177007,00.html|archive-date=November 26, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
On ], Judge Greer issued a nine-page court ruling, rejecting the petition. Greer wrote that "the Petition is an attempt by Mr. and Mrs. Schindler to relitigate the entire case. It is not even a veiled or disguised attempt. The exhibits relied upon by them clearly demonstrate this to be true." Regarding Iyer's claims, Greer wrote that they were "incredible to say the least" and that "Ms. Iyer details what amounts to a 15-month cover-up (April 1995 through July 1996) which include the staff of Palm Garden of Largo Convalescent Center, the Guardian of the Person, the guardian ''ad litem'', the medical professionals, the police, and believe it or not, Mr. and Mrs. Schindler. It is impossible to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Schindler would not have subpoenaed Ms. Iyer for the January 2000 evidentiary hearing had Iyer contacted them (in 1996) as her affidavit alleges." ()


Despite the extended emotion-laden legal struggle, the case broke no new legal ground: it remains settled law that the spouse is the ] in decisions where the patient is incompetent. However, it is now more generally recognized that the next of kin's decisions should be carried out in a timely fashion, even on matters of life and death. The case has raised public awareness of the value of having an ].{{citation needed|date=February 2024}}
==Family dispute==
===Michael Schiavo===
Under Florida law and supported by rulings of State and Federal courts, Michael Schiavo, Schiavo's husband, was her legal ]. Michael says his wife would not have wanted to live in a ] and that he was fighting for her ].


At the ten-year anniversary of Schiavo's death, several news sources offered retrospectives on the case, some still attempting to explain how this particular case became so notable.<ref> nbc news.com, March 31, 2015, Arthur Caplan</ref><ref> time.com, Josh Sanburn, March 31, 2015</ref><ref> cbsnews.com, Radhika Chalasani, March 31, 2016</ref><ref>"", '']'', Michael Kruse, January 29, 2015</ref><ref>"" ''The New York Times'', April 21, 2014</ref><ref></ref><ref></ref>
In ], Michael began studying nursing at St. Petersburg Community College to better care for his wife. He eventually became a respiratory therapist and an emergency room nurse.


===Schiavo memo===
In March 1994, guardian ''ad litem'' John H. Pecarek was appointed by the court to determine if there had been any abuse by Michael Schiavo. Pecarek's report found no evidence for any inappropriate actions and indicated that Michael had been very attentive to his wife.
During the Terri Schiavo case in March 2005, a ]s memo on the controversy was written by ], the legal counsel to ] Senator ] of ].<ref name="autogenerated1">{{Cite web|date=April 6, 2005|title=Senator's office produced Schiavo memo|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7412110|publisher=Associated Press|via=NBC News}}</ref> The memo suggested the Schiavo case offered "a great political issue" that would appeal to the party's ] and could be used against Senator ], a ] from ] who was ], because he had refused to co-sponsor the bill which came to be known as the ].<ref>{{Cite news|date=April 4, 2005|title=The Seattle Times: Nation & World: GOP memo says issue offers political rewards<!-- Bot generated title -->|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002213728_memo20.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070127110336/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002213728_memo20.html|archive-date=January 27, 2007|newspaper=The Washington Post|via=The Seattle Times}}</ref>


Martínez stated that he had not read the memo before he inadvertently passed it to ] Senator ], a Democratic supporter of the Palm Sunday Compromise legislation which gave ] ] to review the Terri Schiavo case.<ref name=autogenerated1 />
In addition to Pecarek, a number of guardians ''ad litem'' as well as hospital staff members have described Michael Schiavo as a supportive husband who berated nurses for not taking better care of his wife; in ], the administration of one nursing home attempted, unsuccessfully, to get a ] against him because he was demanding more attention for his wife at the expense of other patients' care. According to Jay Wolfson, one of Schiavo's court-appointed guardians, due to the attention Schiavo has received in the fifteen years she has been bedridden, she has never developed any ]s.

On ], ], Michael signed an agreement stating he would not withdraw or terminate his wife's medical care or treatment for potential fatal infections, without prior notice to the court.

In an appearance on ]'s '']'' on ], ], Michael Schiavo cited the willingness that Schiavo's parents expressed to keep her alive by multiple extreme measures, including quadruple ] if needed, as an important reason for denying transfer of guardianship to them or other parties with similar desires.

Raising the issue of a possible conflict of interest is the claim that Michael Schiavo stood to inherit the remainder of Schiavo's malpractice settlement upon her death. However, the December 2003 Wolfson GAL report, submitted to Governor Jeb Bush pursuant to Florida's "Terri's Law," notes that Michael had, prior to his 1998 request to the court to determine Schiavo's wishes, "formally offered to divest himself entirely of his financial interest in the guardianship estate" (p. 12). In 2005, Michael publicly responded to the alleged conflict of interest by claiming that less than $50,000 of the original award from the suit is left, the rest having been spent under a judge's supervision on medical care for Schiavo and the ongoing legal battle. He also had a contract drafted stating that, should the Schindlers refrain from any further legal action, he would donate whatever his inheritance might be to charity. The Schindlers refused the offer.

On ], ], media tycoon ] (who believes that ] could have cured Schiavo's condition) offered $1 million to Michael Schiavo if he agreed to waive his guardianship to his wife's parents . The offer was rejected. George Felos, attorney for Michael, described the offer as "offensive." He also stated that Michael had rejected other monetary offers, including one of $10 million.

Michael Schiavo has been criticized by the Schindlers and their supporters for entering into a relationship with another woman, Jodi Centonze, while still legally married to Terri. Michael and Jodi Centonze have had two children together. Michael denies wrongdoing in this matter, stating that the Schindlers actively encouraged him to "get on with his life" and date since ]. Michael said he chose not to divorce Schiavo and relinquish guardianship because he wanted to carry out her final wishes not to be kept alive in a persistent vegetative state.

===Schindler family===
Schiavo's parents and siblings had been battling her husband over her fate since ]. Even though the courts consistently upheld the ruling that Schiavo would choose to have her life support discontinued, her parents used every legal measure available to them to prevent the disconnection of her feeding tube. The Schindlers stated that even if Schiavo had told them of her intention to have artificial nutrition withdrawn, they would not do it.

The Schindlers took videos of Schiavo that purportedly show her responding to them. They enlisted the services of Galaxywave, Inc., "psychic healers" who claim to possess "Remote Healing ADAM Technology." On several occasions, the Schindlers put Schiavo in contact with these psychics via cell phone during their visits with her.

Her parents claimed that Schiavo was a devout ] who did not wish to violate the Church's teachings on euthanasia by ] to death, and that she had never expressed such a desire to anyone in her birth family or circle of friends. The Schindlers' legal fight was funded by a variety of sources on the ].

Schiavo's father, Bob Schindler, criticized Judge Greer because he never called her into the courtroom or visited her to observe her condition firsthand. Schindler called the court order to remove the feeding tube "judicial homicide."

On ], 2005, '']'' reported that the Schindlers planned to sell a list of people and organizations who have contributed financially to their legal fight to a direct-marketing organization that will solicit money from these people for anti-abortion and conservative groups.

==Public opinion==
Two polls showed that a large majority of Americans believed that Michael Schiavo should have had the authority to make decisions on behalf of his wife and that the United States Congress overstepped its bounds with its intervention in the case.

According to an ABC News poll from March 21, 70 percent of Americans believed that Schiavo's death should not be a federal matter, and were opposed to the legislation transferring the case to federal court. In the same poll, when ABC said "Terri suffered brain damage and has been on life support for 15 years. Doctors say she has no consciousness and her condition is irreversible," 63 percent said that they support the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube. Sixty-seven percent agreed with the statement that "elected officials trying to keep Schiavo alive are doing so more for political advantage than out of concern for her or for the principles involved."

A poll by ] reported on March 23 showed that 82 percent of respondents believed Congress and the President should stay out of the matter, while 74 percent thought it was "all about politics." Only 13 percent thought Congress acted out of concern for Schiavo. Furthermore, the ] of Congress sank to 34 percent, its lowest since ].

A poll commissioned by the ] and completed by ] after the Schiavo's death found that, among likely voters, 44 percent said the tube should remain in place when asked, "hen there is conflicting evidence on whether or not a patient would want to be on a feeding tube, should elected officials order that a feeding tube be removed or should they order that it remain in place?" Thirteen percent said the tube should be removed. Forty-four percent said the person should be allowed to live when asked, "f a person becomes incapacitated and has no written statement that expresses his or her wishes regarding health care, should the law presume that the person wants to live, even if the person is receiving food and water through a tube?" (23 percent disagreed). These results were featured in many newspapers. Critics of the poll contend that the questions were leading and that the questions were not related to the Schiavo case. The raw poll data is available online.

All of these polls have been criticized for being ]s.
<!--- All polls by their very nature are push polls --->

One of the effects of this case is that Americans are showing an increased interest in ]s. Some legal experts say that many of the court battles could have been avoided if Schiavo had had one. Many newspapers ran editorials on the importance of having a living will.

==Activism and protests==
], ].]]

Vatican officials, U.S. President George W. Bush, Florida Governor Jeb Bush, many Republicans, and several Democrats in the Florida Legislature and U.S. Congress have sided with Schiavo's parents. Other groups and individuals, including the American Civil Liberties Union as well as many Democratic and several Republican legislators, have expressed support for the position of Michael Schiavo.

Various Christian organizations demanded that Schiavo's feeding tube be reinserted. Most of these groups are affiliated with the ], but the Reverend ], a ] and ] activist, also called for Schiavo's feeding tube to be reinserted. On ], Jackson prayed with the Schindler family outside of Schiavo's Florida hospice. Some groups, such as ], also protested the removal of the feeding tube because they felt it violated the rights of the ].

Forty-seven protesters, including many children, were arrested outside the hospice where Schiavo was located. Most of these were non-violent, staged arrests for ], made when protestors crossed a ] in a symbolic attempt to bring water to Schiavo. One man ran past police and reached the front door of the hospice; he was ] with a ] and was apprehended.

Arrests have been made in two separate ] plots against Michael Schiavo: one in which a North Carolina man is accused of offering $250,000 for the murder of Michael Schiavo and $50,000 for the murder of Judge Greer, and the other in which Michael Mitchell of ], ], robbed a Florida gun store as part of an effort to "rescue Terri Schiavo." Additionally, the wife of one of Michael Schiavo's brothers has been targeted; a white car drove by her home three times over the course of several hours, and on the last pass the driver shouted to her, "If Terri dies, I'm coming back to shoot you and your family." Another of Michael Schiavo's brothers says that he receives death threats every time the case is in the news.

On the day Schiavo died, House Majority Leader ] criticized the legal system and said, "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior." He also threatened to impeach the judges who refused to intervene on Schiavo's behalf. "We will look at an unaccountable, arrogant, out-of-control judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president," DeLay said. On ], 2005, DeLay held a news conference and issued an apology for his comments. He stated, "I said something in an inartful way, and I shouldn't have said it that way, and I apologize for saying it that way."

Judge Greer and his family are under protection from ] due to death threats for having ruled against restoring Schiavo's feeding tube. Additionally, he has been asked to leave his ] congregation, Calvary Baptist Church, in ], a move some might see as ].

==Government involvement==
===Terri's Law===
{{Main|Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case}}
Both the ] and ] made use of extraordinary measures to support the Schindlers. In ], when the Schindlers' final appeal was exhausted, the ] passed "Terri's Law," giving Governor ] the authority to intervene in the case. Bush immediately ordered the feeding tube reinserted, but Judge Baird and the Florida Supreme Court both overturned the law as unconstitutional.

===Congressional subpoenas===
In ], after the order to remove the feeding tube was given by Judge Greer, Republicans in Congress ]ed Schiavo to testify at two separate congressional inquiries (it is a federal crime to prevent congressional witnesses from testifying). Greer opted to ignore the subpoenas, telling congressional attoneys over a conference call that "I have had no cogent reason why the (congressional) committee should intervene." Although Senate Majority Leader ], Senator ], and Representative ], brought the possibility of sanctioning Greer on charges of ], Congress did not attempt to enforce the subpoenas or take any action against Greer.

==="Palm Sunday Compromise"===
Despite a lack of a ], Congress also passed and President George W. Bush signed the so-called "]," transferring jurisdiction of the Schiavo case to federal court. Like in state court, all of the Schindlers' federal appeals were denied, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant ], effectively quashing the Schindlers' legal options.

===Potential conflict between law enforcement agencies===
On March 24, 2005, three hours after cancelling an automatic stay on his order as a result of another Schindler appeal, Greer directed "each and every and singular ] of the state of Florida" enforce his order. If Governor Bush (or the Florida Legislature) had ignored Greer's order by attempting to remove Schiavo from the hospice, a confrontation between the Pinellas Park Police Department and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement agents could have ensured. It has been speculated that this could have led to a ] or a ]. In jest, one official said local police discussed, "...whether we had enough officers to hold off the National Guard." Governor Bush decided to obey the court order despite enormous pressure from the protesters' side.

==Final stages==
On ], 2005, Bob and Mary Schindler announced that their legal options had been exhausted. Paul O'Donnell, a Franciscan monk and the spiritual adviser to the Schindler family, announced to those holding a vigil outside the hospice in Pinellas Park, "The family would request that everyone go home, be with your children, hold them close and share every moment you have with them."

On ], Schiavo was given the ] ("Last Rites"). In accordance with the Catholic ritual of ], a drop of consecrated ] was applied to her tongue, but a small piece of the host was unable to be offered. She had also been given ] through the feeding tube just before it was removed.

Schiavo died at 9:05 a.m. EST on Thursday, ]. According to Michael Schiavo's attorney, George Felos, she died a "calm, peaceful and gentle death," cradled in her husband's arms.

Michael Schiavo had arrived at 8:45 a.m. EST that day. Schiavo's brother, Bobby Schindler, was visiting Schiavo with his sister, Suzanne Vitadamo, but they were asked to leave ten minutes before Schiavo's death. Hospice officials asked the pair to leave so that Schiavo could be examined. Bobby challenged the decision, but Michael Schiavo decided not to allow him to stay. Schiavo's parents, who had been denied access to her during her last hours, traveled to the hospice to visit her when they were informed that she may be approaching death, arriving half an hour after her death. The Schindler family was allowed into the room after Michael Schiavo had left it.

===Autopsy===
Schiavo's body arrived at the office of the medical examiner within three hours of her death. The ] was completed on ] by Pinellas County's ] . Supporters of the Schindlers had contended that the autopsy was required by Florida law, as the body was to be ], but the strict wording of the statute states only that the medical examiner has the authority to conduct an autopsy before a cremation if he or she deems it necessary.

The examiner's office has said it would conduct examinations on Schiavo's body and look for any evidence of what might have caused her 1990 collapse. A ] was also to conduct an exam.

The results of the autopsy have yet to be released.

===Burial===
Schiavo's body was ] following the autopsy. Her parents offered a memorial ] in her honor at the Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Church in Gulfport on ]. Father Frank Pavone, an activist with Priests for Life, delivered the main sermon.


After the existence of the memo was reported by ] and '']'', Senate Majority Leader ] denounced the memo and asserted that the Republican Party's interest in the case was solely based on moral grounds. Darling remained silent about his authorship of the memo as commentators from the conservative magazine '']'' and other publications questioned its authenticity.<ref>{{Cite magazine|last=Barnes|first=Fred|date=April 4, 2005|title=The ABCs of Media Bias|url=https://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/406istku.asp|magazine=]|volume=10|issue=27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051219144050/https://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/406istku.asp|archive-date=December 19, 2005}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Hinderaker|first=John|date=March 27, 2005|title=Fake but Accurate Again?<!-- Bot generated title -->|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/416virea.asp|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120401164354/http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/416virea.asp|archive-date=April 1, 2012|website=The Weekly Standard}}</ref> The source of the memo had not been disclosed by either ABC News or ''The Washington Post''. ''The Washington Post'' says that it neither implied that the memo originated from a Republican source nor that it was circulated by Republicans, though it did in fact make these assertions when it published the story by reporters Mike Allen and Manuel Roig-Franzia on its wire service on March 19, 2005. The authorship claim was removed before publication of the print version on March 20, 2005.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Kurtz|first=Howard|date=March 30, 2005|title=Doubts Raised On Schiavo Memo|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11250-2005Mar29.html|newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Kurtz|first=Howard|date=April 4, 2005|title=Leaving the Anchor Desk, Its Greatest Generation|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24015-2005Apr3.html|newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref> On April 6, 2005, Darling admitted to writing the memo, and resigned his position as legal counsel to Senator Martínez.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Allen|first=Mike|date=April 7, 2005|title=Counsel to GOP Senator Wrote Memo On Schiavo|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32554-2005Apr6.html|newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref>
On May 7, 2005 the parents of Terri Schiavo made public a complaint that they had not been informed if, when, and where the ashes of their daughter were (or are to be) buried by Michael Schiavo. He was ordered by the court to provide this information to them.


==See also== ==See also==
{{wikinews|Terri Schiavo dies}} * ]
* ]
*Individuals who played significant roles in debates or legal actions regarding the removal of life support:
**] * ]
**] * ]
{{Clear}}
**]
**]
*] used during the public and political debates
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
*Parodies
**'']''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s "]" (season 9, episode 4)


==Sources== ==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}
'''Compilations'''
* (legal documents relating to the Schiavo case)
* (113 articles relating to the Schiavo case, dating from April 28, 2001; requires free registration)
*
* (by Matt Conigliaro)
*


==Further reading==
'''Articles'''
<!-- Alphabetical by author: -->
*"Before fight over death, Terri Schiavo had a life." CNN. October 25, 2003. <small></small>
* {{Cite book |editor-last1=Caplan |editor-first1=Arthur L. |editor2=James J. McCartney |editor3=Dominic A. Sisti |date=2006 |title=The Case of Terri Schiavo: Ethics at the End of Life |url=https://archive.org/details/caseofterrischia00capl |url-access=subscription |location=Amherst, NY |publisher=Prometheus Books |isbn=978-1-59102-398-2}}
*Breed, Allen G., and Matt Crenson. "Doctors: Schiavo tapes don't tell story." Associated Press. March 26, 2005. <small></small>
* ''Silent Witness: The Untold Story of Terri Schiavo's Death'' by ] (2005), {{ISBN|0-06-085337-9}}
*Carey, Benedict, and John Schwartz. "Schiavo's condition holds little chance of recovery." ''The New York Times''. March 26, 2005.
* ''Fighting for Dear Life: The Untold Story of Terri Schiavo and What It Means for All of Us'' by David C. Gibbs III (2006), {{ISBN|0-7642-0243-X}}
*"Excerpts from diagnoses of six Schiavo doctors." Associated Press. March 24, 2005. <small></small>
* ''Remembering Terri Schiavo: Reflections of a Health Care Warrior'' by Audrey Ignatoff (2005), {{ISBN|1-4116-3220-6}}
*Fackelmann, Kathleen. "Schiavo not likely to experience a painful death, neurologists say." ''USA Today''. March 23, 2005. <small></small>
* ''Terri's Story: The Court-Ordered Death of an American Woman'' by Diana Lynne (2005), {{ISBN|1-58182-488-2}}
*Graham, Judith. "Schiavo's expressions misleading, experts say." ''Chicago Tribune''. March 25, 2005. <small></small>
* "Terri Schiavo: When Does Personhood End?" in ''The Elements of Bioethics'', Gregory Pence (2007), {{ISBN|978-0-07-313277-8}}
*Kumar, Anita. "The Terri Schiavo case: Before the circus" ''St. Petersburg Times''. April 3, 2005. <small></small>
* ''Terri: The Truth'' by Michael Schiavo, Michael Hirsh (2006), {{ISBN|0-525-94946-1}}
*Lamendola, Bob. "Neurologists see little sign of activity in Schiavo's brain." ''South Florida Sun-Sentinel''. March 23, 2005. <small></small>
* ''A Life That Matters: The Legacy of Terri Schiavo{{snd}}A Lesson For Us All'' by Mary and Robert Schindler (2005), {{ISBN|0-446-57987-4}}
*Rufty, Bill. "Doctors lament misuse of proper terminology in Schiavo debate." ''The Ledger''. March 23, 2005. <small></small>
*Schwartz, Jerry. "Friends remember Schiavo before maelstrom." Associated Press. March 31, 2005. <small></small>


==External links==
'''Legal documents'''
; Compilations
* (]). Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Florida Probate Division. December 28, 1998.
These are compilations of legal documents relating to the Schiavo case:
*. Office of Jeb Bush, Governor of the State of Florida. October 21, 2003. (Subsequently ruled as unconstitutional).
*
* (]). Sixth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida. December 1, 2003.
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141116010101/http://bioethics.miami.edu/research%2Dand%2Dclinical%2Dethics/terri%2Dschiavo%2Dproject/timeline%2Dof%2Dkey%2Devents/part%2D1/index.html |date=November 16, 2014 }}
* (]). Supreme Court of Florida. September 23, 2004.
* (]). State of Florida, County of Duval. March 23, 2005.
* (]). United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. March 23, 2005. (A panel on the 11th Circuit rules 2-1 to deny a motion to reverse lower courts and reinsert a feeding tube).
* (]). United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. March 23, 2005. (Court order denying a motion for a rehearing ''en banc'').
* (]). Supreme Court of the United States. March 23, 2005. (The Schindler's emergency request to the Supreme Court for a stay).
* (]). Supreme Court of the United States. March 24, 2005. (Michael Schiavo's detail of opposition to application of injunction).
* (]). Supreme Court of the United States. March 24, 2005. (Supreme Court order denying injunction pending the decision whether to grant the petition for writ of certiorari).
* (]). United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Tampa Division). March 25, 2005. (Court order denying motion to reinsert feeding tube).
* (]). United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. March 30, 2005. (Court order denying motion for rehearing).


; Information sites
'''Advocacy and commentary'''
* Conigliaro, Matt, Esq., Editor of "Abstract Appeal" Legal Blog. (2005). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050401033938/http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html |date=April 1, 2005 }}. Retrieved 2005-08-31.
*
* . Retrieved 2005-08-30. Includes the initial 1999 (PDF).
*
* Canizaro Library. ], ]
*
*
*


{{Medical ethics cases}}
<!--Categories-->
{{Portal bar|Florida|Biography|Politics|Medicine}}
]
{{Authority control}}
]
]
]
{{lived|b=1963|d=2005|key=Schiavo, Terri}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Schiavo, Terri}}
<!--Interlanguage links-->
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:01, 17 December 2024

American right-to-die legal case

Terri Schiavo
Terri Schiavo with her mother in 2001
BornTheresa Marie Schindler
(1963-12-03)December 3, 1963
Lower Moreland Township, Pennsylvania, U.S.
DiedMarch 31, 2005(2005-03-31) (aged 41)
Pinellas Park, Florida, U.S.
Spouse Michael Schiavo ​(m. 1984)
Articles relating to the
Terri Schiavo case
Others involved

Category

The Terri Schiavo case was a series of court and legislative actions in the United States from 1998 to 2005, regarding the care of Theresa Marie Schiavo (née Schindler) (/ˈʃaɪvoʊ/; December 3, 1963 – March 31, 2005), a woman in an irreversible persistent vegetative state. Schiavo's husband and legal guardian argued that Schiavo would not have wanted prolonged artificial life support without the prospect of recovery, and, in 1998, he elected to remove her feeding tube. Schiavo's parents disputed her husband's assertions and challenged Schiavo's medical diagnosis, arguing in favor of continuing artificial nutrition and hydration. The highly publicized and prolonged series of legal challenges presented by her parents, which ultimately involved state and federal politicians up to the level of George W. Bush, the then U.S. president, caused a seven-year (1998 to 2005) delay before Schiavo's feeding tube was ultimately removed.

On February 25, 1990, at age 26, Schiavo went into cardiac arrest at her home in St. Petersburg, Florida. She was resuscitated, but had severe brain damage due to lack of oxygen to her brain and was left comatose. After two and a half months without improvement, her diagnosis was changed to that of a persistent vegetative state. For the next two years, doctors attempted occupational therapy, speech therapy, physical therapy and other experimental therapy, hoping to return her to a state of awareness, without success. In 1998, Schiavo's husband Michael Schiavo petitioned the Sixth Circuit Court of Florida to remove her feeding tube pursuant to Florida law. He was opposed by Terri's parents, Robert and Mary Schindler. The court determined that Schiavo would not have wished to continue life-prolonging measures, and on April 24, 2001, her feeding tube was removed for the first time, only to be reinserted several days later. On February 25, 2005, a Pinellas County judge again ordered the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. Several appeals and federal government intervention followed, which included Bush returning to Washington, D.C., to sign legislation moving the case to the federal courts. After appeals through the federal court system that upheld the original decision to remove the feeding tube, staff at the Pinellas Park hospice facility disconnected the feeding tube on March 18, 2005, and Schiavo died on March 31, 2005.

The Schiavo case involved 14 appeals and numerous legal motions, petitions, and hearings in the Florida courts; five suits in federal district court; extensive political intervention at the levels of the Florida state legislature, Governor Jeb Bush, the U.S. Congress, and President George W. Bush; and four denials of certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States. The case also spurred highly visible activism from the United States anti-abortion movement, the right-to-die movement, and disability rights groups. Since Schiavo's death, both her husband and her family have written books on their sides of the case, and both have also been involved in activism over related issues.

Background

Early life

Terri Schiavo was born Theresa Marie Schindler to Mary (born 1941) and Robert Schindler (1937–2009) on December 3, 1963, in Lower Moreland Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Philadelphia. She was the oldest of three children. Her mother reported that, as a child, Schiavo would spend hours in her bedroom arranging her collection of stuffed animals. As a teen, she enjoyed listening to John Denver and reading Danielle Steel romances. She attended Bucks County Community College, where she met Michael Schiavo in 1982. The two began dating and married on November 10, 1984. They moved to Florida in 1986, following her parents. Michael worked as a restaurant manager, while Terri took up a bookkeeping job with an insurance company. She had naturally dark hair, but dyed it blonde.

Initial medical crisis: 1990

In the early morning of February 25, 1990, Schiavo collapsed in a hallway of her St. Petersburg, Florida apartment. Firefighters and paramedics, arriving in response to her husband Michael's 9-1-1 call, found her face-down and unconscious. She was not breathing and had no pulse. They attempted to resuscitate her and she was transported to the Humana Northside Hospital. Paramedics had her intubated and ventilated.

Initial medical assessments

The cause of Schiavo's collapse was determined to be cardiac arrest. Her medical chart contained a note that "she apparently has been trying to keep her weight down with dieting by herself, drinking liquids most of the time during the day and drinking about 10–15 glasses of iced tea." Upon admission to the hospital, she was noted as suffering from hypokalemia (low potassium levels): her serum potassium level was an abnormally low 2.0 mEq/L (the normal range for adults is 3.5–5.0 mEq/L). Her sodium and calcium levels were normal. Electrolyte imbalance is often caused by drinking excessive fluids, and a serious consequence of hypokalemia can be heart rhythm abnormalities, including sudden arrhythmia death syndrome. Schiavo was eventually switched from being fed by a nasogastric feeding tube to a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube. Garcia J. DeSousa, a board-certified neurologist in St. Petersburg, Florida, who had previously treated Schiavo, cared for her during her initial admission to Humana Northside; both he and Victor Gambone, an internist and Schiavo family physician, independently made the diagnosis of persistent vegetative state within approximately one year after her sudden cardiac arrest.

Relationship between Terri's husband and parents

From 1990 to 1993, Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers (Terri Schiavo's parents) enjoyed an amicable relationship, with the Schindlers allowing Michael to live rent-free in their condominium for several months.

Rehabilitation efforts: 1990–1993

In November 1990, Michael Schiavo took Terri to the University of California, San Francisco, for experimental nerve stimulation with a thalamic stimulator. The treatment took several months and was unsuccessful. He returned to Florida with her in January 1991 and admitted her as an inpatient to the Mediplex Rehabilitation Center in Bradenton, Florida. On July 19, 1991, Schiavo was transferred to the Sabal Palms Skilled Care Facility, where she received neurological testing and regular speech and occupational therapy until 1994. In mid-1993, Michael Schiavo requested a do not resuscitate order for her after she contracted a urinary tract infection.

Legal cases 1992–2005

Malpractice

In 1992, Michael filed a malpractice suit against Terri's gynecologist on the basis that he failed to diagnose bulimia as the cause of her infertility. Terri had gone to the doctor because she had stopped menstruating but the doctor had failed to take her medical history into account which might have revealed an eating disorder. During the case, one of Terri's friends testified that she knew Schiavo was bulimic. In November 1992, Michael won the case and was awarded $6.8 million by the jury, later reduced to $2 million as Terri was found partly at fault for her condition. After attorneys' fees and other expenses, Michael received $300,000 and $750,000 was put in a trust fund for Terri's medical care. According to Michael, in early 1993 the Schindlers demanded that he share the malpractice money with them.

Petition to remove feeding tube

On June 18, 1990, the court appointed Michael Schiavo as Terri Schiavo's legal guardian; this appointment was not disputed by the Schindlers at the time. In May 1998, Michael Schiavo filed a petition to remove Terri Schiavo's feeding tube, which her parents opposed. Richard Pearse was appointed by the court as a second guardian ad litem (GAL), and on December 29, 1998, reported "Dr. Jeffrey Karp's opinion of the ward's condition and prognosis is substantially shared among those physicians who have recently been involved in her treatment." Pearse concluded from Karp's and Vincent Gambone's diagnosis of Persistent Vegetative State that Schiavo was legally in a persistent vegetative state as defined by Florida Statutes, Title XLIV, Chapter 765, §101(12). This includes the "absence of voluntary action" and an "inability to communicate or interact purposefully".

Pearse found that there was no possibility of improvement but that Michael Schiavo's decisions might have been influenced by the potential to inherit what remained of Terri Schiavo's estate as long as he remained married to her. Due to a lack of a living will and questions regarding Michael's credibility, Pearse recommended denying his petition to remove her feeding tube. Pearse reported that the issue of conflict of interest applied to the Schindlers as well, since, had Michael divorced Terri as they wanted him to, they would have inherited the remainder of Terri Schiavo's estate upon her death.

Schiavo end-of-life wishes

Given the lack of a living will, a trial was held before Pinellas County Judge George Greer during the week of January 24, 2000, to determine what Schiavo's wishes would have been regarding life-prolonging procedures. Michael Schiavo was represented by attorney George Felos, who had won a landmark right-to-die case before the Florida Supreme Court in 1990.

The trial included testimony from 18 witnesses regarding her medical condition and her end-of-life wishes. Michael Schiavo claimed that his wife would not want to be kept on a machine where her chance for recovery was minuscule. According to Abstract Appeal Trial Order, her parents "claimed that Terri was a devout Roman Catholic who would not wish to violate the Church's teachings on euthanasia by refusing nutrition and hydration." Judge Greer issued his order granting the petition for authorization to discontinue artificial life support for Terri Schiavo in February 2000. In this decision, the court found that Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed. This decision was upheld by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal (2nd DCA) and came to be known by the court as Schiavo I in its later rulings.

Oral feeding and the second guardianship challenge

In March 2000, the Schindlers filed a motion to permit assisted feeding of Terri, which is not considered a life-prolonging procedure under Florida law. Since clinical records indicated that Terri Schiavo was not responsive to swallowing tests and required a feeding tube, Judge Greer ruled that she was not capable of orally ingesting sufficient nutrition and hydration to sustain life, and denied the request. The Medical Examiner in his postmortem report was more definitive and reaffirmed that Schiavo could not have swallowed.

In 2000, the Schindlers again challenged Michael Schiavo's guardianship. The Schindlers suggested that he was wasting the assets within the guardianship account by transferring Terri Schiavo to a Pinellas Park, Florida, hospice "after it was clear that she was not 'terminal' within Medicare guidelines" for hospices. By this time, while still legally married to Terri Schiavo, Michael Schiavo was in a relationship with Jodi Centonze, and had fathered their first child. He said he chose not to divorce his wife and relinquish guardianship because he wanted to ensure her final wishes (not to be kept alive in a PVS) were carried out. The court denied the motion to remove the guardian, allowing that the evidence was not sufficient and, in some instances, not relevant. It set April 24, 2001, as the date on which the tube was to be removed.

Schiavo II

In April 2001, the Schindlers filed a motion for relief from judgment citing new evidence of Terri Schiavo's wishes. Judge Greer denied the motion as untimely under Rule 1.540(b)(5) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The Second District Court of Appeal upheld Greer's decision but remanded the issue in order to give the Schindlers an opportunity to file a new motion. On April 24, 2001, Terri's feeding tube was removed for the first time. The Schindlers filed a civil suit against Michael Schiavo alleging perjury, which was assigned to another court. The judge, Frank Quesada, issued an injunction against the removal of feeding tube until this was settled. The feeding tube was reinserted on April 26, 2001. On appeal by Michael Schiavo, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed Judge Quesada's order. In the same time frame, Michael Schiavo filed a motion to enforce the mandate of the guardianship court (that the feeding tube be removed). The Second District Court of Appeal denied the motion. These three decisions, all published in a single order by Florida's Second District Court of Appeal, came to be known by the court as Schiavo II in its later rulings.

Schiavo III and IV: PVS diagnosis challenge

Left: CT scan of normal brain; Right: Schiavo's 2002 CT scan provided by Ronald Cranford, showing loss of brain tissue. The black area is liquid, indicating hydrocephalus ex vacuo. The small white piece in the right image is the thalamic stimulator implanted in her brain.

On August 10, 2001, on remand from the Florida Second District Court of Appeal, Judge Greer heard a motion from the Schindlers claiming that new medical treatment could restore sufficient cognitive ability such that Terri Schiavo herself would be able to decide to continue life-prolonging measures. The court also heard motions from the Schindlers to remove the guardian (Michael Schiavo) and to require Judge Greer to recuse himself. Judge Greer denied the motions and the Schindlers appealed to the Second District Court of Appeals. On October 17, 2001, the Court of Appeal affirmed the denials of the motions to remove and recuse. The Court of Appeals acknowledged that their opinion misled the trial court, and they remanded the question of Terri Schiavo's wishes back to the trial court and required an evidentiary hearing to be held. The court specified that five board certified neurologists were to testify. The Schindlers were allowed to choose two doctors to present findings at an evidentiary hearing while Schiavo could introduce two rebuttal experts. Finally, the trial court itself would appoint a new independent physician to examine and evaluate Terri Schiavo's condition. These decisions, all published in a single order by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal, came to be known by the court as Schiavo III in its later rulings. In October 2002, on remand by the Second District Court of Appeal, an evidentiary hearing was held in Judge Greer's court to determine whether new therapy treatments could help Terri Schiavo restore any cognitive function. In preparation for the trial, a new computed axial tomography scan (CAT scan) was performed, which showed severe cerebral atrophy. An EEG showed no measurable brain activity. The five physicians chosen were William Maxfield, a radiologist, and four neurologists: William Hammesfahr, Ronald Cranford, Melvin Greer and Peter Bambakidis.

The five doctors examined Terri Schiavo's medical records, brain scans, the videos, and Terri herself. Cranford, Greer, and Bambakidis testified that Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). Drs. Maxfield and Hammesfahr testified that she was in a minimally conscious state. As part of the court-ordered medical exam, six hours of video of Terri Schiavo were taped and filed at the Pinellas County courthouse. The tape included Terri Schiavo with her mother and neurologist William Hammesfahr. The entire tape was viewed by Judge Greer, who wrote, Terri "clearly does not consistently respond to her mother". From that six hours of video, the Schindlers and their supporters produced six video clips intended to support their case, totaling less than six minutes, and released those clips to public websites. Judge Greer ruled that Terri Schiavo was in a PVS, and was beyond hope of significant improvement. The trial court order was particularly critical of Hammesfahr's testimony, which claimed positive results in similar cases by use of vasodilation therapy, the success of which is unsupported in the medical literature. This ruling was later affirmed by Florida's Second District Court of Appeal, which stated that "this court has closely examined all of the evidence in the record", and "we have ... carefully observed the video tapes in their entirety." The court concluded that "if we were called upon to review the guardianship court's decision de novo, we would still affirm it." This decision by the Second District Court of Appeals came to be known as Schiavo IV in later rulings.

Around the start of 2003, the Schindlers began to create more publicity by lobbying for their case to keep their daughter alive. On September 11, 2003, the Schindlers petitioned the court to forestall removal of the feeding tube in order to provide for "eight weeks' therapy". Accompanying the petition were four affidavits from members of the Schindler family and one from Dr. Alexander T. Gimon. At the hearing, the Schindlers' counsel read into the record additional affidavits from three speech professionals and two nurses. In particular, nurse Carla Sauer Iyer asserted that she was able to feed Terri Schiavo orally but that Michael characterized any such interaction as "therapy" and ordered her not to do so. Iyer claimed in her affidavit that her initial training in 1996 consisted solely of the instruction, "Do what Michael Schiavo tells you or you're terminated", and that standing orders were not to contact the Schindler family, but that she "would call them anyway".

On September 17, 2003, Judge George Greer denied the petition, and wrote that "the Petition is an attempt by Mr. and Mrs. Schindler to re-litigate the entire case. It is not even a veiled or disguised attempt. The exhibits relied upon by them, clearly demonstrate this to be true." Regarding Iyer's statements, Greer wrote that they were "incredible to say the least" and that "Ms. Iyer details what amounts to a 15-month cover-up from April 1995 through July 1996, which include the staff of Palm Garden of Largo Convalescent Center, the Guardian of the Person, the guardian ad litem, the medical professionals, the police and, believe it or not, Mr. and Mrs. Schindler ... It is impossible to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Schindler would not have subpoenaed Ms. Iyer for the January 2000 evidentiary hearing had Iyer contacted them in 1996 as her affidavit alleges."

Terri's Law and other government delays

Main article: Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case

On October 15, 2003, Schiavo's feeding tube was removed. Within a week, when the Schindlers' final appeal was exhausted, State Rep. Frank Attkisson and the Florida Legislature passed "Terri's Law" in an emergency session giving Governor Jeb Bush the authority to intervene in the case. Governor Bush immediately ordered the feeding tube be reinserted. Governor Bush sent the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to remove Schiavo from the hospice. She was taken to Morton Plant Rehabilitation Hospital in Clearwater, where her feeding tube was surgically reinserted. She was then returned to the hospice. Part of the legislation required the appointment of a guardian ad litem (GAL), Jay Wolfson, to "deduce and represent the best wishes and best interests" of Schiavo, and report them to Governor Bush. Wolfson's report did not change Michael's role as her legal guardian and did not otherwise obstruct him legally.

Michael Schiavo opposed the Governor's intervention in Schiavo's case, and was represented, in part, by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). At the same time, Robert and Mary Schindler, her parents, attempted to intervene and participate in the "Terri's Law" case but were denied by Judge W. Douglas Baird, a Circuit Judge in the Florida Sixth Circuit. They appealed, and, on February 13, 2004, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal (Second District Court of Appeals) ordered Baird to hold further hearings on the issue. On March 17, 2004, Baird denied the Schindlers the right to intervene a second time. The Schindlers, represented by the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), appealed the right to participate in the "Terri's Law" case, with the court scheduling an oral argument date for June 14. The Schindlers' other attorney, Pat Anderson, was concurrently challenging Michael Schiavo's right to be her guardian, and, on June 16, 2004, she made a petition for writ of quo warranto.

On May 5, 2004, Baird found "Terri's Law" unconstitutional, and struck it down. Bush appealed this order to the Second District Court of Appeals, but on May 12, 2004, the court issued an "Order Relinquishing Case for Entry of Final Judgment and Order to Show Cause Why this Proceeding Should Not be Certified to the Supreme Court As Requiring Immediate Resolution". The Second District Court of Appeals, in sending it directly to the Florida Supreme Court, invoked "pass through" jurisdiction.

The Florida Supreme Court then overturned the law as unconstitutional.

Final feeding tube removal and federal involvement

Early 2005 motions

On February 23, 2005, the Schindlers filed a motion for relief from judgment pending medical evaluations. The Schindlers wanted Schiavo to be tested with an fMRI and given a swallowing therapy called VitalStim. The motion was accompanied by 33 affidavits from doctors in several specialties, speech-language pathologists and therapists, and a few neuropsychologists, all urging that new tests be undertaken. Patricia Fields Anderson, the Schindler family attorney, still held out hope "that Terri might be able to take nourishment orally, despite past findings that she is incapable". Judge Greer formally denied the motion and ordered the "removal of nutrition and hydration from the ward" and set the time and date for the removal of the feeding tube as "1:00 p.m. on Friday, March 18, 2005".

On February 28, 2005, the Schindlers filed a motion, asking for permission to attempt to provide Schiavo with "Food and Water by Natural Means". This second motion asked for permission to "attempt to feed" Schiavo by mouth. Judge Greer denied the second motion on March 8, saying "it has become clear that the second motion is part and parcel of the previous motion on medical evaluations. The same declarations are being used for both motions and the motion appears to be an alternative pleading to the previous motion. Both are asking for an experimental procedure." The following day, Greer denied the first motion as well, citing that an affiant doctor for Michael cautioned that fMRI was an experimental procedure that should be conducted in an academic setting, because Schiavo had already undergone swallowing tests and failed, and because VitalStim had only been performed on patients who were not in a PVS. Greer noted that "most of the doctor affidavits submitted are based on their understanding of Schiavo's condition from news reports or video clips they have seen. Many are obviously not aware of the medical exams undertaken for the 2002 trial."

Following Greer's order on March 18, 2005, to remove the feeding tube, Republicans in the United States Congress subpoenaed both Michael and Terri Schiavo to testify at a congressional hearing. Greer told congressional attorneys, "I have had no cogent reason why the (congressional) committee should intervene." He also stated that last-minute action by Congress does not invalidate years of court rulings.

Palm Sunday Compromise

Main article: Palm Sunday Compromise

President George W. Bush and Congressional Republicans anticipated Greer's adverse ruling well before it was delivered and worked on a daily basis to find an alternative means of overturning the legal process by utilizing the authority of the United States Congress. On March 20, 2005, the Senate, by unanimous consent, passed their version of a relief bill; since the vote was taken by voice vote, there was no official tally of those voting in favor and those opposed. Soon after Senate approval, the House of Representatives passed an identical version of the bill S.686, which came to be called the "Palm Sunday Compromise" and transferred jurisdiction of the Schiavo case to the federal courts. The bill passed the House on March 21, 2005, at 12:41 a.m. (UTC−5). Bush flew to Washington, D.C. from his vacation in Texas in order to sign the bill into law at 1:11 a.m.

While the bill had been proposed by Republican Senators Rick Santorum and Mel Martínez, it also had the support of Democratic Senator Tom Harkin due to disability rights concerns in the Schiavo case. Harkin had worked with disability rights groups for years and co-authored the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act. American disability rights groups traditionally tend to ally themselves with Democrats and the political left; however, in the Schiavo case, they joined pro-life organizations in opposing the removal of her feeding tube and supporting the Palm Sunday Compromise. According to Marilyn Golden, Harkin's support was necessary for passage of the bill, as any voice opposition by Democrats would have delayed it.

As in the state courts, all of the Schindlers' federal petitions and appeals were denied, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari, effectively ending the Schindlers' judicial options. At the same time, the so-called Schiavo memo surfaced, causing a political firestorm. The memo was written by Brian Darling, the legal counsel to Florida Republican senator Mel Martínez. It suggested the Schiavo case offered "a great political issue" that would appeal to the party's base (core supporters) and could be used against Senator Bill Nelson, a Democrat from Florida, because he had refused to co-sponsor the bill. Nelson easily won re-election in 2006.

Republican majority leader and physician Bill Frist opposed the removal of her feeding tube and, in a speech delivered on the Senate floor, challenged the diagnosis of Schiavo's physicians of Schiavo being in a persistent vegetative state (PVS): "I question it based on a review of the video footage which I spent an hour or so looking at last night in my office." After her death, the autopsy showed signs of long-term and irreversible damage to her brain consistent with PVS. Frist defended his actions after the autopsy.

Final local motions, death, autopsy, and burial

On March 24, 2005, Judge Greer denied a petition for intervention by the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) and signed an order forbidding the department from "taking possession of Theresa Marie Schiavo or removing her" from the hospice and directed "each and every and singular sheriff of the state of Florida" to enforce his order. The order was appealed to the Second District Court of Appeals the following day, which resulted in an automatic stay under state law. While the stay was in effect, Florida Department of Law Enforcement personnel prepared to take custody of Terri Schiavo and transfer her to a local hospital for reinsertion of the feeding tube. Once Greer was made aware of the stay, he ordered it lifted and all parties stood down. Governor Bush decided to obey the court order despite enormous pressure from the political right. If Bush (or the Florida Legislature) had ignored Greer's order by attempting to remove her from the hospice, a confrontation between the Pinellas Park Police Department and the FDLE agents could have ensued. In jest, one official said local police discussed "whether we had enough officers to hold off the National Guard."

Terri Schiavo died at a Pinellas Park hospice on March 31, 2005.

Autopsy

Schiavo's body was taken to the Office of the District 6 Medical Examiner for Pinellas and Pasco counties, based in Largo, Florida. The autopsy was conducted on April 1, 2005, and revealed extensive brain damage. The manner of death was certified as "undetermined." The autopsy was led by Chief Medical Examiner Jon R. Thogmartin. In addition to consultation with a neuropathologist (Stephen J. Nelson), Thogmartin also arranged for specialized cardiac and genetic examinations to be made. The official autopsy report was released on June 15, 2005. In addition to studying Terri Schiavo's remains, Thogmartin scoured court, medical and other records and interviewed her family members, doctors and other relevant parties. Examination of Schiavo's nervous system by neuropathologist Stephen J. Nelson, revealed extensive injury. The brain itself weighed only 615 g (21.7 oz), only half the weight expected for a female of her age, height, and weight, due to the loss of a massive number of neurons. Microscopic examination revealed extensive damage to nearly all brain regions, including the cerebral cortex, the thalamus, the basal ganglia, the hippocampus, the cerebellum, and the midbrain. The neuropathologic changes in her brain were precisely of the type seen in patients who enter a PVS following cardiac arrest. Throughout the cerebral cortex, the large pyramidal neurons that comprise some 70% of cortical cells – critical to the functioning of the cortex – were completely lost. The pattern of damage to the cortex, with injury tending to worsen from the front of the cortex to the back, was also typical. There was marked damage to important relay circuits deep in the brain (the thalamus) – another common pathologic finding in cases of PVS. The damage was, in the words of Thogmartin, "irreversible, and no amount of therapy or treatment would have regenerated the massive loss of neurons."

The cardiac pathologist who studied Schiavo's heart found it and the coronary vessels to be healthy, which excludes the possibility that her initial collapse was the result of myocardial infarction, although there was a localized area of healed inflammation (opening the possibility of myocarditis). Thogmartin found that "there was no proof that Terri Schiavo ever had an eating disorder such as bulimia." Regarding the possibility of strangulation or domestic violence as a cause of Schiavo's initial collapse, the report states: "No trauma was noted on any of the numerous physical exams or radiographs performed on Mrs. Schiavo on the day of, in the days after, or in the months after her initial collapse. Indeed, within an hour of her initial hospital admission, radiographic examination of her cervical spine was negative. Specifically, external signs of strangulation including cutaneous or deep neck injury, facial/conjunctival petechiae, and other blunt trauma were not observed or recorded during her initial hospital admission. Autopsy examination of her neck structures 15 years after her initial collapse did not detect any signs of remote trauma, but, with such a delay, the exam was unlikely to show any residual neck findings."

Regarding the cause and manner of Schiavo's death, Thogmartin wrote, "Mrs. Schiavo suffered severe anoxic brain injury. The cause of which cannot be determined with reasonable medical certainty. The manner of death will therefore be certified as undetermined."

Burial

Schiavo's gravemarker

Schiavo's body was cremated. Her parents organized a memorial Mass for her at the Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Church in Gulfport on April 5, 2005. Father Frank Pavone, the founder of the Priests for Life anti-abortion organization, delivered the homily.

Michael Schiavo had his wife's cremated remains interred in a cemetery on June 20, 2005. The Schindlers' attorney stated that the family was notified by fax only after the memorial service; by then, the family had already started getting calls from reporters. The ashes were interred at Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park in Clearwater, Florida.

The epitaph (pictured) reads:

Schiavo / Theresa Marie / Beloved Wife
Born December 3, 1963
Departed this Earth / February 25, 1990
At peace March 31, 2005

I kept my promise

Ethical and legal issues

Right to die

The Schiavo case has been compared to the Karen Ann Quinlan case and Nancy Cruzan case, two landmark right-to-die cases. Quinlan entered a persistent vegetative state in 1975, and her family was allowed to remove her from a ventilator in 1976 after a ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court based on her right of privacy. She died of pneumonia in 1985. Cruzan was diagnosed with PVS in 1983 and her legal case reached the Supreme Court, which ruled that "clear and convincing evidence" of her wishes to die under such circumstances was needed. Cruzan's family did not have enough evidence of that, but later produced more. She died after being removed from life support in 1990.

The "Terri Schiavo case" actually refers to a series of cases. It differed from the Quinlan and Cruzan cases by involving settled law rather than breaking new legal ground on the right-to-die issue. In 2006, Professor Lois Shepherd, PhD JD, states it was "unclear" whether the Schiavo case represents a landmark decision. The Terri Schiavo affair involved a dispute between family members and her legal guardian over her wishes when there is no documented desire. According to medical ethicist Matthew Stonecipher, "The movement to challenge the decisions made for Terri Schiavo threatened to destabilize end-of-life law that had developed over the last quarter of the 20th century, principally through the cases of Karen Ann Quinlan and Nancy Cruzan." The outcome of the Schiavo case was also in part determined by a 1990 Florida case, Guardianship of Estelle Browning. In that case, attorney George Felos, representing a Browning relative, successfully argued that Browning's feeding tube should be removed before the Florida Supreme Court. The elderly Browning had expressed, in a living will, her wish not to be kept alive by any artificial means, including receiving food and water "by a gastric tube or intravenously." At that time, it was common to remove people from ventilators, but the law in Florida was not clear on removing them from feeding tubes. In a landmark ruling, the Florida Supreme Court decided that Browning had "the constitutional right to choose or refuse medical treatment, and that right extends to all relevant decisions concerning one's health."

Disability rights

During the years of legal proceedings, disability rights groups and activists closely monitored and involved themselves in the case. In March 2003, 12 disability rights groups, led by Not Dead Yet, along with four other amici filed an amicus curiae brief in which they opposed the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube. They also used the Schiavo case to advocate for federal review in cases where third parties decide to withdraw life support from patients unable to give consent. They argued that persistent vegetative state is frequently misdiagnosed, and that the reasons for withdrawal of life support from a patient should be scrutinized since even family member surrogates can have conflicts of interest. The Palm Sunday Compromise granted the federal review they sought, but it was limited to only the Schiavo case.

Public opinion and activism

Main article: Public opinion and activism in the Terri Schiavo case

The seven-year case generated a great deal of public attention and activism. There was extensive media coverage and both sides courted public opinion. In 2000, the Schindlers created the Terri Schindler-Schiavo Foundation to garner support. During the weeks when Schiavo's feeding tube was removed in 2005, activists kept up an around-the-clock vigil outside her hospice. The protests were described as loud but non-violent. There were dozens of arrests, with most being for crossing a police line with water for Schiavo.

Two polls conducted shortly after Schiavo's feeding tube was removed for the final time in 2005 showed that a large majority of Americans believed that Michael Schiavo should have had the authority to make decisions on behalf of his wife and that the U.S. Congress overstepped its bounds with its intervention in the case.

Developments since Schiavo's death

Since Terri Schiavo's death in March 2005, her family and Michael Schiavo have clashed a number of times. Each side has also worked to promote their own causes related to the case. In April 2005, the families disagreed over Schiavo's burial. The Schindlers had wanted her body to be buried in Florida, while Michael Schiavo said at the time that he would cremate her body and then have her ashes buried in her home state of Pennsylvania. In June 2005, however, Schiavo's ashes were buried in Florida instead. The words "I kept my promise" were included on the marker, referring to his promise to follow what he said was her wish not to be kept alive artificially. The statement angered the Schindlers.

In December 2005, Michael Schiavo created a political action committee, TerriPAC. It was formed to raise money to support right-to-die candidates and oppose candidates who had voted for government involvement in the Schiavo case. In 2007, TerriPAC paid a $1,350 fine to the Federal Election Commission for failing to file complete and timely records. Schiavo shut down the PAC later that year.

The Schindlers continued operation of the Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation, with a new goal of helping individuals in situations similar to Terri's. In April 2010, Michael Schiavo charged that the Schindlers were improperly using Terri's name, as he held the rights to it, and that the family was using the foundation in order to make money. A Florida television station looked at the foundation's tax records and found that for 2008, it paid 64% of the $91,568 it raised in salaries to Terri's father, Robert Schindler Sr., her sister, Suzanne Vitadamo, and her brother, Robert Schindler Jr. Their attorney said the foundation does its work effectively and that the high percentage for salaries was due to the small amount of money the foundation raises. He also said that the Schindlers had the right to use Terri's name as she is a public figure. The foundation had been fined $1,000 shortly before Schiavo's death for failing to file timely paperwork. In September 2010, the Schindlers renamed the organization the "Terri Schiavo Life and Hope Network". (Page headers in the web publication show the name change occurred in 2010, compare volume 1 to 2 for 2010)

In 2006, both Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers released books telling their sides of the story. Schiavo's was called Terri: The Truth, while the Schindlers' was titled A Life that Matters: The Legacy of Terri Schiavo – A Lesson for Us All.

Despite the extended emotion-laden legal struggle, the case broke no new legal ground: it remains settled law that the spouse is the next of kin in decisions where the patient is incompetent. However, it is now more generally recognized that the next of kin's decisions should be carried out in a timely fashion, even on matters of life and death. The case has raised public awareness of the value of having an advance medical directive.

At the ten-year anniversary of Schiavo's death, several news sources offered retrospectives on the case, some still attempting to explain how this particular case became so notable.

Schiavo memo

During the Terri Schiavo case in March 2005, a talking points memo on the controversy was written by Brian Darling, the legal counsel to Republican Senator Mel Martínez of Florida. The memo suggested the Schiavo case offered "a great political issue" that would appeal to the party's base and could be used against Senator Bill Nelson, a Democrat from Florida who was up for reelection in 2006, because he had refused to co-sponsor the bill which came to be known as the Palm Sunday Compromise.

Martínez stated that he had not read the memo before he inadvertently passed it to Iowa Senator Tom Harkin, a Democratic supporter of the Palm Sunday Compromise legislation which gave federal courts jurisdiction to review the Terri Schiavo case.

After the existence of the memo was reported by ABC News and The Washington Post, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist denounced the memo and asserted that the Republican Party's interest in the case was solely based on moral grounds. Darling remained silent about his authorship of the memo as commentators from the conservative magazine Weekly Standard and other publications questioned its authenticity. The source of the memo had not been disclosed by either ABC News or The Washington Post. The Washington Post says that it neither implied that the memo originated from a Republican source nor that it was circulated by Republicans, though it did in fact make these assertions when it published the story by reporters Mike Allen and Manuel Roig-Franzia on its wire service on March 19, 2005. The authorship claim was removed before publication of the print version on March 20, 2005. On April 6, 2005, Darling admitted to writing the memo, and resigned his position as legal counsel to Senator Martínez.

See also

References

  1. ^ Smith, Brad (March 20, 2005). "Schiavo Videotapes Offer Powerful But Misleading Evidence". Tampa Tribune. Archived from the original on March 20, 2005. Retrieved February 17, 2006.
  2. ^ "Schiavo Timeline, Part 1". The University of Miami Ethics Programs. Archived from the original on November 16, 2014. Retrieved December 5, 2014.
  3. "§ 765.401 of Florida Statutes – Health Care Advance Directives – The proxy". State of Florida. November 22, 2006. Archived from the original on December 8, 2008. Retrieved January 1, 2007.
  4. Levesque, William R. (November 8, 2003). "Schiavo's wishes recalled in records". St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on January 6, 2006. Retrieved January 5, 2006.
  5. "Schiavo autopsy shows irreversible brain damage". MSNBC. Associated Press. June 15, 2005. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
  6. Felos, George J. (March 24, 2005). ""Respondent Michael Schiavo's opposition to application for injunction", Case No.: 04A-825" (PDF). Blue Dolphin Publishing. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 13, 2006. Retrieved January 15, 2006.
  7. ^ Easton, Nina (March 23, 2005). "Rights groups for disabled join in fight". Archived from the original on June 10, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2006.
  8. ^ Neuman, Clayton (March 27, 2006). "Another Schiavo Skirmish". Time. Archived from the original on November 26, 2012. Retrieved November 27, 2012.
  9. ^ Wade, Jake (April 30, 2010). "Terri Schiavo's Family Profiting From Foundation". WMAZ. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013.
  10. ^ Lytle, Tamara (December 8, 2005). "Schiavo turns rage into TerriPAC". Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original on October 16, 2013. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
  11. "How to Deal with Terri Schiavo's Tragedy Splits Family". October 26, 2003.
  12. "Robert Schindler, who fought to care for daughter Terri Schiavo, dies – Archdiocese of Baltimore".
  13. "CNN.com - Terri Schiavo's life, death sparked national debate - Mar 31, 2005". www.cnn.com. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  14. "CNN.com - Terri Schiavo's life, death sparked national debate - Mar 31, 2005". www.cnn.com. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  15. Frey, Jennifer (March 25, 2005). "Terri Schiavo's Unstudied Life". Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved July 30, 2010.
  16. Staff Reports (March 27, 2005). "Before tragedy, an ordinary life". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  17. ^ Wolfson, Jay (December 1, 2003). "A report to Governor Jeb Bush and the Sixth Judicial Circuit in the matter of Theresa Marie Schiavo" (PDF). abstractappeal.com. pp. 2, 8, 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved September 21, 2011.
  18. ^ Cranford, Ronald (Summer 2005). "Facts, Lies, and Videotapes: The Permanent Vegetative State and The Sad Case of Terri Schiavo". The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 33 (2): 363–71. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00501.x. ISSN 1073-1105. PMID 16083094. S2CID 13039529.
  19. ^ "Schiavo case highlights eating disorders". USA Today. February 26, 2005. Archived from the original on November 29, 2011. Retrieved November 28, 2011.
  20. Mark Fuhrman (2005). Silent Witness. William Morrow. p. 67. ISBN 0-06-085337-9.
  21. Meyer J, et al. "Sudden Arrhythmia death Syndrome: Importance of the Long QT Syndrome" Archived May 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine Am Fam Physician. 2003 Aug 1;68(3):483–488. Retrieved July 26, 2011.
  22. Pariente, Barbara, Chief Justice Archived October 31, 2012, at the Wayback Machine (for The Court). "Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, et al., vs. Michael Schiavo, Guardian of Marissa Brown", Case Number: SC04-925, Florida Supreme Court, September 23, 2004 PDF link Archived April 16, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  23. ^ Pearse, Richard L. Jr. P.A. Guardian Ad Litem. (December 29, 1998). "Report of guardian ad litem", for "In re: the guardianship of Theresa Schiavo, an incapacitated person, Case No. 90-2908GD-003" (PDF). Hospice Patients Alliance. pp. 2, 8–11. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 11, 2006. Retrieved February 1, 2006.
  24. Greer, George W., Circuit Judge. "In re: The Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated", (PDF) Archived July 7, 2011, at the Wayback Machine File No. 90-2908GD-003, Fla. 6th Judicial Circuit Archived September 26, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, February 11, 2000
  25. "State of Florida. Florida Statutes, Citation of Law, §765.101(12), Florida Statutes". State of Florida. June 1, 2005. Archived from the original on May 17, 2013. Retrieved February 3, 2006.
  26. ^ Greer, George W. Circuit Judge (February 11, 2000). "In re: the guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated", File No. 90-2908GD-003" (PDF). Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit. pp. 9–10. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved January 8, 2006.
  27. "Florida Woman Dies Attached to a Tube; Legal Fight Goes On". The New York Times. Associated Press. July 19, 1989. Archived from the original on March 12, 2017. Retrieved February 13, 2017.
  28. ^ Levesque, William R. (October 13, 2003). "Right-to-die law defined by local case". St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved November 23, 2012.
  29. Altenbernd, Chris W. (for The Court) (January 24, 2001). "In re Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee, Case Number: 2D00-1269". Florida Second District Court of Appeal. Archived from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved February 6, 2006.
  30. See, for instance p. 6 of US District Court Case No. 8:05-CV-530-T-27TBM (PDF) Archived February 13, 2006, at the Wayback Machine p. 6
  31. Greer, George W. Circuit Judge (March 7, 2000). "In re: the guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated, File No. 90-2908GD-003" (PDF). Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved February 9, 2006.
  32. ^ Thogmartin, Jon R. (June 13, 2005). ""Report of Autopsy" for Theresa Schiavo, Case #5050439" (PDF). co.pinellas.fl.us/forensics/. p. 34. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 18, 2013. Retrieved November 7, 2013.
  33. Anderson, Patricia F. (January 1, 2003). "Second amended petition to remove guardian". libertytothecaptives.net. p. 14. Archived from the original on February 6, 2006. Retrieved February 10, 2006.
  34. "Florida Rules of Civil Procedure". The Florida Bar. December 1, 2005. Archived from the original on October 31, 2012. Retrieved November 22, 2012.
  35. Altenbernd, Chris W. Judge (for The Court) (July 11, 2001). ""In re Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee", and "Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellant, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellees", Case Numbers: 2D00-1269, 2D01-1836, and 2D01-1891". Florida Second District Court of Appeal. Archived from the original on July 9, 2011. Retrieved February 11, 2006.
  36. Fins, Joseph; Nicholas Schiff (September 1, 2005). "In Brief: The Afterlife of Terri Schiavo". The Hastings Center Report. 35 (4). The Hastings Center: 8. doi:10.1353/hcr.2005.0038. PMID 16225295. S2CID 44800298. Archived from the original on December 11, 2012. Retrieved October 1, 2005. Quote: "She had developed hydrocephalus ex vacuo, a condition marked by enlarged ventricles filled with cerebrospinal fluid, because of this profound loss of cortical volume."
  37. Altenbernd, Chris W. Judge (for The Court) (October 17, 2001). "In re: Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee, Case Number: 2D01-3626" (PDF). Florida Second District Court of Appeal. p. 12. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 11, 2006. Retrieved February 22, 2006.
  38. Nohlgren, Stephen (November 10, 2003). "Schiavo tapes: snippets, then not much". St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on January 11, 2008. Retrieved April 5, 2008.
  39. Greer, George W. Circuit Judge (November 22, 2002). "In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GB-003". Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit. Archived from the original on July 9, 2011. Retrieved February 4, 2006.
  40. Altenbernd, Chris W. Judge (for The Court) (June 6, 2003). ""In re: Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Appellants, v. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Appellee", Case Number: 2D02-5394" (PDF). Florida Second District Court of Appeal. pp. 9–10. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 26, 2004. Retrieved February 22, 2006.
  41. ^ Carla Sauer Iyer (March 2, 2005). "Affidavit". Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  42. "Fox interview of Carla Sauer Iyer". Fox News via American Patriot Friends Network (APFN). March 25, 2005. Archived from the original on March 26, 2005. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  43. Breed, Allen G. (March 25, 2005). "Michael Schiavo's character is mixed portrait". Orange County Register. Archived from the original on July 6, 2009. Retrieved March 1, 2009.
  44. Heidi Law (January 1, 2002). "Heidi Law Affidavit". self. Archived from the original on October 27, 2006. Retrieved January 1, 2007.
  45. Greer, George W. Circuit Judge (September 17, 2003). In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908GD-003 (PDF). Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 10, 2007. Retrieved July 25, 2007. Direct quote from pages 5–6 of this 9-page Order.
  46. Bury, Chris (March 15, 2005). "Transcript: Michael Schiavo on 'Nightline': Husband at the Heart of the 'Right to Die' Case Speaks to Chris Bury". ABC News. Archived from the original on December 26, 2005. Retrieved February 21, 2006.
  47. "Schiavo Case Still In Court". www.cbsnews.com. May 6, 2004. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
  48. "Judge: Schiavo's parents can't join fight over law". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
  49. "State of Florida "Case Docket", Case Number: 2D04-1528". Florida Second District Court of Appeal. January 1, 2004. Retrieved March 2, 2006.
  50. Baird, W. Douglas Circuit Judge (May 5, 2005). "Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Jeb Bush, Governor of the State of Florida, and Charlie Crist, Attorney General of the State of Florida, Respondents, Case No. 03-008212-CI-20". Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit. Archived from the original on June 23, 2011. Retrieved February 3, 2006.
  51. Birkhold, James Clerk (for The Court) (May 12, 2004). "Order Relinquishing Case for Entry of Final Judgment and Order to Show Cause Why this Proceeding Should Not be Certified to the Supreme Court As Requiring Immediate Resolution", Case Number: 2D04-2045" (PDF). Florida Second District Court of Appeal. pp. 6–7. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 14, 2005. Retrieved April 1, 2006.
  52. Conigliaro, Matt (June 10, 2004). "Schiavo News". abstractappeal.com. Archived from the original on April 25, 2006. Retrieved April 7, 2006.
  53. Pariente, Barbara Chief Justice (for The Court). (September 23, 2004). "Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, et al., Appellants, vs. Michael Schiavo, Guardian of Theresa Schiavo, Appellee, Case Number: SC04-925" (PDF). Florida Supreme Court. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 5, 2006. Retrieved April 15, 2006.
  54. Gibbs, David C. III (February 23, 2005). ""Resondents' Fla.R.Civ.P.1.540(b)(5) Motion for relief from judgment pending contemporary medical/psychiatric/rehabilitative evaluation of Theresa Marie Schiavo", File Number: 90-2908GD-003" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 26, 2006. Retrieved May 1, 2006.
  55. ^ Greer, George W. Circuit Judge (March 9, 2005). "In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, as Guardian of the person of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GD-003" (PDF). Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved May 28, 2006.
  56. Face the Nation, CBS: Transcript for Sunday, March 27, 2005 (PDF) Archived June 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
  57. Troxler, Howard (September 15, 2003). "Too thin a line between life, death for Schiavo". Saint Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on May 9, 2006. Retrieved March 8, 2006.
  58. Greer, George W. Circuit Judge (February 25, 2005). "In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GD-003" (PDF). Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit]. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
  59. Gibbs, David C. III (February 27, 2005). "Emergency expedited motion for permission to provide Theresa Schiavo with food and water by natural means, File Number: 90-2908GD-003" (PDF). p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 25, 2006. Retrieved March 25, 2006.
  60. Greer, George W. Circuit Judge (March 8, 2005). "In re: The guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated. Michael Schiavo, Petitioner, v. Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler, Respondents, File No. 90-2908-GD-003" (PDF). Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved March 25, 2006.
  61. Davis, Tom Chairman (for The Committee) (March 18, 2005). ""Subpoena", Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on September 4, 2005. Retrieved September 1, 2005.
  62. "Schiavo's feeding tube removed despite congressional intervention". USA Today. Associated Press. March 18, 2005. Archived from the original on February 17, 2006. Retrieved February 24, 2006.
  63. "Schiavo's Feeding Tube Removed". Associated Press. March 18, 2005. Archived from the original on December 15, 2005. Retrieved October 1, 2005.
  64. ^ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (March 28, 2005). "Congress Ready to Again Debate End-of-Life Issues". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved February 13, 2017.
  65. "GOP memo says issue offers political rewards". The Washington Post. April 4, 2005. Archived from the original on March 6, 2011. Retrieved March 2, 2006.
  66. Frist, Bill (2005). Bill Frist : a senator speaks out on ethics, respect and compassion. Washington, D.C.: Monument Press. p. 195. ISBN 0-9769668-3-2.
  67. Medical Examiner's Report on the Schiavo Autopsy (PDF) Archived October 13, 2016, at the Wayback Machine June 13, 2005
  68. Kornblut, Anne E. (2005). "Schiavo Autopsy Renews Debate on G.O.P. Actions". The New York Times, June 16, 2005
  69. "Report: State Tried Schiavo Grab". CBS News. Associated Press. March 26, 2005. Archived from the original on August 29, 2006. Retrieved February 23, 2006.
  70. "Autopsy: No sign Schiavo was abused: Findings show woman's brain 'profoundly atrophied'". CNN. June 7, 2005. Archived from the original on April 21, 2006. Retrieved May 3, 2006.
  71. Pavone, Frank A. "Father Frank A. Pavone – Biography", Priests for Life Archived January 2, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, link Archived February 6, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  72. "Schiavo's parents planning a funeral Mass for today", Saint Petersburg Times, April 5, 2005 link Archived September 6, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  73. Stacy, Mitch. "Schiavo's Remains Buried Amid Acrimony: Acrimony Between Terri Schiavo's Parents and Husband Continues As Her Remains Buried in Florida", Associated Press, June 21, 2005 link Archived June 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  74. Shepherd, Lois L. (2009). If That Ever Happens to Me: Making Life and Death Decisions After Terri Schiavo. Univ of North Carolina Press. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-0-8078-8864-3.
  75. ^ Stonecipher, Matthew (September 2006). "The evolution of surrogates' right to terminate life-sustaining treatment". Virtual Mentor. 8 (9): 593–98. doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.9.hlaw1-0609. PMID 23234711. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
  76. "Karen Ann Quinlan dies after 10 years in a coma". St. Petersburg (FL) Evening Independent. June 12, 1985.
  77. "The Death of Nancy Cruzan". Frontline, PBS. March 24, 1992. Archived from the original on May 14, 2016. Retrieved September 15, 2017.
  78. Shepherd, Lois (2006). "Terri Schiavo: Unsettling The Settled" (PDF). Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. 37: 297. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 2, 2016. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
  79. Sommer, David (October 19, 2003). "Schiavo Case Could Cause Change In Law". Tampa Bay Online. Archived from the original on October 23, 2003. Retrieved November 30, 2012.
  80. Townsend, Liz. "Disability Rights Groups File Amicus Brief in Terri Schiavo Case". National Right to Life News. Archived from the original on June 10, 2014. Retrieved November 20, 2012.
  81. Shepherd, Lois (2009). If That Ever Happens to Me: Making Life and Death Decisions after Terri Schiavo (Studies in Social Medicine). The University of North Carolina Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN 978-0-8078-3295-0.
  82. Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (April 1, 2005). "Schiavo's Case May Reshape American Law". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 16, 2015. Retrieved February 13, 2017.
  83. "Schiavo's parents turn to court of public opinion". Associated Press. February 15, 2005. Archived from the original on September 27, 2012. Retrieved November 25, 2012.
  84. Didion, Joan (June 9, 2005). "The Case of Theresa Schiavo". The New York Review of Books. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Retrieved November 25, 2012.
  85. ^ Nohlgren, Stephen; Zucco, Tom (March 28, 2005). "Schiavo case has myriad fund sources". St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on August 29, 2013. Retrieved November 27, 2012.
  86. "Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation Changes Name; Hones Mission" (Press release). Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network press release. Archived from the original on November 30, 2010. Retrieved November 25, 2012.
  87. "Schiavo Protesters Have Hearts on Sleeves and Anger on Signs". The New York Times. March 28, 2005. Archived from the original on December 10, 2011. Retrieved July 24, 2011.
  88. "Schiavo Protesters' Passions Rise". CBS News. March 27, 2005. Archived from the original on January 19, 2013. Retrieved November 24, 2012.
  89. "Schiavo Politics, Up Close". CBS News. March 25, 2005. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved July 23, 2011.
  90. "Parents Hold Funeral Mass for Terri Schiavo". Associated Press. April 6, 2005. Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved November 27, 2012.
  91. "Even in Death, Acrimony over Schiavo". Associated Press. June 21, 2005.
  92. "Schiavo Timeline, Part 2". University of Miami Ethics Programs. Archived from the original on January 9, 2018.
  93. "TerriPAC". Archived from the original on October 10, 2007. Retrieved November 26, 2012.
  94. "life&hope Volume 2 / 1st Edition" (PDF). About us – Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network. Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network. 2010. from https://www.lifeandhope.com/about, "Vol. 2 – 2010, Issue 1". Archived (PDF) from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  95. "life&hope Volume 2 / 2nd Edition" (PDF). About us – Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network. Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network. 2010. from https://www.lifeandhope.com/about, "Vol. 2 – 2010, Issue 2". Archived (PDF) from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  96. Ten Years After Terri Schiavo, Death Debates Still Divide Us: Bioethicist nbc news.com, March 31, 2015, Arthur Caplan
  97. How Terri Schiavo Shaped the Right-to-Die Movement time.com, Josh Sanburn, March 31, 2015
  98. A look back: The Terri Schiavo case cbsnews.com, Radhika Chalasani, March 31, 2016
  99. "Jeb 'Put Me Through Hell'", Politico, Michael Kruse, January 29, 2015
  100. "Terri Schiavo Documentary: The Case's Enduring Legacy" The New York Times, April 21, 2014
  101. A decade after Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was disconnected, her family's pain lives on
  102. The audacity of Jeb Bush: A governor goes all in on the Terri Schiavo case
  103. ^ "Senator's office produced Schiavo memo". Associated Press. April 6, 2005 – via NBC News.
  104. "The Seattle Times: Nation & World: GOP memo says issue offers political rewards". The Washington Post. April 4, 2005. Archived from the original on January 27, 2007 – via The Seattle Times.
  105. Barnes, Fred (April 4, 2005). "The ABCs of Media Bias". The Weekly Standard. Vol. 10, no. 27. Archived from the original on December 19, 2005.
  106. Hinderaker, John (March 27, 2005). "Fake but Accurate Again?". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on April 1, 2012.
  107. Kurtz, Howard (March 30, 2005). "Doubts Raised On Schiavo Memo". The Washington Post.
  108. Kurtz, Howard (April 4, 2005). "Leaving the Anchor Desk, Its Greatest Generation". The Washington Post.
  109. Allen, Mike (April 7, 2005). "Counsel to GOP Senator Wrote Memo On Schiavo". The Washington Post.

Further reading

External links

Compilations

These are compilations of legal documents relating to the Schiavo case:

Information sites
Medical ethics cases
Assisted
suicide
Euthanasia/
Withholding
treatment
Medical opinion against
parent/patient/guardian
Informed consent
to treatment
Research
Portals: Categories: