Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:50, 14 January 2007

• ]

Template:RFCheader

• Talk:Religious_antisemitism#RfC:_Are_.22Religious_Antisemitism.22_and_.22Anti-Judaism.22_the_same_thing.3F Should anti-Judaism be characterized in the lead as another word for "religious antisemitism," or should a distinction be recognized? 17:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Talk:Philosophy There are disputes concerning the introduction of this article, especially the role of rationality, the East, and proper sourcing. All sections from this past December onward are relevant. 18:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

• Talk:Ion (dialogue) Plato's Ion is admittedly unfair to performers, but it is still very interesting. It contradicts the purpose of encyclopedic articles to have half of the article be written in an imposing voice that seeks to rehabilitate the public's opinion toward the acting profession. Arguably, vox populi is generally unnaffected by this dialogue. It is quite apparent that the offending half of this article was edited by a thespian and this individual's opinion does not belong in a resource site. Stephen Kinch 01:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

• Talk:Jesus#How_the_topic_should_be_introduced Should the article be focused toward Christianity or should the focus be different (is there a fundamental POV issue)? Seeking input through a straw poll in the discussion page. 03:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusions#RFCSingle editor insisting on reverting or rewritng the same information into the intro regardless of input from other editors.18:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

• Someone please comment so I don't have to rfd to get attention20:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Talk:John 1:1#RfC One user consistently placing information in article after multiple reverts. Information is included above. I believe that the information is irrelevant to the article (would perhaps be more appropriate to the Trinity article), argumentative and resembles original research. 05:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Zakir Naik Ongoing dispute among pro-Naik and anti-Naik POV-pushers. Article has been multi-tagged for a long time with few secondary reliable sources and is essentially a triumphantly pro-Naik and religiously extremist POV article. Many well-intentioned editors have given and left due to frustration regarding the POV-pushers in this article.05:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Person#Request for Comment: persons v. people Changing of 'persons to 'people' and 'personhood' to 'being a person' throughout, making the article all but useless. Emeraude 11:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Ebionites#Reason for adding totally disputed tag Should the article on Ancient Ebionites include a short, explanatory sentence clearly describing their angelology according to the fullest primary source, Epiphanius' account in Panarion? Or, should this account of their angelology "not be discussed" at all in the article other than the briefest mention, since modern-day "revivalist Ebionite" groups and authors dispute Epiphanius' reliability on this question? 09:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Also see Talk:Ebionites#Neutrality Dispute?, Talk:Ebionites#Origen on Ebionites' supposed heresy, and Talk:Ebionites#A way forward to understand the full context of the dispute. Ovadyah 16:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Template talk:Philosophy navigation Is Ayn Rand a philosopher? This affect many entries on wikipedia and is endlessly debated on many discussion pages. THis may be the first movement towards a general policy on her. 07:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Talk:Jews_for_Jesus#Request_for_Comment Should the view that JfJ is "incompatible with Judaism" (with which JfJ disagrees) be presented as factually true or a majority opinion? Seraphimblade 01:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Talk:pseudoreligion: How should the article on pseudoreligion properly cite an essay that includes feminism and "PCism" as pseudoreligions? 13:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:List of groups referred to as cults: Should a list of purported cults published by the Parliamentary Commission about Cults in France, be placed in that article, in the article List of groups referred to as cults, or in both locations? 23:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

• On Antisemitism related articles. This RfC was initially prepared to a User-RfC ], but it seems that it is best addressed in Article RfC. 23:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Celtic_Reconstructionist_Paganism#Request_for_comments - one of the editors of the article has cited her own amateur original research published on the web. Does it meet WP:RS and WP:V? 22:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Landmark_Education#Request_for_Comment:_Inclusion_of_Austrian_classification Dispute over whether or not to include mention of Landmark Education as "sect" by the Austrian government. See 1999 Report, 2000 report, 2002 Report, 2003 Report, 2004 Report, 2005 Report, 2006 report.

• Anti-Cult Movement Dispute over whether the existence of an "Anti-Cult Movement" can legitimately be stated/implied to be a fact

• Talk:Analytic/Anglophone and Continental Philosophy Editwar whether intro picture is just silly and should be removed or whetehr removing would be overly serious drabness. Other issues as well, see old discussion. 15:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Mami Wata Discussion about the state of the article that has been lingering unresolved with little motion since at least this summer. Survey created about presence of cleanup tags conduct of one user. Concerns raised about personal attacks by another user. Needs more eyes. 18:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Islam in the United States Estimates of the size of the Muslim population in the US range from 1.1 million to 6.7 million. One editor believes that calculations of the mean and median for these data points are "BS" and OR. Does calculating the mean and median (one minute on the calculator) constitute original research? 17:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Criticism of the Qur'an - Disputes over authenticity/reputation of sources, what constitutes a reliable source, & what constitutes a valid criticism. 14:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Sathya_Sai_Baba#Frank_Baranowski - Should Frank Baranowski be described as a "Professor" and "scientist" or "kirlian photographer"? Can the Island Lanka Newspaper be used as a source for this, despite neither the University of Arizona nor ASU having him listed as a professor, nor any google hits about him as a professor except in the context of his work on Sathya Sai Baba's photographic "aura"? 03:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

• Talk:Jahbulon#Poll:_Tag_on_article - is the article encyclopedic and can the tag stating otherwise be removed? 04:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

• Trademark infringement We should not link to an external web site if that web site violates trademark law. All Wiki links to the offending web site should be removed, in keeping with Misplaced Pages policy. 16:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  • The editor who is reporting this has an agenda and his suggestion needs to be heavily scrutinized. Please review the article's talk page and the history of this discussion which takes place on several talk pages and articles before acting on the request.

• Misplaced Pages dispute resolution