Misplaced Pages

User talk:Getabrainmorans: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:12, 13 May 2021 editTeflon Peter Christ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers140,333 edits ANI notice: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit Revision as of 17:10, 13 May 2021 edit undoOshwah (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators496,866 edits WarningNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 12:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC) ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 12:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

== ] ==
Hi ]! I need to talk to you about your recent edit summary use - specifically, the edit summaries below:

* : {{tq|"oxbridge dumbasses can't even quote people properly"}}
* : {{tq|"wikipedia dumbasses can't even link things properly"}}
* : {{tq|"‎i know you've based your entire wikipedia career around sucking this guy's cock like an industrial pressure pump ..."}}

These edit summaries are not appropriate nor are they acceptable. It is not okay to make ] like that in your edit summaries. Instead, they should be appropriate, ], descriptive, and summarize the changes that you've made to the page you're saving. Please do not add any more edit summaries like this. It is against ], and can lead to administrative action if it continues - something I really don't want to have to do. Please keep your edit summaries appropriate for me, okay? :-) If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. Thanks! ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 17:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:10, 13 May 2021

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Getabrainmorans. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. isento (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Civility

Hi Getabrainmorans! I need to talk to you about your recent edit summary use - specifically, the edit summaries below:

  • 12 May 2021: "oxbridge dumbasses can't even quote people properly"
  • 12 May 2021: "wikipedia dumbasses can't even link things properly"
  • 13 May 2021: "‎i know you've based your entire wikipedia career around sucking this guy's cock like an industrial pressure pump ..."

These edit summaries are not appropriate nor are they acceptable. It is not okay to make personal attacks like that in your edit summaries. Instead, they should be appropriate, civil, descriptive, and summarize the changes that you've made to the page you're saving. Please do not add any more edit summaries like this. It is against policy, and can lead to administrative action if it continues - something I really don't want to have to do. Please keep your edit summaries appropriate for me, okay? :-) If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. Thanks! ~Oshwah~ 17:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)