| Revision as of 15:57, 21 January 2007 edit68.39.174.238 (talk) Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:21, 22 January 2007 edit undoJerzy (talk | contribs)57,486 edits "Wikify"Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :Ahh, that's easier to see. Now all you need is some ]! ] 15:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | :Ahh, that's easier to see. Now all you need is some ]! ] 15:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == "Wikify" == | |||
| After nearly 3.5 years' editing, i have never before suspected that anyone would use ] as you do. (And I would argue that the wording of ] should be changed to be more consistent with the Glossary.) You certainly must stop using it as loosely in your edit summaries as you have been. <br>--]•] 19:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)<br> | |||
Revision as of 19:21, 22 January 2007
hi thereLlanfairpwll 20:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
re The Beatles
I am officially waggling my eyebrows at you, matey! LessHeard vanU 22:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC) (this means I do not approve of your language in your comments re your edit. It doesn't mean I disagree or agree with your point, just the way it was expressed).
- I've suggested on the talkpage that it can only included if a source can be cited or referenced. Otherwise we all have to be encyclopedic (and say 'one of' and 'regarded', etc.). Cheers. LessHeard vanU 22:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Of course, I would say that blue is the greatest colour! Cheers for the link. LessHeard vanU 23:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Username award! Although I'd change your signature color so it isn't black! 68.39.174.238 02:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ahh, that's easier to see. Now all you need is some Wiki-rangers! 68.39.174.238 15:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
"Wikify"
After nearly 3.5 years' editing, i have never before suspected that anyone would use "wikify" as you do. (And I would argue that the wording of should be changed to be more consistent with the Glossary.) You certainly must stop using it as loosely in your edit summaries as you have been.
--Jerzy•t 19:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)