| Revision as of 05:50, 22 October 2009 editMoogwrench (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,032 edits →Birnbaum article: thanks← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:23, 20 July 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Moogwrench/Archive 2) (bot | ||
| (298 intermediate revisions by 53 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{user page}} | |||
| ==Birnbaum article== | |||
| {{infobox|data1={{Misplaced Pages:Signpost}}|bodystyle=width:33%}} | |||
| Hi - hope you don't mind I threw in a few things on your new article. ] (]) 03:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{archive box | auto=yes }} | |||
| :No, thanks alot! I need all the help I can get! ] (]) 05:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 70K | |||
| |counter = 2 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(31d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Moogwrench/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| == New Page Patrol survey == | |||
| == Something I would like to know about Edit warring == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5" | |||
| Why is it that whenever a more experienced user reverts an edit and doesn't even explain his or her reversions of content in either an Edit summary or the discussion page for that article, and then you go through the bother of putting in your own explanation, and then they summarily revert again, again without explanation or discussion, and then flag YOU for edit warring, how does that work? How is that fair? ] (]) 06:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | ] | |||
| <big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The ] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. | |||
| *If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. | |||
| *If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. | |||
| '''Please click to take part.'''<br> | |||
| Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see ]</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Edit war warning from ]== | |||
| Hi. We're into the last five days of the ]. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:2009 Honduran constitutional crisis|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 23:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=WiR_list_2&oldid=812113507 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| :Just to repeat what I placed on your talk page, RicoCorinth: Why did you revert my reversion on the ], in which you say that "Politicing among a handful of US Congressmen, is" irrevelant to International Reaction to the Crisis? Why does the Washington Post, as well as a number of other organizations, write long articles about how Repubs are messing up Obama's chance to have a unified US reaction? Did you not even read the article I cited in the my revision? Quote: " actions have complicated the strategy of the Obama administration... The administration is pressing for a negotiated solution in Honduras and worries that the de facto government is trying to run out the clock until the Nov. 29 presidential election -- with the support of its allies in Washington." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/08/AR2009100802288.html?wprss=rss_world/centralamerica I actually think that the Republican actions are substantial part of US reaction? What do you think? ] (]) 23:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Moogwrench. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| ::No. I don't think a few republicans playing politics is a substantial part of the US reaction. It's mostly an internal matter, and it's not just about Honduras. And yes, I've read all about it, but it's bigger than just about Honduras. They're playing politics. That's all. They haven't gotten a bill passed. I think it's more relevant to the United States, domestically. These members of Congress are a small part of Congress, which is only one-third of the federal government of one country. The US position is still that the coup was illegal and that the US does not recognize the interim/ ''de facto''/ coup-installed/ coup government. | |||
| ::I was going to write, "Politicking among a handful of US Congressmen, is" a small fraction of 1/3 of one country's government, and ]. | |||
| ::Same thing goes for the Congress's Legal Research service. It's not the US's position, and it's not an ], and it declared that exiling Zelaya was unconstitutional. | |||
| ::It's nothing new that "The administration is pressing for a negotiated solution in Honduras and worries that the de facto government is trying to run out the clock until the Nov. 29 presidential election," but that's not what you tried to put into the article.. four times. -- ] 01:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :::Bah! Look, its not just internal US politics when you have Republican senators going down there and getting accused of being coup financiers by the Resistance. And the citations of the LLoC report and accompaying NY Times article didn't say that it was an RS, just that it is out there and Obama has to deal with it. I wish you would respond to what I actually write, and not your own straw man arguments. Oh, and next time, make sure my edits are actually destructive before you reverse them. I was actually cleaning up someone's sloppy edit with that recent one. ] (]) 01:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Latin American activists accuse American politicians of all kinds of things all the time. | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| ::::<s>Dictator</s> President Chavez accused Bush of being the devil. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=866998231 --> | |||
| ::::It would be worthy of inclusion if the Republican senators actually ''were'' coup financiers. | |||
| ==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
| ::::Obama doesn't have to deal with the Legal Research report, because it found that: | |||
| ::::"Although the arrest may have been legitimate, the military's expulsion of Zelaya was a 'direct violation' of the constitution" -- | |||
| ::::By the way, '''''bitchen''''' video! | |||
| ::::Here's something else from the cite above: | |||
| ::::"But other Republicans who have befriended the de facto government have little or no experience in the region, such as Sen. Jim DeMint (S.C.), an outspoken Obama foe. That has given rise to speculation that they are playing politics. | |||
| ::::"'It's about the Republicans using what they can to attack the administration,' said Julia E. Sweig, a Latin America expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'It's definitely bigger than Latin America.'" | |||
| ::::The edit I reverted was destructive, in that it deleted (destroyed) a source cited to substantiate content in the article. The edit just looked sloppy at first blush. -- ] 02:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] 14:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::::First, the whole point of that article is that Republicans are messing up Obama's attempt. But fine, it doesn't need to be in that general of an article. Fine. | |||
| :::::Next point, separate the removal from office from the removal from the country. You cite: "Although the arrest may have been legitimate, the military's expulsion of Zelaya was a 'direct violation' of the constitution." Two different things. Zelaya is back in the country; so if the only thing illegal was his deportation then problem is solved. What is Obama worried about? ] (]) 02:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:23, 20 July 2021
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Moogwrench. |
.jpg)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Moogwrench! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Moogwrench. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:High schools in Citrus Heights, California has been nominated for merging
Category:High schools in Citrus Heights, California has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)