| Revision as of 09:20, 18 January 2007 editChrisGriswold (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers22,679 edits →Speedy deletion tagging: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:21, 27 January 2007 edit undo24.3.194.217 (talk) →Speedy deletion tagging: rmNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Speedy deletion tagging== | ==Speedy deletion tagging== | ||
| Hello! Before using speedy deletion tags, you may wish to look through the ]. While a couple of the tags you placed appear to be on appropriate speedy deletion candidates, most of the articles do at least assert that the subject would be ]. If you disagree that the subjects actually are and believe that the article should be deleted, you would need to nominate the article for a full discussion at ]. ] 09:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | Hello! Before using speedy deletion tags, you may wish to look through the ]. While a couple of the tags you placed appear to be on appropriate speedy deletion candidates, most of the articles do at least assert that the subject would be ]. If you disagree that the subjects actually are and believe that the article should be deleted, you would need to nominate the article for a full discussion at ]. ] 09:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks. --] (<big>]]</big>) 09:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:21, 27 January 2007
Speedy deletion tagging
Hello! Before using speedy deletion tags, you may wish to look through the criteria for speedy deletion. While a couple of the tags you placed appear to be on appropriate speedy deletion candidates, most of the articles do at least assert that the subject would be notable. If you disagree that the subjects actually are and believe that the article should be deleted, you would need to nominate the article for a full discussion at articles for deletion. Seraphimblade 09:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)