Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:50, 28 January 2007

Welcome to my talk page. I will try and reply to all your messages...

Archives
September 2005 – June 2006 June 2006 – December 2006

Problem

I'm sorry about the attacks on Zinta's page but I just felt that you were working more on her page than any other actress like Bipasha or Shilpa. You, as a professional should be worried about other articles too. I am only interested in topics concerning Rani. But I do help around other pages too once in a while when I find time. It's just that there are so many people attacking Rani's page, I feel like I'm the only one adding to that page. If you see, from references to filmography to the award section and to the career, media appearances, television appearances, trivia, accomplishments, personal life, I've added and improved those sections. I added the box to filmography cuz no one wud help me b4 and now, everyone copies the format of that pic. Like Preity's awards now. They put it in Rani's format. It's just so funny! Anyhow, I still feel Hero was not a hit and sometimes, I doubt boxofficeindia.com sources cuz they do come across as manipulating numbers. Anyway, a new problem now: Hariharan wants to cast people according to films and not IMDB. I said no! Cuz we guys had a big fight on this and I agreed on the IMDB format although I so don't want to. But the decision has been made. Now just bcoz Zinta is casted at the bottom on IMDB for jhoom barabar jhoom, we are not changing every movie's format. And if so, I demand Rani to be before Zinta on Veer-Zaara page then. As for Baabul pics, they dont have any good pictures, and I put Rani's cuz the movie is about her life and her situation and she is there with every other actor. Plus, i love the dresses. It's a new designer and it's probably the trademark of the movie as the news channel were talking abt yesterday. And for KANK, no more pics, I just wanted a picture of the main hero and heroine together. Thanks. -- shez 10:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Sanjay Dutt

I understand that u reverted the page to what someone else did earlier but dude, everything that was on that page had external links which would provide enough info on him, its not one person's personal view that's being portrayed here. People from different backgrounds who check wikipedia should know what are the popular perceptions about a certain personality. As long as the comments dont authoritively say or assert that a person is such and such but merely report on the perceptions of the time while at the same time mentioning that they are popular perceptions, Misplaced Pages is as close to the facts as it can get. Someone looking at this page to figure out who sanjay dutt is should be able to understand what his image is like, its like saying amitabh is the biggest star of bollywood, can u quantify that statement ? u cant , there is no statistical analysis to prove that, but it is a common perception, so as long as someone says that amitabh is preceived to be the biggest star in bollywood, It does not make any sense to mess with the post. thanks.

Hello, there!

Hello, Pa7, sorry that I was kinda quiet the last days - am currently totally stressed out because of college. About a century ago, you posted on my discussion page and I didn't reply. Sorrysorrysorry. ;) Anyway, as fr recent vandals: not sure you noticed, but there's some user, called User:Sc4704. He's kinda -- difficult, as he doesn't communicate at all and posts completely unverified stuff on SRK's, Salman's and Salman's movies' articles. Banyantree banned him for disrupting Wiki, however, I'm afraid he'll start again when he'll get unbanned. Besides that, everything's peachy, I think. User:Ekantik suddenly appeared out-of-nowhere and, IMHO, I think his edits are really very good. Besides that, usual Shez-stuff and some serious Ajith Kumar-owning. I'm toying with the thought of cleaning up his article, however, to keep it clean, I might need some help. Best regards, --Plumcouch 15:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Madhuri Dixit

Hello, Pa7, yep, heard about Madhuri's comeback too. She signed with Yash Raj and starts filming in January, I heard. Do you know who will play the male lead? I'm seriously rooting for either Shahrukh or Salman, since, IMHO, they had great chemnistry with her. Who would you like to see opposite her? Best regards, --Plumcouch 20:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy New Year!!

Hello, Pa7, just wanted to wish you a Happy New Year!! :) Best regards, --Plumcouch 18:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Pa7,

thank you so much for the Barnstar. Don't know what to say. *blushes* As for Madhuri: yes, I think she and Aamir would be interesting together - I haven't seen any movie with them as a couple; they've only done two or three together, right? I read (at boxofficeindia.com) that Aamir is in negotiations with Yashraj to do a role in Dhoom 3 - that be awesome - Hrithik Roshan, Aamir & Shahrukh Khan in the same movie. Hope you have a good year ahead too, Pa7, and best regards, --Plumcouch 01:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

please don't delete the film career section for Shilpa Shetty. I have tagged it instead for improvement. I would hope that soon it will not only convey the films she appeared in, but actors she has worked with, but far more detail on her film characters, and how she got into the roles etc, directors she has worked under. It is a start and I have started a number of her films to rid of the red links. The film career of most major actors and actresses on wikipedia have started like this and take time to write and develop so please don't delete the foundation. Thankyou. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

howeve rtrivial it may seem it is still her film career. You can't block out the majority of her films in discussion. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

But I am hoping that this can be expanded - it should give details of notable actors and direcotrs she has worked with how she got into character etc. With her name in the headlines at the moment I don;t think a two line sentence on her career looks good do you? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

ok but i would like to see it thickened out until you imporve it as you say -then you may take out some of the mentioned films. I would prefer her film career to actually be more knoweldgable than the Celebrity BB section. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

the film career section now looks much better for Shilpa. It doesn;t read like a who who of every film and covers the highlights of her career nicely. I stil think it needs a bit more detail on certain other films but I'll leave that up to you. Good. All we need now is a wikipedian to snapshot her as she leaves Big Brother for a free image!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Although notable roles shuld'nt be opinion they should be films in which she was critcally accalimed e.g the 2000 and 2004 films I think. Film in which she was nominated or won an award should be regarded as notable of her career even if the film wasn't that great! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

OK I'd imagine a lot of info is in Hindi if you speak this terrific. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Good stuff. All the best Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Shilpa Shetty

Hi there, I have responded to your points at the page. It is also unfortunate that I am currently having problems regarding internet connection at home and will have to wait until this is resolved before I can beging a massive cleanup and putting away information into main articles, etc. Anyway I have outlined all these points at the talk-page, please read through it, thanks. Ekantik 18:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't get it!

I don't get it! Preity Zinta can have forty references. An increase in twenty within a week whereas if I add two references on Rani, you delete them. What do you have against her? Just let me put information on the page. Don't remove sections. Why don't you delete the commitment section on Shilpa's page but you delete it on Rani's. If you think it gives a wrong message, then change the message, don't delete it completely.

-- shez 10:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Calm down

Ok in commitments section, you can have hellen keller institute stuff if not meeting people. And why are you so keen on accentuating failure rather than success. If i write she was no.1 , it's apparently bad, and you add she is a failure, it's good. You're having some jealousy problems. Anyway, I'm keeping commitments without the extra trivia. -- shez 10:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Fine! Then Be Useful!

Look I have nothing against you. Just be useful. If you can source Preity Zinta's info then you can surely do the same for Rani. Don't play games. I know what's your problem! You have been repeatedly crushing over my work. What's wrong with the one of the biggest names, you deleted it twice, meaning you hav a problem with Rani. It's the same phrase as on Zinta's page, just different, I don't want the pages to look identical. Thanks. And do help than create problems. I hope you will source some of the things and add more info cuz the page is bland.

-- Ok I'm sorry! But if you have free time right now, can you add a photo to the intro section cuz it looks empty. If so, make sure it's a recent one and something classy. Thanks. Btw, do you think i shud put references to some of the awards to make them valid.

-- shez 10:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hardiljopyaarkarega.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hardiljopyaarkarega.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Stop accusing me of not having a life. Maybe you don't cause you do this everyday. I use this as a past time whenever I'm bored. And if you don't want to help then why are you offering your time to delete. I think you have problems. And please don't verbally assault me. I don't play games with word. If you want to be ***** then be my guest. I'm not like you. And stop saying you don't know Rani, cuz you don't know Preity either but you adore her.

You've been caught!

Oh my god! You are a hypocrite. I just went on HDJPK's page and saw Preity's name b4 Rani even though the rules said use imdb format. And i'm not saying you did that but who knows. You edited after the cast name change and neglected that cast change. And if today, I had gone on Veer-Zaara's page and put Rani's name above Preity, you would've instantly changed it. You disgust me. It's a shame. Get a life. Stop defaming Rani just because you have issues.

-- shez 10:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Read it urself!

"Since when has "your work" been any of my priority. I mean I do have a life and it certainly does not revolve around wikipedia or in your case Rani Mukerji." You clearly imply do your own work. Your life only revolves around Rani. I don't need to take bullshit from someone I don't even know. Anyway, wht about your response to HDJPK page? Are you hiding from it? Y didn't you change the wrong version? And don't make up stories that you were looking for references cuz you clearly said ur priority is not mine, im busy on saif's page. you don't need to look for references. Rani was nominated for GIFA. and lastly, i don't think you wud ever put references unless it's like failure in the case of baabul. Peace out!