| Revision as of 12:27, 29 January 2007 editGiollaUidir (talk | contribs)2,453 edits →[]: Keep!← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:52, 29 January 2007 edit undoArgyriou (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,511 edits →[]: k/cNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''comment''' sorta maybe leaning towards keep, but really, it needs to say something more than x was an IRA volunteer killed by the British Police. I would also STRONGLY suggest we use the term "IRA member" rather than either of the terms terrorist or volunteer as both of them seem to be POV to me. ] 22:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | *'''comment''' sorta maybe leaning towards keep, but really, it needs to say something more than x was an IRA volunteer killed by the British Police. I would also STRONGLY suggest we use the term "IRA member" rather than either of the terms terrorist or volunteer as both of them seem to be POV to me. ] 22:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per above.] 12:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per above.] 12:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per above. I'm beginning to think that ]'s POV is so strong as to render pretty much any AfD by him as a bad-faith nomination. ''']''' <small>]</small> 21:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:52, 29 January 2007
Diarmuid O'Neill
- Diarmuid O'Neill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non notable IRA terrorist. Seems to be written to make a POV attack on the British Police Astrotrain 13:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. O'Neill became notable only in death, because of the dispute over whether the police acted correctly in firing at him; a major campaign was organised by his friends to try to get official acknowledgment that the police acted wrongly. The case has been taken up by Amnesty International. Sam Blacketer 13:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I think terrorists are fairly notable in any case and this one is a particular case. Could definitely do with a cleanup and probably a more thorough de-poving. MLA 13:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment- the way things are going, Wikipeida is turning into some sort of IRA memorial site. Although some terrorists are notable, most of them are not- this man didn't even seem to have committed an attrocity that would have made him notable. Astrotrain 13:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- CommentThat comment actually disgusted me and really give me an incite into your vantage point with regards this type of topic. Do you think the only way a republicans can attain notability is by committing an "atrocity"?? This guy was pulled out of his bed and killed, so who is it that commits the atrocities. My advice would be to try and avoid POV and stick to fact in these types of issue. I have had to learn that lesson the hard way. regards--Vintagekits 21:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment- the way things are going, Wikipeida is turning into some sort of IRA memorial site. Although some terrorists are notable, most of them are not- this man didn't even seem to have committed an attrocity that would have made him notable. Astrotrain 13:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I think this could be alright if rewritten in NPOV. Seems to be notable; he is the subject of multiple independent reliable sources. Trebor 15:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - references show broad news coverage. Definitely notable; one doesn't have to commit a "major atrocity" to be included on Misplaced Pages. Walton monarchist89 18:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - noticeable individual with several news articles about him --Barry 19:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as above.--Vintagekits 21:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- comment sorta maybe leaning towards keep, but really, it needs to say something more than x was an IRA volunteer killed by the British Police. I would also STRONGLY suggest we use the term "IRA member" rather than either of the terms terrorist or volunteer as both of them seem to be POV to me. Jcuk 22:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above.GiollaUidir 12:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above. I'm beginning to think that User:Astrotrain's POV is so strong as to render pretty much any AfD by him as a bad-faith nomination. Argyriou (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)